It was shown in vitro that flavonoids are potent antioxidants and inhibitors of ubiquitous enzymes, and their anticarcinogenic properties were demonstrated with different cell lines (for a review, see reference
8). Due to these properties, flavonoids are reported to protect against cancer, coronary heart disease, and stroke. In order to judge the potential beneficial health effects of flavonoids in humans, studies on their fate in the gastrointestinal tract, including transformation by bacteria, are necessary. Intestinal bacteria play important roles not only in deconjugation of flavonoids but also in their further degradation. The bacterial metabolites, which possibly exert biological activities different from those of the original flavonoids, may be absorbed and further metabolized in the human body. Therefore, it is essential to study their conversion by intestinal bacteria and to identify and characterize the fermentation products formed. Although some flavonoid-degrading species, their substrates, and some of the final products are known (
2,
15,
18,
22), information on the anaerobic degradation pathways, intermediates, and the enzymes involved is lacking.
Eubacterium ramulus, a strict anaerobe resident in the human intestinal tract, grows with quercetin-3-glucoside (isoquercitrin) as the sole carbon and energy source. The only intermediates detected in this degradation were quercetin and phloroglucinol, the fermentation products being 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, butyrate, and acetate (
20). Furthermore,
E. ramulus was found to be able to split the ring system of several other flavonols and flavones, forming the corresponding hydroxyphenylacetic and hydroxyphenylpropionic acids, respectively. Degradation pathways of flavonols and flavones were proposed, which include reduction of the heterocyclic C-ring of the aglycon, yielding dihydroflavonols and flavanones, respectively, followed by ring fission. Cleavage of the resulting chalcones might subsequently give rise to the respective phenolic acids (
19).
E. ramulus was detected in fecal samples from each of 20 persons tested at cell numbers which average 0.16% of the total flora (
21). Therefore,
E. ramulus may be considered a common inhabitant of the human intestine and a key organism for flavonoid degradation in this habitat.
In order to test the proposed flavonoid degradation pathways, the fermentation of the flavonol quercetin and the flavone luteolin by resting cells of E. ramulus was studied. In this report we describe the detection and identification of intermediates of quercetin and luteolin degradation, respectively.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Organism.
E. ramulus strain wK1, previously isolated from a human fecal sample (
20), was used throughout the study. The organism will be made available upon request.
Chemicals.
Quercetin, luteolin, and eriodictyol were purchased from Roth (Karlsruhe, Germany), taxifolin was purchased from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany), and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)propionic acid were purchased from Fluka (Deisenhofen, Germany). High-pressure liquid chromatographic (HPLC)-grade methanol (Fluka) was used throughout the experiments.
Growth media and anoxic techniques.
The anoxic techniques were essentially those of Hungate (
11) and Bryant (
3). A gas phase of N
2-CO
2 (80:20, vol/vol) was used. The anoxic workstation (MK 3; DW Scientific, Shipley, Great Britain) had a gas phase of N
2-CO
2-H
2(80:10:10, vol/vol/vol).
E. ramulus strain wK1 (
20) was grown under strictly anoxic conditions in tubes fitted with butyl-rubber stoppers and screw caps. The medium (ST medium) contained the following compounds per liter: 9 g of tryptically digested meat peptone, 1 g of proteose peptone, 3 g of meat extract, 4 g of yeast extract, 6 g of glucose, 3 g of NaCl, 2 g of Na
2HPO
4, 0.5 ml of Tween 80, 0.25 g of cystine, 0.25 g of
l-cysteine–HCl, 0.1 g of MgSO
4 · 7 H
2O, 5 mg of FeSO
4 · 7 H
2O, and 3.4 mg of MnSO
4 · 2 H
2O. The pH after autoclaving at 121°C for 20 min was between 6.8 and 7.1.
Preparation of resting cell suspensions and degradation experiments.
The E. ramulus cultures grown overnight in ST medium were transferred into the anoxic workstation and were prepared for centrifugation (10,000 × g, 15 min). After centrifugation, the cells were washed once with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) containing either 1.4 mM cysteine or 5 mM dithiothreitol, and the pellet was resuspended in the same buffer to an optical density indicated in the experiments. Aliquots of this cell suspension were each transferred into 250-ml serum bottles and used for the resting-cell experiments.
Degradation experiments were performed by adding defined amounts of flavonoids dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) with a syringe. The bottles were incubated at either 37 or 19°C in a water bath equipped with a rotary shaker (120 rpm). At different times, aliquots were taken with a syringe and immediately centrifuged (12,000 ×g, 5 min), and the supernatant was directly analyzed by HPLC. The pellets were lyophilized (Alpha 2-4; Christ, Osterode, Germany) and dissolved in dimethylformamide or methanol for further analysis by HPLC. For a comparison, the supernatant and the pellet together were lyophilized and dissolved in the same solvents for further analysis by HPLC.
Preparation of cell extracts and partially purified enzyme preparations.
The cell extracts were prepared in the presence or absence of oxygen at 4°C from E. ramulus cultures grown overnight in ST medium supplemented with 0.1 mM quercetin. The cells were centrifuged (10,000 × g, 15 min), washed once with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.9), resuspended in the same buffer supplemented with DNase, and ruptured by twofold passage through a French pressure cell at 130 MPa (SLM Instruments, Rochester, N.Y.). Cell extracts (average, 15 mg of protein/ml) were obtained by centrifugation at 18,000 × g for 20 min. The cytoplasmic fraction was prepared by centrifugation at 100,000 × g for 45 min.
The enzyme enrichment was performed at 4°C under aerobic conditions using a fast-performance liquid chromatography system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany). The cytoplasmic fraction (average, 13 mg of protein/ml) was loaded onto a DEAE-Sephacel (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) column (6 by 2.5 cm) equilibrated with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2). Elution was done with a gradient of KCl (0 to 1 mM) in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.2) at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. Fractions with taxifolin-transforming activity were used for the characterization of the taxifolin transformation and the preparation of alphitonin.
Determination of the taxifolin-transforming activity.
Taxifolin transformation was detected by HPLC analysis. The assay contained 60 μM taxifolin (added from a 1.2 mM stock solution in DMSO) in 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.9). The final DMSO concentration was 5%. The reaction was started by the addition of cell extract (average, 150 μg of protein), soluble enzyme fraction (average, 130 μg of protein), or partially purified enzyme preparation (average, 42 μg of protein), respectively. The assay was performed in the presence or absence of oxygen at room temperature. For HPLC analysis, samples were taken at different times and mixed with one volume of methanol-H2O-acetic acid (50:45:5, vol/vol/vol) to stop the reaction. Control reactions were devoid of enzyme or contained enzyme preparations inactivated by incubation for 1 h at 50°C.
HPLC.
Flavonoids and aromatic metabolites were measured using an HPLC system with a diode array detector (Gynkotek, Munich, Germany). The HPLC system was equipped with a pump Model 480, degasser ERC-5535, autosampler GINA 160, a column oven, a diode array detector UVD-320, and a reversed-phase C18 column (LiChroCART 250-4 LiChrospher 100 RP-18, 5 μm; 250 by 4 mm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The column temperature was maintained at 37°C. Aqueous 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) (solvent system A) and methanol (solvent system B) served as the mobile phase in a gradient mode (B from 5 to 30% in 20 min, from 30 to 50% in 5 min, from 50 to 80% in 10 min, from 80 to 100% in 4 min) with a flow rate of 1 ml/min and detection at 280 nm. TFA was replaced by aqueous 1.6% formic acid (FA) for isolation of metabolites to be analyzed by mass spectrometry. All compounds except alphitonin were identified by their retention times and UV spectra (λ = 200 to 355 nm) in comparison to reference substances. Calibration curves were used for quantification.
Sample preparation for ESI-MS.
Selected incubation supernatants from degradation experiments were used for identification of the different compounds by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). The samples (250 μl) were run on the HPLC system using the FA-methanol gradient, and the different peaks were manually collected for further analysis.
Mass spectrometry.
Coupled HPLC-ESI-MS or ESI-MS using flow injection (10 μl/min) was performed depending on the purity and concentration of the samples. Moreover, collision-induced dissociation tandem mass spectrometry was carried out to obtain a specific fragmentation.
For analysis, a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer fitted with a Z-spray API electrospray source (Quattro II; Micromass, Manchester, United Kingdom) was used. The HPLC system (2960; Waters, Milford, Mass.) was equipped with a reversed-phase C18 column (LiChroCART 250-4 LiChrospher 100 RP-18, 5 μm; 250 by 4 mm; Merck) and a 996 PDA detector. The mobile phase was a gradient of aqueous formic acid and methanol similar to those used for isolation of the metabolites (described above) with a flow rate of 0.5 ml/min and was split 6:1 prior to introduction into the mass spectrometer. MS analyses were carried out in either positive or negative ionization mode. The temperature of the ion source was maintained at 100°C. The desolvation temperature was 350°C, and the desolvation gas N2 had a flow rate of 400 liters/h. The cone and capillary voltage used for the analysis of quercetin and luteolin were 50 V and 3.7 kV, respectively, and 20 V and 3.0 kV for the analysis of the metabolites. Product ion scans of [M+H]+ were performed at low-energy collisions (15 to 30 eV) using argon as the collision gas (1.5 × 102 to 2.8 × 102mPa). The obtained molecular ion peaks and mass spectra were compared to those of reference substances.
In parallel to NMR analyses, the alphitonin and taxifolin preparations were subjected to MS with electron impact ionization (EI-MS, 70 eV) using a Varian MAT CH6 spectrometer (Varian, Palo Alto, Calif.). EI-MS of taxifolin (m/z, percent): 304 (M+, 28), 275 (32), 153 (92), 123 (68). EI-MS of alphitonin (m/z, %): 304 (M+, 12), 126 (100), 123 (75).
Preparation of alphitonin for NMR analysis.
Taxifolin (8.8 mg) was incubated with 4 ml of the partially purified taxifolin-transforming preparation until no further alphitonin formation was observed (210 min). Samples of maximally 250 μl each were injected onto the HPLC column. Alphitonin and the nontransformed taxifolin were separated using the TFA-methanol gradient. The fractions of both substances were manually collected, pooled, and dried by vacuum centrifugation (RC 10.22.; Jouan, Saint-Nazaire, France).
NMR analysis.
1H NMR spectra (300 MHz) and 13C NMR spectra (75 MHz) were recorded on a Varian Gemini 300 in DMSO-d6.13C NMR signals were assigned on the basis of attached proton test (APT). Nontransformed taxifolin, which was obtained from the alphitonin preparation as described above, and commercially available taxifolin gave identical1H NMR spectra. 1H NMR of taxifolin: δ 4.51 (dd, J = 11.2, 6.1 Hz, 1H, 3-H), 5.00 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H, 2-H), 5.76 (d,J = 6.1 Hz, 1H, 3-OH), 5.88, 5.93 (each d,J = 2.0 Hz, 2H, 6-H, 8-H), 6.76 (s, br, 2H, 5′-H, 6′-H), 6.89 (s, br, 1H, 2′-H), 8.97, 9.03, 10.82, 11.91 (each s, 4H, OH). 1H NMR of alphitonin: δ 2.82, 2.88 (each d, J = 14.0 Hz, 2H, CH2), 5.73, 5.79 (each d, J = 1.8 Hz, 2H, 5-H, 7-H), 6.39 (dd,J = 8.2, 1.9 Hz, 1H, 6′-H), 6.51 (d, J= 8.2 Hz, 1H, 5′-H), 6.56 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, 1H, 2′-H).13C NMR of alphitonin: δ 41.55 (CH2), 90.39, 96.39 (C-5, C-7), 101.98 (C-2), 106.19 (C-3a), 115.65, 118.59 (C-2′, C-5′), 121.93 (C-6′), 125.66 (C-1′), 144.45, 154.08 (C-3′, C-4′), 158.64 (C-7a), 168.69, 172.56 (C-4, C-6), 193.60 (C-3).
DISCUSSION
These investigations were done in order to get insight into the pathway of flavonoid degradation by a relevant bacterial species of the human intestinal tract,
E. ramulus. The flavonol quercetin was chosen because quercetin glycosides are highly abundant dietary flavonoids. The ability of
E. ramulus to grow on quercetin-3-glucoside was previously shown. Quercetin and phloroglucinol were detected as intermediates in the transformation of quercetin-3-glucoside. The formation of phloroglucinol indicated that
E. ramulus is capable of splitting the heterocyclic C-ring of quercetin (
20). The degradation of quercetin was also reported for other human intestinal bacteria and for species from the bovine rumen. Examples include
Butyrivibrio sp. C3 (
4),
Clostridium orbiscindens (
22),
Pediococcus Q-05 (
16), and
Eubacterium oxidoreducens (
17). In contrast to
E. oxidoreducens, which is able to grow on the aglycon quercetin as the sole carbon and energy source in the presence of hydrogen or formate as reductants (
17), the growth of
E. ramulus with quercetin was strictly dependent on glucose, which could be replaced neither by hydrogen nor by formate (
20). However, as described herein, resting cells of
E. ramulusare able to convert quercetin and its flavone analogue, luteolin. This offered the opportunity to study these transformations quantitatively in the absence of glucose and other media components.
In accordance with previous reports using growing cultures (
19,
20), quercetin was transformed by resting cells of
E. ramulus to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (Fig.
1 and structures in Fig.
8). In the course of fermentation, the enol carbon C-3 is transformed to the carboxyl group of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid. Thus, this bacterial degradation of quercetin does not occur via reverse reactions of its biosynthesis in plants. In the quercetin synthesis pathway of plants (for a review, see reference
6), the intermediate taxifolin is formed by hydroxylation of eriodictyol (structure in Fig.
9).
Two intermediates of the quercetin degradation were identified, taxifolin and alphitonin (Fig.
1). Separate experiments showed that both taxifolin and alphitonin were transformed to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (Fig.
3 and
4). The degradation of taxifolin to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid is in accordance with previous results using growing cells of
E. ramulus(
19). Alphitonin was identified as an intermediate of the conversion of taxifolin to 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (Fig.
3). From these data, the pathway of the quercetin degradation shown in Fig.
8 could be deduced. It starts with the reduction of the double bond in the 2,3-position of quercetin, resulting in the formation of taxifolin. The following ring contraction to the identified isomeric alphitonin probably occurs by a ring opening-recyclization mechanism via a chalcone or diketone structure. However, this postulated chalcone (or tautomeric diketone) could not be observed, presumably because of the fast cyclization to alphitonin. We cannot distinguish whether this cyclization is part of an enzyme-catalyzed reaction or whether it occurs spontaneously. Neither the α-hydroxychalcone [2-hydroxy-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1-(2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)propenone] nor the diketone [3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-1-(2,4,6-trihydroxyphenyl)propane-1,2-dione] have been described in the literature so far. As a result of the ring contraction to alphitonin, a benzylic CH
2 group is already formed as it finally appears in the product, 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid. An oxidative decarboxylation step is postulated for the conversion of alphitonin to phloroglucinol and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid. Whereas 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid was identified as a final product, phloroglucinol was shown to undergo further degradation to butyrate and acetate (L. Schoefer, personal communication).
This is the first report describing alphitonin as an intermediate of bacterial metabolism. The elucidation of structure became necessary because a reference substance for this compound was not available, and the molecular masses of alphitonin and the corresponding chalcone structure are identical. The structure of alphitonin was unambiguously deduced from the NMR data, which were in agreement with the data reported by Kiehlmann and Li (
14). These authors demonstrated the nonenzymatic isomerization of taxifolin to alphitonin under drastic conditions (115°C for 4 days). The structure of alphitonin, isolated from the heartwood of
Alphitonia excelsa, was reported in 1960 (
1). The compound was also identified in the wood of
Alphitonia petriei but not in that of
Alphitonia whitei (
7). Remarkably, no studies on the biological activity of alphitonin have been reported so far. Our results, however, indicate that alphitonin appears as an intermediate of intestinal metabolism of the abundant flavonoid quercetin and might be absorbed in the human intestinal tract.
We also investigated the degradation of the flavone luteolin by resting cells of
E. ramulus. The proposed degradation pathway is shown in Fig.
9. Initial reduction led to the formation of eriodictyol, similar to the transformation of quercetin to taxifolin. Eriodictyol was identified as an intermediate in the resting-cell fermentation (Fig.
7). By the ensuing ring cleavage, a chalcone structure could be formed which may be further reduced to a dihydrochalcone. However, neither of these compounds nor a fused five-membered structure similar to alphitonin was observed. The final product of luteolin degradation was 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)propionic acid, which was identified in fermentation experiments with resting cells (Fig.
7), comparable to the results obtained previously with growing cells of
E. ramulus(
19), which fermented luteolin and eriodictyol in the presence of glucose. Phloroglucinol is certainly another intermediate, as postulated for several flavonoid degradation pathways (
9,
18,
22), but its further degradation occurred instantly. Similar to our results, it was reported that eriodictyol is converted to 3-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)propionic acid by a strain of
Clostridium butyricum (
18).
The comparison of the pathways (Fig.
8 and
9) reveals that degradation of both quercetin and luteolin by
E. ramulus starts with the reduction of the double bond in the 2,3- position prior to the C-ring fission. The steps that follow differ due to the 3-hydroxyl group in the quercetin molecule, which is the only difference from the luteolin structure. This hydroxyl group seems to be a prerequisite for the formation of the alphitonin structure following C-ring cleavage. In contrast, the fission of the heterocyclic ring of eriodictyol, which results from luteolin, would lead directly to a chalcone structure, and for further transformation a second reduction step is assumed. These postulated intermediates could not be observed during luteolin conversion by resting cells, although such chalcones and dihydrochalcones are known to be stable (
6). It was shown previously that the dihydrochalcone phloretin is also degraded by growing cells of
E. ramulus in the presence of glucose (
19). The final products resulting from the B-ring of quercetin and luteolin, respectively, differ in one carbon atom within the side chain, indicating an additional decarboxylation step in the case of quercetin degradation. The notion that the degradation of flavonols and flavones by
E. ramulus occurs by two different pathways and involves different enzymes is supported by the finding that the taxifolin-transforming enzyme preparation did not transform eriodictyol, either in the presence or in the absence of oxygen (data not shown).
In conclusion, the fermentation by resting cells constitutes an advantageous method for the detection of intermediates of flavonoid degradation by intestinal bacteria. These bacterial metabolites should be included in investigations concerning the flavonoid effects after ingestion by humans. However, the characterization of the involved enzymes and the reaction mechanisms requires further studies with cell-free systems. This approach has already been initiated for the taxifolin isomerization as described above, and it will be continued in ongoing studies in our laboratories.