INTRODUCTION
Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a versatile Gram-negative bacterium that inhabits a variety of different environments. It is also an opportunistic human pathogen that causes acute infections in hospitalized patients as well as chronic infections in cystic fibrosis patients. Unfortunately,
P. aeruginosa infections are becoming difficult to treat because of the increasing prevalence of multidrug (antibiotic) resistance (
1). To improve the treatment of these infections, we need to understand which gene functions are essential for the growth of
P. aeruginosa and develop new therapeutics to inhibit them. The study of essential genes is difficult because, by definition, inactivation of an essential gene is lethal to the cell. Analysis of essential genes generally involves the construction of conditional mutants, often accomplished by controlling the expression of a gene with an inducible promoter. Inducible promoters allow the transcription of a gene to be turned on and modulated by the addition of an inducer as well as turned off when the inducer is removed. The inability to turn off gene expression can make it difficult to determine the function of a gene, particularly when low-level expression is sufficient for gene function. Inducible promoters should also allow expression over a wide range so that the induced expression can both match the native expression level and exceed it when overexpression of the gene is desired.
In the model bacterium
Escherichia coli, the
araC-ParaBAD inducible promoter system satisfies these criteria (
2,
3). In the absence of arabinose, transcription from the
araBAD promoter is repressed by the regulatory protein AraC. When AraC binds arabinose, it is repositioned at the
araBAD promoter and activates transcription (
4). The
araBAD promoter is also controlled by carbon catabolite repression that prevents the transcription of genes necessary for the metabolism of less-preferred carbon sources (such as arabinose) when a preferred one (glucose) is available (
5,
6). In the absence of glucose, the EIIA component of the glucose-specific phosphotransferase system (EIIA
Glc) is phosphorylated and stimulates adenylate cyclase to produce cyclic AMP (cAMP). The transcriptional activator protein CRP (also called the catabolite activator protein, CAP) binds cAMP and activates the
araBAD promoter. In the presence of glucose, EIIA
Glc transfers its phosphate to glucose as it is transported across the cell envelope and into the cell. Nonphosphorylated EIIA
Glc cannot stimulate adenylate cyclase, cAMP is not produced, and CRP cannot activate the
araBAD promoter. As a result of these regulatory factors, gene expression from the
araBAD promoter can be induced, and modulated over a wide range, by the addition of arabinose (
3). In the absence of arabinose, the noninduced expression from the promoter is low, and it can be reduced even further by the addition of glucose. This tight control is arguably the most important feature of the inducible promoter system, particularly in the study of essential genes where high noninduced expression (leakiness) can prevent the determination of gene function. Promoter leakiness can also obscure the phenotype associated with any gene, whether essential or nonessential, when only a small amount of gene product is necessary for gene function.
The recognition of the tight control of the
araC-ParaBAD system has prompted its use in other bacteria, including
P. aeruginosa. While the basic regulatory features of AraC are preserved in
P. aeruginosa, carbon catabolite repression is fundamentally different (
7). Instead of utilizing a phosphotransferase system,
P. aeruginosa imports glucose through an ATP-binding cassette transporter. Without EIIA
Glc, adenylate cyclase is not stimulated to produce cAMP in the absence of glucose. In fact, cAMP levels do not change when
P. aeruginosa is grown with different carbon sources (
8), and carbon source preference, the organizing principle behind catabolite repression, is different in
P. aeruginosa. P. aeruginosa prefers to catabolize amino acids and organic acids rather than sugars, such as glucose (
9,
10). The regulatory factors that enforce catabolite repression in
P. aeruginosa are Hfq, Crc, CbrAB, and CrcZ (
7,
11). Hfq binds mRNA necessary for the assimilation of alternative carbon sources near the ribosome-binding site (RBS) and inhibits the formation of the translation initiation complex. The small regulatory RNA CrcZ modulates Hfq availability. It contains five Hfq-binding sites and can sequester Hfq. The CbrAB two-component transcriptional regulatory system controls the amount of CrcZ according to the carbon source being used (
12).
Despite these fundamental differences in catabolite repression, the
araC-ParaBAD system has been used effectively to induce the expression of several genes in
P. aeruginosa (
13–17). In various cases, however, we and others have noticed that
araC-ParaBAD may not be as tightly controlled in
P. aeruginosa as in
E. coli. This motivated us to examine whether
araC-ParaBAD meets the same desired criteria in
P. aeruginosa that provoked its widespread use in
E. coli and other bacteria. To this end, we assessed the behavior of the
araC-ParaBAD system in
P. aeruginosa. We found that transcription from
araC-ParaBAD was high in the absence of inducer and could not be decreased by catabolite repression. We then sought to improve the functionality of the system and compare it to the
lacIq-
Ptac and
rhaSR-PrhaBAD inducible promoter systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
General methods.
The strains, plasmids, and oligonucleotide primers used in this study are listed in
Tables 1,
2, and
3, respectively. Strains were grown in lysogeny broth (LB; 1% tryptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 1% sodium chloride) and M9 minimal medium (48 mM sodium phosphate dibasic, 22 mM potassium phosphate monobasic, 8.6 mM sodium chloride, 19 mM ammonium chloride, 2.0 mM magnesium sulfate, 0.1 mM calcium chloride) with the indicated carbon sources. When necessary for strain construction,
E. coli strains were grown in medium supplemented with 100 μg/ml ampicillin, 30 μg/ml kanamycin, or 10 μg/ml tetracycline;
P. aeruginosa strains were grown in medium supplemented with 30 μg/ml gentamicin, 25 μg/ml tetracycline, or 250 μg/ml carbenicillin.
Plasmid construction.
Plasmid pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm (
18) provided the backbone for the miniTn7 plasmids constructed in this study. The
araC-ParaBAD sequence was amplified by PCR from pHERD20T (
15) with oligonucleotide primers oJM400 and oJM401. The
lacIq-
Ptac sequence was amplified by PCR from pMMB66HE (
19) with oligonucleotide primers oJM402 and oJM403. The
rhaSR-PrhaBAD sequence was amplified by PCR from
E. coli strain W3110 genomic DNA with oligonucleotide primers oJM641 and oJM642. The pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm plasmid and PCR products were cut with SacI and PstI and then ligated to make pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-araC-ParaBAD (pJM100), pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-lacI
q-Ptac (pJM101), and pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-rhaSR-PrhaBAD (pJM220), respectively. The plasmids were confirmed by PCR with oligonucleotide primers oJM414 and oJM415. DNA fragments cloned into pJM100, pJM101, or pJM220 plasmid were sequenced with oJM414 and oJM457, oJM551, or oJM730, respectively.
To construct miniTn7 plasmids with
lacZ transcriptional fusions, the
lacZ sequence was amplified by PCR from miniCTX-lacZ (
20) with oligonucleotide primers oJM524 and oJM456. oJM524 introduces a strong ribosome-binding site (stRBS; 5′-TAAGGAGG-3′) with a 7-bp spacer sequence between the RBS and start codon. The
lacZ PCR product, as well as pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm, pJM100, pJM101, and pJM220 plasmids, were cut with PstI and HindIII and then ligated to make pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-stRBS-lacZ (pJM181), pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-araC-ParaBAD-stRBS-lacZ (pJM179), pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-lacI
q-Ptac-stRBS-lacZ (pJM180), and pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-rhaSR-PrhaBAD-stRBS-lacZ (pJM230), respectively. To build derivatives with reduced RBS strength, pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-araC-ParaBAD-intRBS-lacZ (pJM299) and pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-araC-ParaBAD-stRBS-lacZ (pJM289), the
lacZ sequence was amplified by PCR with oligonucleotide primers oJM741 or oJM727, respectively, and with oJM456. oJM741 introduces an intermediate-strength RBS (intRBS) with an 8-bp spacer sequence between the RBS and start codon. oJM727 introduces a weak RBS (wkRBS) with a 7-bp spacer sequence between the RBS and start codon. Both PCR products were cut with PstI and HindIII and then ligated with pJM100 as described above.
To build a miniTn7-araC-ParaBAD plasmid with the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of
amiE, oligonucleotides oJM744 and oJM745 were annealed and then ligated with pJM100 that had been cut with SpeI and PstI to make pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-araC-ParaBAD-5′ UTR amiE (pJM301). The annealed oJM744-oJM745 DNA fragment has an NcoI site that overlaps with the
amiE start codon to simplify the construction of translational fusions. To construct a derivative with a
lacZ translational fusion, the
lacZ sequence was amplified by PCR from miniCTX-lacZ with oligonucleotide primers oJM748 and oJM749. The PCR product was then ligated into pJM301 that had been cut with NcoI and HindIII by isothermal assembly (
21) to make pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-araC-ParaBAD-5′ UTR amiE-lacZ (pJM302).
To build miniTn7 plasmids with aacC1 (gm, gentamicin acetyltransferase) transcriptional fusions, the aacC1 sequence was amplified by PCR from pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm with oligonucleotide primers oJM669 and oJM670. oJM679 introduces a strong RBS (as described above). The aacC1 PCR product, as well as pJM100 and pJM220 plasmids, were cut with PstI and HindIII and then ligated to make pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-araC-ParaBAD-stRBS-aacC1 (pJM238) and pUC18T-miniTn7T-gm-rhaSR-PrhaBAD-stRBS-aacC1 (pJM240), respectively.
To make the miniCTX derivatives of each of these plasmids, miniCTX1 plasmid (
22) as well as pJM100, pJM101, pJM220, pJM238, and pJM240 plasmids were cut with SacI and HindIII. The SacI-HindIII miniCTX1 and released DNA fragments were then ligated to produce miniCTX1-araC-ParaBAD (pJM251), miniCTX1-lacI
q-Ptac (pJM252), miniCTX1-rhaSR-PrhaBAD (pJM253), miniCTX1-araC-ParaBAD-stRBS-aacC1 (pJM259), and miniCTX1-rhaSR-PrhaBAD-stRBS-aacC1 (pJM260), respectively.
To make miniCTX plasmids for complementation of trp mutants, the trpF, trpC, and trpA sequences were amplified by PCR from P. aeruginosa strain PA14 genomic DNA with oligonucleotide primers oJM681 and oJM682, oJM679 and oJM680, and oJM676 and oJM677, respectively. Each PCR product contains the native RBS from each trp gene. The PCR products, as well as pJM251 and pJM253 plasmids, were cut with SpeI and HindIII and then ligated to make miniCTX1-araC-ParaBAD-PA14 trpF (pJM256), miniCTX1-rhaSR-PrhaBAD-PA14 trpF (pJM268), miniCTX1-araC-ParaBAD-PA14 trpC (pJM255), miniCTX1-rhaSR-PrhaBAD-PA14 trpC (pJM267), miniCTX1-araC-ParaBAD-PA14 trpA (pJM254), and miniCTX1-rhaSR-PrhaBAD-PA14 trpA (pJM266). DNA fragments cloned into miniCTX plasmids were confirmed with oligonucleotide primers oJM691 and oJM703. The cloned DNA fragments were sequenced with oJM703 and oJM457 (miniCTX1-araC-ParaBAD, pJM251) or oJM730 (miniCTX1-rhaSR-PrhaBAD, pJM253).
Conjugations.
P. aeruginosa recipient strains, as well as E. coli donor and helper strains, were grown in 3 ml LB (with antibiotic when appropriate) at 37°C with rolling for about 8 h. One milliliter of each culture was centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 2 min in microcentrifuge tubes. The culture supernatants were aspirated, cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml LB, and cell suspensions were centrifuged. Aspiration, resuspension, and centrifugation were repeated. The supernatant was aspirated and cell pellets were resuspended in 35 μl LB. Cell suspensions were spotted onto LB agar and incubated at 37°C overnight. The cells were scraped off and resuspended in LB and serially diluted 10-fold, and 100 μl of each dilution was spread on Vogel-Bonner minimal medium (VBMM; 10 mM sodium citrate tribasic, 9.5 mM citric acid, 57 mM potassium phosphate dibasic, 17 mM sodium ammonium phosphate, 1 mM magnesium sulfate, 0.1 mM calcium chloride, pH 7.0) agar with antibiotic (gentamicin or tetracycline) and incubated at 37°C overnight. Chromosomal integration of miniTn7 was confirmed by PCR with oligonucleotide primers oJM473 and oJM414, while miniCTX integration was confirmed with oDHL12 and oDHL13.
Electroporations.
Recipient strains were grown in 3 ml LB in duplicate at 37°C with rolling for about 8 h. The two 3-ml cultures were pooled and then dispensed into four microcentrifuge tubes. The cultures were centrifuged at 8,000 ×
g for 2 min. Each cell pellet was resuspended in 1 ml 300 mM sucrose and centrifuged twice (
23). The four cell pellets were resuspended and pooled in a total of 300 μl of 300 mM sucrose. One hundred microliters of each suspension was transferred to 1-mm-gap-width electroporation cuvettes. One hundred nanograms of pFLP2 plasmid was added to each suspension. Cells were electroporated at 1,800 V in an Eppendorf electroporator 2510. Nine hundred microliters of LB was added to each electroporation. Recovery cultures were incubated at 37°C with rolling for 1 h. Cultures were serially diluted 10-fold, spread on LB agar with antibiotic (carbenicillin), and incubated at 37°C overnight.
Excision of antibiotic resistance cassette by Flp-FRT recombination.
Recipient strains containing chromosomal gentamicin resistance cassette flanked by
FRT recombination sites were electroporated with pFLP2 plasmid (
24). Transformants were streaked on LB with carbenicillin, as well as on LB with gentamicin, to screen for excision of the gentamicin resistance cassette by Flp recombination. Gentamicin-sensitive transformants were streaked from LB with carbenicillin to LB with 5% sucrose. Strains that have the pFLP2 plasmid are sucrose sensitive, while those that have lost the plasmid are sucrose resistant. Sucrose-resistant colonies were streaked on LB, LB with gentamicin, and LB with carbenicillin to confirm both excision of the gentamicin resistance cassette and loss of the pFLP2 plasmid.
β-Galactosidase assays.
Strains were grown in 3 ml medium (LB, M9-glucose, M9-Casamino Acids, or M9-succinate) at 37°C with rolling until cell density reached an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of about 0.5. Cultures were diluted 50-fold into the 3 ml medium with or without inducer (l-arabinose, isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside [IPTG], or l-rhamnose) and grown at 37°C with rolling until an OD600 of about 0.5 (mid-exponential growth phase). One milliliter of each culture was centrifuged at 10,000 × g in a microcentrifuge tube for 1 min. Cell pellets were stored at −20°C. Cell pellets were thawed on ice and resuspended in 1 ml cold Z buffer (60 mM sodium phosphate dibasic, 40 mM sodium phosphate monobasic, 10 mM potassium chloride, 1 mM magnesium sulfate, pH 7.0, with 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol). One hundred microliters of each cell suspension was added to microcentrifuge tubes containing 900 μl Z buffer, 100 μl chloroform, and 50 μl 0.1% SDS. Reaction mixtures were vortexed and incubated at 30°C for 10 min. Two hundred microliters of 4 mg/ml ortho-nitrophenyl-β-galactoside (in 0.1 M phosphate buffer; 60 mM sodium phosphate dibasic, 40 mM sodium phosphate monobasic, pH 7.0) was added to each sample. Reactions were vortexed briefly and incubated at 30°C for 10 to 20 min. Four hundred microliters of 1 M sodium carbonate was added to each sample to terminate the reactions. Reaction mixtures were vortexed and centrifuged to remove cell debris. One milliliter of each reaction supernatant was transferred to disposable cuvettes. The absorbance of each reaction mixture was measured at 420 nm (A420). β-Galactosidase activity (in Miller units) was calculated as (1,000 × A420)/(reaction time in minutes × cell suspension volume in ml × OD600).
Gentamicin resistance assays.
For broth culture assays, strains were grown in 3 ml LB with or without inducer (0.2% l-arabinose or 0.03125% l-rhamnose) at 37°C with rolling until an OD600 of approximately 0.5. Five microliters of each culture was added to 150 μl LB or LB with gentamicin (80, 20, 5, 1.25, 0.31, or 0.078 μg/ml) in a 96-well plate. Five microliters of each culture was also added to 150 μl LB with inducer (0.2% l-arabinose or 0.03125% l-rhamnose) and gentamicin (80, 20, 5, 1.25, 0.31, or 0.078 μg/ml). Each condition was tested in triplicate. Cultures were grown at 37°C with shaking in a BioTek Synergy H1 hybrid plate reader for 8 h, and the OD600 was measured every 15 min. Relative growth of culture after 300 min (transition state-early stationary phase for cultures without gentamicin) was calculated (average of triplicates with gentamicin divided by average of triplicates without gentamicin). For spot dilution plate assays, strains were grown in 3 ml LB with or without inducer (0.2% l-arabinose or 0.03125% l-rhamnose) at 37°C with rolling until an OD600 of approximately 0.5, as described above. The cultures were then serially diluted 10-fold in LB, 5 μl of each dilution was spotted on LB agar and LB agar with gentamicin, and cells were grown at 37°C overnight.
Complementation of tryptophan auxotrophy.
Strains were grown in 3 ml M9 minimal medium supplemented with 50 mM succinate, as well as with 1 mM l-tryptophan or 0.003125% l-rhamnose when indicated. Cultures were grown at 37°C with rolling for about 15 h and the OD600 was measured. Strains were also grown in 200 μl M9 with 50 mM succinate, as well as with l-rhamnose (0.006, 0.003, 0.0015, 0.0008, 0.0004, and 0.0002%) or l-tryptophan (1.0, 0.25, 0.0625, and 0.0156 mM), as indicated. Each condition was tested in triplicate. These cultures were grown at 37°C with shaking in a BioTek Synergy H1 hybrid plate reader for 8 h, and the OD600 was measured every 15 min.
Accession number(s).
The annotated nucleotide sequences of plasmids pJM100, pJM101, pJM220, pJM251, pJM252, and pJM253 were submitted to GenBank under accession numbers KX787911, KX782328, KX777256, KX787912, KX782329, and KX782327, respectively.
DISCUSSION
The aims of the work described here were to describe the shortcomings of the araC-ParaBAD inducible promoter system and reengineer it to improve its functionality in P. aeruginosa, as well as to identify a system that is tightly controlled in the absence of inducer and inducible over a wide range of expression levels. These criteria are important because a failure to achieve tight control of gene expression can obscure the study of gene function, while a narrow range of inducible gene expression can make it difficult to match an induced expression level with the native expression level. Our data show that the araC-ParaBAD inducible promoter system is not tightly controlled in the absence of arabinose in P. aeruginosa, as it is in E. coli, and the leakiness cannot be reduced through carbon catabolite repression. Although araC-ParaBAD exhibits high maximally induced expression, the high noninduced expression narrows the range within which expression can be modulated. Both the lacIq-Ptac and rhaSR-PrhaBAD inducible promoter systems display significantly lower noninduced expression than araC-ParaBAD, and they both maintain high maximal induced expression. Consequently, expression from lacIq-Ptac and rhaSR-PrhaBAD is inducible over a broader range than that of araC-ParaBAD. Of these three inducible promoter systems, rhaSR-PrhaBAD is the most tightly controlled and allows expression over the widest range.
Although our data describe the different behaviors of these inducible promoter systems in
P. aeruginosa, they do not necessarily explain why the differences exist. In
E. coli, the promoters of many catabolic genes (including the
ara,
lac, and
rha operons) tend to be weak and need to be activated by transcription factors to allow the formation of the RNA polymerase-promoter complex and transcriptional initiation (
40). Alterations that strengthen these promoters by making the sequence closer to the consensus sequence recognized by RNA polymerase (
TTGACA-17-
TATAAT in
E. coli) can eliminate the need for activation. (DNA sequences shown in boldface indicate the consensus promoter sequence recognized by σ
70-RNA polymerase in
E. coli.) The
lacUV5 promoter (
TTT
ACA-18-
TATAAT), for example, is a derivative of the
lac promoter (
TTT
ACA-18-
TATGT
T) with mutations that strengthen the promoter and suppress the need for cAMP-CRP activation (
41). The
tac promoter (
TTGACA-16-
TATAAT) used in this study is a
trp-lacUV5 hybrid that strengthens the promoter even further (
33). If promoter strength was the only factor that contributes to noninduced expression, then the
tac promoter may be expected to be the least tightly controlled. Presumably, the architecture of the regulatory system and the cellular levels of the regulatory proteins are also important factors. The regulatory system that controls the
tac promoter is comprised of a single regulatory protein, the LacI transcriptional repressor. LacI binds to an operator site that overlaps the promoter and prevents the formation of the RNA polymerase-promoter complex. The
lacIq gene has a mutation that strengthens the promoter that controls expression of
lacI, leading to an increase in the amount of LacI produced, thereby decreasing noninduced expression from the
tac promoter (
42,
43). The
rhaBAD promoter (AG
GT
CG-17-
TAG
AC
T) is weak in
E. coli. Activation of the
rhaBAD promoter occurs through a regulatory cascade involving RhaR and RhaS (
26). RhaR is a transcription factor that binds rhamnose and activates the transcription of the
rhaS gene, as well as its own gene. When RhaS, also a transcription factor, accumulates to sufficient amounts, it activates transcription from the
rhaBAD promoter. Perhaps this architecture creates a regulatory buffer that maintains low noninduced expression (
27). The
araBAD promoter (C
TGACG-18-
TACTG
T) is also quite weak in
E. coli. It is repressed by AraC (in the absence of arabinose) and then activated by the arabinose-AraC complex. One possible explanation for its leakiness is that the cellular levels of AraC are lower and the promoter is stronger in
P. aeruginosa than
E. coli. In this scenario, AraC repression may be less complete and the need for activation by arabinose-AraC could be diminished in
P. aeruginosa compared to that in
E. coli.
Despite its leakiness in
P. aeruginosa, the
araC-ParaBAD system has been used to induce the expression of several genes (
13–17). For some applications of inducible promoter systems, tightly controlled gene expression may not be particularly important. In cases where the amount of gene product necessary for gene function is large, the leaky gene expression from
araC-ParaBAD may be insufficient for gene function. On the other hand, there are presumably many other cases where only a small amount of gene product is needed for gene function. In this study, we presented two distinct examples that demonstrate the problems associated with the
araC-ParaBAD system in
P. aeruginosa. Noninduced expression of a gentamicin acetyltransferase gene (
aacC1) from
araC-ParaBAD was sufficient to confer gentamicin resistance. Similarly, noninduced expression of three different tryptophan biosynthesis genes (
trpF,
trpC, and
trpA) from
araC-ParaBAD was sufficient to support tryptophan biosynthesis and cell growth in minimal medium. The leakiness of the
araC-ParaBAD system was already encountered in a study of essential cell envelope biosynthesis genes (
14). To overcome this problem, the authors constructed a suicide plasmid (pBEM10) for integration of
araC-ParaBAD upstream of target genes at their native chromosomal loci. The distinguishing feature of this integration plasmid was the inclusion of a weak RBS (TTG
GGCTAACCTTCTGAAAAGCTT
ATG; Δ
G of −3.09 kcal/mol; 19-nucleotide RBS start codon spacing). This weak RBS would offset the effects of
araC-ParaBAD leakiness by decreasing translational initiation and accumulation of the resulting protein gene product. Subsequently, miniCTX1 derivatives that preserve this weak RBS were constructed and used to study other essential envelope biosynthesis genes (
16,
44). As we demonstrated in our study, decreasing RBS strength can reduce the problem of promoter leakiness, but it also reduces the maximal induced amount of gene product and narrows the range within which the gene product can be modulated. Therefore, the existing method for overcoming the problems with the
araC-ParaBAD system incompletely achieves the goals of tightly controlled noninduced expression and high maximum induced expression, allowing a broad range of inducible gene expression. Furthermore, this approach does not resolve the problem when the gene product in not a protein, such as noncoding RNAs that are not translated into proteins.
In addition to modulating RBS strength, we also explored an alternative approach to mitigate the effects of
araC-ParaBAD leakiness. We introduced a portion of the 5′ UTR from the
amiE gene downstream of
araC-ParaBAD in an attempt to subject target genes to carbon catabolite repression (translational inhibition by Hfq) in
P. aeruginosa. The expectation was that the addition of the 5′ UTR would allow us to decrease translation of target mRNA when the cells were grown with a preferred carbon source (such as amino acids, which elicit strong catabolite repression). Indeed, the 5′ UTR of
amiE improved the functionality of the
araC-ParaBAD systems by decreasing the noninduced activity of the
lacZ gene about 6-fold and increasing the induction ratio about 5-fold in rich medium (LB). The reduction was more modest than we expected, however, when cells were grown in minimal medium supplemented with Casamino Acids compared to minimal medium with glucose. The 5′ UTR of the
amiE gene is 134 bp in length and contains a transcriptional terminator (
amiL) that prevents read-through transcription of the
ami operon in the absence of aliphatic amides, followed by a 40-bp region with the CA motif recognized by Hfq (
11,
12). Using a translational
lacZ fusion, the 134-bp 5′ UTR resulted in an approximately 2-fold decrease in activity in minimal medium supplemented with succinate compared to glucose and about a 10-fold decreased compared to activity in minimal medium with mannitol (
12). We observed only about a 10% decrease in activity with our
amiE-lacZ translational fusion in minimal medium with succinate compared to glucose. These results suggest that the CA motif is not sufficient for catabolite repression of
amiE and indicate that additional upstream sequences also are involved. A more complete understanding of catabolite repression in
P. aeruginosa should allow the design and implementation of a posttranscriptional regulatory module that could augment the usefulness of
araC-ParaBAD as well as other inducible and constitutive promoter systems.
Although our primary motivation to identify an inducible promoter system that is tightly controlled in
P. aeruginosa was the analysis of essential gene function with the aim of developing new antibiotics to treat
P. aeruginosa infections, the utility of tightly controlled inducible promoters is not restricted to the study of essential genes. They can also be applied to understanding essential cellular functions maintained through parallel gene pathways. Such parallel pathways are employed by cells to promote phenotypic stability despite cellular and environmental variability. Genes in these pathways are often synthetically lethal, meaning that mutants in individual gene pathways are viable and mutant combinations are lethal. The study of synthetic lethal genes often involves conditional expression of a gene with an inducible promoter that allows inactivation of its synthetic lethal gene pairs. Tightly controlled inducible promoters can also be used to modify genetic circuits to understand the design principles of natural circuits, as well as to replace natural genetic circuits with controllable synthetic ones that have altered functionality. Such genetic engineering can also be applied to precisely alter cell metabolism and improve a targeted cellular function (
45). In this context, tightly controlled inducible promoters are used to shift metabolic flow toward a desired product by amplifying the desired pathway or limiting an alternative pathway. The improved and expanded repertoire of inducible promoter systems provided in this work, in particular
rhaSR-PrhaBAD, should help progress toward an understanding of gene function and the engineering of metabolic capabilities in
P. aeruginosa.