Free access
Domain: Metabolism
Review
13 December 2021

Iron Transport and Metabolism in Escherichia, Shigella, and Salmonella

ABSTRACT

Iron is an essential element for Escherichia, Salmonella, and Shigella species. The acquisition of sufficient amounts of iron is difficult in many environments, including the intestinal tract, where these bacteria usually reside. Members of these genera have multiple iron transport systems to transport both ferrous and ferric iron. These include transporters for free ferrous iron, ferric iron associated with chelators, and heme. The numbers and types of transport systems in any species reflect the diversity of niches that it can inhabit. Many of the iron transport genes are found on mobile genetic elements or pathogenicity islands, and there is evidence of the spread of the genes among different species and pathotypes. This is notable among the pathogenic members of the genera in which iron transport systems acquired by horizontal gene transfer allow the bacteria to overcome host innate defenses that act to restrict the availability of iron to the pathogen. The need for iron is balanced by the need to avoid iron overload since excess iron is toxic to the cell. Genes for iron transport and metabolism are tightly regulated and respond to environmental cues, including iron availability, oxygen, and temperature. Master regulators, the iron sensor Fur and the Fur-regulated small RNA (sRNA) RyhB, coordinate the expression of iron transport and cellular metabolism genes in response to the availability of iron.

INTRODUCTION

Escherichia, Shigella, and Salmonella are members of the Enterobacteriaceae family and commonly inhabit the vertebrate intestinal tract. Like most other bacteria, they require iron for growth and survival. Because iron can be found in both the ferrous (Fe2+) and ferric (Fe3+) states and can transfer electrons over a wide range of redox potentials (−300 to +700 mV), many cellular enzymes have evolved to use iron as a cofactor. Iron is required for the function of ribonucleotide reductase to produce the precursors for DNA biosynthesis, as a component of cytochromes required for electron transport, and as a cofactor for tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle enzymes, among others. The enzymes may use iron in the form of heme, as iron-sulfur clusters, or as an iron atom. In laboratory-grown Escherichia coli, the amount of iron in a cell is in the range of 105 to 106 atoms (1), and low intracellular iron results in growth inhibition or arrest.

IRON HOMEOSTASIS

Although iron is essential, too much iron is lethal for the cell, especially if it is not chelated or protein bound. Iron acts as a catalyst for Haber-Weiss reactions, generating highly reactive hydroxyl radicals. In the presence of superoxide or hydrogen peroxide, ferric iron is converted to ferrous iron, which reacts with peroxide in the Fenton reaction to produce hydroxyl radicals. Hydroxyl radicals can cause damage or death of the cell by damaging DNA, unsaturated lipids, and proteins (2).
Thus, the uptake of iron by the bacterial cell is tightly regulated (3, 4). There is a balance between the concentration of available iron in the environment and cellular needs, and homeostasis is maintained by regulating iron uptake, use, and storage. When iron is limiting, Enterobacteriaceae turn on genes for iron uptake systems and actively acquire the metal. As the intracellular concentration increases beyond the cell’s immediate needs, these transporters are downregulated, and any excess iron is shunted into iron storage proteins. Similarly, metabolic pathways and processes that have high iron requirements are regulated in response to the availability of iron and other environmental signals that help fine-tune metabolism in response to the levels of iron in the cell. Genes for these metabolic pathways and for iron storage proteins are downregulated in low iron (5). In order to cope with the loss of essential iron-dependent metabolic pathways during iron starvation, cells may upregulate the expression of non-iron-containing isoenzymes that rely on other divalent metals, such as manganese, instead (6).
For bacteria in many environments, the level of free iron is growth limiting, and the acquisition of sufficient iron is problematic. While ferrous iron is relatively soluble, the presence of oxygen results in the formation of insoluble ferric iron. Most oxic environments contain too little free iron to support microbial growth. Furthermore, bacteria colonizing mammalian hosts, as is typical of the Enterobacteriaceae, must compete with their hosts for this essential nutrient (7, 8). As in bacteria, mammalian iron homeostasis is highly regulated, and the majority of intracellular or circulating iron is found in heme, with smaller amounts in iron-sulfur cluster-containing proteins or iron proteins. Nonheme iron being shuttled through the circulation is bound to transferrin. Iron on surfaces, in secretions, and in neutrophils is bound to lactoferrin. Thus, the concentration of free, available iron for microbial growth in mammals is vanishingly low in body fluids, on the order of 10−36 M (7).
Bacteria have evolved a variety of iron acquisition systems to allow them to obtain iron in all the environments in which they reside (Fig. 1). These systems include the transport of ferrous or ferric iron, either free or associated with low-affinity chelators such as citrate or phosphate. Bacteria also synthesize and secrete high-affinity iron chelators (siderophores) that scavenge iron in the extracellular environment. The uptake of the chelated siderophore requires dedicated outer and inner membrane transport proteins specific for the iron-siderophore complex. Bacteria that are host associated or pathogenic often have receptors for host iron complexes such as heme, hemoglobin, or transferrin and can remove the heme or iron from the protein to use within the bacterial cell.
FIG 1
FIG 1 Overview of iron transport systems in Enterobacteriaceae. Free iron crosses the outer membrane (OM) via nonspecific porins, while iron complexed to a carrier or in heme requires a TonB-dependent, specific outer membrane receptor. In the periplasm, both free and complexed iron may be picked up by a substrate-specific periplasmic binding protein (PBP) and shuttled to the cognate cytoplasmic membrane (CM) permease for transport into the cytosol. Cytoplasmic membrane transporters typically consist of a transmembrane channel protein coupled with cytoplasmic ATPases. Free ferrous iron in the periplasm can also be recognized and transported directly by the ferrous transporter Feo, which requires a GTPase for function.
The acquisition of iron in Gram-negative bacteria requires transport across both the outer and inner membranes (Fig. 1). Free ferrous or ferric iron appears to use porins to cross the outer membrane, but larger complexes cannot passively cross the outer membrane or use the general porins. These complexes, such as siderophores or heme, require specific outer membrane receptors. Once the chelate is bound to the receptor, energy must be expended to transport the iron chelate into the periplasm. Since the outer membrane is not energized, the energy for active transport across the outer membrane must originate in the inner membrane. Energy is transferred to receptors in the outer membrane from the energy-transducing complex of TonB, ExbB, and ExbD. Although anchored in the cytoplasmic membrane, TonB can span the periplasmic space to contact the receptors and act as a conduit for energy derived from the cytoplasmic membrane proton motive force (9).
After transiting the outer membrane, the iron chelate is bound to a periplasmic binding protein (PBP) and shuttled to the cytoplasmic membrane for entry into the cell. There are specific cytoplasmic membrane transporters for ferrous iron, ferric iron, and iron bound to siderophores, heme, or citrate. The cytoplasmic membrane permeases consist of a channel-forming protein and an ATPase or other source of energy for active transport (Fig. 1). Within the cell, the iron is released from the carrier, although in the case of heme, the intact molecule may be used by the cell. Because siderophores have a high affinity for ferric, but not ferrous, iron, reduction of the iron in the cytosol aids in its release from the siderophore. Specific enzymes that reduce iron and/or degrade the siderophore are often produced by the bacteria.

