IRON HOMEOSTASIS
Although iron is essential, too much iron is lethal for the cell, especially if it is not chelated or protein bound. Iron acts as a catalyst for Haber-Weiss reactions, generating highly reactive hydroxyl radicals. In the presence of superoxide or hydrogen peroxide, ferric iron is converted to ferrous iron, which reacts with peroxide in the Fenton reaction to produce hydroxyl radicals. Hydroxyl radicals can cause damage or death of the cell by damaging DNA, unsaturated lipids, and proteins (
2).
Thus, the uptake of iron by the bacterial cell is tightly regulated (
3,
4). There is a balance between the concentration of available iron in the environment and cellular needs, and homeostasis is maintained by regulating iron uptake, use, and storage. When iron is limiting,
Enterobacteriaceae turn on genes for iron uptake systems and actively acquire the metal. As the intracellular concentration increases beyond the cell’s immediate needs, these transporters are downregulated, and any excess iron is shunted into iron storage proteins. Similarly, metabolic pathways and processes that have high iron requirements are regulated in response to the availability of iron and other environmental signals that help fine-tune metabolism in response to the levels of iron in the cell. Genes for these metabolic pathways and for iron storage proteins are downregulated in low iron (
5). In order to cope with the loss of essential iron-dependent metabolic pathways during iron starvation, cells may upregulate the expression of non-iron-containing isoenzymes that rely on other divalent metals, such as manganese, instead (
6).
For bacteria in many environments, the level of free iron is growth limiting, and the acquisition of sufficient iron is problematic. While ferrous iron is relatively soluble, the presence of oxygen results in the formation of insoluble ferric iron. Most oxic environments contain too little free iron to support microbial growth. Furthermore, bacteria colonizing mammalian hosts, as is typical of the
Enterobacteriaceae, must compete with their hosts for this essential nutrient (
7,
8). As in bacteria, mammalian iron homeostasis is highly regulated, and the majority of intracellular or circulating iron is found in heme, with smaller amounts in iron-sulfur cluster-containing proteins or iron proteins. Nonheme iron being shuttled through the circulation is bound to transferrin. Iron on surfaces, in secretions, and in neutrophils is bound to lactoferrin. Thus, the concentration of free, available iron for microbial growth in mammals is vanishingly low in body fluids, on the order of 10
−36 M (
7).
Bacteria have evolved a variety of iron acquisition systems to allow them to obtain iron in all the environments in which they reside (
Fig. 1). These systems include the transport of ferrous or ferric iron, either free or associated with low-affinity chelators such as citrate or phosphate. Bacteria also synthesize and secrete high-affinity iron chelators (siderophores) that scavenge iron in the extracellular environment. The uptake of the chelated siderophore requires dedicated outer and inner membrane transport proteins specific for the iron-siderophore complex. Bacteria that are host associated or pathogenic often have receptors for host iron complexes such as heme, hemoglobin, or transferrin and can remove the heme or iron from the protein to use within the bacterial cell.
The acquisition of iron in Gram-negative bacteria requires transport across both the outer and inner membranes (
Fig. 1). Free ferrous or ferric iron appears to use porins to cross the outer membrane, but larger complexes cannot passively cross the outer membrane or use the general porins. These complexes, such as siderophores or heme, require specific outer membrane receptors. Once the chelate is bound to the receptor, energy must be expended to transport the iron chelate into the periplasm. Since the outer membrane is not energized, the energy for active transport across the outer membrane must originate in the inner membrane. Energy is transferred to receptors in the outer membrane from the energy-transducing complex of TonB, ExbB, and ExbD. Although anchored in the cytoplasmic membrane, TonB can span the periplasmic space to contact the receptors and act as a conduit for energy derived from the cytoplasmic membrane proton motive force (
9).
After transiting the outer membrane, the iron chelate is bound to a periplasmic binding protein (PBP) and shuttled to the cytoplasmic membrane for entry into the cell. There are specific cytoplasmic membrane transporters for ferrous iron, ferric iron, and iron bound to siderophores, heme, or citrate. The cytoplasmic membrane permeases consist of a channel-forming protein and an ATPase or other source of energy for active transport (
Fig. 1). Within the cell, the iron is released from the carrier, although in the case of heme, the intact molecule may be used by the cell. Because siderophores have a high affinity for ferric, but not ferrous, iron, reduction of the iron in the cytosol aids in its release from the siderophore. Specific enzymes that reduce iron and/or degrade the siderophore are often produced by the bacteria.
REGULATION OF IRON HOMEOSTASIS
The major regulatory factor controlling iron acquisition is an iron binding transcription factor, Fur (ferric uptake regulator) (first identified in
E. coli by Hantke [
3,
10]). The active form of Fur is a dimer, and each monomer has two metal binding sites: a structural site that binds zinc, which controls dimerization (
11), and a regulatory site that binds iron. Recent evidence suggests that iron in the regulatory site is bound as a [2Fe-2S] cluster (
12). When intracellular iron is sufficient to satisfy cell needs, the Fur protein will bind to iron, and the active iron-bound dimer then binds to specific operator sequences (Fur boxes) in the DNA (
4), usually overlapping the −10 or −35 sequences in the promoter of target genes. In most cases, the binding of Fur at these sites prevents RNA polymerase binding and blocks transcription (
Fig. 2); however, Fur has also been found to act less commonly as a positive regulator (
13). Fur boxes are often found upstream of genes involved in iron acquisition. The repression of these genes by iron-bound Fur ensures that iron transport is turned off when iron is plentiful in the cell, thereby preventing toxic iron overload. Iron-bound Fur further prevents iron overload by positively regulating the expression of
ftnA, encoding the major iron storage protein (
13). Fe-Fur alleviates the repressive action of H-NS by competing for binding upstream of
ftnA (
13). Conversely, when iron is low, Fur cannot bind to its operator sequences to regulate transcription. Thus, the iron transport genes are turned on to initiate iron uptake, while the
ftnA iron storage gene is silenced by H-NS (
Fig. 2). There are multiple, sometimes overlapping, binding sites for Fur upstream of some Fur-regulated genes, including
ftnA (
13) and the aerobactin operon (
14).
Fur boxes are also found upstream of the
fur gene, overlapping the −10 consensus sequence. Fur binds weakly at this site and inhibits
fur transcription from p
feoa and p
feob (
Fig. 3); this autoregulation may help control the level of Fur in the cell (
15). The
fur gene is also expressed from upstream promoters, and these are controlled by binding sites for Crp, ArcA, OxyR, and SoxS (
15–17). Thus, the level of Fur not only is tightly regulated by the concentration of iron and cellular iron needs but also is influenced by carbon metabolism (Crp), the level of environmental oxygen (ArcA), and oxidative stress (OxyR and SoxS) via the induction of these additional transcripts (
Fig. 3).
Studies in
E. coli indicated a palindromic 5′-
GATAATGATAATCATTATC-3′, 19-bp consensus sequence for the Fur binding site (
14,
18), but analysis of a larger number of promoter/operator regions suggests that Fur binding is more complex. The consensus sequence has been proposed to consist of three adjacent repeats of the hexamer 5′-
GATAAT-3′ (
4,
19). In this model, additional hexamer repeats can extend the binding site, which can be occupied cooperatively by additional Fur dimers (
19). The extended binding sites can account for the range of affinities and extent of regulation observed for different Fur targets. Analysis of Fur binding at a bidirectional promoter region suggests that the 19-bp consensus can be structured as overlapping 13-mer sequences, allowing two Fur dimers to interact with opposite faces of the helix (
20).
Fur plays a broader role in the cell than solely regulating iron acquisition. A genome-wide analysis of Fur binding and transcriptional regulation in
E. coli K-12 showed the direct regulation of at least 81 genes in 42 transcriptional units (
21). The regulon includes genes for carbon and energy metabolism and precursors for DNA synthesis. Several targets for Fur regulation are enzymes that have iron cofactors or are involved in cellular processes that require iron. Fur plays an even larger role in pathogenic enteric bacteria. A variety of virulence factors are regulated by Fur, indicating that the low-iron environment of the host serves as an environmental cue to turn on genes required for infection and disease. For example, Shiga toxin, produced by
Shigella dysenteriae and some pathogenic
E. coli strains, is Fur regulated, and in
Salmonella, the type III secretion system encoded on pathogenicity island 1 is regulated by the binding of Fur at the
hilD promoter (
22,
23).
Another target of Fur repression is the small (90-nucleotide) regulatory RNA RyhB (
5,
24) (
Fig. 2). RyhB base pairs with the 5′ end of transcripts encoding iron-containing or iron storage proteins and prevents translation, leading to the degradation of the transcript. When iron is abundant, Fur represses the expression of
ryhB, allowing transcripts encoding iron-containing and iron storage proteins to be translated. Iron can then be shunted into iron-reliant metabolic pathways (e.g., TCA cycle enzymes and SodB), and any excess iron can be stored (e.g., in bacterioferritin). At low iron concentrations,
ryhB is highly expressed, ensuring that many genes encoding iron-dependent metabolism proteins and the iron storage protein Bfr are turned off. This response, termed “iron sparing” (
5), reduces the need for iron while the cell is experiencing iron starvation, allowing the cell to reserve its available iron for only the most essential iron-dependent functions. RyhB also affects Fur synthesis. The synthesis of
E. coli Fur is coupled to the translation of an upstream open reading frame (ORF) (
uof), and the base pairing of RyhB with the Uof mRNA blocks the translation of
uof and the downstream
fur gene (
25) (
Fig. 3). Thus, RyhB could moderate the increase in Fur that occurs when iron is limiting and Fur no longer binds upstream.
