Protozoa are the main consumers of bacteria in the environment, and as such they play a major role in controlling bacterial biomass (
33) and regulating nutrient recycling (
14). Therefore, being able to study the flow of carbon in food webs involving bacteria and protozoa can provide an insight into how protozoan grazing affects bacterial function in a wide range of systems.
Protozoan grazing has the potential to alter the genotypic and phenotypic composition of bacterial communities (
15,
17,
18,
35). Perhaps as a result of this, protozoan grazing has also been found to have an effect on the function of activated sludge systems, including nitrogen removal processes. Studies using eukaryotic inhibitors to remove grazers from activated sludge have reported a wide range of effects following reduced grazing pressure. These effects include an increase in turbidity or planktonic cell densities, and either no effect (
21,
32), higher nitrification rates (
16,
20), or lower (
29,
30) rates of nitrification in the absence of grazers. These conflicting reports on the effect of predation on nitrification might be due to protozoa displaying feeding preferences or to the indirect ways in which protozoan grazing can affect bacterial processes. For example, it has been shown that the release of substances, such as vitamins and nucleotides, secreted by protozoa as metabolic by-products, can act as growth factors, which enhance bacterial activity, including nitrification (
31). In addition, the presence of some types of grazers, particularly ciliates, has been shown to be closely related to a decrease in biochemical oxygen demand (
27), and it has been reported that ciliates can alter water flux and help redistribute nutrients in flocs (
8), which in turn might have an impact on nitrification rates.
Although the data presented in the literature suggest that protozoan grazing is an important factor for activated sludge processes, there are still many questions as to whether its effects are directly linked to predation and possibly feeding preferences. In the present study we sought to identify protozoa assimilating carbon from autotrophic bacteria under ammonia-oxidizing conditions and acetate-consuming bacteria under denitrifying conditions using RNA-stable isotope probing (RNA-SIP).
Since it was first developed, RNA-SIP has been successfully used to identify functional groups of bacteria responsible for different processes, including denitrification and benzene and phenol degradation (
9,
10,
19,
25,
26). In these studies, the flow of carbon was tracked from soluble labeled substrates into the bacteria consuming it. However, recent studies have shown that it is possible to use this technique to track the flow of carbon across more than one trophic level, unraveling some of the interactions observed in microbial food webs (
11,
13,
23,
24). These studies exemplify the broad range of questions that can be addressed with SIP and have begun to define the boundaries beyond which SIP has limited utility.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Clone library construction.
Activated sludge was collected from St. Marys Sewage Treatment Plant in Sydney, Australia, at the end of spring in November 2006. Sludge samples (0.5 ml) were collected and centrifuged for 10 min at 14,000 rpm and 4°C. RNA was extracted from pellets by using an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen Pty., Ltd., Australia) according to the manufacturer's instructions. An on-column DNase treatment was performed by using the Qiagen RNase-free DNase set (catalog no.79254). RNA was quantified by using a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Biosciences Biolab, Australia) and reverse transcribed with the primer EK555sR (5′-GCTGCTGGCACCAGACT-3′), modified from EK555F (
22), and the avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Promega Corp., Australia). The cDNA was used to amplify an ∼250-bp product from the 18S rRNA sequence from positions 300 to 555 using EK555sR and 300F (5′-AGGGTTCGATTCCGGAG-3′) (
5) in a 100-μl PCR. The PCR contained 4 μl of cDNA, 10 μl of AmpliTaq 10× buffer (Applied Biosystems), 6 μl of a 25 mM MgCl
2 solution (Applied Biosystems), 40 pmol each of the forward and reverse primers, 2 μl of a 10 mM mix of all four deoxynucleoside triphosphates, 0.4 μl of AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (Applied Biosystems, United Kingdom), and 5 μl of dimethyl sulfoxide and molecular-grade H
2O (Eppendorf, Australia). The PCR conditions used were an initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min; followed by 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 61°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s; and a final extension cycle of 10 min at 72°C. The products were purified by using a Qiagen PCR purification kit and cloned into pCR4-TOPO (Invitrogen, Australia). Positive clones were selected by using blue/white screening and checked for the insert by colony PCR using the M13F and M13R primer set. Plasmids were extracted from confirmed clones by using a PureLink HQ Mini-Plasmid purification kit (Invitrogen). Plasmid inserts were sequenced by using the M13F primer on an ABI3730 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were aligned by using Lasergene MegAlign software (version 6; DNAStar, Inc.). The phylogenetic affiliation of the sequences was obtained by using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) (
2) function on the NCBI server (
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast ). Clones from each phylogenetic hit were reamplified using the primers EK555R and GC300F for denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis. Library coverage was calculated as described previously (
12).
Bacterial and protozoan strains and culture conditions.
Escherichia coli strain BL-21 was grown overnight in 10% M9 minimal salts medium supplemented with 0.5% [13C]glucose (Isotec). The cells were harvested during stationary phase by a 10 min centrifugation step (14,000 rpm), where 100 ml of ∼107 cells/ml were concentrated into 1 ml to achieve a final concentration of ∼109 cells/ml. The ciliate, Tetrahymena rostrata, was routinely maintained in 10% M9 minimal salts medium without glucose and fed with heat-killed E. coli BL-21 that had been grown in 10% M9 minimal media with 13C-labeled glucose as described above. Ciliates were enumerated by live counts in known volumes by using a light microscope.
Introduction of 13C-labeled bacteria and protozoa into activated sludge.
An initial batch experiment was set up where 13C-labeled T. rostrata cells were added to 10 ml of freshly collected activated sludge and mixed thoroughly to a final concentration of 104 cells/ml. RNA from the amended sludge, as well as control RNA from unamended sludge, was extracted by using an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen). The cells were harvested by centrifugation and resuspended in 100 μl of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer by vortexing, followed immediately by the addition of the RLT buffer plus β-mercaptoethanol as per the manufacturer's instructions. The RNA was quantified by using a Nanodrop ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Biosciences Biolab, Australia).
A second batch experiment was set up where 13C-labeled E. coli BL21 cells were added to 10 ml of freshly collected activated sludge to a final concentration of 108 cells/ml in a 50-ml Falcon tube. The activated sludge was then incubated for 16 h at room temperature with shaking at 55 rpm. RNA from the amended sludge as well as control RNA from activated sludge without the addition of 13C-labeled E. coli, was extracted as described above.
[13C]bicarbonate pulse.
Activated sludge was collected from St. Marys Sewage Treatment Plant in Sydney, Australia, at the end of spring in November 2006. Four 200-ml subsamples were incubated aerobically in 1-liter Erlenmeyer flasks at room temperature and 150 rpm in the dark. Two samples were treated with ammonium sulfate (4 mM), while the other two acted as ammonium free controls. Control and treatment reactors received an unlabeled or
13C-labeled pulse of sodium bicarbonate (Sigma-Aldrich Pty., Ltd, Australia) to a final concentration of 2 mM. Pulses were added to sludge samples after 0, 2, and 4 h. To quantify CO
2, 4-ml sludge samples were taken every 2 h for 10 h. Each sample was filtered through a 0.2-μm-pore-size membrane (Millipore), and the pH was adjusted to 10 and stored at 4°C until processing. The bicarbonate concentration in the sludge was determined by gas chromatography of headspace samples after acidification as previously described (
1,
3). Activated sludge samples (0.5 ml) were collected after 0, 6, and 10 h and then centrifuged for 10 min at 25,000 ×
g and 4°C, and the RNA was extracted as described above.
[13C]acetate pulse.
Activated sludge was collected from St. Marys Sewage Treatment Plant in Sydney, Australia, at the end of spring in November 2006. Four 200-ml serum bottles were filled with the anoxic sludge and sealed with gray butyl stoppers and open-seal aluminum crimp caps, and the headspaces were flushed with N
2 gas for 2 min. All four bottles were pretreated for 1 h with 500 μM [
12C]sodium acetate, thereby enabling nitrate-reducing bacteria to consume any nitrate present in the sludge samples. After the pretreatment, two of the 200-ml samples were treated with [
12C]sodium acetate, and two were treated with [
13C]sodium acetate (Sigma-Aldrich Pty., Ltd, Australia) added to a final concentration of 1 mM (
28), with or without sodium nitrate as an electron acceptor added to a final concentration of 5 mM. Pulses were repeatedly added to all four reactors every 30 min over a period of 2.5 h. In all, each reactor received six pulses of [
12C]sodium acetate or [
13C]sodium acetate with a cumulative concentration of 6 mM. Treatment reactors received five pulses of sodium nitrate with a cumulative concentration of 25 mM. Activated sludge samples (0.5 ml) were collected after 0, 3, and 8 h and then centrifuged for 10 min at 25,000 ×
g and 4°C, and the RNA was extracted as described above.
To quantify acetate concentration, 1.5-ml samples were collected and filtered as described above, and 900 μl of the filtrate was transferred to a gas chromatography sample vial. The samples were acidified with the addition of 100 μl of 10% (vol/vol) formic acid, and the vials were sealed and crimped. Samples were stored at 4°C until processing. Acetate concentration in the activated sludge samples was determined by using a Hewlett-Packard 5890 Series II gas chromatography/mass spectrometer (GC/MS) with an Agilent 6890 Series Injector at the Bioanalytical Mass Spectrometry Facility at the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. The acidified samples were separated by using an 18-m Phenomenex ZB-FFAP column (0.25 mm, inner diameter), with helium as the carrier gas. Subsamples (10 μl) were injected into a prepacked deactivated glass wool liner with a split injection mode (split ratio of 50). The run conditions were as follows: injector temperature, 250°C; and oven temperature, 120°C ramped up at 10°C/min to 140°C and then ramped up in 40°C increments to 240°C. A 2-min solvent delay and single ion monitoring detection modes were used.
13C atom percentage quantification in activated sludge biomass.
Activated sludge samples (0.5 ml) collected in parallel with the samples used for RNA SIP analysis, were centrifuged for 10 min at 25,000 × g and 4°C, washed twice using chilled phosphate buffer solution, dried for 24 h in a drying oven, and analyzed for 13C atom% by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) using a Europa Roboprep CN elemental analyzer (EA) attached to a Finnigan MAT Conflo III and a 252 mass spectrometer at Environmental Isotopes Pty Ltd, North Ryde, Australia.
RNA-SIP analysis.
Extracted RNA (1 μg) was subject to equilibrium (isopycnic) CsTFA density gradient centrifugation as previously described (
26). Gradients were harvested into 20 fractions from the bottom of the gradient (starting with fraction 1) by displacing the gradient media from the top using water and a syringe pump, and RNA was recovered from fractions by precipitation with isopropanol as described previously (
26). Pellets were resuspended in 20 μl of H
2O immediately before eight fractions (4 to 11) encompassing the expected distribution of RNA in the gradients were subjected to reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Fractions 4 to 11 corresponded to buoyant densities from 1.77 to 1.83 g/ml as determined by mass on an analytical balance. RNA recovered from the fractions was reverse transcribed as described above. The cDNA was used to amplify a ∼250-bp product from the 18S rRNA sequence from positions 300 to 555 using EK555sR and GC300F, which includes a 39-bp guanine and cytosine (GC) clamp on the 5′ end of the selected region (5′-CGCCCGCCGCGCCCCCGCCCCGGCCCGCCGCCCCCGCCCAGGGTTCGATTCCGGAG-3′) (
5). The composition of the PCR was as described above for the clone library construction. The PCR conditions used were an initial denaturation at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 61°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension cycle of 10 min at 72°C.
The GC-clamped PCR products were separated by using DGGE on 10% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide gels with a 30 to 50% urea-formamide denaturing gradient using the DGGE 2401 system (C.B.S. Scientific Co.) as previously described (
26). The gels were run at 60°C, 55 V, and 300 A for 17 h; stained with SYBR gold nucleic acid gel stain (Invitrogen, Australia) for 15 min; and visualized by using a Bio-Rad Gel Doc imaging system (Bio-Rad Laboratories Pty., Ltd., Australia). The gels were evaluated manually to determine the presence or absence of bands in each fraction. Bands of interest were excised by using a 1-ml pipette tip and resuspended in 20 μl of H
2O. One microliter of this was used to reamplify the bands before running them in another DGGE gel to assess purity.
Sequencing of DGGE bands.
Once the purity of the excised bands was established, they were analyzed by reamplifying for sequencing using the primers EK555sR and the non-GC-clamped 300F (
5). The PCR products were cleaned by using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen) and quantified by using a Beckman U.V. spectrophotometer DU 640 (Beckman). PCR products were sequenced by using an ABI3730 capillary sequencer (Applied Biosystems). Contigs and alignments of the recovered sequences were assembled by using DNAStar, Lasergene, SeqMan, and MegAlign software (version 6). The phylogenetic affiliation of the contigs was obtained by using BLAST (
2) on the NCBI server.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers.
Sequence data were deposited with GenBank under accession numbers GQ167353 to GQ167386 and GQ918140 .
DISCUSSION
Very little is known about the movement of carbon from bacteria to protozoa in complex microbial communities such as activated sludge. Although it is clear that protozoa have feeding preferences based on a variety of factors, it is not known whether specific protozoan lineages graze on specific functional groups of bacteria. In the present study we assessed the utility of RNA-SIP in the identification of protozoa grazing on autotrophic bacteria under ammonia-oxidizing conditions and acetate consumers under denitrifying conditions in activated sludge.
We demonstrated that it is possible to retrieve labeled 18S rRNA sequences from activated sludge using RNA-SIP after direct addition of labeled protozoa (Fig.
1). Additionally, we showed that labeled 18S rRNA sequences could be retrieved from activated sludge after feeding with
13C-labeled bacterial cells (Fig.
2). This experiment revealed that peritrichs closely related to
Epicarchesium abrae and
Zoothamnium duplicatum and a
Spumella sp. heterotrophic nanoflagellate from the order Chrysomonadida dominate the acquisition of carbon from planktonic
E. coli cells in activated sludge. These results are consistent with a previous study, where it was shown that between 65 and 75% of the decrease of the
E. coli population in activated sludge can be attributed to predation by ciliates (
4). However, the present study also shows that other protozoa, such as flagellates, are capable of grazing on planktonic
E. coli populations. The utility of this method for identifying grazers of bacterial populations was also recently shown in a marine system, where labeled picocyanobacteria were added to seawater, and their predators were identified using RNA-SIP (
7).
Once the utility of RNA-SIP to track carbon from bacteria to protozoa in activated sludge was established, we showed that it is also possible to use this method to track carbon flow through more than one trophic level: from labeled substrate, to bacteria, to protozoa. The RNA-SIP analysis of activated sludge samples pulsed with
13C-labeled bicarbonate in the presence of ammonium sulfate, identified a single protozoan phylotype that increased in density after the pulse was consumed, the peritrich ciliate
Epistylis galea (Fig.
6).
Members of this genus are known to be abundant in the protozoan community of wastewater treatment plants (
8,
27). The subclass Peritrichia is composed of sessile stalked organisms that live attached to surfaces. In activated sludge, this is usually the surface of flocs. Like most peritrichs,
E. galea feeds by filtering bacteria from the plankton. Recently, culture independent methods, showed that in nitrifying wastewater treatment plants, ammonia is oxidized to nitrite by bacteria belonging to a wide variety of different
Betaproteobacteria, including to
Nitrosomonas europaea,
Nitrosomonas eutropha,
Nitrosococcus mobilis, members of the
Nitrosomonas marina cluster, and four phylogenetic lineages with no cultured representatives (
36).
E. galea is likely to have become labeled in our experiments through predation on members of these genera in the planktonic phase.
Given that aggregated biomass, rather than its planktonic counterpart, is mostly responsible for the processing of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorous in wastewater treatment, we speculate that E. galea fed from planktonic cells generated from the growth and subsequent dispersal of autotrophs from flocs. Besides E. galea, no other protozoan phylotype was labeled sufficiently to generate the necessary increase in buoyant density required for reliable identification by stable isotope probing. This may indicate that E. galea dominates the acquisition of carbon from autotrophs in activated sludge or that other predators consuming autotrophs have a more varied diet (i.e., less prey selectivity), consuming enough unlabeled carbon to evade detection by RNA-based SIP.
In addition to the [
13C]bicarbonate pulse, we conducted a
13C-labeled acetate pulse under nitrate reducing conditions. While [
13C]acetate and nitrate were consumed and the
13C atom% of the biomass increased more in the presence of nitrate than in its absence, we could not detect increases in the density of the 18S rRNA of any particular protozoa. This suggests that no protozoan phylotype was labeled sufficiently to generate the necessary increase in buoyant density required for identification by stable isotope probing. This may be a consequence of a reduction in protozoan grazing activity in activated sludge under anoxic conditions (
6) or may reflect dilution of
13C throughout the community.
In summary, analysis of a clone library of the protozoan community in activated sludge revealed that most of the identified sequences belonged to the ciliates of the subclass Peritrichia and to amoebae. These results confirm the dominance of surface associated protozoa in the activated sludge environment. In accordance with this, RNA-SIP identified the peritrich E. galea as a consumer of CO2-assimilating microbes in activated sludge. RNA-SIP was unable to identify any other protozoa involved in grazing on CO2-assimilating microbes under ammonia-oxidizing conditions or acetate-consuming bacteria under denitrifying conditions, suggesting that protozoa do not feed specifically on these functional groups.
This apparent dilution of 13C throughout the activated sludge community, with many species possibly receiving insufficient enrichment for identification in density gradients, represents a limitation to nucleic acid-based stable isotope probing methods in the examination of carbon flow across trophic levels in this ecosystem. Although this may not be the case for substrates other than CO2 or acetate, the approach shows greatest potential in the identification of keystone predators of labeled cultivable bacteria in activated sludge.