According to European law (Directives 80/777/EEC and 96/70/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council), natural mineral water is microbiologically unaltered water and thus clearly distinguishable from ordinary drinking water. Furthermore, it is characterized by its constancy of composition concerning certain mineral salts and trace elements. Natural or drilled underground sources of natural mineral water must be protected from pollution to guarantee the original microbiological purity and the chemical composition of essential components of the mineral water. In addition, it is prohibited to subject natural mineral water to any treatment except for (i) the elimination and/or (re)introduction of carbon dioxide and (ii) the decantation and/or filtration of unstable constituents such as iron, manganese, sulfur, or arsenic compounds.
One consequence of these directives is that natural mineral water also contains the indigenous microbial flora present at the source (
28). This natural bacterial community appears to be highly preserved throughout the bottling process, as indicated by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) screening of numerous isolates obtained before and after bottling (
47). In 1960, Buttiaux and Boudier (
7) were the first to show that within 1 week after bottling and storage at ambient temperatures the natural microbial flora of the water starts to multiply and gives rise to an increase in CFU up to 10
4 to 10
5 ml
−1. Various research groups confirmed this bacterial growth phenomenon by quantifying the bacteria present in natural mineral waters at the source and at several points in time after bottling and storage at different temperatures (
6,
13,
19,
37,
40,
41,
53). These studies focused on quantification of the bacterial community as a whole by determining (i) heterotrophic plate counts, (ii) total cell counts using acridine orange or ethidium bromide, and/or (iii) viable cell counts using 2-(4-iodophenyl)-3-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-phenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride to quantify the number of actively respiring cells. Regarding the bacterial community composition of bottled mineral waters, only approaches based on isolation and subsequent identification of individual mineral water bacteria have been applied (
19,
20,
47). Given that cultivation-dependent community analyses generally suffer from well-recognized quantitative and qualitative biases (
45,
50), it is likely that the true bacterial community structure of bottled natural mineral waters remains largely unrecognized to date.
In the present study, the culture-independent full-cycle rRNA approach, involving the establishment of 16S rRNA gene clone libraries and the subsequent design and application of clone-specific probes for quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (
4,
23), was applied to provide a more realistic picture of the bacterial flora growing in a bottled noncarbonated natural mineral water. In contrast to previous reports, the actively growing bacterial community was found to be dominated by members of the betaproteobacterial order
Burkholderiales.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Storage and filtration of natural mineral water samples.
Noncarbonated natural mineral water samples (pH 7.2; mineral content [in mg liter−1]: Na+, 5; K+, 1; Ca2+, 78, Mg2+ 24; Cl−, 4.5; SO42− 10; NO3−, 3.8; HCO3−, 357) were analyzed at 1 to 23 days after bottling. Natural mineral water in 0.5- and 1.5-liter polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles was purchased either from a retail outlet in Germany or directly from the manufacturer within 1 day after bottling. Mineral water bottles were stored at room temperature (20 to 22°C) prior to investigation. Bottles were vigorously agitated twice daily to minimize biofilm formation on the bottle walls. For DNA extraction, whole-cell fixation for FISH, determination of viable cell counts, and PCR with whole cells, microbial cells were concentrated from 50 to 3,000 ml of mineral water on white polycarbonate (PC) filters (diameter, 25 mm; pore size, 0.2 μm [GTTP 02500; Millipore, Eschborn, Germany]) by using a stainless steel vacuum filtration unit consisting of six glass filter towers (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany).
Extraction of genomic DNA.
DNA was extracted from 500 to 3,000 ml of mineral water by using two different methods. Prior to both DNA extractions, planktonic bacteria were enriched on a PC filter by filtration. Subsequently, the PC filter was cut into small pieces with a sterile scalpel. For DNA extraction according to method I, bacteria were resuspended from the PC filter pieces by vortexing with 2 ml of natural mineral water and pelleted by centrifugation (14,000 rpm, 10 min). DNA from pelleted bacteria was extracted by enzymatic cell lysis and chloroform treatment according to a previously established protocol (
55). Method II involved the resuspension of PC filter pieces in 400 μl of TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]). Subsequently, cells were lysed by ultrasonic treatment (Sonorex Super RK 102 H; Bandelin, Berlin, Germany) with sterile glass beads (diameter, 0.10 to 0.11 mm) for 10 min in the presence of 50 μl of 25% sodium dodecyl sulfate and 600 μl of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25:24:1). Lysates were incubated at 65°C for 10 min and subsequently centrifuged (14,000 rpm, 10 min). Nucleic acids were extracted twice with 1 ml of phenol each time. To precipitate nucleic acids from the solution, 0.1 volumes of 3 M sodium acetate (pH 5.2) and 2.5 volumes of ice-cold ethanol were added, followed by incubation for 2 h at −20°C. Precipitated DNA was washed with ice-cold 70% ethanol and resuspended in 50 μl of double-distilled water prior to storage at −20°C.
Enrichment of microbial cells from mineral water for direct PCR.
Bacteria from 500 ml of bottled natural mineral water were enriched on a PC filter by filtration and subsequently resuspended from the filter surface with 2 ml of mineral water by vortexing. After centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 10 min) and disposal of the supernatant, the cell pellet was resuspended in 20 μl of mineral water and stored at −20°C.
PCR amplification.
Oligonucleotide primers (616V-630R) targeting the 16S rRNA genes of almost all bacteria were used for PCR to obtain almost full-length bacterial 16S rRNA gene fragments (∼1.5 kb) as described previously (
24). Reaction mixtures containing 25 pmol of each primer were prepared in a total volume of 50 μl by using 10× REDTaq PCR buffer and 3 U of REDTaq DNA polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany). Thermal cycling was carried out by an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 40 s, annealing at 52°C for 40 s, and elongation at 72°C for 1 min 30 s. Cycling was completed by a final elongation step at 72°C for 10 min. The presence and size of the amplification products were determined by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Ethidium bromide-stained bands were digitally recorded with a video documentation system (Cybertech, Hamburg, Germany).
16S rRNA sequence analysis.
Amplified 16S rRNA gene sequences were cloned, sequenced, and phylogenetically analyzed according to previously described procedures (
32). All 16S rRNA gene-containing clones were screened by RFLP analysis by using the four-base-specific restriction endonucleases CfoI and MspI in 1× SuRE/Cut buffer L (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) (
22). The new 16S rRNA gene sequences were added to an alignment of ca. 50.000 full small-subunit rRNA sequences (
http://arb-db-central.swiki.net/1 ) by using the alignment tool ARB_EDIT of the ARB program package (
34). Alignments were refined by visual inspection. Chimeric sequences were identified by independently subjecting base positions 1 to 513, 514 to 1026, and 1027 to 1539 (
Escherichia coli numbering) of the 16S rRNA sequence to phylogenetic analysis. Inconsistent affiliation of the gene fragments in the phylogenetic trees was interpreted as being caused by a chimeric sequence. Phylogenetic analyses were performed by applying distance matrix, maximum-parsimony, and maximum-likelihood methods. Only alignment positions that were conserved in ≥50% of either bacterial or proteobacterial sequences were analyzed. Phylogenetic consensus trees were prepared as recommended previously (
33). Names of bacterial taxa were used in accordance with the prokaryotic nomenclature proposed in the taxonomic outline of the second edition of
Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bergeysoutline200210 ) (
15).
Fixation of microbial cells on PC filters for FISH.
After filtration of microbial cells on white PC filters, all fixation and washing steps were performed in the vacuum filtration unit by successively applying and removing a vacuum. All fixation solutions were prepared as described previously (
10). The PC filter was covered with fresh fixation solution (4% paraformaldehyde in 1× phosphate-buffered saline) for 20 min. Fixation solution was removed by applying a vacuum. Subsequently, PC filters were successively washed three times with 1× phosphate-buffered saline and double-distilled water, air dried, and stored in the dark prior to FISH.
Oligonucleotide probes and FISH.
Probes used in the present study are listed in Table
1. Newly developed probes were additionally deposited at probeBase (
http://www.microbial-ecology.net/probebase/ ) (
31). Oligonucleotides labeled with the hydrophilic sulfoindocyanine dye Cy3 were purchased from Hybaid-Interaktiva (Ulm, Germany). Optimal hybridization conditions were determined for newly designed probes (
23) by using previously established hybridization and washing buffers (
36). In situ hybridization of paraformaldehyde-fixed bacteria on a PC filter was performed according to a published protocol (
17). Accordingly, the PC filter with the paraformaldehyde-fixed bacteria was cut into four sections. Each filter section was placed on a microscopic slide and covered with 30 μl of hybridization solution. Hybridization was performed in an equilibrated chamber at 46°C. Subsequently, filter sections were stringently washed for 15 min at 48°C and dried on Whatman 3M paper (Whatman International, Ltd., Maidstone, United Kingdom).
DAPI and ChemChrome staining.
PC filter sections with oligonucleotide probe-stained bacteria were covered with ice-cold 1.5 μM DAPI (4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole) solution (
21) and stained for 10 min on ice in the dark. Thereafter, the filter sections were washed with ice-cold double-distilled water followed by 50% ethanol, dried on Whatman 3M paper, and mounted on glass slides with Citifluor AF1 (Citifluor, Ltd., Canterbury, United Kingdom).
Viability staining of microbial cells was performed immediately after filtration by covering the PC filter with the fluorogenic esterase substrate ChemChrome (Chemunex, Maisson-Alfort, France) according to the manufacturer's recommendations.
Total, probe-dependent, and viable cell counts.
An epifluorescence microscope equipped with a mercury lamp (Axioplan HBO 50; Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) and appropriate fluorescence filter sets for counting of probe (Cy3 filter set HQCy3; excitation, BP535/50 nm; dichroic mirror Q565 LP; emission, BP610/75 nm [Carl Zeiss])-, DAPI (filter set 01; excitation, 365/12; dichroic mirror 397; emission LP397 [Carl Zeiss])-, and ChemChrome (filter set 09, excitation, BP470/40 nm; dichroic mirror, 510 nm; emission, LP520 nm [Carl Zeiss])-stained microbial cells was used. The total and viable cell numbers were determined by counting DAPI- and ChemChrome-stained cells, respectively, in at least 50 randomly chosen fields of view. For analyzing the relative cell numbers of individual bacterial populations, FISH was combined with DAPI staining. For each hybridization experiment, probe- and DAPI-stained cells in 20 randomly chosen fields of view were counted at a magnification of 400 or 1,000. In each microscopic field probe-positive cell counts were determined first. Bleaching of Cy3-labeled cells by UV light prior to their recording could thereby be avoided. All probe-dependent counts were corrected by subtracting the counts obtained with the negative control probe NON338 (Table
1). The ratio of the number of cells labeled by the rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe to the total number of cells stained by DAPI was calculated for each field of view.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
The sequences obtained in the present study are available in GenBank under accession numbers AF522997 to AF523070 .
DISCUSSION
Although the factors responsible for the growth of bacteria in natural mineral waters after bottling have been extensively discussed previously (
29), knowledge of the actual microbial diversity is still limited. Community structure data for natural mineral waters have thus far been obtained solely by cultivation-based methods. The most frequently isolated microorganisms from bottled natural mineral water were aerobic heterotrophs belonging mainly to the
Gamma but also to the
Alpha and
Beta classes of
Proteobacteria (for reviews, see references
28 and
29). However, because of their inherent qualitative and quantitative biases, cultivation-based diversity surveys are rather unlikely to reflect the true microbial community structure present in situ (
12,
27,
45,
50). The present study provides for the first time quantitative in situ data on the bacterial community composition in a noncarbonated natural mineral water at different points in time after filling. Using cultivation-independent 16S rRNA gene-based molecular techniques we could (i) identify most of the bacterial groups responsible for the bacterial growth, and (ii) reveal their relative contributions to overall cell numbers.
16S rRNA gene library surveys allow the determination of species richness (measured as number of OTUs) in any given habitat. In contrast to eutrophic wastewater systems (
51), the oligotrophic natural mineral water investigated in the present study showed a much lower species richness (11 OTUs) (Table
3). The observed low species number probably reflects the limited availability of dissolved organic carbon in this highly oligotrophic habitat (
28). Surprisingly, eight of the 11 OTUs identified had high 16S rRNA gene similarities (above 97%) to described species, and phylogenetic analyses unambiguously placed these in the betaproteobacterial genera
Hydrogenophaga,
Aquabacterium,
Polaromonas,
Rhodoferax, and
Limnobacter (all in the order
Burkholderiales), and in the alphaproteobacterial genera
Caulobacter (two OTUs) and
Bradyrhizobium (Fig.
2 and Table
3). In accordance with previous reports on the lifestyle of bacteria in bottled mineral waters (
28,
29), most described members of these genera are heterotrophs, preferably using oxygen as an electron acceptor (
14,
26,
43,
54). Recently, 34 clusters of typical planktonic bacteria in lakes and rivers were delineated by phylogenetic analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences (
56). However, none of the clones from our study belong to these surface freshwater clusters. In contrast, some of our OTUs are affiliated with sequences retrieved from groundwater habitats (Fig.
2), supporting the hypothesis that bacteria growing in bottled mineral waters mainly originate from the underground source (
47). Biofilms growing in the bottling plant could represent an additional origin for bacteria in the bottled mineral water; e.g.,
Aquabacterium and
Caulobacter species are known to inhabit freshwater biofilms (
26,
44).
For an encompassing assessment of microbial diversity, knowledge of species richness has to be supplemented with quantitative data about the relative proportions of the individual bacterial groups (species evenness). By using quantitative FISH, we could demonstrate that
Betaproteobacteria dominated the growing bacterial consortium in the mineral water analyzed. This observation is consistent with the general importance of this class in diverse oligotrophic freshwater habitats including lake waters (
18) and drinking water distribution systems (
25). Although bacteria of the genera
Hydrogenophaga,
Aquabacterium, and
Polaromonas (order
Burkholderiales) contributed substantially to overall bacterial growth, the proportion of
Betaproteobacteria that could not be identified varied depending on bottle size and sampling time. Given that the relative numbers of
Betaproteobacteria (class level) remained essentially constant after the late logarithmic growth phase (Fig.
4), these observations might best be explained by shifts in community composition among betaproteobacterial genera or species. Thus, bacteria belonging to the other three identified betaproteobacterial OTUs (also members of the order
Burkholderiales), for which no specific probes were designed and applied, might have been numerically more abundant in situ than suggested by the number of clones representing these organisms in the gene libraries.
Many novel fluorescent and nonfluorescent
Pseudomonas species have been isolated from natural mineral waters (
5,
8,
11,
48,
49). Although these
Pseudomonas species have been described as being by far the most important members of the natural mineral water flora (
28,
29), it should be noted that (i) none of the 16S rRNA gene clones retrieved in our study were of gammaproteobacterial origin and (ii) only a maximum of 9% of all FISH-positive cells were identified as
Gammaproteobacteria by using oligonucleotide probe GAM42a. We additionally analyzed bottled natural mineral waters of five other brands by FISH (data not shown) and the proportion of
Gammaproteobacteria never exceeded 6% of the bacterial cells. Although only a limited number of different mineral water brands was analyzed, our data are not consistent with the current perception that gammaproteobacterial species, such as
Pseudomonas, are key players in bottled natural mineral waters. It is thus tempting to speculate that members of the
Betaproteobacteria, more precisely of the order
Burkholderiales, may also be the dominant bacteria in some other natural mineral waters. The genus-specific probe set developed in the present study could be used in future diversity surveys to explore this possibility.
Finally, it is important to know whether the autochthonous bacteria are harmful to human health. Although this possibility cannot be ruled out by the applied methods, it is noteworthy that none of the identified bacteria was closely related to any known human pathogen.