REGULATION OF IRON HOMEOSTASIS

The major regulatory factor controlling iron acquisition is an iron binding transcription factor, Fur (ferric uptake regulator) (first identified in E. coli by Hantke [3, 10]). The active form of Fur is a dimer, and each monomer has two metal binding sites: a structural site that binds zinc, which controls dimerization (11), and a regulatory site that binds iron. Recent evidence suggests that iron in the regulatory site is bound as a [2Fe-2S] cluster (12). When intracellular iron is sufficient to satisfy cell needs, the Fur protein will bind to iron, and the active iron-bound dimer then binds to specific operator sequences (Fur boxes) in the DNA (4), usually overlapping the −10 or −35 sequences in the promoter of target genes. In most cases, the binding of Fur at these sites prevents RNA polymerase binding and blocks transcription (Fig. 2); however, Fur has also been found to act less commonly as a positive regulator (13). Fur boxes are often found upstream of genes involved in iron acquisition. The repression of these genes by iron-bound Fur ensures that iron transport is turned off when iron is plentiful in the cell, thereby preventing toxic iron overload. Iron-bound Fur further prevents iron overload by positively regulating the expression of ftnA, encoding the major iron storage protein (13). Fe-Fur alleviates the repressive action of H-NS by competing for binding upstream of ftnA (13). Conversely, when iron is low, Fur cannot bind to its operator sequences to regulate transcription. Thus, the iron transport genes are turned on to initiate iron uptake, while the ftnA iron storage gene is silenced by H-NS (Fig. 2). There are multiple, sometimes overlapping, binding sites for Fur upstream of some Fur-regulated genes, including ftnA (13) and the aerobactin operon (14).
FIG 2
FIG 2 Regulation of iron transport and iron metabolism genes in Enterobacteriaceae. (Left) When intracellular iron is sufficient, Fur binds iron, and one or more dimers of Fe-Fur bind to DNA sequences (Fur boxes) upstream of the transcription start site. The binding of Fe-Fur represses genes involved in iron acquisition. The gene encoding the small RNA RyhB is also repressed by Fe-Fur. Because RyhB represses the translation of genes involved in iron storage and metabolism, these genes are expressed only in high iron, when RyhB levels are low. Fe-Fur can also act as a positive regulator. The ftnA gene, encoding the major iron storage protein in Enterobacteriaceae, is activated by the binding of Fe-Fur, which displaces H-NS, allowing transcription to proceed. Thus, when the iron level is high, iron acquisition is shut off, and any free intracellular iron is either bound up by Fur or shunted into iron-reliant metabolic pathways or iron storage to prevent toxicity. RNAP, RNA polymerase. (Right) When iron levels are low and Fur is not bound, iron transport systems and RyhB are derepressed. RyhB in turn represses iron storage and metabolism genes by base pairing with target transcripts, leading to the degradation of both RyhB and the transcript. In Salmonella, RyhB can also act as a positive regulator for the iron transporter gene iroN; thus, RyhB plays a direct role in regulating both iron uptake and iron storage. In low iron, when Fe-Fur is not available to alleviate repression by H-NS, the iron storage gene ftnA is repressed. Thus, when iron levels are low, iron acquisition systems are induced, while iron storage and iron-dependent metabolism pathways are turned off.
Fur boxes are also found upstream of the fur gene, overlapping the −10 consensus sequence. Fur binds weakly at this site and inhibits fur transcription from pfeoa and pfeob (Fig. 3); this autoregulation may help control the level of Fur in the cell (15). The fur gene is also expressed from upstream promoters, and these are controlled by binding sites for Crp, ArcA, OxyR, and SoxS (1517). Thus, the level of Fur not only is tightly regulated by the concentration of iron and cellular iron needs but also is influenced by carbon metabolism (Crp), the level of environmental oxygen (ArcA), and oxidative stress (OxyR and SoxS) via the induction of these additional transcripts (Fig. 3).
FIG 3
FIG 3 Genetics and regulation of fur. Fur, the repressor that serves as the master regulator of iron transport and metabolism in enteric bacteria, has three potential promoters. Binding sites for repressors are shown as red boxes, and binding sites for activators are in green. The primary promoters pfura and -b are autoregulated and repressed by the fur gene product. There is also a Crp binding site that allows transcription from an upstream promoter (pfur) in response to carbon metabolism. Binding sites for ArcA (oxygen), OxyR (oxidative stress), and SoxS (oxidative stress) regulate a polycistronic message that includes fldA, uof, and fur in response to oxygen and oxidative stress. The uof sequence that is cotranscribed with fur has a RyhB binding site and allows the translational regulation of Fur synthesis via the RyhB sRNA.
Studies in E. coli indicated a palindromic 5′-GATAATGATAATCATTATC-3′, 19-bp consensus sequence for the Fur binding site (14, 18), but analysis of a larger number of promoter/operator regions suggests that Fur binding is more complex. The consensus sequence has been proposed to consist of three adjacent repeats of the hexamer 5′-GATAAT-3′ (4, 19). In this model, additional hexamer repeats can extend the binding site, which can be occupied cooperatively by additional Fur dimers (19). The extended binding sites can account for the range of affinities and extent of regulation observed for different Fur targets. Analysis of Fur binding at a bidirectional promoter region suggests that the 19-bp consensus can be structured as overlapping 13-mer sequences, allowing two Fur dimers to interact with opposite faces of the helix (20).
Fur plays a broader role in the cell than solely regulating iron acquisition. A genome-wide analysis of Fur binding and transcriptional regulation in E. coli K-12 showed the direct regulation of at least 81 genes in 42 transcriptional units (21). The regulon includes genes for carbon and energy metabolism and precursors for DNA synthesis. Several targets for Fur regulation are enzymes that have iron cofactors or are involved in cellular processes that require iron. Fur plays an even larger role in pathogenic enteric bacteria. A variety of virulence factors are regulated by Fur, indicating that the low-iron environment of the host serves as an environmental cue to turn on genes required for infection and disease. For example, Shiga toxin, produced by Shigella dysenteriae and some pathogenic E. coli strains, is Fur regulated, and in Salmonella, the type III secretion system encoded on pathogenicity island 1 is regulated by the binding of Fur at the hilD promoter (22, 23).
Another target of Fur repression is the small (90-nucleotide) regulatory RNA RyhB (5, 24) (Fig. 2). RyhB base pairs with the 5′ end of transcripts encoding iron-containing or iron storage proteins and prevents translation, leading to the degradation of the transcript. When iron is abundant, Fur represses the expression of ryhB, allowing transcripts encoding iron-containing and iron storage proteins to be translated. Iron can then be shunted into iron-reliant metabolic pathways (e.g., TCA cycle enzymes and SodB), and any excess iron can be stored (e.g., in bacterioferritin). At low iron concentrations, ryhB is highly expressed, ensuring that many genes encoding iron-dependent metabolism proteins and the iron storage protein Bfr are turned off. This response, termed “iron sparing” (5), reduces the need for iron while the cell is experiencing iron starvation, allowing the cell to reserve its available iron for only the most essential iron-dependent functions. RyhB also affects Fur synthesis. The synthesis of E. coli Fur is coupled to the translation of an upstream open reading frame (ORF) (uof), and the base pairing of RyhB with the Uof mRNA blocks the translation of uof and the downstream fur gene (25) (Fig. 3). Thus, RyhB could moderate the increase in Fur that occurs when iron is limiting and Fur no longer binds upstream.
In most cases, regulation by RyhB is negative. However, in Salmonella, RyhB acts to increase the translation of the iroN mRNA, encoding a component of the Salmonella iron transport system Iro (see the section on salmochelins and Fig. 10C, below). Salmonella encodes two different RyhB small RNAs (sRNAs), RyhB-1 and RyhB-2 (24). The two ryhB genes are found in all sequenced Salmonella species, including the distantly related species Salmonella bongori. The two sRNAs share an identical 33-base region, but the rest of the sequence is not as highly conserved. The two genes have overlapping and separate functions. The expression of both ryhB-1 and ryhB-2 is repressed by Fur, but ryhB-1 is activated by H2O2, while ryhB-2 is activated in stationary phase (26).
E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, and related bacteria can be found in a variety of environments that differ with respect to the concentrations and forms of iron available to the bacteria. Although members of this family are predominately associated with the vertebrate gastrointestinal tract, they can survive outside the host, and within the host, there are different niches in which these bacteria are found. E. coli is a normal inhabitant of the colon, but pathogenic strains can colonize other parts of the intestine or urinary tract, and some can be found in the blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Pathogenic E. coli strains are often categorized as pathotypes to indicate the location and type of disease that they cause and the presence of specific genes (27). Pathotypes include enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), Shiga-toxin producing E. coli (STEC), enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), diffusely adherent E. coli (DAEC), adherent-invasive E. coli (AIEC), neonatal meningitis E. coli (NMEC/MNEC), extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC), and uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) strains, among others. Human-pathogenic strains of Salmonella can spread from the intestine and can disseminate and infect numerous organs. Yersinia, a related member of the Enterobacteriaceae, is also highly invasive and shares many of the iron transport systems found in Salmonella and E. coli. Shigella and enteroinvasive E. coli are adapted for growth in the cytosol of host colonic epithelial cells. All of these areas differ with respect to iron concentrations, the presence of ferrous or ferric iron, levels of oxygen, availability of nutrients, and the sequestration of iron in heme or proteins. The Enterobacteriaceae have evolved to use multiple environmental cues to adapt to iron availability.
Oxygen sensing provides cues about the type and extent of iron availability. In anoxic environments, Fe2+ predominates. Ferrous iron is more soluble and thus is more available to the cell. The intracellular, labile Fe2+ pool was found to be higher for cells growing anaerobically than for aerobically grown cells (28). This leads to an increase in Fur binding to DNA and increased transcriptional repression. Oxygen also regulates specific iron transport systems, adding another layer of regulation to iron acquisition. Enterobacteriaceae in the lumen of the gut grow in the absence of oxygen. However, pathogens that gain access to the surface of intestinal epithelial cells or that invade and replicate within epithelial cells are in a microaerobic environment (17, 29, 30). In Shigella flexneri, oxygen inhibited the expression of the Feo ferrous iron transporter while increasing the transcription of the iuc ferric iron transporter (17). This regulation by oxygen is mediated by two transcription factors, ArcA and the fumarate and nitrate reduction regulatory protein (FNR). These regulatory proteins bind upstream of the start site of transcription and positively or negatively regulate expression in response to oxygen (31). This allows the expression of the feo genes when the bacteria are in an anoxic environment where Fe2+ predominates. In the presence of oxygen, feo is repressed, and the ferric iron transporter iuc is expressed. Oxygen further affects the expression of these genes through an effect on fur expression (Fig. 3); ArcA binds upstream of fur and represses expression under anaerobic conditions (17). Superoxide also regulates fur. It induces a polycistronic mRNA (pfldA) that includes fur (16) (Fig. 3).
Temperature also serves as a signal for the expression of iron acquisition genes. The synthesis of the heme transport protein in Shigella dysenteriae type 1 and pathogenic E. coli is increased at 37°C, a cue indicative of the human environment (32). Additionally, E. coli siderophore synthesis and transport genes (ent, fep, and fes) and ferric citrate transport genes (fec) showed increased expression at 37°C compared to 23°C (33). The ent, fep, and fec genes also respond to carbon sufficiency and are positively controlled by Crp (34). Thus, Fur acts as a master on/off switch to regulate the expression of iron transport genes, and additional transcription factors or posttranscriptional regulation controls individual systems to take advantage of the iron sources most commonly found in that environment.

IRON TRANSPORT SYSTEMS

There are many different iron transporters in the enteric bacteria, and the general rule seems to be the more the better. A summary of the systems found in E. coli, Salmonella, and Shigella is shown in Table 1.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Iron transport systemsa in E. coli, Shigella, and Salmonella
Species or pathotypebPresence of iron transport systemc
FeoEfeSitEntSalIucYbtFecShu/Chu
E. coli K-12+Ps +   + 
E. coli Nissle++++   + 
AIECd++V+VV+V+
EHEC++ + V ++
EIEC+ ++ V + 
ETEC+  +     
UPECe+++++++++
NMEC+++++V+VR
Shigella boydii+ +  +   
Shigella dysenteriae type 1+ +++   +
Shigella flexneri+ +PsR+ R 
Shigella sonnei+R++R+   
Salmonella enterica+R+++VVf  
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi+  ++    
Salmonella bongori+  +     
a
Ent, enterobactin; Sal, salmochelin; Iuc, aerobactin; Ybt, yersiniabactin; Fec, ferric dicitrate; Shu/Chu, Shigella/E. coli heme transporter.
b
AIEC, adherent-invasive E. coli; EHEC, enterohemorrhagic E. coli; EIEC, enteroinvasive E. coli; ETEC, enterotoxigenic E. coli; UPEC, uropathogenic E. coli; NMEC, neonatal meningitis E. coli.
c
+, usually present; V, presence is variable; R, rarely present; Ps, one or more of the genes are pseudogenes in this species.
d
Reviewed by Dogan et al. (138).
e
Reviewed by Robinson et al. (181).
f
Yersiniabactin is not produced by human pathogens of S. enterica serovar Enteritidis but is found in some isolates of subspecies III and VI (139).

Ferrous iron transporters. (i) Feo.

The most evolutionarily ancient and widespread of the bacterial iron transporters is Feo (Fig. 4), and this transporter is found in all members of this family. It was first described in E. coli (35, 36) and consists of three proteins, FeoA, -B, and -C. FeoB is a cytoplasmic membrane protein that forms the channel for iron transport. The N-terminal cytoplasmic domain of FeoB has homology with eukaryotic small G proteins, and the GTPase activity is essential for transport (37). FeoA and FeoC are small cytoplasmic proteins whose roles are not fully understood. FeoC is found primarily in the Gammaproteobacteria and is absent from most other bacterial families (38). In Vibrio cholerae, the Feo proteins are present in a large complex, and FeoA was shown to be required for complex formation; FeoC is a component of the complex and is required for iron transport but not for complex formation (39). In the Enterobacteriaceae, FeoC has a cysteine motif suggesting that it might bind iron. It was shown that Klebsiella pneumoniae FeoC contains an iron-sulfur cluster (40), and a suggested function for FeoC includes its acting as an iron-responsive transcription factor. However, these residues are not conserved in all FeoC proteins, and there is no clear evidence of a role for FeoC in the regulation of transcription (4143). In Salmonella, FeoC plays a role in stabilizing FeoB and protecting it from proteolysis (44).
FIG 4
FIG 4 The ferrous iron transporter Feo. (A) Ferrous iron that gains access to the periplasm via the outer membrane porin OmpC or OmpF can be transported across the cytoplasmic membrane by FeoABC. FeoB forms the membrane channel, and it has an N-terminal GTPase domain that is required for transport. The small cytoplasmic proteins FeoA and FeoC are both required, but their exact functions are not known. (B) The feo operon is repressed by Fur but is positively regulated by ArcA and FNR when the cells are growing anaerobically. The positive regulation of feo expression by OmpR couples ferrous iron uptake to porin synthesis. The scale for the genes and regulatory region is approximate.
Free ferrous iron does not appear to require a specific outer membrane receptor. Rather, it crosses the outer membrane through porins (Fig. 4A). The deletion of ompC and ompF prevented growth under conditions where the cells were dependent on Feo for iron transport, and there is strong regulation of feo by the EnvZ-OmpR two-component regulatory system, which also controls porin expression (45).
The feo operon, like other iron transport systems, is regulated by Fur (35), with iron as the corepressor (Fig. 4B). Fe-Fur binds upstream of feoA and represses expression by blocking RNA polymerase binding. In addition to iron, the level of oxygen in the environment influences feo expression. Under anaerobic conditions, where ferrous iron predominates, the feo operon is induced, while the presence of oxygen results in repression. In S. flexneri, the induction of feo when the cells are growing anaerobically is mediated by the oxygen-sensing transcription factors ArcA and FNR (17).

(ii) Sit/Yfe.