In most cases, regulation by RyhB is negative. However, in
Salmonella, RyhB acts to increase the translation of the
iroN mRNA, encoding a component of the
Salmonella iron transport system Iro (see the section on salmochelins and
Fig. 10C, below).
Salmonella encodes two different RyhB small RNAs (sRNAs), RyhB-1 and RyhB-2 (
24). The two
ryhB genes are found in all sequenced
Salmonella species, including the distantly related species
Salmonella bongori. The two sRNAs share an identical 33-base region, but the rest of the sequence is not as highly conserved. The two genes have overlapping and separate functions. The expression of both
ryhB-1 and
ryhB-2 is repressed by Fur, but
ryhB-1 is activated by H
2O
2, while
ryhB-2 is activated in stationary phase (
26).
E. coli,
Salmonella,
Shigella, and related bacteria can be found in a variety of environments that differ with respect to the concentrations and forms of iron available to the bacteria. Although members of this family are predominately associated with the vertebrate gastrointestinal tract, they can survive outside the host, and within the host, there are different niches in which these bacteria are found.
E. coli is a normal inhabitant of the colon, but pathogenic strains can colonize other parts of the intestine or urinary tract, and some can be found in the blood or cerebrospinal fluid. Pathogenic
E. coli strains are often categorized as pathotypes to indicate the location and type of disease that they cause and the presence of specific genes (
27). Pathotypes include enterotoxigenic
E. coli (ETEC), Shiga-toxin producing
E. coli (STEC), enterohemorrhagic
E. coli (EHEC), enteroinvasive
E. coli (EIEC), enteroaggregative
E. coli (EAEC), diffusely adherent
E. coli (DAEC), adherent-invasive
E. coli (AIEC), neonatal meningitis
E. coli (NMEC/MNEC), extraintestinal pathogenic
E. coli (ExPEC), and uropathogenic
E. coli (UPEC) strains, among others. Human-pathogenic strains of
Salmonella can spread from the intestine and can disseminate and infect numerous organs.
Yersinia, a related member of the
Enterobacteriaceae, is also highly invasive and shares many of the iron transport systems found in
Salmonella and
E. coli.
Shigella and enteroinvasive
E. coli are adapted for growth in the cytosol of host colonic epithelial cells. All of these areas differ with respect to iron concentrations, the presence of ferrous or ferric iron, levels of oxygen, availability of nutrients, and the sequestration of iron in heme or proteins. The
Enterobacteriaceae have evolved to use multiple environmental cues to adapt to iron availability.
Oxygen sensing provides cues about the type and extent of iron availability. In anoxic environments, Fe
2+ predominates. Ferrous iron is more soluble and thus is more available to the cell. The intracellular, labile Fe
2+ pool was found to be higher for cells growing anaerobically than for aerobically grown cells (
28). This leads to an increase in Fur binding to DNA and increased transcriptional repression. Oxygen also regulates specific iron transport systems, adding another layer of regulation to iron acquisition.
Enterobacteriaceae in the lumen of the gut grow in the absence of oxygen. However, pathogens that gain access to the surface of intestinal epithelial cells or that invade and replicate within epithelial cells are in a microaerobic environment (
17,
29,
30). In
Shigella flexneri, oxygen inhibited the expression of the Feo ferrous iron transporter while increasing the transcription of the
iuc ferric iron transporter (
17). This regulation by oxygen is mediated by two transcription factors, ArcA and the fumarate and nitrate reduction regulatory protein (FNR). These regulatory proteins bind upstream of the start site of transcription and positively or negatively regulate expression in response to oxygen (
31). This allows the expression of the
feo genes when the bacteria are in an anoxic environment where Fe
2+ predominates. In the presence of oxygen,
feo is repressed, and the ferric iron transporter
iuc is expressed. Oxygen further affects the expression of these genes through an effect on
fur expression (
Fig. 3); ArcA binds upstream of
fur and represses expression under anaerobic conditions (
17). Superoxide also regulates
fur. It induces a polycistronic mRNA (p
fldA) that includes
fur (
16) (
Fig. 3).
Temperature also serves as a signal for the expression of iron acquisition genes. The synthesis of the heme transport protein in
Shigella dysenteriae type 1 and pathogenic
E. coli is increased at 37°C, a cue indicative of the human environment (
32). Additionally,
E. coli siderophore synthesis and transport genes (
ent,
fep, and
fes) and ferric citrate transport genes (
fec) showed increased expression at 37°C compared to 23°C (
33). The
ent,
fep, and
fec genes also respond to carbon sufficiency and are positively controlled by Crp (
34). Thus, Fur acts as a master on/off switch to regulate the expression of iron transport genes, and additional transcription factors or posttranscriptional regulation controls individual systems to take advantage of the iron sources most commonly found in that environment.