Open access
Announcement
17 July 2014

Genome Sequence of “Candidatus Arthromitus” sp. Strain SFB-Mouse-NL, a Commensal Bacterium with a Key Role in Postnatal Maturation of Gut Immune Functions

ABSTRACT

Candidatus Arthromitus” sp. strain SFB-mouse-NL (SFB, segmented filamentous bacteria) is a commensal bacterium necessary for inducing the postnatal maturation of homeostatic innate and adaptive immune responses in the mouse gut. Here, we report the genome sequence of this bacterium, which sets it apart from earlier sequenced mouse SFB isolates.

GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Candidatus Arthromitus” spp., also known as segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB), are noncultivable, spore-forming, Clostridia-related commensal bacteria that colonize the digestive tracts of many animal species (1). SFB typically form filaments that are solidly anchored in gut epithelial cells (2), notably in the ileum. In mice, SFB play a key role in the postnatal maturation of gut innate and adaptive immune functions, and notably, they can induce a strong IgA response (3, 4) and the recruitment and activation of intraepithelial CD8+ T lymphocytes (5) and lamina propria CD4+ T cells (6, 7; reviewed in reference 8).
Here, we report the complete genome sequence of the mouse-specific isolate “Candidatus Arthromitus” sp. SFB-mouse-NL. While an earlier sequenced mouse SFB isolate from Japan was shown to elicit a T helper (Th) 17 immune response in the intestinal lamina propria of C57BL/6 mice (7), the present strain, an independent isolate from The Netherlands (9), was reported to not only induce a strong Th17 response but also to foster Th1, Th2, and regulatory T-cell responses in C3H/HeN mice (6). To define whether the observed differences may be related to genetic variations between the two SFB isolates, we determined the genome sequence of strain SFB-mouse-NL.
DNA was isolated from fecal material from SFB-monocolonized mice using a modified version of the protocol described in Morita et al. (10). The DNA was sequenced using Illumina paired-end sequencing technology. The sequence reads were filtered using CLC and BOWTIE (11) to eliminate mouse genome sequences, and they were assembled using CLC, ABySS (12), and SOAPdenovo (13), yielding 40 scaffolds >1,000 bp with high BLASTn scoring to existing SFB genome sequences. Finishing was performed using GAP4 of the Staden package (14) through iterative selection of read pair mapping to scaffold extremities and independent de novo assembly of these reads by SOAP. The scaffolds were also ordered using Mauve aligner (15), with earlier published SFB genome sequences as the reference, and some sequence gaps bridged by PCR performed on the basis of this alignment and sequencing of the PCR products. Genome annotation was performed using RAST (16).
The genome of “Candidatus Arthromitus” sp. SFB-mouse-NL consists of one circular chromosome (1,654,902 bp) with 1,598 predicted coding sequences (CDS). The genome contains 4 (partial) prophages. A comparative analysis of the “Candidatus Arthromitus” sp. SFB-mouse-NL genome and two complete and 7 incomplete other SFB genomes retrieved from NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genomes/) using MUMmer (17) and Mauve (18) revealed that the SFB-mouse-NL genome is distinct (0.4% of overall nucleotide divergence) from the other genomes (which show <0.2% of overall nucleotide divergence among them).

Nucleotide sequence accession number.

The genome sequence of “Candidatus Arthromitus” sp. SFB-mouse-NL has been deposited in GenBank under the accession no. CP008713.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Laurence Ma for technical assistance in DNA sequencing, as well as Jean-Michel Batto and Pierre Leonard for help in computing.
This project was supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR) (contract ANR-10-BLAN-1317) and INRA AIP Bio-Resources.

REFERENCES

1.
Snel J, Heinen PP, Blok HJ, Carman RJ, Duncan AJ, Allen PC, and Collins MD. 1995. Comparison of 16S rRNA sequences of segmented filamentous bacteria isolated from mice, rats, and chickens and proposal of “Candidatus Arthromitus.” Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 45:780–782.
2.
Klaasen HL, Koopman JP, Poelma FG, and Beynen AC. 1992. Intestinal, segmented, filamentous bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 8:165–180.
3.
Klaasen HL, Van der Heijden PJ, Stok W, Poelma FG, Koopman JP, Van den Brink ME, Bakker MH, Eling WM, and Beynen AC. 1993. Apathogenic, intestinal, segmented, filamentous bacteria stimulate the mucosal immune system of mice. Infect. Immun. 61:303–306.
4.
Lécuyer E, Rakotobe S, Lengliné-Garnier H, Lebreton C, Picard M, Juste C, Fritzen R, Eberl G, McCoy KD, Macpherson AJ, Reynaud CA, Cerf-Bensussan N, and Gaboriau-Routhiau V. 2014. Segmented filamentous bacterium uses secondary and tertiary lymphoid tissues to induce gut IgA and specific T helper 17-cell responses. Immunity 40:608–620.
5.
Umesaki Y, Okada Y, Matsumoto S, Imaoka A, and Setoyama H. 1995. Segmented filamentous bacteria are indigenous intestinal bacteria that activate intraepithelial lymphocytes and induce MHC class II molecules and fucosyl asialo GM1 glycolipids on the small intestinal epithelial cells in the ex-germ-free mouse. Microbiol. Immunol. 39:555–562.
6.
Gaboriau-Routhiau V, Rakotobe S, Lécuyer E, Mulder I, Lan A, Bridonneau C, Rochet V, Pisi A, De Paepe M, Brandi G, Eberl G, Snel J, Kelly D, and Cerf-Bensussan N. 2009. The key role of segmented filamentous bacteria in the coordinated maturation of gut helper T cell responses. Immunity 31:677–689.
7.
Ivanov II, Atarashi K, Manel N, Brodie EL, Shima T, Karaoz U, Wei D, Goldfarb KC, Santee CA, Lynch SV, Tanoue T, Imaoka A, Itoh K, Takeda K, Umesaki Y, Honda K, and Littman DR. 2009. Induction of intestinal Th17 cells by segmented filamentous bacteria. Cell 139:485–498.
8.
Schnupf P, Gaboriau-Routhiau V, and Cerf-Bensussan N. 2013. Host interactions with segmented filamentous bacteria: an unusual trade-off that drives the post-natal maturation of the gut immune system. Semin. Immunol. 25:342–351.
9.
Klaasen HL, Koopman JP, Van den Brink ME, Van Wezel HP, and Beynen AC. 1991. Mono-association of mice with non-cultivable, intestinal, segmented, filamentous bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 156:148–151.
10.
Morita H, Kuwahara T, Ohshima K, Sasamoto H, Itoh K, Hattori M, Hayashi T, and Takami H. 2007. An improved DNA isolation method for metagenomic analysis of the microbial flora of the human intestine. Microbes Environ. 22:214–222.
11.
Langmead B, Trapnell C, Pop M, and Salzberg SL. 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10:R25.
12.
Simpson JT, Wong K, Jackman SD, Schein JE, Jones SJ, and Birol I. 2009. ABySS: a parallel assembler for short read sequence data. Genome Res. 19:1117–1123.
13.
Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y, Li Z, Huang W, Yuan J, He G, Chen Y, Pan Q, Liu Y, Tang J, Wu G, Zhang H, Shi Y, Liu Y, Yu C, Wang B, Lu Y, Han C, Cheung DW, Yiu SM, Peng S, Xiaoqian Z, Liu G, Liao X, Li Y, Yang H, Wang J, Lam TW, and Wang J. 2012. SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. GigaScience. 1:18.
14.
Staden R, Judge DP, and Bonfield JK. 2003. Managing sequencing projects in the GAP4 Environment. In Krawetz SA and Womble DD (ed), Introduction to bioinformatics. a theoretical and practical approach. Humana Press, Inc., Totowa, NJ.
15.
Rissman AI, Mau B, Biehl BS, Darling AE, Glasner JD, and Perna NT. 2009. Reordering contigs of draft genomes using the Mauve aligner. Bioinformatics 25:2071–2073.
16.
Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, and Zagnitko O. 2008. The RAST server: Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics 9:75.
17.
Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, and Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5:R12.
18.
Darling AE, Mau B, and Perna NT. 2010. ProgressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Genome Announcements
Genome Announcements
Volume 2Number 428 August 2014
eLocator: 10.1128/genomea.00705-14

History

Received: 19 June 2014
Accepted: 26 June 2014
Published online: 17 July 2014

Contributors

Authors

Alexander Bolotin
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
Tomas de Wouters
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
Pamela Schnupf
INSERM UMR1163, Laboratory of Intestinal Immunity, Paris, France
Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité and Institut Imagine, Paris, France
Christiane Bouchier
Institut Pasteur, Plate-forme Génomique, Paris, France
Valentin Loux
INRA, UR1077 Mathématique Informatique et Génome, Jouy en Josas, France
Moez Rhimi
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
Alexandre Jamet
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
Rozenn Dervyn
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
Samira Boudebbouze
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
Hervé M. Blottière
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
Alexei Sorokin
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
Johannes Snel
NIZO Food Research, Ede, The Netherlands
Present address: Johannes Snel, CTGB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Nadine Cerf-Bensussan
INSERM UMR1163, Laboratory of Intestinal Immunity, Paris, France
Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité and Institut Imagine, Paris, France
Valérie Gaboriau-Routhiau
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
INSERM UMR1163, Laboratory of Intestinal Immunity, Paris, France
Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité and Institut Imagine, Paris, France
Maarten van de Guchte
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
Emmanuelle Maguin
INRA, UMR1319 Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France
AgroParisTech, UMR Micalis, Jouy en Josas, France

Notes

Address correspondence to Emmanuelle Maguin, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.

Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy