Research Article
1 February 2001

Management of Indigenous Plant-Microbe Symbioses Aids Restoration of Desertified Ecosystems

ABSTRACT

Disturbance of natural plant communities is the first visible indication of a desertification process, but damage to physical, chemical, and biological soil properties is known to occur simultaneously. Such soil degradation limits reestablishment of the natural plant cover. In particular, desertification causes disturbance of plant-microbe symbioses which are a critical ecological factor in helping further plant growth in degraded ecosystems. Here we demonstrate, in two long-term experiments in a desertified Mediterranean ecosystem, that inoculation with indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and with rhizobial nitrogen-fixing bacteria not only enhanced the establishment of key plant species but also increased soil fertility and quality. The dual symbiosis increased the soil nitrogen (N) content, organic matter, and hydrostable soil aggregates and enhanced N transfer from N-fixing to nonfixing species associated within the natural succession. We conclude that the introduction of target indigenous species of plants associated with a managed community of microbial symbionts is a successful biotechnological tool to aid the recovery of desertified ecosystems.
Desertification of terrestrial ecosystems is claiming several million hectares annually (29). It results from anthropogenic impacts which exacerbate the activity of natural agents. Disturbance of natural plant communities is the first visible symptom but is often accompanied or preceded by loss of key physicochemical and biological soil properties (soil structure, plant nutrient availability, organic matter content, and/or microbial activity (24). These properties largely determine soil quality and fertility, and thus plant establishment and productivity. Hence their degradation results in a loss of sustainability. Since soil degradation limits the potential for reestablishment of native plants (1, 29), erosion and desertification are accelerated. Desertification has a negative environmental impact, particularly in arid, semiarid, and subhumid areas of the world (13). In particular, desertification reduces the inoculum potential of mutualistic microbial symbionts that are key ecological factors in governing the cycles of major plant nutrients and hence in sustaining the vegetation cover in natural habitats. The most important symbionts are (i) mycorrhizal fungi, which enhance the ability of plants to establish and cope in stress situations (nutrient deficiency, drought, soil disturbance, etc.) (8, 23), and (ii) N-fixing rhizobia, which enable leguminous plants to flourish in the absence of adequate fixed N sources. A reduction in the potential to form these symbioses therefore hinders revegetation success (2, 14, 22). Mediterranean regions are characterized by a set of climatic conditions which include a long dry and hot summer, with scarce, erratic, but torrential rainfalls. This climate, together with anthropogenic degradative activities (overgrazing, nonregulated cultivation techniques, deforestation, etc.), is a major threat to the sustainability of Mediterranean ecosystems (16, 27). Susceptibility to desertification in Mediterranean regions is increasing worldwide (29). Desertified and desertification-threatened areas are common in the Mediterranean regions of Europe, particularly in southeastern Spain, and there are many representative areas where reclamation or rehabilitation programs are being attempted to restore sustainable ecosystems (12, 13, 18). Shrub communities, associated with other small woody plants, are characteristic of these semiarid ecosystems, with nitrogen-fixing legumes being key components of the natural succession (5, 12, 13, 18). These species are extremely important because their associated rhizobial symbioses constitute a source of N input to the ecosystem (7). Thus, reestablishing a shrubland is a key step in revegetation strategies. All the woody legumes involved also form a symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) (13). The fungal mycelium which extends from the mycorrhizal roots forms a three-dimensional network which links the roots and the soil environment. It constitutes an efficient system for nutrient uptake (particularly P) and scavenging in nutrient-poor conditions. The mycelium also contributes to the formation of water-stable aggregates necessary for good soil tilth (15). In the tripartite rhizobial-AMF-legume symbiosis, there is synergism between the partners in that the scarcity of available P in desertified ecosystems limits legume establishment and N2 fixation (7) in the absence of AM formation. Loss of microsymbiont propagules from degraded Mediterranean ecosystems can preclude either natural or artificial processes of revegetation; therefore, augmentation of the inoculum may be needed (20). In revegetation schemes, inoculation of plants with microsymbionts should not only help plant establishment (13) but also improve the physical, chemical, and biological soil properties contributing to soil quality (10). This premise has to be tested experimentally.
The main objective of this investigation was to assess the long-term benefits of inoculation with a combination of AMF and rhizobial strains on the establishment of key plant species in a representative desertified Mediterranean ecosystem. The experimental variables to be tested in transplanted seedlings included survival rates, N fixation, N transfer from N-fixing to nonfixing species associated in the natural succession, and improvements in soil quality in terms of N content, levels of organic matter (OM), and hydrostable soil aggregates. In addition, we determined whether these changes were accompanied by an increase in the inoculum potential of AMF, suggesting that this represented the initial steps in the restoration of a self-sustaining ecosystem.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The ecosystem.

A representative area within a desertified semiarid ecosystem in the Sierra de los Filabres, Almeria, southeastern Spain, was chosen for field studies. The existing natural vegetation was a degraded shrubland where Anthyllis cytisoides, a drought-tolerant legume able to form symbioses with both rhizobial and AM microsymbionts, was the dominant species (20). Small numbers of indigenous AMF spores (Scutellospora calospora,Glomus coronatum, G. constrictum,Acaulospora spp., and an undescribed hyaline species typical of semiarid soils [11]) were present in the soil, but the indigenous inoculum potential of AMF was inadequate to support an extensive revegetation program (20). Two experiments were carried out.

Experiment 1.

Seeds of A. cytisoides were collected at random from wild plants growing in the experimental area and germinated (20). After 3 days, seedlings were transferred to 325-ml plastic containers (Troncoconic), as used in commercial forestry practice, filled with 300 g of autoclaved soil from the field site. Plants (40 per treatment) were grown under nursery conditions at ambient temperatures from 19 to 25°C, with watering every 2 days. All seedlings were inoculated with a previously selected rhizobial culture, Rhizobium sp. strain NR4 (from the collection of this institute [21]), and received one of three mycorrhizal treatments: (i) inoculation with an exotic AMF,Glomus intraradices, from the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientı́ficas collection; (ii) inoculation with a mixture of indigenous AMF; or (iii) a control treatment of sterile inoculum. Inoculation was performed such that each seedling received 20 g of inoculum (21) consisting of a mixture of spores, hyphae, and mycorrhizal onion root fragments from trap cultures containing either G. intraradices or all five AMF taxa and representing the natural abundance and diversity in the site. The control was an autoclaved mixture of these AMF inocula.
After 6 months, in November 1994, the plants were transplanted to the chosen desertified ecosystem (20). The plants were planted 1 m apart in a randomized design in a bare area at a density similar to the natural abundance in well-covered areas in the adjacent ecosystem. The plants were left to develop under field conditions without any further management. After 12, 36, and 60 months, the plants were assessed for percentage survival. Fifteen representative plants per treatment were selected for monitoring of the key experimental variables in the adjacent rhizosphere soil, such as soil aggregation (9), nitrogen and organic matter content (9), number of AMF infective propagules (10), and height and diameter of the plant canopies. In each case, rhizosphere soil was collected by using a corer. Climatological characteristics are described elsewhere (19), but the key features were as follows: average annual rainfall, 218 mm; temperature range, 4 to 30°C; average yearly temperature, 18°C.

Experiment 2.

Two-month-old seedlings of both A. cytisoides and Lavandula multifida plants were transplanted into an adjacent experimental area to that used for experiment 1. The plants were produced as above, except that only two treatments were compared (plus or minus the inoculum of indigenous AMF). The Anthyllis seedlings were inoculated with a rhizobial culture as before. A completely randomized block design was used for planting, consisting of two factors: planting combinations and AMF inoculation treatments. The planting combinations included (i)Anthyllis growing alone, (ii) Lavandula growing alone, and (iii) the plants growing as a mixture of the two species. In all cases, the plants were planted 20 cm apart to facilitate rhizosphere interactions. The other factor, the AMF treatment consisted of (i) plants inoculated with the mixture of indigenous AMF as prepared for experiment 1 and (ii) the noninoculated control (also prepared as in experiment 1). There were 20 plants per species/planting combination and AMF treatment. All plants received a single dressing at transplanting of the isotope 15N as (NH4)2SO4 with 10% 15N atom excess, at a rate equivalent to 5 kg of N ha−1 to measure N fixation and N transfer from the N-fixing to the non-N-fixing plants (7). After 10 months of growth under natural conditions in the field, the plants were harvested and shoot biomass was determined after drying for 48 h at 60°C. Isotopic N composition was determined (7), and the roots were evaluated for percent colonization by AMF (21).

RESULTS

Experiment 1.

The results of a 5-year trial showed significant improvements in the performance of Anthyllis plants inoculated with native AMF and rhizobial ecosymbionts (Fig.1). Survival rates were higher in AMF-inoculated than in uninoculated plants (80 and 65%, respectively), but at least 25 plants in any treatment, out of the 40 transplanted, survived the dry and adverse conditions during the first year after outplanting, with no more losses afterward. In year 1, the plants inoculated with the exotic AMF G. intraradices were larger than those that underwent the other two treatments, but by year 3 the plants inoculated with the mixed indigenous AMF were the largest. By year 5, the plants inoculated with G. intraradices were not significantly larger than the plants not inoculated with AMF whereas the plants inoculated with the mixed inoculum were almost twice as large as those that underwent the other two treatments.
Fig. 1.
Fig. 1. Time course changes in plant growth of field-established nodulated A. cytisoides growing under natural conditions, either uninoculated (□) or inoculated with G. intraradices(■) or with native AMF (▨). For each experimental variable, mean values not sharing a letter differ significantly at P < 0.05 by Duncan's multiple-range test.
Inoculation with the microbial ecosymbionts resulted in an increase in the number of AMF propagules able to develop colonization units on plant roots in the soil around the Anthyllis plants (Fig.2). Diversity analysis of AMF propagules in the rhizosphere of Anthyllis plants showed that all five key taxa were present in the rhizosphere of all plants in year 5 while spores of the introduced exotic AMF were scarce.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2. Time course changes in soil traits related to soil quality in the rhizosphere of field-established nodulated plants ofA. cytisoides growing under natural conditions, either uninoculated (□) or inoculated with G. intraradices (■) or with native AMF (▨). For each experimental variable, mean values not sharing a letter differ significantly at P < 0.05 by Duncan's multiple range test. Data points on the yaxis represent background values in the bare soil before transplanting.
There were also significant improvements in years 3 and 5 in the physicochemical properties in the soil around the Anthyllisplants inoculated with the mixed AMF inoculum, including N content, amount of OM, and aggregation (Fig. 2).

Experiment 2.

The 1-year field trial used 15N isotope dilution techniques to study N fixation in Anthyllisand N transfer from this plant to Lavandula, a nonleguminous woody species commonly associated with Anthyllis in the natural plant succession in the target area (5). The results (Fig. 3) showed that (i)Lavandula plants benefited from growing with the N-fixing legume, with regard to both biomass accumulation and N acquisition; (ii) inoculation with native AMF benefited plant growth, N fixation, and N transfer in both plants, even though indigenous fungi had colonized the roots of noninoculated plants to high levels after 10 months in the field; and (iii) inoculation of Anthyllis with AMF also enhanced the mycorrhizal level of uninoculatedLavandula plants growing nearby.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3. Above-ground biomass production, amount of N in the legume derived from biological fixation (%NdfFix), amount of N in the nonlegume derived from transfer of the N fixed by the legume (%NdfTransf), and mycorrhizal colonization in plants of A. cytisoides and L. multifida growing for 10 months under natural conditions, either uninoculated (□) or inoculated with native AMF (▨). For each experimental variable, mean values not sharing a letter differ significantly at P < 0.05 by Duncan's multiple-range test.

DISCUSSION

In relation to applied environmental microbiology, the following three main points deserve discussion: (i) whether the microsymbionts, particularly native versus exotic AMF, were effective in improving outplanting performance and survival of native legumes; (ii) whether a long-term effect of AMF inoculation on physicochemical soil properties was evident; and (iii) whether AMF inoculants affect N fixation by the target legume and the subsequent N transfer to improve N nutrition for non-N-fixing vegetation.
The effectiveness of microsymbionts in improving the outplanting performance of native shrub legumes was evident. Results from experiment 1 showed that bioaugmentation of the soil with an inoculum of a mixed, native AMF inoculum increased plant productivity. This correlates with other studies which show that native AMF are important contributors to plant biodiversity and ecosystem productivity (3, 28). It is noteworthy that all five key taxa of AMF propagules were present in the rhizosphere of all plants in year 5, while spores of the introduced exotic AMF were scarce. Thus, the inoculum had established sustainable relationships with the transplants and would maintain the inoculum potential of the ecosystem. These results demonstrate that this biotechnology (microsymbiont inoculation) can be used in revegetation strategies for desertified lands.
A long-term improvement in the physicochemical properties was evident in the soil around the Anthyllis plants inoculated with the mixed AMF inoculum, including increased N content and higher levels of OM and soil aggregation. An increase in the levels of both OM and N in soil stimulates plant development (12, 18, 27). The OM content increases mainly through leaf and branch fall, but it has also been related to the extent of AM colonization of the root (10). It can be assumed that the increase in N content in the rhizosphere of the legume can be accounted for by an improvement in nodulation and N fixation capacity resulting from inoculation with AMF (7). The improvement of soil aggregation contributes to the maintenance of good water infiltration rates, good tilth, and adequate aeration for plant growth, thus improving soil quality (30). The important role of the soil mycelium of AMF in the formation of water-stable soil aggregates is well documented (4, 9, 17, 26), and the involvement of glomalin, a glycoprotein produced by the external hyphae of AMF, has been demonstrated (30). Glomalin has been suggested to contribute to the hydrophobicity of soil particles and also, because its glue-like hydrophobic nature, to participate in the initiation of soil aggregates (30).
It is clear from the results of the experiment 2 that inoculation with native AMF benefited plant growth, N fixation, and N transfer. An improved N status of nonleguminous plants grown in association with legumes has previously been described for agricultural crops (6, 15), but this is the first demonstration of this phenomenon for natural plant communities in a semiarid ecosystem. The results emphasize the important role of shrub legumes as a source of AMF inoculum for the surrounding area and in improving N nutrition for non-N-fixing vegetation. They support the general conclusion that the introduction of target indigenous species of plants associated with a managed community of microbial symbionts is a successful biotechnological tool to aid the recovery of desertified ecosystems.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the CICYT, OECD, Wain Fund, and EU REDEEM, REDMED and MYRISME Projects.

REFERENCES

1.
Agnew C. and Warren A. A framework for tackling drought and land degradation. J. Arid Environ. 33 1996 309 -320
2.
Allen E. B. The restoration of disturbed arid landscapes with special reference to mycorrhizal fungi. J. Arid Environ. 17 1989 279 -286
3.
Allen E. B., Allen M. F., Helm D. J., Trappe J. M., Molina R., and Rincon E. Patterns and regulation of mycorrhizal plant and fungal diversity. Plant Soil 170 1995 47 -62
4.
Andrade G., Mihara K. L., Linderman R. G., and Bethlenfalvay G. J. Soil aggregation status and rhizobacteria in the mycorrhizosphere. Plant Soil 202 1998 89 -96
5.
Azcón R. and Barea J. M. Mycorrhizal dependency of a representative plant species in Mediterranean shrublands (Lavandula spica L.) as a key factor to its use for revegetation strategies in desertification-threatened areas. Appl. Soil Ecol. 7 1997 83 -92
6.
Azcón-Aguilar C., Azcón R., and Barea J. M. Endomycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium as biological fertilizers for Medicago sativa in normal cultivation. Nature 27 1979 235 -237
7.
Barea J. M., Azcón R., and Azcón-Aguilar C. Vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in nitrogen-fixing systems. Methods Microbiol. 24 1992 391 -416
8.
Barea J. M., Azcón-Aguilar C., and Azcón R. Interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and rhizosphere microorganisms within the context of sustainable soli-plant systems Multitrophic interactions in terrestrial systems. Gange A. C. and Brown V. K. 1997 65 -77 Backwell Science Cambridge, United Kingdom
9.
Bethlenfalvay G. J., Cantrell I. C., Mihara K. L., and Schreiner R. P. Relationships between soil aggregation and mycorrhizae as influenced by soil biota and nitrogen nutrition. Biol. Fertil. Soils 28 1999 356 -363
10.
Carrillo-Garcı́a A., Leon de la Luz J. L., Bashan Y., and Bethlenfalvay G. J. Nurse plants, mycorrhizae, and plant establishment in a disturbed area of the Sonoran Desert. Restor. Ecol. 7 1999 321 -335
11.
Dodd J. C. and Krikun J. Observations on endogonaceous spores in the Negev Desert. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 82 1984 536 -540
12.
Francis C. F. and Thornes J. B. Matorral: erosin and reclamation Soil degradation and rehabilitation in Mediterranean environmental conditions. Albadalejo J., Stocking M. A., and Dı́az E. 1990 87 -115 CSIC Murcia, Spain
13.
Herrera M. A., Salamanca C. P., and Barea J. M. Inoculation of woody legumes with selected arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia to recover desertified Mediterranean ecosystems. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59 1993 129 -133
14.
Jasper D. A., Abbott L. K., and Robson A. D. Soil disturbance reduces the infectivity of external hyphae of vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 112 1989 93 -99
15.
Jeffries P. and Barea J. M. Arbuscular mycorrhiza—a key component of sustainable plant-soil ecosystems The mycota. IX. Fungal associations. Hock B. 2000 95 -113 Springer-Verlag KG Berlin, Germany
16.
López-Bermúdez F. and Albaladejo J. Factores ambientales de la degradación del suelo en el area mediterránea Soil degradation and rehabilitation in Mediterranean environmental conditions. Albadalejo J., Stocking M. A., and Dı́az E. 1990 15 -45 CSIC Murcia, Spain
17.
Miller R. M. and Lodge D. J. Fungal reponses to disturbance: agriculture and forestry The mycota. IV. Environmental and microbial relationships. Wicklow D. T. and Söderström D. T. 1997 65 -80 Springer-Verlag KG Berlin, Germany
18.
Morgan R. P. C., Rickson R. J., and Wright W. Regeneration of degraded soils Soil degradation and rehabilitation in Mediterranean environmental conditions. Albadalejo J., Stocking M. A., and Dı́az E. 1990 69 -85 CSIC Murcia, Spain
19.
Puigdefábregas J., Alonso J. M., Delgado L., Domingo F., Cueto M., Gutiérrez L., Lázaro R., Nicolau J. M., Sánchez G., Solé A., and Vidal S. The Rambla Honda field site: interactions of soil and vegetation along a catena in semi-arid Southeast Spain Mediterranean desertification and land use. Brandt C. J. and Thornes J. B. 1996 137 -168 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, N.Y
20.
Requena N., Jeffries P., and Barea J. M. Assessment of natural mycorrhizal potential in a desertified semiarid ecosystem. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62 1996 842 -847
21.
Requena N., Jimenez I., Toro M., and Barea J. M. Interactions between plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium spp. in the rhizosphere of Anthyllis cytisoides, a model legume for revegetation in mediterranean semi-arid ecosystems. New Phytol. 136 1997 667 -677
22.
Roldan A. and Albaladejo J. The effect of mycorrhizal inoculation and soil restoration on the growth of Pinus halepensis in a semiarid soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 18 1994 143 -149
23.
Schreiner R. P., Milhara K. L., McDaniel H., and Bethlenfalvay G. J. Mycorrhizal fungi influence plant and soil functions and interactions. Plant Soil 188 1997 199 -209
24.
Skujins J. and Allen M. F. Use of mycorrhizae for land rehabilitation. MIRCEN J. 2 1986 161 -176
25.
Soil Conservation Service Soil Survey Laboratory methods and procedures for collecting soil samples. U.S. 1973 Department of Agriculture Washington, D.C.
26.
Tisdall J. M., Smith S. E., and Rengasamy P. Aggregation of soil by fungal hyphae. Aust. J. Soil Res. 35 1997 1 55–60.
27.
Vallejo V. R., Bautista S., and Cortina J. R. Restoration for soil protection after disturbances Life and environment in the Mediterranean. Trabaud L. 1999 301 -343 Wit Press Wessex, United Kingdom
28.
Van der Heijden M. G. A., Klironomos J. N., Ursic M., Moutoglis P., Streitwolf-Engel R., Boller T., Wiemken A., and Sanders I. R. Mycorrhizal fungal diversity determines plant biodiversity, ecosystem variability and productivity. Nature 396 1998 69 -72
29.
Warren A., Sud Y. C., and Rozanov B. The future of deserts. J. Arid Environ. 32 1996 75 -89
30.
Wright S. F. and Upadhyaya A. A survey of soils for aggregate stability and glomalin, a glycoprotein produced by hyphae of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Plant Soil 198 1998 97 -107

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Volume 67Number 21 February 2001
Pages: 495 - 498
PubMed: 11157208

History

Received: 3 July 2000
Accepted: 13 November 2000
Published online: 1 February 2001

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Contributors

Authors

Natalia Requena
Departamento de Microbiologı́a del Suelo y Sistemas Simbióticos, Estación Experimental del Zaidı́n, CSIC, 18008 Granada, Spain1;
Max-Planck-Institut für terrestrische Mikrobiologie, 35043 Marburg, Germany2; and
Estefania Perez-Solis
Departamento de Microbiologı́a del Suelo y Sistemas Simbióticos, Estación Experimental del Zaidı́n, CSIC, 18008 Granada, Spain1;
Concepción Azcón-Aguilar
Departamento de Microbiologı́a del Suelo y Sistemas Simbióticos, Estación Experimental del Zaidı́n, CSIC, 18008 Granada, Spain1;
Peter Jeffries
Research School of Biosciences, University of Kent Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NJ, United Kingdom3
José-Miguel Barea
Departamento de Microbiologı́a del Suelo y Sistemas Simbióticos, Estación Experimental del Zaidı́n, CSIC, 18008 Granada, Spain1;

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy