DTP and DTaP Vaccines for Infants and Young Children
Prior to the 1940s, in excess of 200,000 pertussis cases were reported in the United States annually. In 1934, the greatest number (
n = 260,000) of annual cases was reported (
473). In the United States, DTP vaccines were first licensed in 1914 and became available for routine infant immunization in 1948 (
473). In 1976, the number of pertussis cases reported to the U.S. CDC reached its nadir at approximately 1,000 (
144,
271,
474 – 476). In the United States, the whole-cell pertussis vaccine has been administered to children in combination with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. Whole-cell pertussis vaccines, consisting of suspensions of inactivated
B. pertussis, elicit humoral immunity to pertussis following intramuscular injection (
477). Based on that concept, the first evidence of DTP vaccine efficacy was obtained from a clinical trial conducted during the 1929 pertussis outbreak in the Faroe Islands of Denmark (
478,
479). In the 1930s, many steps were taken to improve DTP vaccines, including increasing the number of inactivated
B. pertussis bacteria in the vaccine, standardizing the methods used to grow and kill the bacteria, and using fresh, rapidly growing phase one bacteria as the inoculum (
62,
480). As a result, a variety of DTP vaccines were produced in the United States, which varied in their methods of production and generated different levels of antibody response (
480,
481). Previous observational studies and clinical trials showed 70% to 90% efficacy of DTP vaccines to prevent serious pertussis disease (
158,
482 – 484). To enhance the immunogenicity of the vaccine and reduce its adverse effects, vaccine was adsorbed onto an aluminum salt (
284).
In 1970s, confidence in DTP vaccines began to decline in several countries after reports of local and systemic reactions surfaced in several locations (
Table 6). In addition to reports of local skin reactions at the injection site, other less common but more serious systemic adverse events were linked to DTP, including neurological diseases such as encephalopathy, infantile spasms, and sudden infant death syndrome (
485 – 487). Moreover, growing medical and public anxiety coupled with a heightened molecular structural knowledge of
B. pertussis led to production of less reactogenic acellular pertussis vaccines (
284). In Japan, Sato et al. designed the first purified-component DTaP vaccine (
488). The initial acellular vaccines (Takeda-type vaccines) consisted predominantly of FHA, small amounts of inactivated PT, and, in some cases, fimbrial proteins and PRN. These constructs were followed by development of other acellular (Biken-type) vaccines containing equal amounts of PT and FHA. Newer DTaP vaccines contained purified immunogenic antigens and excluded LPS, which was present in the DTP vaccines (
473,
489 – 493). In addition, the new-generation DTaP vaccines underwent rigorous testing for potential toxicity and potency in mice, while testing for potential adverse events and antibody response was done in children. The results of safety testing were reassuring and revealed that the efficacy of DTaP vaccines exceeded that of whole-cell DTP vaccines. Larger effectiveness trials and pertussis surveillance studies followed and proved that DTaP vaccines were effective and safe (
284).
In 1981, Japan introduced DTaP vaccines exclusively into the national immunization schedule. Since then, the reported number of pertussis cases in Japan has been low (
494 – 496). These results from Japan encouraged other developed countries to evaluate Japanese DTaP vaccines and to develop DTaP vaccines with additional antigens. Approximately 24 acellular pertussis vaccines have been designed, many of which were evaluated in large clinical trials (
Fig. 2; see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Although acellular pertussis vaccines are now used routinely in the immunization programs of many countries, optimizing the formulation of acellular vaccines has proven to be challenging, in part because no simple method (e.g., use of a correlate of protection) exists to evaluate the protective efficacy of newer pertussis vaccines (
188). Therefore, acellular pertussis vaccines vary with respect to manufacturer, number of components, quantity of each component, and methods of purification and toxin inactivation as well as incorporation adjuvants and excipients (
492).
Acellular pertussis vaccines have been studied extensively. In 1995, Edwards et al. conducted a large clinical trial to compare the safety and immunogenicity of 13 DTaP vaccines and two DTP vaccines (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) (
492,
493). The results of this study showed that all 13 DTaP vaccines were as immunogenic as or more immunogenic than DTP vaccines and were associated with substantially fewer and less-severe adverse reactions than standard commercial DTP vaccines. Another clinical trial was conducted in 1996 by Gustafsson et al. to determine the efficacy and safety of two-component DTaP, five-component DTaP, and DTP vaccines among approximately 10,000 Swedish infants (
404). The efficacy of the vaccines was determined to be approximately 60% for the two-component vaccine, 85% for the five-component vaccine, and 48% for the DTP vaccine. Rates of local skin reactions (redness of ≥2 cm, tenderness, and nodule of ≥2 cm) and systemic adverse events (fever of ≥38°C, crying longer than 1 h, weakness, cyanosis, and pallor) were significantly higher after any dose of DTP vaccine than after the three DTaP vaccines.
More recently, in 2012, Zhang et al. conducted a Cochrane review of several clinical trials that evaluated the safety and efficacy of one-, two-, and multicomponent DTaP vaccines in children (
489). In this review, the efficacies of multicomponent DTaP vaccines in preventing severe (∼85%) and mild (71% to 78%) pertussis were similar. The estimated efficacies of one- and two-component DTaP vaccines were 59% to 75% to protect against severe pertussis but only 13% to 54% to protect against mild pertussis. In addition, the efficacies of DTP and DTaP have been shown to decrease over time after receipt of the fifth dose of either vaccine. In one study, the efficacy of DTaP vaccine declined from 98% to 71% (one year versus 6 years from fifth-dose completion) (
497). In a large population-based study involved 15,286 participants, DTP vaccines yielded protection for 5 to 14 years (
393). Although the efficacy of acellular pertussis vaccines in published studies varies by the number of
B. pertussis antigens and manufacturer, a meta-analysis of several large pertussis vaccine trials showed no significant differences between DTaP and DTP vaccine efficacy against laboratory-confirmed pertussis (
Fig. 2).
In the past 30 years, there has been a substantial increase in disease rates, and several pertussis outbreaks have occurred across the United States despite continued high DTaP vaccination uptake estimates among infants (
174,
194,
201,
203 – 206,
271,
377,
476,
498). In addition, the epidemiology of pertussis has evolved such that pertussis in adolescents and adults continues to be a global concern even in countries with strong economies and high rates of childhood immunization, such as Australia, Belgium, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States (
174 – 187,
302,
499). This change in the epidemiology of pertussis has been reflected in the cases reported to the U.S. CDC and the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control (EUVAC). According to the U.S. CDC 2014 Provisional Pertussis Surveillance Report, the incidence rates of pertussis for the years 2013 and 2014 were approximately 151, 40, 22, 30, 25, and 2 per 100,000 persons for the age groups less than 6 months, 6 to 11 months, 1 to 6 years, 7 to 10 years, 11 to 19 years, and ≥20 years, respectively (
500). In the 2010 EUVAC pertussis surveillance report, the incidence rates of pertussis across Europe were 15, 4, 5, 13, 10, and 2 cases per 100,000 persons for the age groups less than 1 year, 1 to 4 years, 5 to 9 years, 10 to 14 years, 15 to 19 years, and ≥20 years of age, respectively (
501).
Several factors have been attributed to the increase in incidence rates and the shift in the epidemiology of pertussis, including lower immunization rates among adolescents and adults, waning immunity after receipt of acellular pertussis vaccines, an increase in the awareness of pertussis by health care providers caring for adolescents and adults, improvements in diagnostics and surveillance methods, evolution of
B. pertussis, and the spread of other
Bordetella species (
239 – 241,
246,
499,
502 – 513).
Some vaccine experts believe that the relatively short duration of immunity offered by acellular pertussis vaccines is the most important factor that explains the trends of outbreaks, particularly among children 7 to 10 years old (
193,
496). For example, during the California outbreak, children primed with DTP vaccines had longer-lasting immunity than those primed with DTaP (
502). In Australia, a sustained pertussis epidemic occurred in the past several years, which is thought to be a result of the switch from DTP to DTaP vaccines (
514). Other vaccine-preventable disease scientists do not believe that the change in the underlying
B. pertussis epidemiology is sufficient to explain the pertussis upsurge in adults but instead believe that increased public awareness and the addition of PCR and single-point serological diagnosis are the major factors for the high rates of cohort cases reported (
163,
193,
287). In addition,
B. parapertussis is often underdiagnosed and cannot be ignored as a potential cause for pertussis outbreaks, because no vaccine is currently available to protect humans from this species (
27).
The prevention of pertussis centers on the provision of pertussis vaccines in routine childhood immunization programs. These programs vary across countries where licensed pertussis vaccines have been administered to infants, children, and adults. In the United States, and based on the guidelines of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), the childhood immunization schedule for DTaP vaccine consists of five doses for children less than 7 years of age. These five doses are given at 2, 4, 6, and 15 to 18 months of age, and one booster dose is given at 4 to 6 years of age (
515,
516). Although DTaP vaccines became widely used in many countries, including the United States, Canada, and Australia, in some Asian and many European countries, DTP vaccines are still the mainstay of pertussis prevention (
182,
432,
517 – 519).
In the United States, despite great success of public health programs and availability of vaccines for disadvantaged children through the federally funded Vaccines for Children Program, many children in medically underserved areas as well as in minority groups remain partially immunized or nonimmunized (
520). Recent (2015) data from Detroit, MI, show that only 40% of children have completed the primary vaccination series and suggest that rates of underimmunization may exceed 50% in some populations (Michigan Care Improvement Registry, unpublished data). Such underimmunization suggests the need for improved local-, state-, and national-level immunization strategies to reach the Healthy People 2020 goals of 95% vaccine coverage for several pediatric vaccines (
521).
Tdap Immunization for Adolescents and Adults
Even in countries with substantial childhood vaccination coverage (sometimes defined as ≥70%), the protection provided by vaccination tends to decrease over time due to waning immunity (
155,
384). In 2003, Crowcroft et al. estimated that the proportion of susceptible children who became infected with
B. pertussis was ∼10 percent at 1 year after complete vaccination, 60% by 5 years, and 100% by 15 years (
155). It has also been estimated that 80% of the current cases of pertussis occur because of waning immunity in household members who had been immunized against pertussis (
522). Such data underscore the importance of booster vaccination among older children, adolescents, and adults. Recent immunization efforts have focused on adults, because the disease in this age group is often overlooked and unrecognized (
225,
251,
282,
523). Moreover, adolescents and adults are usually the primary source of
B. pertussis transmission to neonates and infants, who are at risk of infection themselves (
476,
498,
524 – 527). As a result, another acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) was developed for adolescent and adult use.
Similar to DTaP vaccines, Tdap vaccines have demonstrated high levels of safety and immunogenicity. In a small group of adolescents (
n = 123) aged 11 to 18 years who had never received
B. pertussis antigen-containing vaccines and had no history of
B. pertussis infection, 89% of participants mounted anti-PT antibodies, and all participants had an immune response to at least one
B. pertussis antigens (FHA or pertactin) 29 to 49 days after vaccination (
528). In 2007, Wei et al. investigated a pertussis outbreak at a private school on the island of St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands (
n = 499 students, nursery school through twelfth grade) to determine Tdap vaccine effectiveness (
529). They determined that the estimated Tdap vaccine effectiveness was approximately 66%. In a large randomized clinical trial involving 802 participants aged 18 to 55 years who had completed childhood vaccination with DTP and were given monocomponent Tdap in that study, the antibodies to PT were mounted in 92% at 1 month after vaccine administration (
530). In 2004, Purdy et al. conducted a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether Tdap administration in adolescents and adults would be a good strategy (
531). They found that vaccination is most cost-effective among adolescents because they have the highest incidence of pertussis and pertussis-related complications in which disease-related costs were indirect (i.e., lost productivity at work and disrupted social activities). The results of that study revealed that booster immunization for adolescents 10 to 19 years of age would prevent 0.7 to 1.8 million pertussis cases and save 0.6 to 1.6 billion dollars over 10 years. After an extensive review of its cost-effectiveness, Tdap is now recommended by the ACIP for a wide range of the general population.
Table 7 presents the ACIP recommendations for the Tdap vaccine.
A few years following release of the ACIP recommendations for Tdap vaccine, Koepke et al. conducted a population-based study to evaluate the effectiveness of Tdap vaccines in adolescents (
532). Koepke and colleagues used the Wisconsin Immunization Registry to collect Tdap vaccination histories and reports of laboratory-confirmed pertussis among adolescents during the Wisconsin pertussis outbreak of 2012. The results of their study showed that the effectiveness of Tdap vaccines decreased over a short time regardless of vaccine manufacturer. The estimated effectiveness was ∼75%, 68%, and 35%, and 12% for adolescents who received vaccines during 2012, 2011, 2010, and 2008/2009, respectively, with point estimates differing between the two Tdap vaccine brands. However, in 2015, Decker et al. critiqued the study conducted by Koepke et al., claiming that it was neither randomized nor conducted prospectively (
533). In addition, Decker et al. claimed that the authors of that study were unable to control for brand-specific vaccine analyses, which could have been a potent confounding factor (
533). While future studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness of available Tdap vaccines and until a more durable vaccine is produced, clinician scientists have recently suggested that Tdap vaccination should be started at the age of 9 years instead of that currently recommended (11 years of age) (
534). They also suggested that a booster of Tdap vaccine should be administered every 5 to 10 years to every person. In addition, a booster of Tdap vaccine every 2 to 3 years during local pertussis epidemics may also be considered. Other experts urge the production of a single-component monovalent acellular pertussis vaccine (i.e., free of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids), which could allow more frequent boosters in adults (
535).
In the United States, most Tdap vaccines are administered in outpatient (ambulatory) clinic settings, community pharmacies, or public health departments (
536,
537). Although Tdap vaccines are widely available in those settings, overall rates of Tdap immunization are still relatively low, particularly among adults (
508). The U.S. CDC showed that the uptake of Tdap vaccine among adults was ∼14% in 2014, while much higher vaccine uptake was reported among adolescents (i.e., ∼80% in 2012), likely because it is required for school enrollment in many states (
507,
508).
Tdap Immunization for Pregnant Women
During the last decade, 83% of whooping cough deaths occurred in infants under 3 months of age (
538). Experts now recognize that household members were the primary source of pertussis infection for children (
247,
249,
251,
524,
539 – 541). Although the source of infection (SOI) has not been identified in more than 50% of infant cases, mothers were recognized as the main SOI for an estimated 35% of infections in the United States (
247,
250,
540). Additional information has emerged in a number of reports from Australia and The Netherlands indicating that older children have become the most common SOI to their infant brothers and sisters (
253,
524,
542). In September 2015, Skoff and colleagues used enhanced pertussis surveillance data collected over an 8-year period (2006 to 2013) from seven states (Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mexico, New York, and Oregon) to identify the most common source of pertussis infection in the United States (
543). The results of this study showed that siblings (mean age, ∼8 years) are the main SOI (35.5%), followed by mothers (20.6%), and fathers (10%).
As a result of ongoing community pertussis transmission to babies who are too young for pertussis vaccination, the ACIP released an updated set of recommendations to protect babies from pertussis. The ACIP concluded that administration of Tdap vaccine during pregnancy is safe and immunogenic (
544 – 547). The ACIP recommended that pregnant women, preferably in the third or late second trimester, and all individuals who come into close contact with babies should receive one dose of Tdap vaccine (
544). Nevertheless, as antibody titers decay after 1 year post-Tdap vaccination in healthy adults, maternal antipertussis antibodies also wane rapidly so that there is little persistent antibody in the mother at the time of the next baby, even if the mother is immunized during a prior pregnancy (
548 – 551). Therefore, in 2012, the ACIP revised the recommendations and advised Tdap vaccine for all pregnant women and for each pregnancy irrespective of the interval between pregnancies (
545). Studies have shown that efficient antibody transfer occurred from vaccinated mothers to babies via the placenta, although antibody levels are neither optimum nor long-lasting (
545,
552,
553).
In October 2012, the United Kingdom introduced Tdap immunization for pregnant women. Since then, several studies have been conducted to evaluate vaccine safety and effectiveness. Based on preliminary data from the United Kingdom and Australia, babies born to vaccinated mothers are at lower risk of acquiring pertussis infection early in their lives than their unvaccinated counterparts (
554). In 2014, Donegan et al. used the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink to conduct a cohort study to examine the safety of pertussis vaccine in pregnancy (
555). More than 20,000 pregnant women who received the pertussis vaccine and a matched unvaccinated control group were observed for development of vaccine-related adverse events. The results of this study showed no evidence of a higher risk of stillbirth in the 2 weeks after vaccination or later in pregnancy. In addition, compared with the cohort of unvaccinated women, there was no evidence of a higher risk of premature delivery, stillbirth, maternal or neonatal death, pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, hemorrhage, fetal distress, low birth weight, or any other serious pregnancy- or delivery-related complications. Another study by Amirthalingam et al. analyzed 82 lab-confirmed infant pertussis cases identified from 2008 to 2013 in the United Kingdom Clinical Practice Research Datalink to assess maternal Tdap vaccine effectiveness (
556). Vaccine effectiveness in infants born after 1 October 2012 and younger than 3 months at onset was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84% to 95%). In 2015, Dabrera et al. conducted a case-control study in England and Wales for the period from October 2012 through July 2013 to determine the effectiveness of maternal Tdap vaccine in protecting infants from pertussis (
557). PCR or culture was used to confirm pertussis in clinically suspected disease in infants aged less than 8 weeks. Mothers of 10 cases and 29 controls received Tdap in pregnancy. The results in this study showed an adjusted Tdap vaccine effectiveness of 93% (95% CI, 81% to 97%).
Since the ACIP recommendations for pregnant women were issued, several concerns have been raised. In 2014, Jiménez-Truquehas and Edwards (
558) summarized those concerns as follows: (i) the safety profile of Tdap vaccine for both mothers and babies has not been extensively evaluated, (ii) the high concentration of antibodies transmitted transplacentally could minimize an infant's immune response to pertussis-containing vaccine (
559), and (iii) serological interference between maternal antibodies and infant antibodies after pertussis-containing vaccine can occur (
553). More recent comments about the ACIP recommendations were provided by Boyce and Virk (
534), who expressed concern that passive antipertussis immunity will not allow for sufficient herd immunity to protect infants from community exposures. Moreover, they asserted that the duration of protection yielded by maternal antibodies transfer is relatively short-lasting and will not impact the substantial morbidity that pertussis causes outside the period of infancy.
To address some of these concerns, Hardy-Fairbanks et al. conducted a cohort study in which 70 pregnant women were enrolled to evaluate the effect of maternal Tdap vaccination on infant immunological responses to routine pediatric vaccines (
553). At delivery, pertussis antibody titers among women receiving Tdap vaccine during pregnancy (
n = 16) were approximately 2- to 20-fold higher than those in the control group (unvaccinated women,
n = 54). Umbilical cord antibody titers were approximately 3- to 36-fold higher in vaccinated women than in unvaccinated women. They also found that infants whose mothers were vaccinated with Tdap during pregnancy maintained adequate antibody concentrations even after the first dose of DTaP vaccine was administered. However, slight declines in the immune response following the primary series of DTaP vaccine were observed in the Tdap group compared with controls, but no differences in immune response remained following the booster dose.
Additional studies suggest that there is no evidence of the interference between Tdap vaccine-induced maternal antibody and DTaP immunization among infants reported in previous studies of acellular pertussis vaccines (
560,
561). In 2014, Munoz et al. conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of Tdap vaccine (
n = 33) or placebo (
n = 15) given during the third trimester of pregnancy, with crossover vaccination postpartum (
561). At delivery, antibody titers in women who received Tdap vaccine during pregnancy were higher than those in women who received vaccine after delivery (
P < 0.001). Also, infants of mothers vaccinated with Tdap vaccine during pregnancy had higher immune responses at birth (
P < 0.001) and at age 2 months (
P < 0.001) than those of women who received a placebo in the third trimester. Antibody responses in infants born to mothers vaccinated with Tdap in pregnancy were not different following the fourth dose of DTaP vaccine from those in infants whose mothers were not vaccinated during pregnancy. This trial found no Tdap-associated serious reactions among infants or mothers. Developmental milestones and growth were similar in both infant groups.
In contrast, in 2014, Kharbanda et al. (
562,
563) conducted a retrospective cohort study to determine the risk of chorioamnionitis, preterm birth, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and small size for gestational age in 220 women with singleton pregnancies who received Tdap vaccine during the index pregnancy. They found that 6.1% of women exposed to the Tdap vaccine were diagnosed with chorioamnionitis, compared with 5.5% of those who did not receive the vaccine (adjusted relative risk [RR] = 1.19; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.26). No other statistically significant results were noted. Pertussis experts have encouraged more epidemiological studies and clinical trials to assess the duration of protection that antepartum immunization would offer to infants in order to better understand the immune response to pertussis vaccines and to implement more efficient strategies that would overcome existing barriers to vaccinating pregnant women (
410,
564 – 566). In the efforts to interrupt the circulation of
B. pertussis, several options have been suggested, including vaccination of all pregnant women, vaccination of all of an infant's close contacts, lowering the start date of infant immunization, reinstituting use of DTP vaccines, and adding another
B. pertussis antigen (e.g., AC or BrKA antigen) to existing DTaP vaccines (
193,
287). In 2008, Halasa et al. conducted a randomized controlled trial among 50 neonates aged 2 to 14 days (
567). Two subgroups of these neonates received DTaP vaccine either alone or in combination with hepatitis B vaccine. They found that the additional dose of DTaP at birth was safe but was significantly associated with lower responses to several pertussis antigens than in controls.
Despite national recommendations for maternal Tdap vaccination, the Tdap vaccine has been provided to only a fraction of eligible women in the United States. In 2013, data from California Department of Public Health indicated that only 25% of hospital-delivering women received Tdap vaccine during pregnancy (
554). Another national report found that fewer than three percent of pregnant women received maternal Tdap vaccination (
568). In Michigan, the average uptake of Tdap vaccine among pregnant women who are enrolled in the Medicaid health insurance plan was approximately 14% (
569). In a recent commentary, pediatric specialists at the University of California Los Angeles Medical Center (UCLA) observed that most mothers were not vaccinated with Tdap during pregnancy (
566). Since that report, the UCLA health system has mandated that obstetrics and gynecology clinics maintain a stock of Tdap vaccine for perinatal vaccination of expectant and new mothers.