The genus
Helicobacter comprises bacterial pathogens that colonize the alimentary tract of mammals, with the best-known example being the human gastric pathogen
Helicobacter pylori (
17). Other examples include
Helicobacter species colonizing the gastric mucosa of big cats (
Helicobacter acinonychis), cats and dogs (
Helicobacter felis), and ferrets (
Helicobacter mustelae) (
21,
31). Gastric colonization by
Helicobacter species can illicit a strong immune response, which may develop into pathologies like peptic ulcer disease and precancerous lesions (
17). The lifelong colonization of the gastric mucosa suggests that these
Helicobacter species are well adapted to this harsh environment and are able to combat the diverse antimicrobial activities employed by the host within the gastric mucosa, such as iron restriction and acidity (
43).
Transition metals like iron and nickel are both essential for gastric
Helicobacter species. Iron is involved in redox reactions and functions as a cofactor of many enzymes, whereas nickel is the cofactor of two important enzymes in gastric
Helicobacter species: urease and hydrogenase. The urease enzyme is the main factor allowing acid resistance, whereas hydrogenase is important for energy production, and both enzymes are essential for gastric colonization by
Helicobacter species (
2,
20,
32,
37). Analyses of complete genome sequences of gastric
Helicobacter species allowed the prediction of many genes putatively involved in iron acquisition but surprisingly few predicted nickel acquisition genes (
12,
22,
35).
Ferric iron acquisition in Gram-negative bacteria is usually mediated by a TonB-dependent outer membrane receptor coupled to an ABC transporter for transport in the periplasm and over the inner membrane. Ferrous iron acquisition requires only an FeoB-like single-component system for inner membrane transport (
1,
41). As for ferrous iron, the transport of nickel was until recently thought not to require an outer membrane component but only an ABC transporter or single-component NiCoT transporter (
18,
19). However, it has become apparent that there is much more variation in these themes and that TonB-dependent outer membrane proteins, annotated as putative iron acquisition systems, may be involved in the transport of a range of other metals or compounds (
10,
14,
28,
29,
34). Examples of these new insights stem from recent work with
H. pylori, where two out of three FecA and FrpB orthologs were shown to be regulated by iron and Fur, whereas the third FecA and FrpB ortholog is NikR and nickel repressed (
9,
14,
39) and has been proposed to function in nickel acquisition (
10,
28). Similarly, the
H. mustelae putative TonB-dependent outer membrane protein NikH contributes to urease activity, probably by mediating nickel acquisition (
34). Caution also needs to be taken when annotating ABC transporters, as the proposed ferric citrate permease and ATPase FecD and FecE, respectively, were shown not to contribute to iron acquisition in
H. pylori (
41), suggesting a role for these
H. pylori genes in the acquisition of other metals or compounds. Hence, the currently available genome annotations are potentially unreliable, and functional and mutational data are required to validate or correct the annotation of genome sequences.
DISCUSSION
Iron and nickel are two essential metal ions for gastric
Helicobacter species, since iron participates in many redox reactions and in respiration, whereas nickel functions as a cofactor for the urease and hydrogenase enzymes, responsible for acid resistance, nitrogen metabolism, and energy production (
20,
32). Many studies of the role of iron and nickel in
Helicobacter species have focused on the regulation of metal acquisition systems (
24,
38,
44), while relatively few studies have investigated the putative metal acquisition systems themselves (
10,
11,
28,
41). In this study we have inactivated genes annotated as iron and nickel acquisition systems of
H.
mustelae and demonstrate that several of the proposed iron acquisition genes have been misannotated and should be reannotated as probable nickel/cobalt transporters. Furthermore, our data support a role for
H.
mustelae TonB2 in facilitating the transport of metals other than iron, like nickel (
28,
29).
Since heme is a predominant iron source in the host, it was not surprising that both
H. pylori and
H. mustelae are able to utilize heme as the sole iron source (
11). We were able to confirm these results with our growth promotion assay (Fig.
1B). Interestingly, the genome sequences of
H. pylori and
H. mustelae lack genes encoding clear candidates for heme transporters (
22,
35), and although our studies did not allow us to identify a heme transporter, we were able to demonstrate that a
tonB1 mutant was unable to grow on heme as the sole iron source (Fig.
1B), suggesting a role for a TonB-dependent outer membrane receptor.
Two of the annotated
H. mustelae iron acquisition genes (
fecD and
ceuE) were not regulated by either Fur or iron (Fig.
1A), which mirrored similar findings for
H. pylori (
14,
28,
39,
41). Also, the lack of a clear role for the
tonB2 gene in iron-dependent growth (Fig.
1B) supports our hypothesis that the
tonB2,
fecD, and
ceuE genes may be involved in the acquisition of other metals or compounds. In this study we focused on the roles of the
fecD,
fecE,
ceuE, and
tonB2 genes in nickel utilization by the insertional inactivation of single genes and the creation of double mutants, followed by measurements of the effect of the inactivation on urease activity, cellular nickel content, and the regulation of the expression and activity of the UreAB and UreA2B2 ureases (Fig.
2). The observation that the inactivation of
tonB2 resulted in a reduction in urease activity similar to that of the
H. mustelae nikH mutant (
34) was therefore not surprising. These results are also consistent with observations of
H. pylori where the inactivation of
tonB2 and
frpB4 also resulted in a partial reduction in nickel acquisition (
28), suggesting the presence of an alternative nickel acquisition system.
A comparison of the complete genome sequences of
Helicobacter species previously suggested that only the
H. hepaticus genome contains a complete ABC transporter system for nickel (
4), while the
H. pylori,
H. acinonychis, and
H. mustelae genome sequences lack a clear candidate for such an ABC transporter (
12,
22,
35), with only the predicted ferric citrate permease and ATPase FecDE and a CeuE periplasmic binding protein for enterochelin being annotated (
12,
22,
35). Our findings that FecD and CeuE are involved in nickel acquisition are in agreement with the absence of Fur- and iron-responsive regulation of these genes in
H. pylori (
39) and
H. mustelae (Fig.
1A), the location of the
H. mustelae ceuE gene directly downstream of the
nikH gene (
22,
34), the nickel-responsive regulation of
ceuE in
H. pylori (
7), and the predicted NikR operators in the
H. pylori fecDE promoter (
34).
Data from the mutational studies also suggest that
H. mustelae contains two separate acquisition pathways for nickel, based on the TonB2-energized NikH outer membrane transporter and the NixA inner membrane transporter, whereas the CeuE/FecDE ABC transporter functions independently (Fig.
4). However, some overlap between these two systems may exist, in view of the absence of any effect of the
nixA mutation on urease activity or cellular nickel content, which contrasts with the decreased nickel content of the
tonB2 and
nikH mutants (Fig.
2). This suggests that FecDE is able to satisfy nickel transport requirements in brucella broth without a need for NixA. While our studies clearly support a role for the FecDE and CeuE systems in nickel acquisition, it is still unclear what nickel substrate is recognized by the outer membrane receptor(s) for nickel or whether a nickelophore is involved (
28). Also, we have not proven an actual transport of nickel, although this is likely based on analogy with nickel transport, as demonstrated previously for the FecA3 protein in
H. pylori (
28).
Nickel and cobalt acquisition pathways often overlap; this is likely due to the similarities between these two transition metals (
26,
48). It was demonstrated for
H. pylori that a
nikR mutant was affected in cobalt resistance, and nickel was able to rescue cobalt toxicity (
5,
7), which is suggestive of competition in transport. The increased cobalt resistance observed for
fecD mutants (Fig.
3B) suggests that FecD is also involved in cobalt acquisition, and this was confirmed by the decreased cellular cobalt levels in this mutant. The nickel-regulatory protein NikR seemed not to be able to fully discriminate between cobalt and nickel, since the addition of 1 μM cobalt in the absence of nickel resulted in the repression of UreB2 expression (Fig.
3B), similar to what happens under nickel-sufficient conditions (
33,
34). These results are in agreement with the finding that cobalt-cofactored NikR from
H. pylori and
E. coli is able to bind target DNA
in vitro although with less affinity than nickel-cofactored NikR (
42,
47). Similarly, the specificity of the
Mycobacterium tuberculosis NmtR repressor not only is determined by the protein itself but also depends on the metals imported (
6).
In conclusion, the available genome sequences of gastric
Helicobacter species contain multiple genes annotated as being putatively involved in iron acquisition, of which the
H. mustelae ceuE and
fecDE genes are likely to encode a novel nickel and cobalt acquisition system. This redresses the apparent imbalance between iron and nickel acquisition genes in the
H. mustelae genome sequence (
4,
22,
48), since several genes previously annotated as being involved in iron acquisition can now be reclassified.