The Sit transporters are members of the periplasmic protein-dependent ABC transporter family and can transport both iron and manganese. The sit genes were first identified in Salmonella (46), and this ABC-type transporter consists of a periplasmic binding protein (SitA), the cytoplasmic membrane complex (SitC and SitD), and an ATPase (SitB) on the cytoplasmic face of the SitCD complex (Fig. 5) (4649). Salmonella Sit was shown to transport Fe2+ and Mn2+, and under physiological conditions, it appears to be predominantly a manganese transporter (4951). Similar systems were identified in Shigella (Sit) (30, 52) and Yersinia pestis (Yfe) (53). These three systems share approximately 45 to 75% identity at the amino acid level. The Shigella Sit transporter is also found in pathogenic E. coli strains, including EIEC (54), UPEC (55), and avian-pathogenic E. coli (APEC) (56). This system was determined to be primarily a ferrous iron transporter, although it can also provide manganese to the cell. Both iron and manganese influence the expression of the sit operons; there are binding sites for Fur and MntR upstream of these operons, and these transcription factors act to repress sit in the presence of iron (Fur) or manganese (MntR) (Fig. 5).
FIG 5
FIG 5 The ferrous iron transporter Sit. (A) Sit is a periplasmic binding protein-dependent ABC-type transporter. Ferrous iron entering the periplasm through porins is bound to SitA, which delivers the iron to the SitBCD cytoplasmic membrane permease. Hydrolysis of ATP by the SitB component provides the energy for the transport of ferrous iron into the cell. (B) Diagram of the sit operon. Binding sites for repressors are shown as red boxes. The scale for the genes and regulatory region is approximate.
Analysis of Shigella and E. coli strains showed that the Shigella sit operon was found in some but not all isolates. Analysis of the location and surrounding DNA sequences indicated that the genes are on islands and have spread horizontally (Fig. 6). In one strain of S. flexneri, for example, the sit operon is flanked by an integrase gene and phage tail fiber genes, and the island is inserted at the selC locus (57). In other isolates, the phage genes are associated with the sit operon, but the upstream genes differ. The sizes and locations of the islands differ widely, even among closely related species (Fig. 6). In UPEC isolates, the sit islands map to icd (Fig. 6) (54), while in other E. coli strains, the genes are plasmid borne (56, 58, 59). The presence of the sit operon is highly correlated with an intracellular lifestyle. Those isolates that can replicate within human epithelial cells, Salmonella, Shigella spp., EIEC, and UPEC, were found to have the sit operon, while sit genes are rarely found in commensal strains or extracellular pathogens. This suggested that the genes might play a role in iron acquisition in the eukaryotic cell cytosol. Evidence for iron acquisition via Sit during intracellular growth was found by analysis of the growth of S. flexneri iron transport mutants. A strain having only the Sit system grew as well as the wild type within the host cell cytoplasm, while those having only Feo or a siderophore showed reduced growth (52). Furthermore, the sit genes have been shown to be expressed during the intracellular growth of S. flexneri (30), UPEC (60), and Salmonella enterica (61).
FIG 6
FIG 6 sit island locations in E. coli and Shigella isolates. (A) The sit operon is found in pathogenicity islands located at different sites in the genome (47, 54; this study). Triangles indicate the locations of the islands relative to the E. coli K-12 chromosome. Plasmid locations of the islands have also been described (56, 58, 59). (B) Sizes and locations of the sit islands in representative strains. The sizes and locations of the sit islands were determined by analysis of genome sequences in the NCBI microbial genome database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/microbes/). aAIEC, adherent-invasive E. coli; APEC, avian-pathogenic E. coli; EIEC, enteroinvasive E. coli; ExPEC, extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli; NMEC, neonatal meningitis-associated E. coli (includes MNEC); NTEC, necrotoxigenic and hemolytic E. coli; SEPEC, sepsis-associated E. coli; STEC, Shiga toxin-producing E. coli; UPEC, uropathogenic E. coli. bThis sit island appears to also contain yersiniabactin genes. The endpoint is not clear. cND, not determined; the full genome sequence is not available. dSEPEC strain SMS-3-5 has two sit loci, one chromosomal and one plasmid borne (58, 59). The chromosomal sit island appears to also contain aerobactin genes. The endpoint is not clear.

(iii) EfeU.

The Efe ferrous iron transport system was first identified in E. coli strain Nissle (62) and is encoded by a three-gene operon, efeUOB (ycdNOB) (Fig. 7). In E. coli K-12, Efe is not functional because of a frameshift mutation in efeU, but an intact gene is found in other strains, including E. coli O157:H7 (62, 63) and UPEC strain CFT073 (62). Efe is also found in Shigella sonnei (64), Yersinia pestis (65), and some strains of Salmonella enterica (66).
FIG 7
FIG 7 The Efe ferrous iron transporter. (A) Components of the Efe system and their cellular locations. EfeO and EfeB are periplasmic proteins that are both needed for Efe-mediated iron uptake. EfeO has a peptidase domain and a smaller cupredoxin-like domain, while EfeB can remove iron from heme. EfeU is the cytoplasmic membrane permease component of the Efe system. (B) Genetic organization of the efe operon. The major promoter pefeU is negatively regulated by Fur and CpxR. Binding sites for these repressors are shown as red boxes. The scale for the genes and regulatory region is approximate.
EfeU has homology to Ftr1p, the integral membrane iron-permease component of the Fet3p-Ftr1p iron transporter of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and it is predicted to be a cytoplasmic membrane protein with 7 transmembrane domains (63, 67) (Fig. 7A). EfeU was able to support the growth of E. coli in the absence of other iron transporters, and in vitro studies using proteoliposomes demonstrated that EfeU is a ferrous iron transporter (62). EfeO and EfeB are periplasmic proteins, and both are required for the function of the Efe transporter (63). However, their precise functions in the Efe system are unknown. EfeO has a large, C-terminal peptidase-M75 domain and a smaller, N-terminal cupredoxin-like domain predicted to have two metal binding sites, with one site predicted to bind Cu2+ (67). This suggests that it might be the equivalent of the Fet3p cupredoxin component of the yeast Fet3p-Ftr1p iron transporter (67). EfeB is found as a homodimer, and the crystal structure shows that each monomer binds heme in a hydrophobic pocket in the C-terminal domain (68). EfeB can remove iron from heme without the degradation of the tetrapyrrole ring (69). The source of energy for the transport of ferrous iron via the Efe system is not known, but a ferroxidation step, such as the one used by Fet3p-Ftr1p, has been proposed as the driving force for transport (67). The expression of efeUOB is regulated by iron and pH. Fur represses expression in the presence of iron (62, 70), and the two-component regulatory system CpxAR controls expression as a function of the pH of the medium. At high pH, the binding of unphosphorylated CpxR represses efe expression (63) (Fig. 7B).

Ferric iron transporters. (i) Ferric dicitrate.

The ability of E. coli to use ferric citrate (ferric dicitrate) as an iron source was identified in E. coli K-12 as a citrate-inducible ferric iron transport system (71). Citrate can act as an iron chelator and provide the metal to some enteric Enterobacteriaceae through the Fec transport system (Fig. 8A). Ferric citrate binds to the outer membrane receptor FecA. The periplasmic binding protein FecB delivers ferric citrate to the ABC transporter that is composed of FecCD (cytoplasmic membrane permease) and FecE (ATPase).
FIG 8
FIG 8 The ferric dicitrate (Fec) transport system. (A) The components of the system and their cellular locations. Ferric dicitrate is transported across the outer membrane by FecA and is then delivered by FecB to the cytoplasmic membrane permease FecCDE for transport into the cell. Substrate-bound FecA interacts with the integral membrane anti-sigma factor FecR, causing FecR to release the sigma factor FecI. FecI then binds to RNA polymerase and promotes the transcription of the fecABCDE operon. (B) Genetics and regulation of the fec operons. Binding sites for positive regulators are shown as green boxes, and sites for repressors are shown as red boxes. The scale for the genes and regulatory regions is approximate.
Unlike most enteric iron transporter operons, the fec genes are positively regulated by the iron chelate. Positive regulation is mediated by FecI and FecR. FecI belongs to the extracytoplasmic-function (ECF) sigma factor family, and FecR acts as an anti-sigma factor. Upon the binding of ferric citrate to FecA, FecA transduces the signal to FecR (72), which then releases FecI to bind RNA polymerase (73). This allows the transcription of the fecABCDE operon in response to ferric citrate in the environment (Fig. 8B). FecI and FecR are encoded in an operon immediately upstream of fecABCDE, and both operons are negatively regulated by Fur in the presence of iron (74, 75). The transcriptional regulator SlyA also represses fecIR (76). The fecABCDE promoter region has binding sites for the positive regulators PdhR and Crp (34), coupling iron transport to metabolism, and the negative regulator HypT, which responds to the redox state and sulfoxidation of methionine (77).
The ferric citrate transport system is not widely distributed among the enteric bacteria. Among the E. coli isolates tested, fec genes were more commonly found among UPEC and bacteremic strains than in fecal isolates (78). The presence of the fec genes is variable in the Shigella species. S. sonnei has the Fec system, but it is rarely found in the other Shigella species (57). One isolate of S. flexneri was found to have Fec, and in this strain, the genes map to the Shigella resistance locus (SRL), a pathogenicity island that also carries multiple drug resistance genes (79). Salmonella strains typically lack the fec locus, but analysis of the genome of an S. enterica serovar Tennessee isolate revealed the fec genes in an island that also harbors the lac operon and ORFs that have homology to other metal transporters (80).

Siderophores.

Members of the Enterobacteriaceae, like many other bacteria, synthesize and secrete low-molecular-weight iron chelators (siderophores) when stressed for iron. These compounds bind iron with very high affinities and transport it back into the cell. The siderophores produced by Enterobacteriaceae fall into at least three classes: catechol, hydroxamate, and thiazoline containing (Fig. 9).
FIG 9
FIG 9 Structures of the siderophores produced by E. coli, Shigella, and Salmonella. Enterobactin and salmochelin share a catechol structure but differ in the presence of one or more glucosylations on salmochelin. Aerobactin is a hydroxamate-type siderophore, and yersiniabactin and escherichelin belong to the thiazoline class.

(i) Enterobactin.

Enterobactin (enterochelin [Ent]) is a catechol-type siderophore in which three catechols are linked to serines in a cyclic peptide (Fig. 9). This siderophore was initially identified in E. coli (81) and Salmonella (82) and was subsequently found to be widely distributed in this family. Enterobactin, like other peptide-containing siderophores, is synthesized by a nonribosomal peptide synthase from 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid (DHB) and l-serine. The biosynthetic enzymes are the products of the entABCDEFGH genes (8391). YbdZ, a small MbtH-like protein encoded downstream of fes, interacts with EntF and enhances the production of enterobactin (9294). The mature product is shunted across the cytoplasmic membrane by the enterobactin exporter EntS (P43; YbdA) (95) and finally secreted from the cell by TolC (96).
Enterobactin binds ferric iron with a very high affinity; association constant (Ka) values have been predicted to be as high as 1052 (97). The transport of the iron-siderophore complex into the cells requires a specific outer membrane receptor (FepA), a periplasmic binding protein (FepB), and the cytoplasmic membrane permease (FepCDG) (Fig. 10A). The complex of TonB, ExbB, and ExbD transduces the energy from the cytoplasmic membrane proton motive force to FepA to allow active transport across the outer membrane, and the energy for transport across the cytoplasmic membrane is produced by FepC, the ATPase component of the cytoplasmic membrane permease. In the cytoplasm, Fes, the Fe-enterobactin esterase, cleaves the enterobactin backbone, helping to release the iron from the siderophore. Release is likely aided by the reducing environment of the cytosol; enterobactin has a low affinity for ferrous iron. Linear forms of enterobactin can also be used to transport iron, and these are taken up via the outer membrane receptors Fiu (not shown) and Cir (Fig. 10A) (98, 99).
FIG 10
FIG 10 The enterobactin and salmochelin iron transport systems. (A) The proteins and their cellular locations. Apo-enterobactin is secreted from the cell via EntS and TolC. Apo-salmochelin is secreted across the cytoplasmic membrane by IroC. IroE is a periplasmic esterase that can cleave apo-salmochelin prior to secretion out of the cell. It is not known how apo-salmochelin species are secreted across the outer membrane. Fe-enterobactin is taken up by FepA, Fe-salmochelin is taken up by IroN, and linear Fe-enterobactin species enter the cell via Cir. All the catecholate siderophores are recognized by FepB and are transported via the cytoplasmic membrane FepDGC permease. In addition, Fe-salmochelin can enter the cell via IroC. Once inside the cytoplasm, Fe-enterobactin is cleaved by Fes, and Fe-salmochelin is degraded by IroD. (B) Genetics and regulation of the enterobactin biosynthesis and transport genes. The binding sites shown for Fur upstream of each transcription start site represent multiple overlapping sites at which Fur can bind at each of the sets of divergent promoters. (C) Genetics of the salmochelin system. These genes are required in addition to the enterobactin biosynthesis genes shown in panel B. The scale of the genes and regulatory sites for all operons is approximate.
Because it has such a high affinity for iron, it would be expected that enterobactin would play an important role in the acquisition of iron within the mammalian host by pathogens. However, serum albumin binds enterobactin, significantly reducing its effectiveness (100). Additionally, it was found that lipocalin-2, or NGAL (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin), tightly binds enterobactin and is bacteriostatic for E. coli under iron-limiting conditions (101103), giving rise to the alternative name siderocalin for this protein. Siderocalin is secreted by neutrophils and epithelial cells as part of the innate immune inflammatory response (104) and adds to the arsenal of antimicrobial factors produced by the host in response to infection. As might be expected, pathogens have evolved mechanisms to avoid the inhibitory effects of siderocalin. Salmonellae produce salmochelins, enterobactin molecules that are modified by the addition of 1 to 3 glucose moieties (105, 106). This reduces the affinity of enterobactin for siderocalin and promotes the virulence of S. enterica (107109).
Salmochelin synthesis and transport require the iro genes iroBCDE and iroN (110, 111) in addition to the enterobactin biosynthesis machinery genes (Fig. 10C). IroB is the glucosyltransferase that attaches the glucose moieties to enterobactin (106, 112), and IroC is involved in the secretion of salmochelins from the cell (105, 113). Salmochelins are not recognized by the enterobactin receptor FepA but require the outer membrane receptor IroN (105, 114) for transport into the cell. The uptake of salmochelin across the cytoplasmic membrane has been shown to occur through either the FepBCDG system (113) or IroC (115), which may thus function in both the export and import of salmochelin. IroD and IroE hydrolyze the siderophore (115, 116). IroD, which is found in the cytosol, prefers the ferric salmochelins as the substrate, while the periplasmic IroE cleaves the apo-siderophore to produce linear forms of the salmochelins (116).
The ent genes are organized into 6 clusters with 3 sets of divergent promoters (Fig. 10B). There are multiple binding sites for Fur in these promoter regions, and the operons are negatively regulated by iron. Similarly, there are binding sites for Fur overlapping the −10 sequences of the iroBCDE operon (117) and iroN (118) (Fig. 10C). Additional regulators tie the expression of these genes to the broader metabolism of the cell. There is a binding site for the oxygen-controlled regulator FNR between fepA and fes, and it is predicted to be a positive regulator at this site. Crp binding sites are also present in this region and in the promoter region between fepB and entC, linking expression to carbon metabolism (34). RutB, the master regulator of pyrimidine metabolism in E. coli, binds upstream of fepB with low affinity (119), but a role for RutB in fepB expression has not been established.
Posttranscriptional regulation also regulates the levels of the outer membrane receptors FepA and IroN (Fig. 10B and C). The FepA transcript has binding sites for OmrA and OmrB. These redundant sRNAs are induced by the EnvZ-OmpR two-component regulatory system, and they reduce the synthesis of FepA (120, 121). IroN is regulated by the sRNA RyhB (118). In contrast to most RyhB targets, whose synthesis is decreased by RyhB, IroN requires RyhB for synthesis.
Enterobactin is found in almost all E. coli, Shigella, and Salmonella strains, with the exception of S. flexneri and Shigella boydii (Table 1). Although the genes are present in these Shigella species, deletions, insertions, and mutations have inactivated the genes for the biosynthesis and transport of Ent. The genes for the glucosylation of enterobactin and the transport of the modified siderophore have a much more restricted distribution (Table 1). Salmochelin is found in almost all Salmonella species tested except S. bongori (114). Among Shigella species, the salmochelin locus is found in S. dysenteriae but only rarely in the other species. In E. coli, the salmochelin system has been found in APEC and UPEC strains (122, 123) but is less common among fecal isolates.

(ii) Aerobactin.

Aerobactin, a hydroxamate siderophore that consists of two residues of 6-(N-acetyl-N-hydroxy)lysine linked to citrate (Fig. 9), was first described in Aerobacter aerogenes (81). The siderophore was subsequently identified in many pathogenic E. coli and Shigella isolates (Table 1). The biosynthesis of aerobactin requires the products of the iucABCD genes (124, 125). The secretion of apo-aerobactin out of the cell is not fully understood but may involve the product of the iucA-adjacent shiF gene (126). The iutA gene encodes the outer membrane receptor that is required for aerobactin import (125, 127). Following transport across the outer membrane, iron-loaded aerobactin enters the cell via the generic hydroxamate transport system FhuBCD (128, 129) (Fig. 11).
FIG 11
FIG 11 The aerobactin transport system. (A) Components of the aerobactin system and their cellular locations. Apo-aerobactin is secreted across the cytoplasmic membrane in a process that likely involves ShiF. It is not known how aerobactin is exported across the outer membrane. IutA is the outer membrane receptor for Fe-aerobactin. The transport of Fe-aerobactin across the cytoplasmic membrane is carried out by the general hydroxamate PBP-dependent ABC transporter system FhuDBC. (B) Genetics and regulation of the aerobactin biosynthesis and transport genes. Binding sites for known repressors are shown as red boxes. The scale for the genes and regulatory regions is approximate.
Although the aerobactin genes are highly conserved, the flanking sequences and their chromosomal locations are not, indicating horizontal gene transfer (Table 1). The aerobactin operon can be plasmid borne (130, 131) or associated with pathogenicity islands (e.g., Shi2 and Shi3) (132134). The aerobactin genes have been found in most isolates of S. flexneri and S. boydii, which generally lack enterobactin production, but are rarely found in S. sonnei or S. dysenteriae. Among those species that have the genes, their locations can vary. The aerobactin-containing island in S. flexneri is found at the selC locus (133), while in S. boydii, the genes are on a distinct pathogenicity island inserted at pheV (132). Extraintestinal strains of E. coli, including UPEC, APEC, and NMEC, often carry the aerobactin operon, and studies have shown that the presence of aerobactin correlates with virulence in these strains. Among EHEC/STEC strains, the ability to synthesize or utilize aerobactin is absent from O157:H7 type strain EDL933 (135), but the iuc-iut genes are found in strains O157:H7 USDA5905 (GenBank accession number NZ_CP039837) and DEC5E (GenBank accession number NZ_CP038383.1), and they are common among non-O157:H7 EHEC strains as well (136), showing a high degree of variability, even among closely related strains. Interestingly, human isolates of both EHEC strains and K1 invasive strains typically encode either the aerobactin system or a hemolysin (which may allow access to iron from host hemoglobin) but not both (136), suggesting some functional redundancy of these systems with respect to virulence.
The expression of the aerobactin operon is repressed by Fur when iron is abundant, and there is also regulation by oxygen (17, 57). The oxygen-responsive transcription factor ArcA binds to the iuc promoter and prevents transcription when the cells are growing anaerobically (17).

(iii) Yersiniabactin.

An additional siderophore-mediated iron transport system, yersiniabactin (Ybt) (136) (Fig. 12A), has been identified in some strains of E. coli and Salmonella (138141). Yersiniabactin was first identified in Yersinia enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis (142144) and was later characterized in Y. pestis (137, 145) as part of the high-pathogenicity island (HPI). Yersiniabactin belongs to the thiazoline class of siderophores (Fig. 9), and it is synthesized by a hybrid nonribosomal peptide synthetase/polyketide synthase mechanism (146). Seven gene products are required for yersiniabactin synthesis (high-molecular-weight protein 1 [HMWP1]/Irp1, HMWP2/Irp2, YbtD, YbtE, YbtS, YbtT, and YbtU) (147). It is not known how yersiniabactin is exported from the cell. YbtX is a membrane-embedded protein with some similarity to the enterobactin exporter EntS, but a ybtX mutant is not defective in either yersiniabactin secretion or utilization, and thus, the role of YbtX in yersiniabactin-mediated iron acquisition is unclear (137) (Fig. 12A). The transport of yersiniabactin-bound iron into the cell requires the outer membrane pesticin receptor Psn (FyuA) and the cytoplasmic proteins YbtP and YbtQ (137, 148). The exact mechanism of iron uptake via YbtPQ is not clear. Although classified as an ABC transporter, the YbtPQ permease lacks certain characteristic motifs found in other iron importers, and its structure more closely resembles that of an exporter (149). In addition, a yersiniabactin-specific PBP has not been identified within the ybt locus. It may be encoded elsewhere in the genome, or the YbtPQ permease may have adapted to function without a PBP (137). A role for YbtPQ in the release of the bound metal from the siderophore and the recycling of the empty siderophore to the outside has been proposed (150). Despite these unusual features, YbtPQ is essential for iron import via yersiniabactin, whether by transporting the entire ferri-yersiniabactin complex or just the iron moiety (Fig. 12A). In addition to its role in iron transport, yersiniabactin can bind copper, and this may play a role in copper acquisition, as well as copper detoxification, in UPEC strains (150). Furthermore, yersiniabactin is important for biofilm production by UPEC; the genes are highly upregulated during urine biofilm growth, and an fyuA mutant was defective for biofilm formation (151).
FIG 12
FIG 12 The yersiniabactin transport system. (A) Components of the yersiniabactin system and their cellular locations. Apo-yersiniabactin is exported from the cell by an unknown mechanism. Fe-yersiniabactin is brought into the cell via the FyuA outer membrane receptor. A dedicated PBP for yersiniabactin has not been identified, and it is not known whether a PBP is required. Yersiniabactin-mediated iron transport across the cytoplasmic membrane requires the YbtPQ ATPase permease complex, but it is not known whether the entire siderophore complex, or just the iron, is taken up. (B) Genetics and regulation of the yersiniabactin biosynthesis and transport genes. Binding sites for known repressors are shown as red boxes. Green indicates positive regulation. The scale for the genes and regulatory regions is approximate.
The genes for yersiniabactin synthesis and transport are typically found on the HPI mobile genetic element (152). In Yersinia and some E. coli isolates, including UPEC and EAEC strains, that are positive for yersiniabactin production, the genes are within the HPI, and the island is inserted at an asn tRNA gene (153, 154). In other E. coli strains, including some APEC strains, the ybt genes are located within an island encoding another iron transporter, such as the SitABCD system (Fig. 6).
The three yersiniabactin promoters have binding sites for Fur and the AraC-like transcription factor YbtA (145, 155) (Fig. 12B). Fur represses transcription when iron is present, and YbtA activates transcription when iron is low and yersiniabactin is present in the medium. Increased gene expression dependent upon the presence of the siderophore has not been reported for the other siderophores in enteric bacteria, but there is increased transcription of psn (fyuA) when yersiniabactin is in the medium (145, 156). Regulation at the divergent ybtP-ybtA promoters appears to be more complex than that at the irp2 or fyuA promoter. In the presence of iron, Fur blocks transcription in both directions. When iron is limiting and Fur does not bind, YbtA at low concentrations activates ybtP transcription but inhibits ybtA; at higher concentrations of YbtA, transcription in both directions is repressed (157).
E. coli strains that produce yersiniabactin have been shown to produce a second product of the Ybt biosynthetic pathway (158). This compound, termed escherichelin (Fig. 9), binds Fe3+, but it is unable to supply the iron to E. coli for growth. Rather, this compound may aid E. coli in competing with other organisms in the vicinity. Escherichelin was shown to inhibit the growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by inhibiting pyochelin-mediated iron uptake (158).

(iv) Xenosiderophores.

In addition to producing their own siderophores, the enteric bacteria make receptors for siderophores produced by other organisms. This allows them to steal iron from their neighbors. One receptor commonly found in Enterobacteriaceae is FhuA, which binds the fungal siderophore ferrichrome. This TonB-dependent receptor delivers the siderophore to the periplasm, where it is transported to the cytosol by the FhuBCD PBP-dependent ABC transporter. The FhuBCD permease can transport a variety of hydroxamates, including aerobactin (Fig. 11), rhodotorulic acid, and coprogen, for use by enteric bacteria, but each of these requires a specific outer membrane receptor (128).

Heme transport.

