Brief Report
19 December 2013

Specific Detection and Localization of Microsporidian Parasites in Invertebrate Hosts by Using In Situ Hybridization

ABSTRACT

We designed fluorescence in situ hybridization probes for two distinct microsporidian clades and demonstrated their application in detecting, respectively, Nosema/Vairimorpha and Dictyoceola species. We used them to study the vertical transmission of two microsporidia infecting the amphipod Gammarus duebeni.

TEXT

Microsporidia are important parasites of invertebrates that cause losses in beneficial insects such as pollinators (1, 2) and farmed Crustacea (3, 4), and they are also utilized for biological control of insect pests (5). While many microsporidian species are transmitted horizontally to new hosts, others are transmitted vertically (i.e., female-to-offspring transmission) or by a combination of the two modes (6, 7). Such variation in the mode of transmission affects the evolution of virulence, which is generally reduced in vertically transmitted microsporidia (6, 7). For example, parasites of the genus Nosema that infect crustacean hosts cause little pathogenesis; they form low-burden localized infections in the reproductive tissue, are vertically transmitted, and cause feminization of the host offspring, leading to distorted sex ratios (8, 9). In contrast, Vairimorpha disparis (also from the Nosema clade) causes high-density infection of the fat body, leading to death of the gypsy moth host and subsequent horizontal transmission (10).
Understanding and managing the impact of these parasites on their hosts requires an ability to both discriminate between strains and map the distribution and burden within host tissues. PCR-based detection of microsporidian parasites is well established and can be combined with either restriction fragment length polymorphism (11) or sequencing analysis (12) to identify parasite species. Although quantitative PCR techniques have been developed to monitor parasite burdens in hosts (13), they are a weak tool for the investigation of tissue distribution. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an excellent tool for the visualization of parasites within tissues but is very time-consuming when looking at the distribution of microorganisms across a whole organism or whole tissues because only thin (<100-nm) sections of tissues can be visualized. Since its development as a method to detect microorganisms (14), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has been used to detect and localize many endosymbionts, notably in arthropod hosts (15, 16). It allows the precise localization and distribution of microorganisms within a particular tissue, as well as evaluation of their density. FISH probes target particular regions of the rRNA and can be designed to detect a broad range of microorganisms (if the targeted rRNA region is well conserved across these microorganisms) or to be very specific (if the targeted region is unique); they are thus considered to be phylogenetic stains (17). While this method is widely used to detect and localize bacteria, only a few studies have applied this method to microsporidia (1820). This is partly due to the fact that microsporidia are eukaryotes with unusual rRNAs (21, 22) and many of the tools developed for bacteria to design FISH probes are therefore unsuitable (2325).
In this article, we present two FISH probes designed to detect microsporidia of the genera Nosema/Vairimorpha and Dictyocoela. We tested the specificity of these probes by applying them to three economically important microsporidia of the genus Nosema and to two unrelated clades. We then used these probes to study the distribution of two vertically transmitted microsporidia, Nosema granulosis and Dictyocoela duebenum (26), within the ovaries of the crustacean host Gammarus duebeni in order to elucidate the route of transmission to developing oocytes.
To design these probes, we first used MAFFT (27) to align 34 microsporidian small rRNA sequences across the microsporidian phylogeny, including several Dictyocoela and Nosema species (accession numbers are shown in Fig. 1) in order to identify the regions that were conserved among the members of the genus of interest but distinct from others. rRNA regions are known to be more or less accessible to FISH probes (23). As an accessibility map does not exist yet for microsporidia, whose small rRNA is distinct in structure from that of other eukaryotes and from that of bacteria, we chose to target rRNA regions that are known to be accessible for both yeasts and bacteria. These regions were identified for our species by using the secondary structure of the microsporidian small subunit (SSU) found at the comparative RNA website (http://www.rna.ccbb.utexas.edu/) (28). Finally, we checked the in silico specificity of the two probes by using ProbeCheck (29) and BLAST. By using this method, we designed two probes, Ng02 (ATAGGTCAAGTTTCGCCC), with specificity for the Nosema/Vairimorpha clade, and Dd04 (GACCTTGGTCCTGGTAGC), with specificity to the genus Dictyoceola. The probes matching the targeted areas of each species are illustrated in Fig. 1.
Fig 1
Fig 1 Use of probes Ng02 and Dd04 as phylogenetic markers. (A). Phylogenetic tree showing the relationships of microsporidian species belonging to various clades defined by Vossbrinck and Debrunner-Vossbrinck (39). The species with which probes Ng02 and Dd04 hybridized are highlighted in light and dark gray, respectively. The alignment of the small-subunit rDNA sequences of these 34 microsporidian species was performed with MAFFT (27). The tree, obtained by using the neighbor-joining method, was based on 578 positions. (B) Alignment of the microsporidian species in the tree in panel A focusing on the rRNA regions targeted by probes Ng02 and Dd04. The target region of each probe is shown. Periods indicate nucleotides in that region that match the corresponding probe, while letters indicate mismatches. A dash indicates a deletion in the SSU sequence. The species tested in this study are in bold. A check mark indicates that a hybridization signal was observed, and a boxed X indicates absence of hybridization.
We used the probes on tissues of G. duebeni infected with either D. duebenum or N. granulosis (infection confirmed by PCR-RLFP [11]). Tissues were fixed with acetone or Carnoy fixative and held at −20°C until use. The tissues were subsequently rehydrated in PBS-T (phosphate-buffered saline [pH 7.4] with 0.05% Triton X-100), incubated in a 1:1 solution of PBS-T and hybridization buffer (HB; 20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 0.9 M NaCl, 0.01% SDS, 1× Denhardt's solution, 30% [for Dd04] or 35% [for Ng02] deionized formamide [P040.1; Roth]) for 10 min at 20°C, in HB for 20 min at 20°C, and then in HB for 30 min at 45°C before the addition of 5′-Cy5-labeled probes (Jena Bioscience) Ng02 and Dd04 at concentrations of 0.5 μM (Ng02) and 0.25 μM (Dd04). Following incubation at 45°C overnight, samples were washed in HB at 45°C 2 × 30 min and at 20°C 1 × 30 min and in HB–PBS-T at 20°C 1 × 30 min, stained for 30 min with PBS-T containing 300 nM 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI), and mounted in 40% glycerol. Images were taken with a Zeiss LSM510 confocal inverted microscope (Carl Zeiss Ltd., Herts, United Kingdom) and processed using Gimp. DAPI staining was visualized with a 405-nm laser and a 420- to 480-nm bandpass filter and Cy5-labeled probes using a 633-nm laser and a 650-nm low-pass filter. Autofluorescence of spores was transiently visible with a 488-nm laser and a 530- to 600-nm bandpass filter. Using our probes, we were able to detect all stages of these microsporidia (vegetative and spore stages; see Fig. S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). FISH is therefore a more powerful method to detect microsporidia than is immunofluorescence, which detects only spores (12, 30).
We assessed the specificity of these probes by applying them to G. duebeni whole-mount embryos infected with N. granulosis or D. duebenum and to spores of five other microsporidian species that had been stored in 50% glycerol (31). These included N. ceranae and N. apis, both of which cause significant disease in honeybees (1); Vairimorpha disparis, which also belongs to the Nosema clade (32) and is a parasite studied for biological control of the gypsy moth (5); and parasites from two additional unrelated clades, Paranosema whitei, which is a parasite of flour beetles (33), and Thelohania contejeani, which causes porcelain disease in crayfish (34). The protocol described above was used. The pattern of hybridization perfectly matched the phylogenetic associations (Fig. 1; see Fig. S3 and S4 in the supplemental material). Dd04 hybridized only with D. duebenum, and there was no cross-reactivity with other genera. Ng02 reacted with all three members of the Nosema clade; N. apis, N. ceranae, and V. disparis, and there was no cross-reactivity with other genera. These results not only show that these probes can be used as phylogenetic tools to detect Dictyocoela or Nosema species but highlight their potential use to detect microsporidian species of economic relevance. These probes could also be used to detect these species in environmental samples such as honey, soil, or water in order to follow their spread in the environment.
Finally, we applied these probes to whole-mount ovarian tissues of G. duebeni to investigate the mechanism of transovarial transmission by N. granulosis and D. duebenum. We observed a high density of N. granulosis spores in follicle cells (see Fig. S5 in the supplemental material), which are adjacent to developing oocytes, in accord with previous TEM studies that suggested that spores invade secondary oocytes during their maturation (35). Furthermore, we observed a similar proliferation of D. duebenum spores in follicle cells, as well as the presence of meronts in maturing oocytes (Fig. 2). These data led us to conclude that these two phylogenetically distant microsporidia have evolved convergent vertical transmission strategies.
Fig 2
Fig 2 Transovarial transmission of D. duebenum in its G. duebeni host. (A) G. duebeni ovary. The red signal (FISH) indicates the presence of D. duebenum. (B) High magnification of the G. duebeni ovary shown in panel A. Clusters of microsporidia are visible. (C, D) Group of microsporidia. Spore walls are visible in panel C. (E) A follicle cell containing D. duebenum spores (arrow) is visible in the vicinity of a maturing oocyte (bracket). Oocyte yolk is lightly autofluorescent. (F) Same tissue as in panel E observed in a deeper z plane. An immature oocyte is visible (*), while the maturing oocyte contains D. duebeni meronts (arrowhead). Panel C, differential interference contrast image; B, D, E, and F, fluorescence microscopy images; A, overlay of differential interference contrast and fluorescence images; red, FISH signal; blue, DAPI staining.
Our study shows that FISH can be applied successfully to detect and precisely localize microsporidian species within host tissues. So far, most of the few studies that have applied FISH to microsporidia have focused on the detection of spores of microsporidia infecting vertebrates, especially humans (18, 19, 36). Our study shows that not only the spores but all of the stages of the microsporidian life cycle can be detected by FISH (see Fig. S1 and S2 in the supplemental material). Moreover, previous studies applied this method to stool samples, intestinal biopsy samples, or environmental samples (18, 36). Our study shows that this method is also suitable for use with whole-mount tissues, allowing the study of the dynamics of cell invasion of microsporidia within tissues. Applications of FISH to microsporidia are broad. For example, coinfections with different microsporidian species have been reported in many hosts (13, 37, 38). With the use of specific probes, one could easily determine the tissue specificity of multiple microsporidian species within a host to understand their respective impact on the host's biology. Moreover, as vertical transmission is widespread among microsporidia (9), FISH could help to decipher the various mechanisms used to achieve such vertical transmission. Owing to the diversity of rRNA sequences in microsporidia (39), FISH probes could also be designed for other important clades or species. We believe that the FISH method applied to microsporidia is only at its beginning and that a variety of studies will benefit from its application.

Probe sequence accession numbers.

The sequences of probes Ng02 and Dd04 have been deposited in ProbeBase (29) under accession numbers pB-03882 and pB-03883.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Gareth Howell for his advice on confocal microscopy and Gregory D. Hurst for fruitful discussions.
This work was funded by NERC/BBSRC grant NE/D011000/1.

Supplemental Material

File (zam999103965so1.pdf)
File (zam999103965so2.pdf)
File (zam999103965so3.pdf)
File (zam999103965so4.pdf)
File (zam999103965so5.pdf)
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

1.
Evans JD and Schwarz RS. 2011. Bees brought to their knees: microbes affecting honey bee health. Trends Microbiol. 19:614–620.
2.
Evison SEF, Roberts KE, Laurenson L, Pietravalle S, Hui J, Biesmeijer JC, Smith JE, Budge G, and Hughes WOH. 2012. Pervasiveness of parasites in pollinators. PLoS One 7:e30641. doi:.
3.
Morado JF. 2011. Protistan diseases of commercially important crabs: a review. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 106:27–53.
4.
Stentiford GD, Neil DM, Peeler EJ, Shields JD, Small HJ, Flegel TW, Vlak JM, Jones B, Morado F, Moss S, Lotz J, Bartholomay L, Behringer DC, Hauton C, and Lightner DV. 2012. Disease will limit future food supply from the global crustacean fishery and aquaculture sectors. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 110:141–157.
5.
Solter LF, Becnel JJ, and Oi DH. 2012. Microsporidian entomopathogens, p 221–263. In Vega FE and Kaya HK (ed), Insect pathology, 2nd edition. Elsevier, San Diego, CA.
6.
Dunn AM and Smith JE. 2001. Microsporidian life cycles and diversity: the relationship between virulence and transmission. Microbes Infect. 3:381–388.
7.
Dunn AM, Terry RS, and Smith JE. 2001. Transovarial transmission in the microsporidia. Adv. Parasitol. 48:57–100.
8.
Haine ER, Motreuil S, and Rigaud T. 2007. Infection by a vertically-transmitted microsporidian parasite is associated with a female-biased sex ratio and survival advantage in the amphipod Gammarus roeseli. Parasitology 134:1363–1367.
9.
Terry RS, Smith JE, Sharpe RG, Rigaud T, Littlewood DT, Ironside JE, Rollinson D, Bouchon D, MacNeil C, Dick JT, and Dunn AM. 2004. Widespread vertical transmission and associated host sex-ratio distortion within the eukaryotic phylum Microspora. Proc. Biol. Sci. 271:1783–1789.
10.
Goertz D and Hoch G. 2008. Vertical transmission and overwintering of microsporidia in the gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 99:43–48.
11.
Hogg JC, Ironside JE, Sharpe RG, Hatcher MJ, Smith JE, and Dunn AM. 2002. Infection of Gammarus duebeni populations by two vertically transmitted microsporidia; parasite detection and discrimination by PCR-RFLP. Parasitology 125:59–63.
12.
Franzen C and Müller A. 1999. Molecular techniques for detection, species differentiation and phylogenetic analysis of microsporidia. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 12:243–285.
13.
Chen Y, Evans JD, Zhou L, Boncristiani H, Kimura K, Xiao T, Litkowski AM, and Pettis JS. 2009. Asymmetrical coexistence of Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis in honey bees. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 101:204–209.
14.
Amann R, Fuchs BM, and Behrens S. 2001. The identification of microorganisms by fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 12:231–236.
15.
Bourtzis K and Miller TA. 2003. Insect symbiosis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
16.
Perotti MA, Allen JM, Reed DL, and Braig HR. 2007. Host-symbiont interactions of the primary endosymbiont of human head and body lice. FASEB J. 21:1058–1066.
17.
Amann RI, Ludwig W, and Schleifer K-H. 1995. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiol. Rev. 59:143–169.
18.
Graczyk TK, Johansson MA, Tamang L, Visvesvara GS, Moura LS, DaSilva AJ, Girouard AS, and Matos O. 2007. Retrospective species identification of microsporidian spores in diarrheic fecal samples from human immunodeficiency virus/AIDS patients by multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridization. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45:1255–1260.
19.
Hester JD, Varma M, Bobst AM, Ware MW, Lindquist HD, and Schaefer FW III. 2002. Species-specific detection of three human-pathogenic microsporidial species from the genus Encephalitozoon via fluorogenic 5′ nuclease PCR assays. Mol. Cell. Probes 16:435–444.
20.
Troemel ER, Felix MA, Whiteman NK, Barriere A, and Ausubel FM. 2008. Microsporidia are natural intracellular parasites of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol. 6:2736–2752.
21.
Caetano-Anollés G. 2002. Tracing the evolution of RNA structure in ribosomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:2575–2587.
22.
Hartskeerl RA, Schuitema ARJ, and Dewachter R. 1993. Secondary structure of the small subunit ribosomal-RNA sequence of the microsporidium Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Nucleic Acids Res. 21:1489.
23.
Behrens S, Ruhland C, Inacio J, Huber H, Fonseca A, Spencer-Martins I, Fuchs BM, and Amann R. 2003. In situ accessibility of small-subunit rRNA of members of the domains Bacteria, Archaea, and Eucarya to Cy3-labeled oligonucleotide probes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:1748–1758.
24.
Kumar Y, Westram R, Behrens S, Fuchs B, Glockner FO, Amann R, Meier H, and Ludwig W. 2005. Graphical representation of ribosomal RNA probe accessibility data using ARB software package. BMC Bioinformatics 6:61. doi:.
25.
Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J, and Glöckner FO. 2007. SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res. 35:7188–7196.
26.
Ironside JE, Smith JE, Hatcher MJ, Sharpe RG, Rollinson D, and Dunn AM. 2003. Two species of feminizing microsporidian parasite coexist in populations of Gammarus duebeni. J. Evol. Biol. 16:467–473.
27.
Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, and Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3059–3066.
28.
Cannone JJ, Subramanian S, Schnare MN, Collett JR, D'Souza LM, Du Y, Feng B, Lin N, Madabusi LV, Müller KM, Pande N, Shang Z, Yu N, and Gutell RR. 2002. The comparative RNA web (CRW) site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BMC Bioinformatics 3:2. doi:.
29.
Loy A, Arnold R, Tischler P, Rattei T, Wagner M, and Horn M. 2008. ProbeCheck—a central resource for evaluating oligonucleotide probe coverage and specificity. Environ. Microbiol. 10:2894–2896.
30.
Garcia L. 2002. Laboratory identification of the microsporidia. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:1892–1901.
31.
Maddox JV and Solter LF. 1996. Long-term storage of infective microsporidian spores in liquid nitrogen. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 43:221–225.
32.
Vavra J, Hylis M, Vossbrinck CR, Pilarska DK, Linde A, Weiser J, McManus ML, Hoch G, and Solter LF. 2006. Vairimorpha disparis n. comb. (Microsporidia: Burenellidae): a redescription and taxonomic revision of Thelohania disparis Timofejeva 1956, a microsporidian parasite of the gypsy moth Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 53:292–304.
33.
Sokolova YY, Dolgikh VV, Morzhina EV, Nassonova ES, Issi IV, Terry RS, Ironside JE, Smith JE, and Vossbrinck CR. 2003. Establishment of the new genus Paranosema based on the ultrastructure and molecular phylogeny of the type species Paranosema grylli gen. nov., comb. nov. (Sokolova, Selezniov, Dolgikh, Issi 1994), from the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus Deg. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 84:159–172.
34.
Imhoff EM, Mortimer RJG, Christmas M, and Dunn AM. 2010. Non-lethal tissue sampling allows molecular screening for microsporidian parasites in signal, Pacifasticus leniusculus (Dana), and white-clawed crayfish, Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet). Freshw. Crayfish 17:145–150.
35.
Terry RS, Dunn AM, and Smith JE. 1997. Cellular distribution of a feminizing microsporidian parasite: a strategy for transovarial transmission. Parasitology 115:157–163.
36.
Graczyk TK, Sunderland D, Tamang L, Shields TM, Lucy FE, and Breysse PN. 2007. Quantitative evaluation of the impact of bather density on levels of human-virulent microsporidian spores in recreational water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:4095–4099.
37.
Pilarska DK, Solter LF, Kereselidze M, Linde A, and Hoch G. 2006. Microsporidian infections in Lymantria dispar larvae: interactions and effects of multiple species infections on pathogen horizontal transmission. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 93:105–113.
38.
Weigl S, Korner H, Petrusek A, Seda J, and Wolinska J. 2012. Natural distribution and co-infection patterns of microsporidia parasites in the Daphnia longispina complex. Parasitology 139:870–880.
39.
Vossbrinck CR and Debrunner-Vossbrinck BA. 2005. Molecular phylogeny of the microsporidia: ecological, ultrastructural and taxonomic considerations. Folia Parasitol. (Praha) 52:131–142.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Volume 79Number 11 January 2013
Pages: 385 - 388
PubMed: 23087031

History

Received: 2 September 2012
Accepted: 12 October 2012
Published online: 19 December 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Contributors

Authors

Aurore Dubuffet
School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
UMR CNRS 6282 BioGéoSciences, Université de Bourgogne, Dijon, France
Judith E. Smith
School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom
Leellen Solter
Illinois Natural History Survey, Urbana, Illinois, USA
M. Alejandra Perotti
School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
Henk R. Braig
School of Biological Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
Alison M. Dunn
School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom

Notes

Address correspondence to Aurore Dubuffet, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy