INTRODUCTION
Methane is an important volatile product of the anaerobic degradation of organic matter and is the most abundant hydrocarbon in the Earth's atmosphere (
1). It is the most reduced form of carbon, but while bearing a vast amount of energy, it is thermodynamically one of the most difficult organic compounds to activate. The biological oxidation of methane occurs under both oxic and anoxic conditions and is performed by specialized groups of
Bacteria or
Archaea. Aerobic methanotrophs belong to the
Bacteria, and all oxidize methane in a similar manner, using oxygen for the first step of oxidation of methane to methanol by a monooxygenase. In the following reactions, catalyzed by dehydrogenases, methanol is oxidized to carbon dioxide, with formaldehyde and formate being intermediates (
2).
The aerobic methanotrophs belonging to the
Proteobacteria were divided into two types on the basis of their morphology and physiological properties, including the route of C
1 assimilation (
3). Type I methanotrophs mostly utilize the ribulose monophosphate (RuMP) pathway, in which all cellular carbon is derived from methane and enters the pathway at the level of formaldehyde (
2–4). Type II methanotrophs assimilate carbon via a combination of the serine and ethylmalonyl coenzyme A (ethylmalonyl-CoA) pathways, in which approximately one half of the cellular carbon is derived from methane via formaldehyde and the other half originates from multiple carboxylation reactions in both pathways (
5–7). Both serine and RuMP pathways represent chemoorganoheterotrophic modes of metabolism and were considered to be universal among aerobic methanotrophs. However, some proteobacterial methanotrophs do possess complete gene sets for autotrophic CO
2 fixation by the reductive pentose phosphate cycle, commonly known as the Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) cycle (
8–13): the type I methanotrophs
Methylococcus capsulatus and
Methylocaldum szegediense O-12 and the type II methanotrophs
Methyloferula stellata AR4,
Methylocella silvestris BL2, and
Methylocapsa acidiphila B2. It still remains to be experimentally validated which role the CBB cycle plays in these organisms.
For a century after their first discovery in 1906 by Söhngen, methanotrophic bacteria were believed to be restricted to the
Alphaproteobacteria and
Gammaproteobacteria (
14). However, since 2007 several independent studies have shown that bacterial methanotrophs are phylogenetically much more diverse and are also found within the verrucomicrobial and NC10 phyla (
15–18). The discovery of the (acidophilic) verrucomicrobial methanotrophs not only revealed a wider environmental and phylogenetic spectrum for aerobic methanotrophy but also demonstrated that these methanotrophs lack essential genes of both the RuMP and the serine pathways (
19). Instead, they were shown to utilize the CBB cycle for carbon dioxide fixation, challenging the paradigm that methanotrophs are heterotrophs that derive a large part of their biomass from methane (
20). Similarly, genome analysis suggested that the first described member of the NC10 phylum, the nitrite-dependent methane oxidizer “
Candidatus Methylomirabilis oxyfera,” may also employ the CBB cycle for carbon assimilation (
16,
21). “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera” oxidizes methane via a sequence of reactions similar to those employed by aerobic methanotrophs; however, it does so in the complete absence of external oxygen. Instead, nitrite is reduced to nitric oxide, and the latter is hypothesized to be dismutated to molecular nitrogen and oxygen (
16,
22). The internally produced oxygen can then be used for methane oxidation by a methane monooxygenase.
Before the recent discovery of widespread autotrophy among verrucomicrobial methanotrophs (
20,
23), all methanotrophs were believed to derive at least half of their cellular carbon from methane. This fact was used for the characterization of methanotrophic communities by stable carbon isotope probing (SIP) (
24–29). The detection of aerobic methanotrophy in culture-independent environmental studies was also based on labeling of biomass and lipids with the strongly depleted
13C signature of biogenic methane (
30–33). On the basis of these observations, autotrophy was generally dismissed as a dominant mode of carbon fixation in methanotrophic organisms. However, a recent study by Sharp et al. (
23) has demonstrated that a modified SIP method with [
13C]bicarbonate is necessary to reveal autotrophic methanotrophic communities in a geothermal environment.
The current study aimed to investigate the mode of C1 assimilation in “Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera” enrichment cultures through a tiered approach. We carried out detailed genome and transcriptome analysis focusing on the potential for autotrophic CO2 fixation via the CBB cycle and employed enzyme activity assays to detect the activity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RubisCO) in cell extracts. In whole-cell batch incubations, we performed 13C-labeling experiments using labeled methane and/or bicarbonate to identify the effective source of C assimilation in “Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera”-specific lipid biomarkers and total enrichment culture biomass.
DISCUSSION
Based on the genome information, we followed the hypothesis that the CBB cycle would be the major route of C assimilation in “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera.” Our labeling experiments (
Fig. 4) now provide strong indications that “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera” is an autotrophic organism, which was also recently shown for verrucomicrobial methanotrophs and which is in contrast to the findings for characterized proteobacterial methanotrophs. In the absence of CH
4, the cultures did not incorporate significant amounts of
13C label, showing that CH
4 is essential as an energy source, but the bulk stable carbon isotope analysis suggested that bicarbonate/CO
2 is the carbon source for “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera” cells (
Fig. 4A). However, as the “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera” biomass is available only in enrichment culture, the possibility remains that other community members may have contributed to the observed
13C incorporation. The compound-specific stable carbon isotope analysis provided the decisive data: “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera”-specific fatty acids 10MeC
16:0 and 10MeC
16:1Δ7 (
40) showed a clearly higher
13C content after incubation with
13C-labeled bicarbonate (
Fig. 4) than after incubation with
13C-labeled methane, confirming that bicarbonate/CO
2 was indeed the carbon source for cell material of “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera.” Although some labeling was observed in the incubations with
13CH
4 and unlabeled bicarbonate/CO
2, its extent was clearly lower than that in the incubations with [
13C]bicarbonate and unlabeled methane. This labeling signal was most probably caused by the indirect incorporation of labeled CO
2 originating from labeled methane oxidation (i.e., scrambling). Additionally, the labeling results for a minor fatty acid fraction also indicated the presence of other CO
2-fixing community members (iso-C
15 and ai-C
15 fatty acids became similarly enriched by [
13C]bicarbonate with and without methane) and chemoorganoheterotrophic methanotrophs (C
18:1, C
18:0, and C
19cyc fatty acids became more enriched in
13C by [
13C]methane than by [
13C]bicarbonate).
At the time of the earliest nitrite-dependent methane-oxidizing enrichment culture, a labeling experiment with [
13C]methane showed that after 3 to 6 days of incubation the
13C label was indeed incorporated into bacterial lipids (
52). However, the anticipated biomarker lipid 10MeC
16:0 fatty acid did not become significantly enriched and the
13C content of the 10MeC
16:1Δ7 fatty acid could not be determined due to its low abundance and coelution (
52). This could be caused, at least in part, by the slow growth of “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera.” However, a carbon source other than methane can also explain this observation. This was not tested at that time; our data now provide strong indications that this alternative carbon source is CO
2.
The test for the specific activity of RubisCO with cell extracts of “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera” confirmed that “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera” indeed exhibited CO
2-fixing activity. The measured activity rate may seem low, even when it is compared to the 2-week doubling time of “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera” reported previously (
53). However, this doubling time was observed during the initial enrichment period and represents exponential growth of “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera.” In the current study, the culture exhibited constant steady-state activity, indicating that it was probably close to stationary phase, during which enzyme expression and specific activity are expected to be lower than they are during exponential growth phase. Moreover, the observed specific RubisCO activity compared well with the estimated C assimilation activity determined on the basis of our
13C labeling experiments.
The genomic information and the absence of carboxysome-like structures (
46) suggest that the CO
2 fixation in “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera” is not carboxysomal but, rather, is cytoplasmic. Carboxysomal CO
2 fixation probably evolved in order to increase the rates in the presence of low ambient CO
2 concentrations and to minimize photorespiration (
51). As in the environmental niche of “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera” CO
2 concentrations are unlikely to be limiting and external oxygen is not present, carboxysomal CO
2 fixation might not offer an advantage in comparison with cytoplasmic CO
2 fixation. The incomplete photorespiration pathway also implies that photorespiration might not be relevant in “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera”; however, the mechanism of the hypothesized internal oxygen metabolism is not yet known, and the possibility of internal RubisCO oxygen exposure cannot be ruled out.
The first methanotroph to be shown to possess the functional CBB cycle was
M. capsulatus; however, the main route of carbon assimilation in this methanotroph was shown to be the RuMP pathway (
9,
54). The autotrophic growth of
M. capsulatus could not be achieved in liquid and could be achieved only poorly on solid medium with CO
2 and H
2 or formate (
8). Some other proteobacterial methanotrophs were also shown to possess the complete machinery for an operational CBB cycle (
10–12), but so far it remains unclear what role it might play in those methanotrophs. In contrast, it was recently shown that autotrophy is widespread among the newly discovered verrucomicrobial methanotrophs (
20,
23). The finding that autotrophy might be a more common mode of C
1 metabolism among methanotrophs has implications for the detection of methanotrophy and assessment of its significance in the environment. It implies that the stable carbon isotopic signature of these bacteria would not identify them as part of the methanotrophic community
in situ and in conventional stable isotope studies. A recent report on methanotrophy in a geothermal soil demonstrated that labeling with [
13C]methane, as commonly used in SIP studies targeting methanotrophs, failed in detecting the active methanotrophic community (
23). Instead, a modified SIP method including [
13C]bicarbonate/CO
2 was necessary to successfully detect autotrophic methanotrophs (
23). The same would apply to the detection of “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera”-like methanotrophs in mesophilic, anoxic, and suboxic environments. Thus, “
Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera” might have escaped detection by means of stable isotope analysis, and, more generally, the contribution of autotrophic methanotrophic bacteria to methane cycling might have been hitherto overlooked.