Heme, the iron-containing tetrapyrrole found in hemoglobin and other cellular proteins, is the most abundant source of iron in the mammalian host, and it is not surprising that many pathogens have evolved to take advantage of this molecule. Many members of the Enterobacteriaceae produce hemolysins that could aid in the release of hemoglobin from red blood cells, but experimental models are needed to confirm the role of hemolysins in vivo as a mechanism for gaining access to heme in the host. Heme transporters have been characterized in S. dysenteriae and EHEC (135, 159161) (Fig. 13). The heme transport locus, designated shu in S. dysenteriae, is also present in other pathogenic E. coli strains, including EIEC, EPEC, UPEC, and NMEC (162). The heme transporter is named Chu in E. coli, but the shu and chu genes are almost identical across these organisms, and the Shu terminology is used here to indicate both. These genes are present at the same location in the genome, corresponding to 78 min on the K-12 genome, in all these strains, but there is no evidence for phage genes, insertion elements, or other sequences characteristic of horizontal transmission, and this is not a known hot spot for islands (162). Heme transport systems have been detected in other enteric pathogens that lack the shu locus, but most have not been characterized (162). One additional heme transporter, Hma, has been identified in UPEC strain CFT073 (163).
FIG 13
FIG 13 The Shu (Chu) heme transport system. (A) Components of the Shu system and their cellular locations. Heme is recognized by the ShuA (ChuA) outer membrane receptor. Following transport across the outer membrane, heme is bound by ShuT and delivered to the ShuUV cytoplasmic membrane permease. ShuS is a noncanonical heme oxygenase required for efficient heme utilization and protection against heme toxicity. ShuW, -X, and -Y facilitate the anaerobic degradation of heme. (B) Genetics and regulation of the shu biosynthesis and transport genes. The chu locus is essentially identical. Binding sites for known repressors are shown as red boxes. The scale for the genes and regulatory regions is approximate.
Shu-mediated heme transport requires the outer membrane receptor ShuA (135, 159, 160), the periplasmic binding protein ShuT (164), and the inner membrane permease proteins ShuU and ShuV (162, 165) (Fig. 13A). ShuS is a cytoplasmic heme binding protein that is required for the efficient use of heme as an iron source and for protection against heme toxicity (166, 167). In E. coli, the ShuS homolog ChuS was shown to be a noncanonical heme oxygenase (168), and the ShuW, ShuX, and ShuY homologs were shown to catalyze the anaerobic degradation of heme (169171). In addition to serving as an iron source, heme imported through the Shu transport system also provides a source of porphyrin. A hemA mutant, which lacks the ability to synthesize porphyrins, is able to use heme for growth when the Shu transport system is present (160).
There is transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of the shu operons. Fur binding sites are present in each of the four promoters (57, 160, 162, 172), blocking transcription when sufficient iron is present. Temperature regulates expression posttranscriptionally. The 5′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of the shuA and shuT transcripts contain FourU RNA thermometers (32, 172). This allows the increased synthesis of the Shu proteins at 37°C, but the FourU thermometer sequences occlude the Shine-Dalgarno sequences at lower temperatures, independent of the concentration of iron.

Roles of iron transporters in E. coli, Shigella, and Salmonella pathogenesis.

Members of the Enterobacteriaceae have multiple iron transport systems (Table 1). Some, such as the heme transporter, provide iron only in a particular environment. Others have overlap or even redundancy in their functions, making it more difficult to determine which systems are essential for growth and pathogenesis.
The least complex among these pathogens with respect to iron transport is S. flexneri 2a. Most S. flexneri 2a strains have only three iron transport systems, the ferrous iron transporters Feo and Sit and the aerobactin (Iuc) siderophore transporter (52, 173). Although genes for enterobactin synthesis and transport are present, insertions, deletions, and mutations have rendered all of the operons nonfunctional (174, 175). In S. flexneri, single, double, and triple mutants were constructed, and their growth was determined in different environments to determine which systems were needed where. The deletion of all three systems (Feo, Sit, and Iuc) prevented the growth of the bacteria in the absence of an exogenously supplied siderophore in the laboratory and within cultured cells, indicating that no other iron transport systems were present (52). Analysis of the growth of the mutants extracellularly or in the intracellular environment following invasion of human epithelial cells showed that the loss of any one of the three systems had only a small impact on growth. However, of the double mutants, only the strain that retained the sit genes was able to grow as well as the wild type in infected epithelial cells (52). Studies in a mouse model also determined that Sit was important for pathogenesis (47). In the laboratory, the strain expressing only aerobactin grew as well as the wild type in the presence of oxygen, and the strain with only Feo grew well anaerobically. Thus, outside the host cell, aerobactin provides iron in aerobic environments, and Feo provides iron when oxygen is limited, such as in the lumen of the gut. The Sit system, which is expressed in the presence of oxygen yet transports ferrous iron, is uniquely adapted to provide iron to bacteria growing within host cells. The cytosol is a reducing environment, but sufficient oxygen to induce the transcription of the sit genes is present (17, 30, 47, 57).
Interestingly, the other species of Shigella, which have the same lifestyle as S. flexneri, have differences in iron transport systems (57). All of them have the Sit system, supporting its role in the acquisition of iron during intracellular growth, but different siderophores are produced (Table 1). S. boydii produces aerobactin but not enterobactin, and S. dysenteriae type 1 produces enterobactin and salmochelin but not aerobactin. All of the Shigella isolates tested produce a siderophore, but it appears that any siderophore, rather than a specific one, is sufficient for Shigella survival.
At the other end of the spectrum are the extraintestinal pathogenic E. coli (ExPEC) strains, which include UPEC and bacteremic strains (Table 1). In addition to the Feo, Sit, and Efe systems for ferrous iron transport, UPEC strain CFT073 encodes at least 14 different TonB-dependent outer membrane receptors (176), and TonB dependent iron transport is required for virulence and infection of the kidney in a mouse model of urinary tract infection (177). The requirement for TonB was at least in part due to the need for siderophore transport, as an iuc ent double mutant also had reduced infectivity compared to the wild type (177). The production of aerobactin, in addition to enterobactin, may provide an advantage at sites of inflammation or in the circulation since aerobactin is not bound by siderocalin. Heme transport is also important for the virulence of UPEC. Strain CFT073, a well-characterized UPEC strain, has two heme receptors, ChuA (177) and Hma (163), both of which are required for virulence. In competition assays with the wild-type strain, the chuA mutant had a greater defect in kidney colonization than the hma mutant, which may be explained by the higher level of expression of chuA than of hma in vivo (163).
Among the Salmonella strains, the enterobactin system is important for the growth of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in monocytes (178). Both an enterobactin biosynthesis mutant and a tonB mutant, which is defective for enterobactin transport, have restricted growth in a human monocyte cell line compared to the wild-type parental strain. In contrast, a tonB mutant of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium was unaffected for growth in epithelial or macrophage-like cells, and there was no attenuation of the mutant for mice infected by the intraperitoneal route (179). The tonB mutant was attenuated for infection of mice by the intragastric route, indicating that TonB-dependent receptors, likely siderophore receptors, were required for iron acquisition during infection of the intestinal tract and invasion from this site. Subsequent studies have shown that siderophore synthesis and transport, specifically the salmochelin system, confer a growth advantage to Salmonella in the inflamed intestine (108). Mutation of iroN, the salmochelin receptor, resulted in a competitive disadvantage for S. enterica serovar Typhimurium in the intestine, but the wild type had no advantage over the mutant in lipocalin-2 (siderocalin)-deficient mice (108). Thus, Salmonella infection, which causes inflammation of the intestine, leads to increases in the local levels of siderocalin and the binding of enterobactin produced by bacteria in the gut; S. enterica serovar Typhimurium can glycosylate and linearize enterobactin to form salmochelin, against which siderocalin is ineffective in preventing iron transport.
A role for ferrous iron transport via Feo in enteric bacteria is less clear. An feo mutant of E. coli K-12 was defective in colonizing the mouse intestine (180), and an S. enterica serovar Typhimurium feoB mutant was outcompeted by the wild type in the mouse intestine in a competition assay (179). However, the Salmonella feoB mutant was as lethal as the wild type following oral or intraperitoneal inoculation of mice (179).
The large number and variety of iron transport systems in these pathogens contribute to their ability to survive in multiple environments in the host: the lumen of the gut, the intracellular environment, the bloodstream, and cerebrospinal fluid. The abilities to use heme iron, acquire intracellular ferrous iron via Sit, modify enterobactin to salmochelin to evade its capture by lipocalin, and produce additional siderophores allow these bacteria to rapidly adapt to the different niches that they encounter in the host. The fact that most of these systems are on pathogenicity islands and have characteristics of horizontally transmitted genes suggests that there is continual evolution of these host-associated species, and the bacteria hold the upper hand in the battle for iron within the host.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Some of the work reported in this review was supported by grants AI016935 and AI091957 to S.M.P. from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
Figures were prepared in part with BioRender.
We thank Carolyn Fisher for expert editorial assistance.

REFERENCES

1.
Andrews SC, Robinson AK, Rodríguez-Quiñones F. 2003. Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:215–237.
2.
Wooldridge KG, Williams PH. 1993. Iron uptake mechanisms of pathogenic bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 12:325–348.
3.
Hantke K. 1981. Regulation of ferric iron transport in Escherichia coli K12: isolation of a constitutive mutant. Mol Gen Genet 182:288–292.
4.
Escolar L, Pérez-Martín J, de Lorenzo V. 1999. Opening the iron box: transcriptional metalloregulation by the Fur protein. J Bacteriol 181:6223–6229.
5.
Masse E, Vanderpool CK, Gottesman S. 2005. Effect of RyhB small RNA on global iron use in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 187:6962–6971.
6.
Martin JE, Imlay JA. 2011. The alternative aerobic ribonucleotide reductase of Escherichia coli, NrdEF, is a manganese-dependent enzyme that enables cell replication during periods of iron starvation. Mol Microbiol 80:319–334.
7.
Bullen JJ, Rogers HJ, Spalding PB, Ward CG. 2006. Natural resistance, iron and infection: a challenge for clinical medicine. J Med Microbiol 55:251–258.
8.
Payne SM, Mey AR. 2004. Pathogenic Escherichia coli, Shigella, and Salmonella, p 199–218. In Crosa JH, Mey AR, Payne SM (ed), Iron transport in bacteria. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
9.
Postle K, Larsen RA. 2007. TonB-dependent energy transduction between outer and cytoplasmic membranes. Biometals 20:453–465.
10.
Hantke K. 1984. Cloning of the repressor protein gene of iron-regulated systems in Escherichia coli K12. Mol Gen Genet 197:337–341.
11.
Pecqueur L, D’Autréaux B, Dupuy J, Nicolet Y, Jacquamet L, Brutscher B, Michaud-Soret I, Bersch B. 2006. Structural changes of Escherichia coli ferric uptake regulator during metal-dependent dimerization and activation explored by NMR and X-ray crystallography. J Biol Chem 281:21286–21295.
12.
Fontenot CR, Tasnim H, Valdes KA, Popescu CV, Ding H. 2020. Ferric uptake regulator (Fur) reversibly binds a [2Fe-2S] cluster to sense intracellular iron homeostasis in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 295:15454–15463.
13.
Nandal A, Huggins CCO, Woodhall MR, McHugh J, Rodríguez‐Quiñones F, Quail MA, Guest JR, Andrews SC. 2010. Induction of the ferritin gene (ftnA) of Escherichia coli by Fe2+-Fur is mediated by reversal of H‐NS silencing and is RyhB independent. Mol Microbiol 75:637–657.
14.
de Lorenzo V, Wee S, Herrero M, Neilands JB. 1987. Operator sequences of the aerobactin operon of plasmid ColV-K30 binding the ferric uptake regulation (fur) repressor. J Bacteriol 169:2624–2630.
15.
De Lorenzo V, Herrero M, Giovannini F, Neilands JB. 1988. Fur (ferric uptake regulation) protein and CAP (catabolite-activator protein) modulate transcription of fur gene in Escherichia coli. Eur J Biochem 173:537–546.
16.
Zheng M, Doan B, Schneider TD, Storz G. 1999. OxyR and SoxRS regulation of fur. J Bacteriol 181:4639–4643.
17.
Boulette ML, Payne SM. 2007. Anaerobic regulation of Shigella flexneri virulence: ArcA regulates Fur and iron acquisition genes. J Bacteriol 189:6957–6967.
18.
Calderwood SB, Mekalanos JJ. 1988. Confirmation of the Fur operator site by insertion of a synthetic oligonucleotide into an operon fusion plasmid. J Bacteriol 170:1015–1017.
19.
Escolar L, Pérez-Martín J, de Lorenzo V. 1998. Binding of the fur (ferric uptake regulator) repressor of Escherichia coli to arrays of the GATAAT sequence. J Mol Biol 283:537–547.
20.
Lavrrar JL, Christoffersen CA, McIntosh MA. 2002. Fur-DNA interactions at the bidirectional fepDGC-entS promoter region in Escherichia coli. J Mol Biol 322:983–995.
21.
Seo SW, Kim D, Latif H, O’Brien EJ, Szubin R, Palsson BO. 2014. Deciphering Fur transcriptional regulatory network highlights its complex role beyond iron metabolism in Escherichia coli. Nat Commun 5:4910.
22.
Teixidó L, Carrasco B, Alonso JC, Barbé J, Campoy S. 2011. Fur activates the expression of Salmonella enterica pathogenicity island 1 by directly interacting with the hilD operator in vivo and in vitro. PLoS One 6:e19711.
23.
Ellermeier JR, Slauch JM. 2008. Fur regulates expression of the Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 type III secretion system through HilD. J Bacteriol 190:476–486.
24.
Massé E, Gottesman S. 2002. A small RNA regulates the expression of genes involved in iron metabolism in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:4620–4625.
25.
Večerek B, Moll I, Bläsi U. 2007. Control of Fur synthesis by the non-coding RNA RyhB and iron-responsive decoding. EMBO J 26:965–975.
26.
Kim JN, Kwon YM. 2013. Genetic and phenotypic characterization of the RyhB regulon in Salmonella typhimurium. Microbiol Res 168:41–49.
27.
Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. 2004. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:123–140.
28.
Beauchene NA, Mettert EL, Moore LJ, Keleş S, Willey ER, Kiley PJ. 2017. O2 availability impacts iron homeostasis in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:12261–12266.
29.
Marteyn B, West NP, Browning DF, Cole JA, Shaw JG, Palm F, Mounier J, Prévost M-C, Sansonetti P, Tang CM. 2010. Modulation of Shigella virulence in response to available oxygen in vivo. Nature 465:355–358.
30.
Runyen-Janecky LJ, Payne SM. 2002. Identification of chromosomal Shigella flexneri genes induced by the eukaryotic intracellular environment. Infect Immun 70:4379–4388.
31.
Carpenter C, Payne SM. 2014. Regulation of iron transport systems in Enterobacteriaceae in response to oxygen and iron availability. J Inorg Biochem 133:110–117.
32.
Kouse AB, Righetti F, Kortmann J, Narberhaus F, Murphy ER. 2013. RNA-mediated thermoregulation of iron-acquisition genes in Shigella dysenteriae and pathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS One 8:e63781.
33.
White-Ziegler CA, Malhowski AJ, Young S. 2007. Human body temperature (37°C) increases the expression of iron, carbohydrate, and amino acid utilization genes in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 189:5429–5440.
34.
Zhang Z, Gosset G, Barabote R, Gonzalez CS, Cuevas WA, Saier MH. 2005. Functional interactions between the carbon and iron utilization regulators, Crp and Fur, in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 187:980–990.
35.
Kammler M, Schon C, Hantke K. 1993. Characterization of the ferrous iron uptake system of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 175:6212–6219.
36.
Hantke K. 1987. Ferrous iron transport mutants in Escherichia coli K12. FEMS Microbiol Lett 44:53–57.
37.
Marlovits TC, Haase W, Herrmann C, Aller SG, Unger VM. 2002. The membrane protein FeoB contains an intramolecular G protein essential for Fe(II) uptake in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:16243–16248.
38.
Cartron ML, Maddocks S, Gillingham P, Craven CJ, Andrews SC. 2006. Feo—transport of ferrous iron into bacteria. Biometals 19:143–157.
39.
Stevenson B, Wyckoff EE, Payne SM. 2016. Vibrio cholerae FeoA, FeoB, and FeoC interact to form a complex. J Bacteriol 198:1160–1170.
40.
Hsueh K-L, Yu L-K, Chen Y-H, Cheng Y-H, Hsieh Y-C, Ke S, Hung K-W, Chen C-J, Huang T. 2013. FeoC from Klebsiella pneumoniae contains a [4Fe-4S] cluster. J Bacteriol 195:4726–4734.
41.
Guo J, Nair MKM, Galván EM, Liu S-L, Schifferli DM. 2011. Tn5AraOut mutagenesis for the identification of Yersinia pestis genes involved in resistance towards cationic antimicrobial peptides. Microb Pathog 51:121–132.
42.
Fetherston JD, Mier I, Truszczynska H, Perry RD. 2012. The Yfe and Feo transporters are involved in microaerobic growth and virulence of Yersinia pestis in bubonic plague. Infect Immun 80:3880–3891.
43.
Weaver EA, Wyckoff EE, Mey AR, Morrison R, Payne SM. 2013. FeoA and FeoC are essential components of the Vibrio cholerae ferrous iron uptake system, and FeoC interacts with FeoB. J Bacteriol 195:4826–4835.
44.
Kim H, Lee H, Shin D. 2015. Lon-mediated proteolysis of the FeoC protein prevents Salmonella enterica from accumulating the Fe(II) transporter FeoB under high-oxygen conditions. J Bacteriol 197:92–98.
45.
Gerken H, Vuong P, Soparkar K, Misra R. 2020. Roles of the EnvZ/OmpR two-component system and porins in iron acquisition in Escherichia coli. mBio 11:e01192-20.
46.
Zhou D, Hardt WD, Galán JE. 1999. Salmonella typhimurium encodes a putative iron transport system within the centisome 63 pathogenicity island. Infect Immun 67:1974–1981.
47.
Fisher CR, Davies NMLL, Wyckoff EE, Feng Z, Oaks EV, Payne SM. 2009. Genetics and virulence association of the Shigella flexneri sit iron transport system. Infect Immun 77:1992–1999.
48.
Runyen-Janecky L, Dazenski E, Hawkins S, Warner L. 2006. Role and regulation of the Shigella flexneri Sit and MntH systems. Infect Immun 74:4666–4672.
49.
Janakiraman A, Slauch JM. 2000. The putative iron transport system SitABCD encoded on SPI1 is required for full virulence of Salmonella typhimurium. Mol Microbiol 35:1146–1155.
50.
Kehres DG, Janakiraman A, Slauch JM, Maguire ME. 2002. SitABCD is the alkaline Mn2+ transporter of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Bacteriol 184:3159–3166.
51.
Ikeda JS, Janakiraman A, Kehres DG, Maguire ME, Slauch JM. 2005. Transcriptional regulation of sitABCD of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by MntR and Fur. J Bacteriol 187:912–922.
52.
Runyen-Janecky LJ, Reeves SA, Gonzales EG, Payne SM. 2003. Contribution of the Shigella flexneri Sit, Iuc, and Feo iron acquisition systems to iron acquisition in vitro and in cultured cells. Infect Immun 71:1919–1928.
53.
Bearden SW, Perry RD. 1999. The Yfe system of Yersinia pestis transports iron and manganese and is required for full virulence of plague. Mol Microbiol 32:403–414.
54.
Desvaux M, Dalmasso G, Beyrouthy R, Barnich N, Delmas J, Bonnet R. 2020. Pathogenicity factors of genomic islands in intestinal and extraintestinal Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol 11:2065.
55.
Snyder JA, Haugen BJ, Buckles EL, Lockatell CV, Johnson DE, Donnenberg MS, Welch RA, Mobley HLT. 2004. Transcriptome of uropathogenic Escherichia coli during urinary tract infection. Infect Immun 72:6373–6381.
56.
Sabri M, Léveillé S, Dozois CMY. 2006. A SitABCD homologue from an avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strain mediates transport of iron and manganese and resistance to hydrogen peroxide. Microbiology (Reading) 152:745–758.
57.
Wyckoff EE, Boulette ML, Payne SM. 2009. Genetics and environmental regulation of Shigella iron transport systems. Biometals 22:43–51.
58.
Fricke WF, Wright MS, Lindell AH, Harkins DM, Baker-Austin C, Ravel J, Stepanauskas R. 2008. Insights into the environmental resistance gene pool from the genome sequence of the multidrug-resistant environmental isolate Escherichia coli SMS-3-5. J Bacteriol 190:6779–6794.
59.
Johnson TJ, Nolan LK. 2009. Pathogenomics of the virulence plasmids of Escherichia coli. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 73:750–774.
60.
Reigstad CS, Hultgren SJ, Gordon JI. 2007. Functional genomic studies of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and host urothelial cells when intracellular bacterial communities are assembled. J Biol Chem 282:21259–21267.
61.
Zaharik ML, Cullen VL, Fung AM, Libby SJ, Kujat Choy SL, Coburn B, Kehres DG, Maguire ME, Fang FC, Finlay BB. 2004. The Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium divalent cation transport systems MntH and SitABCD are essential for virulence in an Nramp1G169 murine typhoid model. Infect Immun 72:5522–5525.
62.
Große C, Scherer J, Koch D, Otto M, Taudte N, Grass G. 2006. A new ferrous iron-uptake transporter, EfeU (YcdN), from Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 62:120–131.
63.
Cao J, Woodhall MR, Alvarez J, Cartron ML, Andrews SC. 2007. EfeUOB (YcdNOB) is a tripartite, acid-induced and CpxAR-regulated, low-pH Fe2+ transporter that is cryptic in Escherichia coli K-12 but functional in E. coli O157:H7. Mol Microbiol 65:857–875.
64.
Wei Y, Murphy ER. 2016. Shigella iron acquisition systems and their regulation. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 6:18.
65.
Pieper R, Huang S-T, Parmar PP, Clark DJ, Alami H, Fleischmann RD, Perry RD, Peterson SN. 2010. Proteomic analysis of iron acquisition, metabolic and regulatory responses of Yersinia pestis to iron starvation. BMC Microbiol 10:30.
66.
Giner-Lamia J, Vinuesa P, Betancor L, Silva C, Bisio J, Soleto L, Chabalgoity JA, Puente JL, Salmonella CYTED Network, García-Del Portillo F. 2019. Genome analysis of Salmonella enterica subsp. diarizonae isolates from invasive human infections reveals enrichment of virulence-related functions in lineage ST1256. BMC Genomics 20:99.
67.
Rajasekaran MB, Nilapwar S, Andrews SC, Watson KA. 2010. EfeO-cupredoxins: major new members of the cupredoxin superfamily with roles in bacterial iron transport. Biometals 23:1–17.
68.
Liu X, Du Q, Wang Z, Zhu D, Huang Y, Li N, Wei T, Xu S, Gu L. 2011. Crystal structure and biochemical features of EfeB/YcdB from Escherichia coli O157. J Biol Chem 286:14922–14931.
69.
Létoffé S, Heuck G, Delepelaire P, Lange N, Wandersman C. 2009. Bacteria capture iron from heme by keeping tetrapyrrol skeleton intact. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:11719–11724.
70.
McHugh JP, Rodríguez-Quinoñes F, Abdul-Tehrani H, Svistunenko DA, Poole RK, Cooper CE, Andrews SC. 2003. Global iron-dependent gene regulation in Escherichia coli. A new mechanism for iron homeostasis. J Biol Chem 278:29478–29486.
71.
Frost GE, Rosenberg H. 1973. The inducible citrate-dependent iron transport system in Escherichia coli K12. Biochim Biophys Acta 330:90–101.
72.
Enz S, Brand H, Orellana C, Mahren S, Braun V. 2003. Sites of interaction between the FecA and FecR signal transduction proteins of ferric citrate transport in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 185:3745–3752.
73.
Mahren S, Braun V. 2003. The FecI extracytoplasmic-function sigma factor of Escherichia coli interacts with the β′ subunit of RNA polymerase. J Bacteriol 185:1796–1802.
74.
Kim I, Stiefel A, Plantör S, Angerer A, Braun V. 1997. Transcription induction of the ferric citrate transport genes via the N-terminus of the FecA outer membrane protein, the Ton system and the electrochemical potential of the cytoplasmic membrane. Mol Microbiol 23:333–344.
75.
Angerer A, Braun V. 1998. Iron regulates transcription of the Escherichia coli ferric citrate transport genes directly and through the transcription initiation proteins. Arch Microbiol 169:483–490.
76.
Curran TD, Abacha F, Hibberd SP, Rolfe MD, Lacey MM, Green J. 2017. Identification of new members of the Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 SlyA regulon. Microbiology (Reading) 163:400–409.
77.
Varatnitskaya M, Degrossoli A, Leichert LI. 2021. Redox regulation in host-pathogen interactions: thiol switches and beyond. Biol Chem 402:299–316.
78.
Huang W-C, Wong M-Y, Wang S-H, Hashimoto M, Lin M-H, Lee M-F, Wu J-J, Wang M-C, Lin W-H, Jeng S-L, Wang J-L, Chen Y-L, Teng C-H. 2021. The ferric citrate uptake system encoded in a novel blaCTX-M-3- and blaTEM-1-harboring conjugative plasmid contributes to the virulence of Escherichia coli. Front Microbiol 12:667782.
79.
Luck SN, Turner SA, Rajakumar K, Sakellaris H, Adler B. 2001. Ferric dicitrate transport system (Fec) of Shigella flexneri 2a YSH6000 is encoded on a novel pathogenicity island carrying multiple antibiotic resistance genes. Infect Immun 69:6012–6021.
80.
Binet R, Pettengill EA, Hoffmann M, Hammack TS, Monday SR. 2018. Construction of stable fluorescent laboratory control strains for several food safety relevant Enterobacteriaceae. Food Microbiol 76:553–563.
81.
Gibson F, Magrath DI. 1969. The isolation and characterization of a hydroxamic acid (aerobactin) formed by Aerobacter aerogenes 62-I. Biochim Biophys Acta 192:175–184.
82.
Pollack JR, Neilands JB. 1970. Enterobactin, an iron transport compound from Salmonella typhimurium. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 38:989–992.
83.
Walsh CT, Marshall G. 2004. Siderophore biosynthesis in bacteria, p 18–37. In Crosa JH, Mey AR, Payne SM (ed), Iron transport in bacteria. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
84.
Walsh CT, Liu J, Rusnak F, Sakaitani M. 1990. Molecular studies on enzymes in chorismate metabolism and the enterobactin biosynthetic pathway. Chem Rev 90:1105–1129.
85.
Crosa JH, Walsh CT. 2002. Genetics and assembly line enzymology of siderophore biosynthesis in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:223–249.
86.
Gehring AM, Bradley KA, Walsh CT. 1997. Enterobactin biosynthesis in Escherichia coli: isochorismate lyase (EntB) is a bifunctional enzyme that is phosphopantetheinylated by EntD and then acylated by EntE using ATP and 2,3-dihydroxybenzoate. Biochemistry 36:8495–8503.
87.
Rusnak F, Sakaitani M, Drueckhammer D, Reichert J, Walsh CT. 1991. Biosynthesis of the Escherichia coli siderophore enterobactin: sequence of the entF gene, expression and purification of EntF, and analysis of covalent phosphopantetheine. Biochemistry 30:2916–2927.
88.
Chenault SS, Earhart CF. 1991. Organization of genes encoding membrane proteins of the Escherichia coli ferrienterobactin permease. Mol Microbiol 5:1405–1413.
89.
Nahlik MS, Fleming TP, McIntosh MA. 1987. Cluster of genes controlling synthesis and activation of 2,3-dihydroxybenzoic acid in production of enterobactin in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 169:4163–4170.
90.
Ozenberger BA, Brickman TJ, McIntosh MA. 1989. Nucleotide sequence of Escherichia coli isochorismate synthetase gene entC and evolutionary relationship of isochorismate synthetase and other chorismate-utilizing enzymes. J Bacteriol 171:775–783.
91.
Raymond KN, Dertz EA, Kim SS. 2003. Enterobactin: an archetype for microbial iron transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:3584–3588.
92.
Schomer RA, Thomas MG. 2017. Characterization of the functional variance in MbtH-like protein interactions with a nonribosomal peptide synthetase. Biochemistry 56:5380–5390.
93.
Felnagle EA, Barkei JJ, Park H, Podevels AM, McMahon MD, Drott DW, Thomas MG. 2010. MbtH-like proteins as integral components of bacterial nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Biochemistry 49:8815–8817.
94.
Schomer RA, Park H, Barkei JJ, Thomas MG. 2018. Alanine scanning of YbdZ, an MbtH-like protein, reveals essential residues for functional interactions with its nonribosomal peptide synthetase partner EntF. Biochemistry 57:4125–4134.
95.
Furrer JL, Sanders DN, Hook-Barnard IG, McIntosh MA. 2002. Export of the siderophore enterobactin in Escherichia coli: involvement of a 43 kDa membrane exporter. Mol Microbiol 44:1225–1234.
96.
Bleuel C, Grosse C, Taudte N, Scherer J, Wesenberg D, Krauss GJ, Nies DH, Grass G. 2005. TolC is involved in enterobactin efflux across the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 187:6701–6707.
97.
Carrano CJ, Raymond KN. 1979. Ferric ion sequestering agents. 2. Kinetics and mechanism of iron removal from transferrin by enterobactin and synthetic tricatechols. J Am Chem Soc 101:5401–5404.
98.
Hantke K. 1990. Dihydroxybenzoylserine—a siderophore for E. coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 55:5–8.
99.
Nikaido H, Rosenberg EY. 1990. Cir and Fiu proteins in the outer membrane of Escherichia coli catalyze transport of monomeric catechols: study with beta-lactam antibiotics containing catechol and analogous groups. J Bacteriol 172:1361–1367.
100.
Konopka K, Neilands JB. 1984. Effect of serum albumin on siderophore-mediated utilization of transferrin iron. Biochemistry 23:2122–2127.
101.
Goetz DH, Holmes MA, Borregaard N, Bluhm ME, Raymond KN, Strong RK. 2002. The neutrophil lipocalin NGAL is a bacteriostatic agent that interferes with siderophore-mediated iron acquisition. Mol Cell 10:1033–1043.
102.
Abergel RJ, Clifton MC, Pizarro JC, Warner JA, Shuh DK, Strong RK, Raymond KN. 2008. The siderocalin/enterobactin interaction: a link between mammalian immunity and bacterial iron transport. J Am Chem Soc 130:11524–11534.
103.
Flo TH, Smith KD, Sato S, Rodriguez DJ, Holmes MA, Strong RK, Akira S, Aderem A. 2004. Lipocalin 2 mediates an innate immune response to bacterial infection by sequestrating iron. Nature 432:917–921.
104.
Kjeldsen L, Cowland JB, Borregaard N. 2000. Human neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and homologous proteins in rat and mouse. Biochim Biophys Acta 1482:272–283.
105.
Hantke K, Nicholson G, Rabsch W, Winkelmann G. 2003. Salmochelins, siderophores of Salmonella enterica and uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, are recognized by the outer membrane receptor IroN. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:3677–3682.
106.
Bister B, Bischoff D, Nicholson GJ, Valdebenito M, Schneider K, Winkelmann G, Hantke K, Süssmuth RD. 2004. The structure of salmochelins: C-glucosylated enterobactins of Salmonella enterica. Biometals 17:471–481.
107.
Fischbach MA, Lin H, Zhou L, Yu Y, Abergel RJ, Liu DR, Raymond KN, Wanner BL, Strong RK, Walsh CT, Aderem A, Smith KD. 2006. The pathogen-associated iroA gene cluster mediates bacterial evasion of lipocalin 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:16502–16507.
108.
Raffatellu M, George MD, Akiyama Y, Hornsby MJ, Nuccio S-P, Paixao TA, Butler BP, Chu H, Santos RL, Berger T, Mak TW, Tsolis RM, Bevins CL, Solnick JV, Dandekar S, Bäumler AJ. 2009. Lipocalin-2 resistance of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium confers an advantage during life in the inflamed intestine. Cell Host Microbe 5:476–486.
109.
Valdebenito M, Müller SI, Hantke K. 2007. Special conditions allow binding of the siderophore salmochelin to siderocalin (NGAL-lipocalin). FEMS Microbiol Lett 277:182–187.
110.
Bäumler AJ, Tsolis RM, van der Velden AWM, Stojiljkovic I, Anic S, Heffron F. 1996. Identification of a new iron regulated locus of Salmonella typhi. Gene 183:207–213.
111.
Müller SI, Valdebenito M, Hantke K. 2009. Salmochelin, the long-overlooked catecholate siderophore of Salmonella. Biometals 22:691–695.
112.
Fischbach MA, Lin H, Liu DR, Walsh CT. 2005. In vitro characterization of IroB, a pathogen-associated C-glycosyltransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:571–576.
113.
Crouch M-LV, Castor M, Karlinsey JE, Kalhorn T, Fang FC. 2008. Biosynthesis and IroC-dependent export of the siderophore salmochelin are essential for virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Mol Microbiol 67:971–983.
114.
Bäumler AJ, Norris TL, Lasco T, Voight W, Reissbrodt R, Rabsch W, Heffron F. 1998. IroN, a novel outer membrane siderophore receptor characteristic of Salmonella enterica. J Bacteriol 180:1446–1453.
115.
Zhu M, Valdebenito M, Winkelmann G, Hantke K. 2005. Functions of the siderophore esterases IroD and IroE in iron-salmochelin utilization. Microbiology (Reading) 151:2363–2372.
116.
Lin H, Fischbach MA, Liu DR, Walsh CT. 2005. In vitro characterization of salmochelin and enterobactin trilactone hydrolases IroD, IroE, and Fes. J Am Chem Soc 127:11075–11084.
117.
Lim D, Kim K, Song M, Jeong J-H, Chang JH, Kim SR, Hong C, Im S-S, Park S-H, Lee JC, Shin M. 2020. Transcriptional regulation of salmochelin glucosyltransferase by Fur in Salmonella. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 529:70–76.
118.
Balbontín R, Villagra N, Pardos de la Gándara M, Mora G, Figueroa-Bossi N, Bossi L. 2016. Expression of IroN, the salmochelin siderophore receptor, requires mRNA activation by RyhB small RNA homologues. Mol Microbiol 100:139–155.
119.
Shimada T, Ishihama A, Busby SJW, Grainger DC. 2008. The Escherichia coli RutR transcription factor binds at targets within genes as well as intergenic regions. Nucleic Acids Res 36:3950–3955.
120.
Guillier M, Gottesman S. 2008. The 5′ end of two redundant sRNAs is involved in the regulation of multiple targets, including their own regulator. Nucleic Acids Res 36:6781–6794.
121.
Guillier M, Gottesman S. 2006. Remodelling of the Escherichia coli outer membrane by two small regulatory RNAs. Mol Microbiol 59:231–247.
122.
Johnson JR, Russo TA, Tarr PI, Carlino U, Bilge SS, Vary JC, Stell AL. 2000. Molecular epidemiological and phylogenetic associations of two novel putative virulence genes, iha and iroNE.coli, among Escherichia coli isolates from patients with urosepsis. Infect Immun 68:3040–3047.
123.
Gao Q, Wang X, Xu H, Xu Y, Ling J, Zhang D, Gao S, Liu X. 2012. Roles of iron acquisition systems in virulence of extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli: salmochelin and aerobactin contribute more to virulence than heme in a chicken infection model. BMC Microbiol 12:143.
124.
Gross R, Engelbrecht F, Braun V. 1985. Identification of the genes and their polypeptide products responsible for aerobactin synthesis by pColV plasmids. Mol Gen Genet 201:204–212.
125.
de Lorenzo V, Bindereif A, Paw BH, Neilands JB. 1986. Aerobactin biosynthesis and transport genes of plasmid ColV-K30 in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 165:570–578.
126.
Genuini M, Bidet P, Benoist J-F, Schlemmer D, Lemaitre C, Birgy A, Bonacorsi S. 2019. ShiF acts as an auxiliary factor of aerobactin secretion in meningitis Escherichia coli strain S88. BMC Microbiol 19:298.
127.
Bindereif A, Braun V, Hantke K. 1982. The cloacin receptor of ColV-bearing Escherichia coli is part of the Fe3+-aerobactin transport system. J Bacteriol 150:1472–1475.
128.
Fecker L, Braun V. 1983. Cloning and expression of the fhu genes involved in iron(III)-hydroxamate uptake by Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 156:1301–1314.
129.
Braun V, Gross R, Köster W, Zimmermann L. 1983. Plasmid and chromosomal mutants in the iron(III)-aerobactin transport system of Escherichia coli. Use of streptonigrin for selection. Mol Gen Genet 192:131–139.
130.
Williams PH. 1979. Novel iron uptake system specified by ColV plasmids: an important component in the virulence of invasive strains of Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 26:925–932.
131.
Colonna B, Nicoletti M, Visca P, Casalino M, Valenti P, Maimone F. 1985. Composite IS1 elements encoding hydroxamate-mediated iron uptake in FIme plasmids from epidemic Salmonella spp. J Bacteriol 162:307–316.
132.
Purdy GE, Payne SM. 2001. The SHI-3 iron transport island of Shigella boydii 0-1392 carries the genes for aerobactin synthesis and transport. J Bacteriol 183:4176–4182.
133.
Vokes SA, Reeves SA, Torres AG, Payne SM. 1999. The aerobactin iron transport system genes in Shigella flexneri are present within a pathogenicity island. Mol Microbiol 33:63–73.
134.
Moss JE, Cardozo TJ, Zychlinsky A, Groisman EA. 1999. The selC-associated SHI-2 pathogenicity island of Shigella flexneri. Mol Microbiol 33:74–83.
135.
Torres AG, Payne SM. 1997. Haem iron-transport system in enterohaemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157:H7. Mol Microbiol 23:825–833.
136.
Welinder-Olsson C, Kaijser B. 2005. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC). Scand J Infect Dis 37:405–416.
137.
Perry RD, Fetherston JD. 2011. Yersiniabactin iron uptake: mechanisms and role in Yersinia pestis pathogenesis. Microbes Infect 13:808–817.
138.
Dogan B, Suzuki H, Herlekar D, Sartor RB, Campbell BJ, Roberts CL, Stewart K, Scherl EJ, Araz Y, Bitar PP, Lefébure T, Chandler B, Schukken YH, Stanhope MJ, Simpson KW. 2014. Inflammation-associated adherent-invasive Escherichia coli are enriched in pathways for use of propanediol and iron and M-cell translocation. Inflamm Bowel Dis 20:1919–1932.
139.
Oelschlaeger TA, Zhang D, Schubert S, Carniel E, Rabsch W, Karch H, Hacker J. 2003. The high-pathogenicity island is absent in human pathogens of Salmonella enterica subspecies I but present in isolates of subspecies III and VI. J Bacteriol 185:1107–1111.
140.
Hu J, Kan B, Liu Z-H, Yu S-Y. 2005. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli isolated from Chinese diarrhea patients with high-pathogenicity island of Yersinia is involved in synthesis of siderophore yersiniabactin. World J Gastroenterol 11:5816–5820.
141.
Ellermann M, Gharaibeh RZ, Fulbright L, Dogan B, Moore LN, Broberg CA, Lopez LR, Rothemich AM, Herzog JW, Rogala A, Gordon IO, Rieder F, Brouwer CR, Simpson KW, Jobin C, Sartor RB, Arthur JC. 2019. Yersiniabactin-producing adherent/invasive Escherichia coli promotes inflammation-associated fibrosis in gnotobiotic Il10−/− mice. Infect Immun 87:e00587-19.
142.
Heesemann J. 1987. Chromosomal-encoded siderophores are required for mouse virulence of enteropathogenic Yersinia species. FEMS Microbiol Lett 48:229–233.
143.
Heesemann J, Hantke K, Vocke T, Saken E, Rakin A, Stojiljkovic I, Berner R. 1993. Virulence of Yersinia enterocolitica is closely associated with siderophore production, expression of an iron-repressible outer membrane polypeptide of 65,000 Da and pesticin sensitivity. Mol Microbiol 8:397–408.
144.
Chambers CE, McIntyre DD, Mouck M, Sokol PA. 1996. Physical and structural characterization of yersiniophore, a siderophore produced by clinical isolates of Yersinia enterocolitica. Biometals 9:157–167.
145.
Perry RD, Balbo PB, Jones HA, Fetherston JD, DeMoll E. 1999. Yersiniabactin from Yersinia pestis: biochemical characterization of the siderophore and its role in iron transport and regulation. Microbiology (Reading) 145(Part 5):1181–1190.
146.
Miller DA, Luo L, Hillson N, Keating TA, Walsh CT. 2002. Yersiniabactin synthetase: a four-protein assembly line producing the nonribosomal peptide/polyketide hybrid siderophore of Yersinia pestis. Chem Biol 9:333–344.
147.
Haag H, Hantke K, Drechsel H, Stojiljkovic I, Jung G, Zähner H. 1993. Purification of yersiniabactin: a siderophore and possible virulence factor of Yersinia enterocolitica. J Gen Microbiol 139:2159–2165.
148.
Fetherston JD, Bertolino VJ, Perry RD. 1999. YbtP and YbtQ: two ABC transporters required for iron uptake in Yersinia pestis. Mol Microbiol 32:289–299.
149.
Wang Z, Hu W, Zheng H. 2020. Pathogenic siderophore ABC importer YbtPQ adopts a surprising fold of exporter. Sci Adv 6:eaay7997.
150.
Koh E-I, Robinson AE, Bandara N, Rogers BE, Henderson JP. 2017. Copper import in Escherichia coli by the yersiniabactin metallophore system. Nat Chem Biol 13:1016–1021.
151.
Hancock V, Ferrières L, Klemm P. 2008. The ferric yersiniabactin uptake receptor FyuA is required for efficient biofilm formation by urinary tract infectious Escherichia coli in human urine. Microbiology (Reading) 154:167–175.
152.
Schubert S, Rakin A, Heesemann J. 2004. The Yersinia high-pathogenicity island (HPI): evolutionary and functional aspects. Int J Med Microbiol 294:83–94.
153.
Bach S, de Almeida A, Carniel E. 2000. The Yersinia high-pathogenicity island is present in different members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 183:289–294.
154.
Schubert S, Rakin A, Fischer D, Sorsa J, Heesemann J. 1999. Characterization of the integration site of Yersinia high-pathogenicity island in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 179:409–414.
155.
Fetherston JD, Bearden SW, Perry RD. 1996. YbtA, an AraC-type regulator of the Yersinia pestis pesticin/yersiniabactin receptor. Mol Microbiol 22:315–325.
156.
Fetherston JD, Lillard JW, Perry RD. 1995. Analysis of the pesticin receptor from Yersinia pestis: role in iron-deficient growth and possible regulation by its siderophore. J Bacteriol 177:1824–1833.
157.
Anisimov R, Brem D, Heesemann J, Rakin A. 2005. Molecular mechanism of YbtA-mediated transcriptional regulation of divergent overlapping promoters ybtA and irp6 of Yersinia enterocolitica. FEMS Microbiol Lett 250:27–32.
158.
Ohlemacher SI, Giblin DE, d’Avignon DA, Stapleton AE, Trautner BW, Henderson JP. 2017. Enterobacteria secrete an inhibitor of Pseudomonas virulence during clinical bacteriuria. J Clin Invest 127:4018–4030.
159.
Mills M, Payne SM. 1997. Identification of shuA, the gene encoding the heme receptor of Shigella dysenteriae, and analysis of invasion and intracellular multiplication of a shuA mutant. Infect Immun 65:5358–5363.
160.
Mills M, Payne SM. 1995. Genetics and regulation of heme iron transport in Shigella dysenteriae and detection of an analogous system in Escherichia coli O157:H7. J Bacteriol 177:3004–3009.
161.
Runyen-Janecky LJ. 2013. Role and regulation of heme iron acquisition in gram-negative pathogens. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 3:55.
162.
Wyckoff EE, Duncan D, Torres AG, Mills M, Maase K, Payne SM. 1998. Structure of the Shigella dysenteriae haem transport locus and its phylogenetic distribution in enteric bacteria. Mol Microbiol 28:1139–1152.
163.
Hagan EC, Mobley HLT. 2009. Haem acquisition is facilitated by a novel receptor Hma and required by uropathogenic Escherichia coli for kidney infection. Mol Microbiol 71:79–91.
164.
Eakanunkul S, Lukat-Rodgers GS, Sumithran S, Ghosh A, Rodgers KR, Dawson JH, Wilks A. 2005. Characterization of the periplasmic heme-binding protein shut from the heme uptake system of Shigella dysenteriae. Biochemistry 44:13179–13191.
165.
Burkhard KA, Wilks A. 2008. Functional characterization of the Shigella dysenteriae heme ABC transporter. Biochemistry 47:7977–7979.
166.
Wilks A. 2001. The ShuS protein of Shigella dysenteriae is a heme-sequestering protein that also binds DNA. Arch Biochem Biophys 387:137–142.
167.
Wyckoff EE, Lopreato GF, Tipton KA, Payne SM. 2005. Shigella dysenteriae ShuS promotes utilization of heme as an iron source and protects against heme toxicity. J Bacteriol 187:5658–5664.
168.
Ouellet YH, Ndiaye CT, Gagné SM, Sebilo A, Suits MDL, Jubinville É, Jia Z, Ivancich A, Couture M. 2016. An alternative reaction for heme degradation catalyzed by the Escherichia coli O157:H7 ChuS protein: release of hematinic acid, tripyrrole and Fe(III). J Inorg Biochem 154:103–113.
169.
LaMattina JW, Delrossi M, Uy KG, Keul ND, Nix DB, Neelam AR, Lanzilotta WN. 2017. Anaerobic heme degradation: ChuY is an anaerobilin reductase that exhibits kinetic cooperativity. Biochemistry 56:845–855.
170.
LaMattina JW, Nix DB, Lanzilotta WN. 2016. Radical new paradigm for heme degradation in Escherichia coli O157:H7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:12138–12143.
171.
Mathew LG, Beattie NR, Pritchett C, Lanzilotta WN. 2019. New insight into the mechanism of anaerobic heme degradation. Biochemistry 58:4641–4654.
172.
Wei Y, Kouse AB, Murphy ER. 2017. Transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of Shigella shuT in response to host‐associated iron availability and temperature. Microbiologyopen 6:e00442.
173.
Lawlor KM, Payne SM. 1984. Aerobactin genes in Shigella spp. J Bacteriol 160:266–272.
174.
Schmitt MP, Payne SM. 1991. Genetic analysis of the enterobactin gene cluster in Shigella flexneri. J Bacteriol 173:816–825.
175.
Schmitt MP, Payne SM. 1988. Genetics and regulation of enterobactin genes in Shigella flexneri. J Bacteriol 170:5579–5587.
176.
Welch RA, Burland V, Plunkett G, Redford P, Roesch P, Rasko D, Buckles EL, Liou S-R, Boutin A, Hackett J, Stroud D, Mayhew GF, Rose DJ, Zhou S, Schwartz DC, Perna NT, Mobley HLT, Donnenberg MS, Blattner FR. 2002. Extensive mosaic structure revealed by the complete genome sequence of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:17020–17024.
177.
Torres AG, Redford P, Welch RA, Payne SM. 2001. TonB-dependent systems of uropathogenic Escherichia coli: aerobactin and heme transport and TonB are required for virulence in the mouse. Infect Immun 69:6179–6185.
178.
Gorbacheva VY, Faundez G, Godfrey HP, Cabello FC. 2001. Restricted growth of ent and tonB mutants of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi in human Mono Mac 6 monocytic cells. FEMS Microbiol Lett 196:7–11.
179.
Tsolis RM, Baumler AJ, Heffron F, Stojiljkovic I. 1996. Contribution of TonB- and Feo-mediated iron uptake to growth of Salmonella typhimurium in the mouse. Infect Immun 64:4549–4556.
180.
Stojiljkovic I, Cobeljic M, Hantke K. 1993. Escherichia coli K-12 ferrous iron uptake mutants are impaired in their ability to colonize the mouse intestine. FEMS Microbiol Lett 108:111–115.
181.
Robinson AE, Heffernan JR, Henderson JP. 2018. The iron hand of uropathogenic Escherichia coli: the role of transition metal control in virulence. Future Microbiol 13:745–756.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image EcoSal Plus
EcoSal Plus
Volume 9Number 215 December 2021
eLocator: eESP-0034-2020
Editor: James M. Slauch, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
PubMed: 34910574

History

Received: 23 August 2021
Accepted: 14 November 2021
Published online: 13 December 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. E. coli
  2. Salmonella
  3. Shigella
  4. iron
  5. iron regulation
  6. iron metabolism
  7. Fur
  8. RyhB
  9. iron transport
  10. siderophore

Contributors

Authors

Alexandra R. Mey
Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
Department of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA
John Ring LaMontagne Center for Infectious Disease, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA

Editor

James M. Slauch
Editor:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.

Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy