INTRODUCTION
The vaginal microenvironment comprises microbiota and metabolites that significantly influence gynecological health (
1–8). Using molecular approaches, the vaginal microbiota of reproductive-aged women has been broadly classified into five community state types (CSTs), four of which are dominated by
Lactobacillus species, namely,
L. crispatus (CST I),
L. gasseri (CST II),
L. iners (CST III), and
L. jensenii (CST V) (
9).
Lactobacillus species dominance is generally associated with positive obstetric and gynecological outcomes (
7,
8,
10).
Lactobacillus spp. are believed to prevent the colonization of potential pathogens through the production of lactic acid (
11), bacteriocins (
12,
13), and biosurfactants (
14) and through competitive exclusion by adherence to the vaginal mucosa (
15,
16). In approximately 30% of women (
17,
18),
Lactobacillus spp. are depauperate, and they are instead colonized by a diverse assortment of strict and facultative anaerobic bacteria, including
Gardnerella vaginalis,
Prevotella spp., and
Atopobium vaginae (CST IV) (
9). These features are also attributes of the vaginal disorder bacterial vaginosis (BV), leading to the recent proposal to describe CST IV as molecular-BV (
19).
BV is the most common vaginal condition among reproductive-aged women (
17,
18) and is associated with adverse health outcomes, including increased risks of acquiring sexually transmitted infections (STIs) (
20–22), such as HIV (
22), as well as urinary tract infections (UTIs) (
23), the development of pelvic inflammatory disease (
24), and infertility (
25). Furthermore, in pregnant women, BV is associated with an increased risk for preterm birth (
26–28) and miscarriage (
29). BV is commonly assessed in research studies using the Nugent score, which applies a scoring metric ranging from 0 to 10 to bacterial morphotypes observed in a Gram stain of vaginal smears, wherein a score of ≥7 is considered BV (
30). In a clinical setting, signs and symptoms of BV include an increase in vaginal pH (>4.5), a thin, homogenous gray or white vaginal discharge, the presence of superficial squamous cells with large numbers of adherent bacteria (clue cells), and an amine or “fishy” odor (
31). The simultaneous manifestation of three of these four signs is a positive indication of BV, as clinically assessed by the Amsel criteria (
31).
Bacterial vaginosis is also reflected in the composition of the vaginal metabolome (
2,
4). This relationship is at least partially driven by the associated microbiological changes, with ∼31% of metabolomic variation being explained by CST (
6,
32–35). Among metabolomic differences, the vaginal concentrations of cadaverine and putrescine are typically found to be higher in women afflicted with BV, and both are associated with clinical signs of malodor (
2,
4,
34,
36–40). Higher concentrations of cadaverine, putrescine, and another biogenic amine (BA), tyramine, have also been observed in women with CST IV vaginal microbiota compared to CSTs dominated by
Lactobacillus species (
1).
BAs are small cationic molecules that are primarily produced via specific amino acid decarboxylation (AAD) reactions, although the BAs spermine and spermidine are instead produced through modifications of putrescine. AAD is a well-described acid stress resistance mechanism that involves the consumption of intracellular protons with a concomitant increase in extracellular pH (
41,
42). BAs have additionally been shown to increase pathogen virulence by mediating resistance to multiple antibiotics (
43,
44), protecting against toxicity from oxygen, superoxide, and hydrogen peroxide (
45), and altering susceptibility to host innate defenses (
42,
46). They have also been shown to generate a proton motive force, thereby providing metabolic energy (
47). These functions suggest that BAs have a causal role in the transition from microbiota dominated by
Lactobacillus spp. to ones with a paucity of lactobacilli that are associated with bacterial vaginosis (
1,
2,
4,
19,
32,
40,
48) as opposed to simply being biomarkers of the condition, as has previously been hypothesized (
1).
Beyond reducing the barriers to microbial colonization of the vaginal microenvironment, biogenic amines may directly influence bacterial growth and competitiveness. A few studies have assessed the effect of biogenic amines on the specific growth rates of various nonvaginal bacterial taxa. Cunningham-Rundles and Maas demonstrated that even small concentrations of putrescine led to a reduced growth rate of
Escherichia coli (
49), while Tabor et al. reported an 87% reduction in the growth rate of
E. coli in the absence of spermidine (
50). Only one study, conducted in 1964 by Guirard and Snell, examined the effect of BAs on the growth properties of
Lactobacillus spp., although this was limited to several species involved in food production (
51). Guirard and Snell reported that while spermidine and spermine stimulated the growth rate of several lactobacilli, putrescine and cadaverine significantly reduced growth (
51). Thus far, no one has studied the effect of biogenic amines on the growth kinetics of vaginal
Lactobacillus spp.
Here, we used targeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) to quantify vaginal biogenic amines in an observational longitudinal study. Using these data, we explored the association between vaginal biogenic amines, vaginal CSTs, and Nugent scores. We also evaluated the effect of physiological concentrations of the most common biogenic amines found in the vagina, namely, cadaverine, putrescine, spermine, spermidine, and tyramine, on the lag time, growth rate, and lactic acid production of vaginal Lactobacillus spp.
DISCUSSION
We have previously hypothesized that the biosynthesis of BAs within the vagina reduces
Lactobacillus species-mediated protection and alters the microenvironment sufficiently to enable colonization by a diverse set of anaerobic bacterial species, as observed in molecular-BV (
1,
3,
5,
32,
53). We examined this hypothesis in the context of both an observational cohort study and
in vitro experimentation to examine the direct influence of BAs on
Lactobacillus species growth properties and lactic acid production.
Measured BA concentrations were consistent with previously reported literature (
1,
2,
4,
32,
40) and were found to be associated with both CST and Nugent score. Also consistent with previously reported findings (
3–5,
34), we observed higher concentrations of cadaverine, putrescine, and tyramine in CST IV samples than
Lactobacillus species-dominant CSTs (I and III); conversely, the non-AAD-derived BAs, spermine, and spermidine were minimally detected in CST IV samples but observed in higher concentrations among
Lactobacillus species-dominated CSTs (
1). Further, we show that increases in concentrations of putrescine, cadaverine, and tyramine are associated with greater odds of transitioning into CST IV compared to CST I women, after adjustment for menstrual status, as well as with increased odds of transitioning into a Nugent score of 4 to 6 (intermediate BV) or a Nugent score of 7 to 10 (indicative of BV) compared to having a stable Nugent score of 0 to 3. These data support the hypothesis that BAs are important precursors, rather than simply biomarkers, of BV (
1,
2,
4). Certainly, genetic analyses indicate that several vaginal taxa are capable of producing BAs (
1); however, it is also important to note that putrescine, spermine, and spermidine can be produced endogenously by human cells (
54).
One mechanism through which BAs have been hypothesized to affect the incidence and maintenance of molecular-BV is by directly affecting the growth properties of vaginal lactobacilli (
1). In general, vaginal microbiota dominated by
Lactobacillus spp. is thought to resist the colonization and outgrowth of BV-associated bacteria as well as other reproductive tract infections. This is largely attributed to the production of lactic acid by vaginal
Lactobacillus spp., which acidifies the vaginal microenvironment to a pH of <4.5 and limits the growth of potential pathogens (
55), although lactobacilli contribute other known anticompetitive activities, including the lactic acid-driven rendering of epithelial cells resistant to infection, as was recently shown with
Chlamydia trachomatis (
56). Consistent with this hypothesis, we show in this study that physiological concentrations of cadaverine, putrescine, and tyramine decrease the
in vitro growth rate and/or increase the lag times of representative strains of each of the major vaginal
Lactobacillus spp. as well as affect production of lactic acid of
L. iners AB107 and
L. gasseri NCTC 2948.
Given findings that women with
L. iners (CST III)-dominant microbiota are more likely to transition to CST IV than women with
L. crispatus-dominant microbiota (CST I) and are reportedly more susceptible to vaginal disorders, including BV and STIs (
56–60), we were interested in comparing the growth responses of
L. iners and
L. crispatus relative to the concentrations of BAs reported for CST IV and BV. While the growth rate of
L. iners appeared less impacted by exogenous BAs than other
Lactobacillus spp., the lag time was comparatively longer in the presence of cadaverine and putrescine. It is not entirely clear if growth rate or lag time would be more important
in vivo; however, we hypothesize that under more acidic conditions there is reduced growth of all vaginal
Lactobacillus spp. based on our own assessment of these
Lactobacillus spp. in the laboratory and assessment of
Lactobacillus species growth that has been reported elsewhere to be inhibited at pH ∼3.6 to 4.0, dependent upon species and strain (
61). Therefore,
Lactobacillus spp. may only grow as pH increases above these limits, such as is hypothesized to occur as AAD-derived BAs are produced (
1). In this scenario, lag time, which would represent the time to respond to this change in environmental acidity, would be the most important factor, and the more greatly impacted lag times of
L. iners could help to explain why CST III vaginal microbiota more frequently transition to CST IV than other CSTs (
62). Similarly, when spontaneously clearing molecular BV without antibiotics, wherein levels of putrescine and cadaverine are maximal and the pH is >4.5, a growth rate that is more resistant to these BAs would be favorable, again potentially explaining why
L. iners more commonly dominates immediately following a temporary transition to CST IV (
62) or BV (
63). The ability for
L. crispatus to dominate in other scenarios may then simply relate to its higher growth rate under conditions where BA concentrations have returned to normal and/or with other competitive strategies not assessed in this study.
There are, of course, several limitations to our study. First, this was a relatively small sample size, and we could not assess behavioral and confounding variables, such as age, time-varying sexual activity, antibiotic use, partner concurrency, and douching in the models. This limited power is reflected in the large credible intervals associated with transitioning from a CST IV microbiota to CST I. Additionally, our results were limited to the type strains of the four major vaginal Lactobacillus species; thus, it remains to be determined if these observations are generalizable to other strains and clinical isolates of Lactobacillus species. Similarly, it is important to determine if and how these biogenic amines affect the anaerobic taxa associated with BV. Future experiments should assess the effect of specific BA producers on Lactobacillus spp. and whether there is evidence of pH-dependent competition for nutrients. We also evaluated the effect of biogenic amines upon specific growth properties of vaginal Lactobacillus species grown in vitro, utilizing media that may not sufficiently recapitulate the nutrient resources available in vivo; however, it is noteworthy that these in vitro growth responses reflect the changes in relative abundances of Lactobacillus species determined in vivo when biogenic amine concentrations differ. It is also important to consider that biogenic amines do not occur in the vaginal microenvironment in isolation; thus, the synergistic and/or antagonistic effects of the biogenic amines upon one another and in the presence of other metabolites within the vaginal environment needs to be explored before the full impact of biogenic amines on the growth of vaginal Lactobacillus spp. can be fully understood. Finally, putrescine, spermine, and spermidine each are microbially and host produced, and this study cannot tease apart host from microbial contributions.
Conclusions.
Here, we quantified the physiological concentration of biogenic amines from a longitudinal cohort of participants. We observed that increases in the biogenic amines putrescine, cadaverine, and tyramine were associated with increased odds of having molecular-BV, having a Nugent score of 7 to 10, transitioning into a Nugent score of 7 to 10, and transitioning to molecular-BV. We then interrogated the effect of exogenous biogenic amines upon the growth properties of four vaginal Lactobacillus spp. representing the major vaginal CSTs in vitro. We observed the biogenic amines commonly associated with the malodor characteristic of BV, putrescine and cadaverine, to have adverse effects on the growth rate, lag time, and lactic acid production of vaginal lactobacilli. Biogenic amines are important in reducing vaginal acidity, overcoming acid stress resistance, and providing a source of energy to bacteria. Several biogenic amines have recently been associated with STIs and increased pathogen resistance and the vaginal disorder bacterial vaginosis. The results here provide pertinent information on the potential role that biogenic amines play in affecting vaginal reproductive and sexual health.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Deanna DeSon, Herlin Kadriu, and Trent Jones for their efforts in bacterial culturing and Elizabeth O’Hanlon for her advice about MPNs.
J.R. is the cofounder of LUCA Biologics, a biotechnology company focusing on translating microbiome research into live biotherapeutics drugs for women’s health. All remaining authors have no disclosures to declare.
The research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), General Medical Sciences (NIGMS), and Nursing Research (NINR) of the National Institutes of Health under award numbers R21AI111145 (C.J.Y.), U54GM115371 (C.J.Y.), UH2AI083264 (J.R.), and R01NR015495 (J.R.) and by the Montana Agricultural Experiment Station.
C.J.Y., T.M.N., and J.-L.C.B. conceived of the study. J.R., L.F., and R.M.B. implemented the parent study. A.U. and Z.L. performed metabolomics. J.-L.C.B., E.K.S., B.A., and S.G.G. performed growth curves and lactic acid assays. B.A. performed PCR validation on all vaginal taxa. J.-L.C.B. and M.D.S. performed statistical analysis. J.-L.C.B., M.D.S., R.M.B., J.R., and C.J.Y. advised on statistical analysis and interpretation of the data. J.-L.C.B. and C.J.Y. wrote the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed and contributed to the final version of the manuscript.