INTRODUCTION
Microbial metabolism of protocatechuic acid (3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid) via the β-ketoadipate pathway is known to mediate the degradation of many substituted benzoic acids in a range of soil bacteria able to degrade aromatic compounds (
1). The β-ketoadipate pathway has also recently emerged as an important central pathway for degradation of lignin fragments by lignin-degrading bacteria, such as
Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 and
Pseudomonas putida KT2440 (
2), and has been exploited to generate bioproducts from lignin degradation (
3–5).
In the course of metabolic engineering studies to generate pyridine-dicarboxylic acid products from lignin degradation via protocatechuic acid (
5), a deletion of the
pcaHG genes encoding protocatechuate 3,4-dioxygenase in
Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 was made, which revealed, to our surprise, that this gene deletion mutant still was able to grow on protocatechuic acid as the sole carbon source; hence, there is a second pathway for degradation of protocatechuic acid.
Examination of the genome of
Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 revealed that there is a gene cluster for conversion of hydroxyquinol (benzene-1,2,4-triol) via intradiol oxidative cleavage to maleylacetate and reduction to β-ketoadipate, encoded by genes ro01857-ro01860 (
Fig. 1). The hydroxyquinol catabolic pathway has been observed in
Burkholderia cepacia AC1100 (
6),
Sphingomonas wittichi RW1 (
7), and
Rhodococcus sp. strain PN1 (
8). Kasai et al. have implicated
R. jostii RHA1 genes ro01857-ro01861 in γ-resorcylate catabolism via decarboxylation of gamma-resorcylate (2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid) and hydroxylation of resorcinol to form hydroxyquinol (
9). Transcription of genes ro01857-ro01860 was shown to be regulated by gene regulator TsdR, to which gamma-resorcylate binds as an effector (
9). The oxidative decarboxylation of vanillic acid to 2-methoxyhydroquinone has been reported in extracts of
Sporotrichum pulverulentum (
10); hence, the oxidative decarboxylation of protocatechuic acid to form hydroxyquinol has some biochemical precedent. Here, we present evidence that conversion of protocatechuic acid to hydroxyquinol occurs in
R. jostii RHA1 and is mediated by flavin-dependent mono-oxygenase (ro01860) and decarboxylase (ro01859) enzymes.
DISCUSSION
The hydroxyquinol degradation pathway was previously reported in
Burkholderia cepacia AC1100 (
6),
Sphingomonas wittichi RW1 (
7), and
Rhodococcus sp. strain PN1 (
8) as an aromatic catabolic pathway, and a hydroxyquinol degradation gene cluster has been observed in
Cupriavidus necator JMP134 (
14). This pathway has been implicated in degradation of 4-nitrophenol in
Arthrobacter chlorophenolicus A6 (
15) and in γ-resorcylate catabolism in
R. jostii RHA1 (
9). Following our initial observation that a Δ
pcaHG gene deletion mutant of
R. jostii RHA1 was able to grow on minimal medium containing protocatechuic acid, we hypothesized that protocatechuic acid could be converted via flavin-dependent mono-oxygenase (ro01860) and a decarboxylase (ro01859) into hydroxyquinol. We have shown by metabolite analysis that protocatechuic acid can be converted into hydroxyquinol by wild-type
R. jostii RHA1 cells, by the Δ
pcaHG gene deletion strain, and
in vitro using recombinant Ro01860/Ro01859 enzymes. Therefore, these observations establish a metabolic link between protocatechuic acid and hydroxyquinol in
R. jostii, which can be used as an alternative pathway for metabolism of protocatechuic acid in this bacterium.
The catalytic mechanism of these two enzymes is likely to proceed as shown in
Fig. 5. Phenol hydroxylation
ortho or
para to a phenolic hydroxyl group is well precedented in the flavin mono-oxygenase family, via a flavin hydroperoxide reaction intermediate (
16). Several soil bacteria that can metabolize chlorinated phenols (
17–19) or 4-nitrophenols (
20,
21) are known to express flavin-dependent mono-oxygenase enzymes that catalyze hydroxylation
para to a phenolic hydroxyl group, followed by loss of either a 4-chloro or 4-nitro substituent. In this case, hydroxylation in the 1-position would be catalyzed by mono-oxygenase Ro01860, to give a diffusible intermediate, which is then decarboxylated by Ro01859, using the carbonyl group at C-4 as an electron sink to aid decarboxylation (
Fig. 5). Such a mechanism would explain why a combination of Ro01860 and Ro01859 is needed to effect this oxidative decarboxylation and why no activity was observed using decarboxylase Ro01859 alone. Using mono-oxygenase Ro01860 alone, the intermediate would be formed, leading to consumption of protocatechuic acid, as observed, but the intermediate is likely to be chemically unstable and could not be characterized.
Formation of hydroxyquinol
in vitro was also observed from catechol, 1,4-hydroquinone, or 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid (gentisic acid). Only a small amount of hydroxylation of catechol by mono-oxygenase Ro01860 alone was observed, implying that the two enzymes are more active in combination, perhaps forming a complex. Kasai et al. have shown that the
R. jostii ro01859 and ro01860 gene products are able to convert 2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid to hydroxyquinol: Ro01859 decarboxylates γ-resorcylate to resorcinol, and Ro01860 converts resorcinol to hydroxyquinol (
9). Hence, it appears that these enzymes are able to catalyze several hydroxylation/decarboxylation reactions. Kasai et al. reported that gene regulator TsdR negatively regulates the expression of these genes and binds to γ-resorcylic acid (2,6-dihydroxybenzoic acid). The observation that the Δ
pcaHG deletion mutant can grow on M9-0.1% protocatechuic acid but not on 0.1% vanillic acid or 0.1% 4-hydroxybenzoic acid suggests that the conversion of protocatechuic acid to hydroxyquinol takes place only at higher concentrations of protocatechuic acid; hence, protocatechuic acid may bind more weakly to gene regulator TsdR. Kasai et al. reported activity for resorcinol hydroxylation by Ro01860 using NADH as a cofactor (
9), whereas we observed activity for protocatechuic acid conversion by Ro01860 and Ro01859 using NADPH as a cofactor (NADH was not tested); therefore, it appears that Ro01860 can accept either NADH or NADPH for different transformations.
Our metabolite analysis also indicates two other transformations that can occur in
R. jostii RHA1, as shown in
Fig. 6. First, we have observed the conversion of vanillic acid to guaiacol via decarboxylation, followed by demethylation to catechol. Decarboxylation of vanillic acid to guaiacol was previously seen in
Bacillus megaterium and
Streptomyces (
22); a gene cluster responsible for this transformation has been identified in
Streptomyces sp. strain D7 (
23), and a vanillate decarboxylase enzyme has been purified from
Nocardia sp. strain NRRL 5646 (
24). However, there is no vanillic acid decarboxylase gene annotated on the
R. jostii RHA1 genome, so the gene responsible for this transformation is not known. The decarboxylation of vanillate to guaiacol might explain an earlier observation where an
R. jostii vanillate mono-oxygenase (ro04165) gene deletion strain failed to accumulate vanillic acid when grown on medium containing wheat straw lignocellulose, whereas a Δ
vdh vanillate dehydrogenase gene deletion strain did accumulate vanillin (
3). We did not observe any conversion of protocatechuic acid to catechol, and there is no protocatechuic acid decarboxylase gene annotated on the
R. jostii RHA1 genome, although such a decarboxylase gene has been identified in
Klebsiella pneumoniae (
25). The formation of guaiacol is also consistent with the presence of a gene cluster for guaiacol metabolism in
R. jostii RHA1 at ro08067/08068, containing a homologue for a P450-dependent guaiacol demethylase enzyme, which has been characterized from
Amycolatopsis sp. strain ATCC 39116 (
26).
Second, a surprising observation was the conversion of protocatechuic acid to vanillic acid via methylation of the 3-hydroxy group. There is a methyltransferase gene (ro04166) located in the gene cluster for vanillate mono-oxygenase (ro04165) that may be responsible for this methylation reaction. This reaction is surprising, as it would apparently set up a futile cycle between vanillic acid and protocatechuic acid; therefore, expression of the methyltransferase and demethylase genes would need to be tightly regulated.
We have elsewhere observed 2-methoxyhydroquinone, the methylated form of hydroxyquinol, as a metabolite of lignin oxidation by lignin-degrading enzyme manganese superoxide dismutase from
Sphingobacterium sp. strain T2 (
27). A pathway for degradation of (+)-pinoresinol, a component of lignin structure, via 2-methoxyhydroquinone has also recently been elucidated in
Pseudomonas sp. strain SG-MS2 (
28,
29). Hence, it seems likely that hydroxyquinol can be generated from other lignin oxidation reactions involving aryl-Cα oxidative cleavage of the aryl-C
3 unit found in lignin. In a recent survey of the genomes of lignin-degrading bacteria (
30), the hydroxyquinol gene cluster was only observed in
Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 and
Agrobacterium species, but lignin-degrading
Paenibacillus species and
Ochrobactrum species strains also contained
mhq genes, thought to be involved in hydroquinone breakdown (
31). The pathways branching from vanillic acid and protocatechuic acid shown in
Fig. 6 will reduce metabolic flux through the β-ketoadipate pathway; hence, an understanding of these pathways will underpin efforts to engineer
R. jostii RHA1 for efficient conversion of lignin to renewable chemicals (
3–5).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and chemicals.
Rhodococcus jostii RHA1 was used as the ancestral strain (
32). The Δ
pcaHG R. jostii strain contains a deletion in chromosomal
pcaHG genes, as described here. The
Agrobacterium species was isolated from municipal waste as described previously (
13). For routine growth and maintenance,
R. jostii or
Agrobacterium sp. cells were cultured in liquid or solid Luria-Bertani broth (LB) medium, or, for
R. jostii, on M9 minimal medium supplemented with 0.1% benzoic acid at 30°C and with shaking at 180 rpm, if required. Bacterial growth was measured by absorbance at 595 or 600 nm.
Expression vector pET-S is a derivative of pET151 topo (Invitrogen) in which a Sumo tag was amplified from pOPINS3C (
http://www.oppf.rc-harwell.ac.uk/OPPF/protocols/cloning.jsp) using primers P
for, CCCCCC
CATATGGCACACCATCACCACC (NdeI site underlined), and P
rev, AAAAAA
ATCGATGG
ATTTAAATGG
GCTAGCGGATCCACCGCTGCTGATCTGTTCG (ClaI, SwaI, NheI, and BamHI sites underlined, respectively), and cloned into NdeI/ClaI sites of pET151 topo. All chemicals were purchased form Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise stated.
Construction of gene deletion mutants.
The Δ
pcaHG gene deletion strain was constructed using the pk18
mobsacB plasmid, which uses the
sacB gene (confers sucrose sensitivity) as a counterselectable marker (
11). PCR was used to amplify two 1-kb regions of chromosomal DNA on either side of the genes to be deleted. The amplified 1-kb upstream and downstream DNA sequences were ligated into pk18
mobsac, and the resulting construct (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) was confirmed by DNA sequencing and restriction digestion. The recombinant plasmid was taken up into
R. jostii by electroporation and recombinant colonies selected by kanamycin resistance. Isolation of the double crossover gene deletion was carried out using sucrose resistance counterselection (
11), and the markerless gene deletion was confirmed by internal and external PCR analysis.
Metabolite analysis.
Cultures of R. jostii RHA1 were grown in either Luria-Bertani medium or M9 minimal medium containing 1 mM vanillic acid, vanillin, or protocatechuic acid at 30°C for 24 to 48 h. Aliquots (500 μl) of culture were removed and combined with 500 μl of HPLC-grade methanol-0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Samples were vortexed and then centrifuged (microcentrifuge) for 15 min. Biotransformations using R. jostii cell extract contained 100 μg protein, 1 mM substrate, with or without addition of 0.1 mM NADH, in 50 mM Tris buffer, pH 7.5, and were incubated at 20°C for 1 to 2 h. The incubation was then acidified to pH 1 (1 M HCl) and the products were extracted into ethyl acetate, solvent was evaporated at reduced pressure, and the sample was redissolved in methanol. HPLC analysis of the supernatant was performed with a Hyperclone 5-μm C18 reverse-phase column (Phenomenex), using an Agilent 1200 series HPLC analyzer. The HPLC solvents were water-0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (solvent A) and methanol-0.1% trifluoroacetic acid (solvent B). The applied gradient was 10 to 30% B over 5 min, 30 to 40% B over 15 min, 40 to 70% B over 10 min, 70 to 100% B over 5 min, and 100 to 10% B over 10 min, at a flow rate of 0.5 ml min−1. UV detection was at 270 nm. Samples for LC-MS analysis were suspended in 1:1 methanol (MeOH)-water and were separated on a Phenomenex Luna C18 column (5 μm, 100 Å, 50 mm, 4.6 mm) on an Agilent 1200 analyzer and Bruker HCT Ultra mass spectrometer (flow rate, 0.5 ml/min) with monitoring at 270 nm. Solvent A was water-0.1% formic acid, and solvent B was MeOH-0.1% formic acid. The gradient was 15% solvent B for 5 min, 15 to 25% B from 5 to 15 min, 25 to 70% B from 15 to 23 min, and 70 to 100% from 23 to 30 min. GC-MS analysis (ion-trap analyzer) was performed using a Varian 4000 gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer with a Varian Factor Four column (length, 30 m; inner diameter, 0.25 mm; thickness, 0.25 μm). Electron impact mass spectra (EI-MS) were recorded at an ionization energy of 70 eV.
Expression and purification of R. jostii and Agrobacterium mono-oxygenase and decarboxylase enzymes.
R. jostii ro01859 (decarboxylase) and ro01860 (mono-oxygenase) genes and Agrobacterium agro_00120 (mono-oxygenase) and agro_00121 (decarboxylase) genes were amplified from genomic DNA using PCR, using the oligonucleotide primers given below, and ligated into the pET-S expression vector, using XbaI and ClaI restriction sites, resulting in the expression of an N-His6 fusion protein. Oligonucleotide primers for PCR were the following: ro01859, forward, AAAAAAGCTAGCCAGGGCAAGATCGCACTGG; reverse, AAAAAAATCGATTCACCGGTCGAGTTTGAACAAC; ro01860, forward, AAAAAAAGCTAGCATGTCTGCCTTCGCACAG; reverse, AAAAAAATCGATAGGTGTTTGTCGGTGGTG; ag00120, forward, AAAAAAAGCTAGCATGAACGATATGAGCCATGCG; reverse, AAAAAAATCGATTCAATATTGGCCCTTGGGTTC; ag00121, forward, AAAAAAAGCTAGCATGCAAGGCAAGGTCGCTC; reverse, AAAAAAATCGATTCAGTTCCCGTCGAGTTTGAAC.
Recombinant plasmids were expressed in Escherichia coli BL21(DE3). For protein purification, constructs were grown in Luria-Bertani broth (500 ml) in the presence of ampicillin (50 μg/ml), and protein expression was induced by addition of isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) (250 μM) at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.6. Expression of mono-oxygenases Ro01860 and Ag00120 was carried out in the presence of 1 mM riboflavin to achieve reconstitution of the flavin cofactor. Cultures were grown for 16 h at 16°C, and then cells were harvested by centrifugation (4,000 × g, 20 min). Cells were resuspended in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, containing 300 mM NaCl and sonicated in a Constant Systems cell disruptor (20,000 lb/in2), and then cell debris was removed by centrifugation (20,000 × g, 20 min). Cell extract was applied to a His Gravitrap column (GE Healthcare) and washed with 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, containing 300 mM NaCl and 20 mM imidazole, and then protein was eluted with 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer, pH 8.0, containing 300 mM NaCl and 250 mM imidazole. Purified protein was then desalted using a PD-10 desalting column (GE Healthcare).
SDS-PAGE was carried out using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Invitrogen Mini Gell tank, using a 10% Bis-Tris protein gel, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Thermo Fisher Scientific PageRuler prestained protein ladder was used for molecular weight markers. Western blotting was carried out by using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Invitrogen Novex iBlot 2 nitrocellulose transfer stack and a Thermo Fisher Scientific iBlot 2 gel transfer device, according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using Thermo Fisher Scientific 6×-His tag monoclonal antibody.
Biotransformation using mono-oxygenase Ro01860 and decarboxylase Ro01859.
Biotransformations using recombinant Ro01860 and Ro01859 were carried out using 100 μg of each protein in PBS buffer (1.0 ml) containing 1 mM substrate in the presence of 10 μM FAD and 200 μM NADPH and incubated for 60 min at 25°C. Aliquots (100 μl) were removed and combined with 100 μl of HPLC-grade methanol-0.1% trifluoroacetic acid. Samples were vortexed and then centrifuged (microcentrifuge) for 15 min and analyzed by HPLC using a Zorbax Eclipse plus (Agilent) C18 reverse-phase column, using the gradient and conditions described above. Control incubations lacking enzyme were also carried out, which showed no substrate conversion.
Data availability.
Accession numbers used in this study were
ABG93670 (
R. jostii ro01859 decarboxylase),
ABG93671 (
R. jostii ro01860 flavin-dependent mono-oxygenase),
WP_149145897.1 (
Agrobacterium sp. agro_00120 flavin-dependent mono-oxygenase), and
WP_149145898.1 (
Agrobacterium sp. agro_00121 decarboxylase).