Cellulose Synthase (CesA) Genes in the Green Alga Mesotaenium caldariorum
ABSTRACT
Cellulose, a microfibrillar polysaccharide consisting of bundles of β-1,4-glucan chains, is a major component of plant and most algal cell walls and is also synthesized by some prokaryotes. Seed plants and bacteria differ in the structures of their membrane terminal complexes that make cellulose and, in turn, control the dimensions of the microfibrils produced. They also differ in the domain structures of their CesA gene products (the catalytic subunit of cellulose synthase), which have been localized to terminal complexes and appear to help maintain terminal complex structure. Terminal complex structures in algae range from rosettes (plant-like) to linear forms (bacterium-like). Thus, algal CesA genes may reveal domains that control terminal complex assembly and microfibril structure. The CesA genes from the alga Mesotaenium caldariorum, a member of the order Zygnematales, which have rosette terminal complexes, are remarkably similar to seed plant CesAs, with deduced amino acid sequence identities of up to 59%. In addition to the putative transmembrane helices and the D-D-D-QXXRW motif shared by all known CesA gene products, M. caldariorum and seed plant CesAs share a region conserved among plants, an N-terminal zinc-binding domain, and a variable or class-specific region. This indicates that the domains that characterize seed plant CesAs arose prior to the evolution of land plants and may play a role in maintaining the structures of rosette terminal complexes. The CesA genes identified in M. caldariorum are the first reported for any eukaryotic alga and will provide a basis for analyzing the CesA genes of algae with different types of terminal complexes.
The fundamental unit of cellulose is the microfibril, consisting of a bundle of parallel chains of β-1,4-glucan that are hydrogen bonded to one another, forming a crystalline array (4, 25). Although cellulose is best known as the major component of plant and most algal cell walls, the CesA genes encoding the putative catalytic subunit of cellulose synthase (EC 2.4.1.12) were first identified in the cellulose-producing bacterium Acetobacter xylinus (39, 47). CesA genes in other prokaryotes and several seed plants, including cotton, Arabidopsis thaliana, maize, rice, and poplar (36) have subsequently been characterized. All share a common domain structure that includes putative transmembrane helices (TMH) and a cytoplasmic loop consisting of four conserved regions (U1 to U4), each containing a D residue or QXXRW sequence predicted to be involved in substrate binding and catalysis (D-D-D-QXXRW motif). An N-terminal zinc-binding domain, a strongly conserved region (CR-P) between U1 and U2, and a more variable region between U2 and U3 are found only in plant CesAs (11).
The predicted transmembrane nature of the CesA protein is consistent with the results of earlier freeze fracture electron microscopy studies showing nascent cellulose microfibrils associated with arrays of integral plasma membrane protein particles known as terminal complexes (reviewed in references 5, 10, and 15). Terminal complexes consisting of linear arrays of particles were first identified in the green alga Oocystis apiculata (7) and the cellulose-producing bacterium Acetobacter xylinus (8). Hexagonal arrays of particles termed rosettes were later identified as the terminal complexes of land plants (30). The arrangement of particles within terminal complexes appears to determine the dimensions of the cellulose microfibrils they produce (10, 14, 17, 19, 22, 44). For example, rosettes produce microfibrils composed of about 36 glucan chains but the large linear terminal complexes of giant marine green algae produce microfibrils containing up to 1,000 glucan chains (11). Recently, the role of terminal complexes in cellulose synthesis was demonstrated more directly by labeling freeze fracture replicas of mung bean rosettes with antibodies raised against a CesA gene product (24).
Although the factors that determine terminal complex structure, and thus microfibril dimensions, remain unknown, several lines of evidence indicate that CesA gene products play a direct role in maintaining the association of the particles that compose terminal complexes. The rsw1 mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana, which results in a single amino acid substitution in the cytoplasmic domain of a cellulose synthase (Arabidopsis thaliana CesA1 [AtCesA1]), disrupts assembly of crystalline cellulose microfibrils and leads to accumulation of noncrystalline β-1,4-glucan. Freeze fracture of rsw1 mutants showed that the rosettes are dissociated (2). It has also been shown that the products of two cotton CesA genes (Gossypium hirsutum CesA1 [GhCesA1] and GhCesA2) can associate in vitro through their zinc-binding domains, indicating a role for this domain in terminal complex assembly (26). The Acetobacter CesA proteins, which assemble as a linear terminal complex, lack the zinc-binding domain and two other domains found in all seed plant CesA proteins (11). These observations indicate that comparing the CesA genes of organisms with different types of terminal complexes may reveal domains that control terminal complex assembly and thus microfibril structure.
The origin of rosettes is thought to be a crucial event in the evolution of land plants because it is linked to fundamental changes in cytokinesis and intercellular communication that provided the basis for the origin of the complex body plan (16). Green algae demonstrate the greatest diversity in terminal complex structure, and the history of the evolution of rosettes from linear terminal complexes appears to be preserved within this group (6, 21, 44). According to a recent classification, the monophyletic group Charophyta includes the land plants and six orders of green algae, including the Zygnematales, the Coleochaetales, and the Charales, which are thought to be the closest relatives of land plants (23). Within the Charophyta, all species examined have six-particle rosettes except for Coleochaete scutata (44), which has a unique eight-particle terminal complex (32). Other green algae have linear terminal complexes (44). Mesotaenium caldariorum is in the order Zygnematales, which diverged from the land plant lineage before the Coleochaetales and the Charales (23). Thus, characterization of M. caldariorum CesAs (McCesAs) will reveal the extent of CesA divergence since plants colonized the land and provide a basis for analyzing the CesA genes from algae with different types of terminal complexes, including C. scutata, with its apparently derived eight-particle terminal complex, and chlorophyte green algae, with presumably more primitive linear terminal complexes.
Here we report the identification of CesA genes in the unicellular charophycean alga M. caldariorum, the first reported from a eukaryotic alga.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Culturing.
A culture of the unicellular green alga, M. caldariorum strain 41 was obtained from the UTEX Algal Culture Collection (University of Texas, Austin). Suspension cultures were grown as described previously (27).
Primer design.
The design of three forward and three reverse degenerate primers was based on regions of amino acid conservation among polypeptides deduced from CesA genes of Acetobacter and seed plants. The positions of the primers with respect to regions coding for characterized domains of GhCesA1 (GenBank accession number U58283 ) are illustrated in Fig. 1. Primers 1F and 3R were based on primers UGF and DOMB1R, designed by Doblin et al. (12). For UGF, the redundancy at positions 12 and 13 was increased to account for additional Ser codons (AGC, AGT), and a G, the second nondegenerate base coding for Gly, was added to the 3′ end. The DOMB1R primer was modified by changing the clamp from CC to GG and increasing the degeneracy at position 18 to account for the substitution of Ile for Asn in some Acetobacter species (Fig. 1). Cloning sites were removed from both primers. Two additional forward primers (2F and 3F) were based on deduced amino acid sequences within domain U1 of Gh.CesA1 proteins. Additional reverse primers (1R and 2R) were based on sequences within the CR-P region. The sequences of all primers are listed in Fig. 1.
PCR cloning.
Genomic DNA was isolated from cultured M. caldariorum cells by a rapid cetyltrimethylammonium bromide extraction method (28). Phage suspension from a genomic library of M. caldariorum DNA cloned into λGEM-11 BamHI arms (27) was also used as a template.
Genomic DNA was amplified directly with various combinations of forward and reverse primers (Fig. 1) at an annealing temperature of 56°C with 2.5 mM MgCl2 through 35 cycles. A genomic library phage suspension was amplified with primers 1F and 3R, and the products were subjected to nested and half-nested PCR with various combinations of forward and reverse primers under the same conditions used to amplify genomic DNA. Amplified fragments were gel purified and cloned into pCR-TOPO 2.1 (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad, Calif.) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Plasmid DNA was isolated, and both strands were sequenced by primer walking and the BigDye dRhodamine Terminator method (PE Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.). Sequences were edited and assembled with Sequencher (version 4.0.5; Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor, Mich.).
Library screening.
Probes were synthesized by incorporation of digoxigenin-dUTP by PCR with cloned McCesA fragments as templates and with the same primers that were originally used to amplify the cloned sequences. These probes were used to screen 300,000 plaques from the M. caldariorum genomic library. Phage DNA was isolated and subcloned by standard protocols (38). Plasmid DNA was isolated and sequenced as described above.
Sequence analysis.
The cDNA and polypeptide sequences were deduced from genomic sequences by using NetGene2 (18) and GenScanW (9).
For phylogenetic analysis, McCesAs were compared with predicted amino acid sequences corresponding to CesA genes obtained from GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov ) for Arabidopsis thaliana (accession numbers AF027172, AF027173, and AB018111 [2]; AB006703, AF016893, and AF062485 ; AF091713 [42]; and AL035526, AC007019, and AC006300 ), maize (Zea mays, AF200525, AF200526, AF200528, AF200529, AF200530, AF200531, AF200532, and AF200533 [20]), poplar (Populus tremuloides, AF072131 [48] and hybrid Populus tremula/Populus. alba, AF081534), cotton (G. hirsutum, U58283 and U58284/AF254895 [34] and AF150630 [24]), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum, AF304374 [12]), and Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120 (BAB75456.1 = contig 326). The CesA sequence from Nostoc punctiforme (contig 499) was obtained from the Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (http://www.jgi.doe.gov/JGI_microbial/html/ ). Sequences were edited before alignment, as described in Results. Phylograms were constructed from the aligned sequences by using the heuristic search method in PAUP* (version 4.1b10; Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.) and were tested by bootstrap analysis (by the parsimony method, with 1,000 replicates). Trees were printed with TreeView (33).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The nucleotide sequences of McCesA1 and McCesA2 have been deposited in GenBank under accession numbers AF525360 and AF525361, respectively.
RESULTS
Degenerate primers based on conserved regions of the deduced amino acid sequences of plant and prokaryote CesA genes were used to amplify CesA gene fragments from isolated genomic DNA and a genomic DNA library phage suspension from M. caldariorum. Primer pair 1F-3R amplified two major fragments and several minor fragments from the phage suspension (Fig. 2, lane 1). To test for specificity of amplification, the products of this reaction were subjected to fully nested and half-nested PCR (Fig. 1, lanes 2 to 7). Fully nested PCR with primer pairs 2F-1R and 2F-2R amplified fragments of about 300 and 350 bp, respectively (Fig. 2, lanes 2 and 3). This is close to the expected product sizes of 293 and 338 bp that were calculated from the GhCesA1 sequence and verified by amplification of cloned GhCesA1 with primer pairs 2F-1R and 2F-2R (data not shown). Half-nested PCR with primer pairs 1F-1R and 1F-2R produced numerous bands (Fig. 2, lanes 4 and 5), including those close to the expected product sizes of 326 and 370 bp, respectively. Half-nested PCR with primer pairs 2F-3R and 3F-3R produced strong bands at about 1 and 1.2 kb (Fig. 2, lanes 6 and 7). These exceed the expected values of 733 and 528 bp, presumably due to the presence of one or more introns, since the products differ from each other by about the expected 205 bp. Direct amplification of genomic DNA with primer pairs 1F-1R and 1F-2R did not produce products of the expected sizes (Fig. 1, lanes 8 and 9). However, at least some of the products of amplification with primer pairs 1F-3R, 3F-3R, and 2F-3R were similar in size to those resulting from amplification of the genomic DNA library phage suspension with the same primers.
The major bands from lanes 2, 7, and 12 (Fig. 2) were excised, purified, and cloned into pCR-TOPO 2.1. When the inserts were excised, 11 clones derived from the product in lane 2 (Fig. 2) appeared identical, but the major product in lane 7 produced two distinct classes of inserts and the product in lane 12 produced three distinct classes, including one containing an internal restriction site. A single representative of each of the six distinct clones was sequenced and compared to sequences in GenBank with BLASTX (1). The predicted products of two clones derived from amplification of genomic DNA with the primer pair 2F-3R were similar to GhCesA1, spanning the regions upon which the primers were based (Fig. 1). Although the deduced polypeptides share 84% (M. caldariorum clone 1 [Mc1] compared with Zea mays CesA4 [ZmCesA4] [accession number AF200528 ]) and 73% (Mc2 compared with ZmCesA5 [accession number AF200529 ]) amino acid identity with known CesAs encoded within three open reading frames, they lack similarity in the amino acids encoded by the regions spanning nucleotides 409 to 705 and 970 to 1307 (Mc1) and nucleotides 394 to 624 and 889 to 1162 (Mc2). Prediction of intron-exon boundaries with NetGene2 (18) supports the hypothesis that these regions represent introns (Fig. 3). The spliced sequences have open reading frames of 733 and 718 bp, respectively, and their predicted amino acid sequences share 76% identity. Mc3 and Mc4, derived from amplification of a genomic library suspension with primer pairs 2F-2R and 3F-3R, respectively, were very similar to Mc2, differing by 17 bp within their 1,224-bp consensus sequence (data not shown). Together, the four clones represent at least two distinct McCesA sequences (Fig. 3).
The cloned Mc1 and Mc2 fragments were used to synthesize probes for screening an M. caldariorum genomic library. A total of 300,000 plaques were screened, 103 plaques were selected, and 10 clones were purified. Phage DNA was isolated from each of these clones, and the inserts were excised with BamHI, revealing five distinct restriction patterns. One clone was subcloned, sequenced in its entirety, and assembled. Comparison to sequences in GenBank with BLASTX revealed eight open reading frames with high similarity to plant CesAs. Start and stop codons were identified in frame at the N-terminal and C-terminal ends. Prediction of splicing sites by using GenScanW with both Arabidopsis and maize parameter matrices (9) indicated the presence of 11 exons and 10 introns, and the spliced gene produced an open reading frame of 3,390 bp. This gene was similar to that for Mc1, differing by only nine base substitutions and a 9-bp insert within their 1,377-bp consensus, and was named McCesA1. Two additional genomic clones were partially subcloned and sequenced. One was very similar to McCesA1, differing by a single deletion and two base substitutions, including a T→C substitution that produced an additional BamHI site. The other clone was also similar to Mc1, differing by seven base substitutions within their 1,368-bp consensus sequences. Genomic clones corresponding to Mc2 to Mc4 were retrieved neither in the first screen nor when the genomic library was rescreened with only the probe based on Mc2. Of nine additional clones that were partially sequenced, three were nearly identical to McCesA1, three were more similar to Mc1, and three were similar to McCesA1 but had additional deletions (data not shown). The designation McCesA2 was assigned to Mc2, which represents Mc2 to Mc4.
By using ClustalX software (43), the predicted McCesA1 protein was compared with proteins representing different subfamilies of seed plant CesAs (20). The hypothetical McCesA1 protein of 1,130 amino acids contains all domains characterized in plant CesAs, as highlighted in Fig. 4. These include the zinc-binding domain near the N terminus (26). As predicted by HMMTOP (45), McCesA1 contains eight putative TMH. The cytoplasmic domain between the second and third TMH includes the four putative substrate-binding domains, U1 to U4, which are highly conserved in all known CesAs. Between U1 and U2 is the CR-P, a conserved region in plants (34) that is absent in bacterial CesAs (11) and is poorly conserved in some cyanobacteria (31) and the slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum (3). The McCesA1 CR-P is very similar to those of plant CesAs (up to 87% identity with A. thaliana CesA1 [AtCesA1] [accession number AF027172 ]) and bears only slight similarity to those of cyanobacterial CesAs (13% identity with that of Nostoc punctiforme, contig 499).
McCesA1 is also similar to seed plant CesAs in regions that are not universally conserved (Fig. 4). These include the hypervariable region between U2 and U3 (34), also known as the class-specific region (CSR) (46). Like those of seed plants, the McCesA1 CSR contains basic residues at the N terminus and acidic residues at the C terminus, including DDXED and EXE motifs (amino acids 747 to 751 and 756 to 758, respectively). It also contains three K motifs (centered on amino acids 697, 720, and 735) and a cysteine-rich region (amino acids 703 to 715) and shares up to 42% amino acid identity with the CSRs of plant CesAs (ZmCesA1 [AF200525]). The region between the zinc-binding domain and the first TMH is also highly variable among the known CesAs. McCesA has the longest N terminus, including a unique 28-residue block and blocks corresponding to all of the sequence blocks found in the N-terminal regions of other plant CesA proteins.
McCesA1 joins 11 other CesA genomic sequences in which intron-exon boundaries are conserved (36, 37). All McCesA1 intron-exon junctions are also found in AtCesA1 and AtCesA3 (Fig. 4 and 5). Within the region corresponding to McCesA1 exon 6, these Arabidopsis genes have an additional intron, which is present in all other Arabidopsis CesAs except AtCesA4, AtCesA5, and AtCesA9. A second additional intron within the region corresponding to McCesA1 exon 7 is present in all Arabidopsis CesAs except AtCesA7, and a third additional intron in the region corresponding to McCesA1 exon 10 is present in all Arabidopsis CesAs. In McCesA1 and all CesAs examined, the C-terminal exon contains TMH-4 through TMH-8 and the penultimate exon contains H-3, H-4, and TMH-3 (Fig. 5).
Figure 6A shows a parsimony phylogram corresponding to the bootstrap consensus tree for deduced amino acid sequences encoded by McCesA1 and selected seed plant CesAs, rooted with deduced amino acid sequences encoded by two cyanobacterial CesAs. Prior to alignment with ClustalX (43), the sequences were edited to remove the poorly conserved N terminus upstream of the (P/L/S)(Y/F)R consensus sequence, the variable region between the G(Y/F)(D/E/S/G) and (L/I)(K/R)E consensus sequences, and the C terminus downstream of the WV(R/K) consensus sequence (Fig. 4). The analysis shows a high similarity between McCesA1 and seed plant CesAs (Fig. 6A). Although the possibility of higher-level groupings is strongly supported (bootstrap values, 72 to 100%), the early divergence of McCesA1 and separation of the seed plant CesAs into two major clades is supported only weakly (bootstrap values, 52 to 68%). An analysis including McCesA2 was carried out with the conserved region from the DQF consensus sequence directly following TMH-2 to the DCDH consensus sequence of U2 (Fig. 4). The unrooted phylogram corresponding to the bootstrap consensus tree shows strong support for an M. caldariorum clade that is separate from that corresponding to the seed plant CesAs (Fig. 6B). Some of the sequences included in Fig. 6A were omitted from Fig. 6B for clarity. When included, their positions were consistent with those shown in Fig. 6A. The topologies of trees created using distance methods (neighbor joining) were identical to those shown except for the position of AtCesA7 in the rooted tree (data not shown).
DISCUSSION
CesA domains and terminal complex structure.
The deduced amino acid sequence encoded by McCesA1 includes the D-D-D-QXXRW motif and putative TMH that characterize all known CesAs and shows remarkable similarity to seed plant CesAs, with amino acid identities up to 59% (ZmCesA7 [accession number AF200531 ]). McCesA1 has a zinc-binding domain, a highly conserved CR-P between U1 and U2 that is 87% identical to the most similar seed plant CR-P (that of AtCesA1 [AF027172]), and a variable region or CSR between U2 and U3. These features were previously known only in seed plant CesAs (11); however, our results indicate that these domains arose prior to the evolution of land plants. Of the three CesA domains unique to M. caldariorum and seed plants, the CR-P may have had the earliest origin, since CesAs from two strains of cyanobacteria contain an insertion with limited similarity to the CR-P (31) and a CesA from the cellular slime mold D. discoideum contains a highly divergent insertion between U1 and U2 (3).
Although we have no direct evidence that McCesAs function in cellulose synthesis, their strong similarity to seed plant CesAs is consistent with this hypothesis. In Arabidopsis and other seed plants, the CesA family is part of a larger superfamily that includes six families of cellulose synthase-like (Csl) genes of unknown function resembling bacterial CesAs in domain structure (37). The McCesAs most closely resemble members of the CesA family, based on the presence of the characteristic zinc-binding, CR-P, and CSR domains. Although tobacco Csl genes were amplified with primers similar to those used in this study (12), no Csl sequences were amplified from M. caldariorum DNA.
Rosette terminal complexes appear to have arisen among the charophytes, the group of green algae thought to be most closely related to land plants (23, 29). Whereas the linear terminal complexes of the chlorophyte green algae are similar to those of Acetobacter and Dictyostelium (8, 17, 44), land plants and two orders of charophyte green algae (Charales and Zygnematales) have rosette terminal complexes (44). The striking similarity between McCesAs and those of seed plants is consistent with the hypotheses that acquisition of their shared zinc-binding and CSR domains and specific features of the CR-P accompanied the origin of rosette terminal complexes and that these domains and features may be involved in the assembly or function of the rosette. The putative role of the zinc-binding domain in protein-protein interaction is consistent with this interpretation (26). In addition, McCesA1's deduced amino acid sequence is identical to that of wild-type AtCesA1 in the 20 amino acids upstream of TMH3. In the Arabidopsis rsw1 mutant, this region includes a V-for-A substitution that results in dissociation of rosettes, indicating that the A and surrounding amino acids may be involved in maintaining rosette integrity (2).
The terminal complexes of the two earlier-divergent orders of charophyte green algae (Klebsormidiales and Chlorokybales) have not been examined. Analysis of the terminal complexes and CesA genes in these groups and the CesAs of chlorophyte green algae with linear terminal complexes may further reveal the relationship between CesA domains and terminal complex organization. Additional insight might be gained from examining the CesA genes of C. scutata in the order Coleochaetales, which appears to have diverged from the land plant lineage after the Zygnematales but before the Charales (23). The taxonomic position of C. scutata (23) is consistent with the hypothesis that its unique eight-particle terminal complex (32) was derived from a rosette.
Multiple McCesA genes.
Our identification of several genomic clones very similar to McCesA1 parallels results obtained in a screen of the same genomic library for phytochrome genes. To determine whether the similar phytochrome clones were alleles or distinct genes, Lagarias et al. (27) sequenced phytochrome fragments amplified from populations grown from single cells. Each of these clonal populations contained two or more very similar phytochrome genes, indicating that these similar genes are present within the genome of a single individual. M. caldariorum is expected to be haploid like other members of the Desmidiaceae, but polyploidy cannot be ruled out (27). By analogy, these data indicate that clones very similar to McCesA1 represent separate genes, unless the population from which the library was derived is polyploid. The McCesAs represented by Mc2 to Mc4 are distinct from McCesA1 based on substantial sequence divergence. Although we identified numerous genomic clones similar to McCesA1 and the Mc1 PCR product, we found none corresponding to Mc2 to Mc4, even when only probes based on Mc2 were used for screening. The genes corresponding to Mc2 to Mc4 may be poorly represented in the genomic library. However, the cloning of three PCR products that are similar to each other but distinct from Mc1 and McCesA1 indicates that M. caldariorum has at least two CesA genes and possibly six or more.
Seed plants have moderately large families of CesA genes. In Arabidopsis, expression analysis and genetic complementation studies have revealed that many of the 10 members of the CesA gene family serve distinct functions. For example, AtCesA4 (20), AtCesA7, and AtCesA8 (41) are expressed during secondary cell wall synthesis in vascular tissue whereas AtCesA6 (13), AtCesA1, and AtCesA3 (40) are expressed in expanding cells. However, even CesAs with identical expression patterns, such as AtCesA7 and AtCesA8 or AtCesA1 and AtCesA3, cannot complement mutations in the coexpressing paralog (40, 41). These observations led to the hypothesis that rosette terminal complexes are assembled from at least two different CesA isoforms (see reference 35 for a review). Although M. caldariorum is unicellular, its cell division cycle includes distinct phases of wall deposition, such as cell plate formation during cytokinesis and primary and secondary cell wall deposition. The multiple McCesAs may be required for the different phases of cell wall deposition or for the assembly of rosettes composed of multiple CesA isoforms.
Phylogenetic analysis of McCesA genes.
Phylogenetic analysis confirmed the high similarity between M. caldariorum and seed plant CesAs inferred from the alignments of deduced amino acid sequences. The possibility of the divergence of McCesA1 before the diversification of seed plant CesAs was weakly supported. Our analysis is consistent with previously reported topologies for seed plant CesAs with the exception of the position of AtCesA7, which varies between our parsimony and neighbor-joining trees and also among published phylogenies (20, 37, 46).
The AtCesA genes have been classified according to their expression patterns; i.e., type I is expressed in developing vascular tissue (AtCesA4, AtCesA7, and AtCesA8), type II is expressed in expanding tissue (AtCesA1, to AtCesA,3, AtCesA5, and AtCesA6), and type III finds limited expression in floral organs and leaf-stem junctions (AtCesA9, and AtCesA10) (D. P. Delmer, R. Eshed, P. Hogan, M. Doblin, D. Jacob-Wilk, L. Peng, A. Roberts, and D. Holland, Abstr. Quadr. Joint Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Plant Biol. Can. Soc. Plant Physiol., abstr. 510, 2001). CesA phylogenies show that type I AtCesAs form a clade with other CesAs expressed during secondary cell wall deposition and that type II and type III CesAs are distributed between two major clades (20, 37, 46). In our analysis, the two McCesAs occupy a separate clade with strong bootstrap support, indicating that CesAs specialized for primary and secondary cell wall deposition diverged after the origin of land plants.
When alignments (Fig. 4) and gene phylogenies (Fig. 6) are considered together, some interesting patterns emerge. McCesA1 has the longest N terminus of any of the CesAs analyzed and includes a unique sequence block and sequence blocks found in the other CesAs (Fig. 4). Thus, it appears that diversification of seed plant CesAs has involved the deletion of several sequence blocks. The Arabidopsis type I and related seed plant CesAs have lost the greatest number of N-terminal sequence blocks. The structure of the CSR region has been used previously to group the CesA genes of rice into different classes (46). Although the McCesA1 CSR is similar to those of seed plants, it cannot be assigned to one of the previously described classes based on the organization of the CSR.
Work is under way to examine the CesAs of algae with diverse types of terminal complexes in an effort to identify domains that may be involved in terminal complex structure and assembly. Analysis of expression patterns of CesAs in algae may also provide insight into the evolutionary origin of nonidentical pairs of CesAs and their roles in terminal complex assembly and microfibril synthesis.
FIG. 1.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 3.
FIG.4.
FIG. 5.
FIG. 6.
Acknowledgments
This work was support by grant DBI 9872627 from the National Science Foundation and the University of Rhode Island Foundation.
We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of members of the Delmer lab, especially Monica Doblin, Pat Hogan, and Yasushi Kawagoe. We also acknowledge Monika Doblin for sharing, prior to publication, the primer sequences upon which primers 3F and 3R were based, and Yasushi Kawagoe for the use of primers 1F, 2F, 1R, and 2R. We thank Donna and Clark Lagarias for use of the M. caldariorum genomic library and much helpful advice.
REFERENCES
1.
Altschul, S. F., W. Gish, W. Miller, E. W. Myers, and D. J. Lipman. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol.215:403-410.
2.
Arioli, T., L. Peng, A. S. Betzner, J. Burn, W. Wittke, W. Herth, C. Camilleri, H. Hofte, J. Plazinski, R. Birch, A. Cork, J. Glover, J. Redmond, and R. E. Williamson. 1998. Molecular analysis of cellulose biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Science279:717-720.
3.
Blanton, R. L., D. Fuller, N. Iranfar, M. J. Grimson, and W. F. Loomis. 2000. The cellulose synthase gene of Dictyostelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97:2391-2396.
4.
Brett, C. T. 2000. Cellulose microfibrils in plants: biosynthesis, deposition, and integration into the cell wall. Int. Rev. Cytol.199:161-199.
5.
Brown, R. M., Jr. 1985. Cellulose microfibril assembly and orientation: recent developments. J. Cell Sci. Suppl.2:13-32.
6.
Brown, R. M., Jr., C. H. Haigler, J. Suttie, A. R. White, E. Roberts, C. Smith, T. Itoh, and K. Cooper. 1983. The biosynthesis and degradation of cellulose. J. Appl. Polymer Sci.37:33-78.
7.
Brown, R. M., Jr., and D. Montezinos. 1976. Cellulose microfibrils: visualization of biosynthetic and orienting complexes in association with the plasma membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA73:143-147.
8.
Brown, R. M., Jr., J. H. M. Willison, and C. L. Richardson. 1976. Cellulose biosynthesis in Acetobacter xylinum: visualization of the site of synthesis and direct measurement of the in vivo process. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA73:4565-4569.
9.
Burge, C., and S. Karlin. 1997. Prediction of complete gene structures in human genomic DNA. J. Mol. Biol.268:78-94.
10.
Delmer, D. P. 1987. Cellulose biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol.38:259-290.
11.
Delmer, D. P. 1999. Cellulose biosynthesis: exciting times for a difficult field of study. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.50:245-276.
12.
Doblin, M. S., L. De Melis, E. Newbigin, A. Bacic, and S. M. Read. 2001. Pollen tubes of Nicotiana alata express two genes from different β-glucan synthase families. Plant Physiol.125:2040-2052.
13.
Fagard, M., T. Desnos, T. Desprez, F. Goubet, G. Refregier, G. Mouille, M. McCann, C. Rayon, S. Vernhettes, and H. Hofte. 2000. PROCUSTE1 encodes a cellulose synthase required for normal cell elongation specifically in roots and dark-grown hypocotyls of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell12:2409-2423.
14.
Giddings, T. H., Jr., D. L. Brower, and L. A. Staehelin. 1980. Visualization of particle complexes in the plasma membrane of Micrasterias denticulata associated with the formation of cellulose fibrils in primary and secondary cell walls. J. Cell Biol.84:327-339.
15.
Giddings, T. H., Jr., and L. A. Staehelin. 1991. Microtubule-mediated control of microfibril deposition: a re-examination of the hypothesis, p. 85-99. In C. W. Lloyd (ed.), The cytoskeletal basis of plant growth and form. Academic Press, New York, N.Y.
16.
Graham, L. E., M. E. Cook, and J. S. Busse. 2000. The origin of plants: body plan changes contributing to a major evolutionary radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA97:4535-4540.
17.
Grimson, M. J., C. H. Haigler, and R. L. Blanton. 1996. Cellulose microfibrils, cell motility, and plasma membrane protein organization change in parallel during culmination in Dictyostelium discoideum. J. Cell Sci.109:3079-3087.
18.
Hebsgaard, S. M., P. G. Korning, N. Tolstrup, J. Engelbrecht, P. Rouze, and S. Brunak. 1996. Splice site prediction in Arabidopsis thaliana pre-mRNA by combining local and global sequence information. Nucleic Acids Res.24:3439-3452.
19.
Herth, W. 1983. Arrays of plasma-membrane “rosettes” involved in cellulose microfibril formation of Spirogyra. Planta159:347-356.
20.
Holland, N., D. Holland, T. Helentjaris, K. S. Dhugga, B. Xoconostle-Cazares, and D. P. Delmer. 2000. A comparative analysis of the plant cellulose synthase (CesA) gene family. Plant Physiol.123:1313-1323.
21.
Hotchkiss, A. T., Jr. 1989. Cellulose biosynthesis: the terminal complex hypothesis and its relationship to other contemporary research issues, p. 232-247. In N. G. Lewis and M. G. Paice (ed.), Plant cell wall polymers. Biogenesis and biodegradation. American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C.
22.
Itoh, T., R. M. O'Neil, and R. M. Brown, Jr. 1984. Interference of cell wall regeneration of Boergesenia forbesii protoplasts by Tinopal LPW, a fluorescent brightening agent. Protoplasma123:174-183.
23.
Karol, K. G., R. M. McCourt, M. T. Cimino, and C. F. Delwiche. 2001. The closest living relatives of land plants. Science294:2351-2353.
24.
Kimura, S., W. Laosinchai, T. Itoh, X. Cui, C. R. Linder, and R. M. Brown, Jr. 1999. Immunogold labeling of rosette terminal cellulose-synthesizing complexes in the vascular plant Vigna angularis. Plant Cell11:2075-2086.
25.
Koyama, M., W. Helbert, T. Imai, J. Sugiyama, and B. Henrissat. 1997. Parallel-up structure evidences the molecular directionality during biosynthesis of bacterial cellulose. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA94:9091-9095.
26.
Kurek, I., Y. Kawagoe, D. Jacob-Wilk, M. Doblin, and D. P. Delmer. 2002. Dimerization of cotton fiber cellulose synthase catalytic subunits occurs via oxidation of the zinc-binding domains. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11109-11114.
27.
Lagarias, D. M., S.-H. Wu, and J. C. Lagarias. 1995. Atypical phytochrome gene structure in the green alga Mesotaenium caldariorum. Plant Mol. Biol.29:1127-1142.
28.
Lukowitz, W., U. Mayer, and G. Jurgens. 1996. Cytokinesis in the Arabidopsis embryo involves the syntaxin-related KNOLLE gene product. Cell84:61-71.
29.
McCourt, R. M. 1995. Green algal phylogeny. Tree10:159-163.
30.
Mueller, S. C., and R. M. Brown, Jr. 1980. Evidence for an intramembrane component associated with a cellulose microfibril-synthesizing complex in higher plants. J. Cell Biol.84:315-326.
31.
Nobles, D. R., D. K. Romanovicz, and R. M. Brown, Jr. 2001. Cellulose in cyanobacteria. Origin of vascular plant cellulose synthase? Plant Physiol.127:529-542.
32.
Okuda, K., and R. M. Brown, Jr. 1992. A new putative cellulose-synthesizing complex of Coleochaete scutata. Protoplasma168:51-63.
33.
Page, R. D. M. 1996. TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput. Appl. Biosci.12:357-358.
34.
Pear, J. R., Y. Kawagoe, W. E. Schreckengost, D. P. Delmer, and D. M. Stalker. 1996. Higher plants contain homologs of the bacterial celA genes encoding the catalytic subunit of cellulose synthase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA93:12637-12642.
35.
Perrin, R. M. 2001. Cellulose: how many cellulose synthases to make a plant? Curr. Biol.11:R213-R216.
36.
Richmond, T. 2000. Higher plant cellulose synthases. Genome Biol.1:3001.1-3001.6.
37.
Richmond, T. A., and C. R. Somerville. 2000. The cellulose synthase superfamily. Plant Physiol.124:495-498.
38.
Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
39.
Saxena, I. M., F. C. Lin, and R. M. Brown, Jr. 1990. Cloning and sequencing of the cellulose synthase catalytic subunit gene of Acetobacter xylinum. Plant Mol. Biol.15:673-683.
40.
Scheible, W.-R., R. Eshed, T. Richmond, D. Delmer, and C. Somerville. 2001. Modifications of cellulose synthase confer resistance to isoxaben and thiazolidinone herbicides in Arabidopsis Ixr1 mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA98:10079-10084.
41.
Taylor, N. G., S. Laurie, and S. R. Turner. 2000. Multiple cellulose synthase catalytic subunits are required for cellulose synthesis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell12:2529-2539.
42.
Taylor, N. G., W.-R. Scheible, S. Cutler, C. R. Somerville, and S. R. Turner. 1999. The irregular xylem3 locus of Arabidopsis encodes a cellulose synthase required for secondary cell wall synthesis. Plant Cell11:769-779.
43.
Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin, and D. G. Higgins. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X Windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res.25:4876-4882.
44.
Tsekos, I. 1999. The sites of cellulose synthesis in algae: diversity and evolution of cellulose-synthesizing enzyme complexes. J. Phycol.35:635-655.
45.
Tusnády, G. E., and I. Simon. 1998. Principles governing amino acid composition of integral membrane proteins: applications to topology prediction. J. Mol. Biol.283:489-506.
46.
Vergara, C. E., and N. C. Carpita. 2001. β-d-Glycan synthases and the CesA gene family: lessons to be learned from the mixed-linkage (1→3),(1→4)β-d-glucan synthase. Plant Mol. Biol.47:145-160.
47.
Wong, H. C., A. L. Fear, R. D. Calhoon, G. H. Eichinger, R. Mayer, D. Amikam, M. Benziman, D. H. Gelfand, J. H. Meade, A. W. Emerick, R. Bruner, A. Ben-Bassat, and R. Tal. 1990. Genetic organization of the cellulose synthase operon in Acetobacter xylinum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA87:8130-8134.
48.
Wu, L., C. P. Joshi, and V. L. Chiang. 2000. A xylem-specific cellulose synthase gene from aspen (Populus tremuloides) is responsive to mechanical stress. Plant J.22:495-502.
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Copyright
© 2002 American Society for Microbiology.
History
Received: 30 April 2002
Accepted: 10 August 2002
Published online: 1 December 2002
Contributors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Note:
- For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
- There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
- Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.
Citations
Citation
2002.
Cellulose Synthase (CesA) Genes in the Green Alga Mesotaenium caldariorum. Eukaryot Cell
1:.
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.