Free access
Brief Report
20 June 2013

Malonate Catabolism Does Not Drive N2 Fixation in Legume Nodules

Abstract

Malonyl-coenzyme A (CoA) decarboxylase, malonyl-CoA synthetase, and malonate transporter mutants of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae and trifolii fixed N2 at wild-type rates on pea and clover, respectively. Thus, malonate does not drive N2 fixation in legume nodules.

TEXT

The C3-dicarboxylic acid malonate is abundant in legumes, accounting for up to 4% of the weight of plants (dry weight) and up to 50% of total acidity (13). Despite its abundance, a role for malonate as a significant carbon source for bacteroid metabolism was initially ruled out by studies on malonate utilization and metabolite uptake studies with intact symbiosomes (46). However, because the level of malonate is elevated in nodules during symbiosis, it has been suggested that it may be an important carbon source during N2 fixation (7, 8). The malonate catabolic operon has been characterized well in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii, where matA, matB, and matC encode malonyl-coenzyme A (CoA) decarboxylase, malonyl-CoA synthetase, and a presumed malonate transporter, respectively (9). Furthermore, it was reported that a matB mutant of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ATCC 14479 did not fix N2 on white clover and had nodules filled with vacuoles rather than bacteroids (10). It is possible that the paradigm that C4-dicarboxylic acids are the principal carbon sources that fuel N2 fixation is incorrect (11, 12). However, malonate is a competitive inhibitor of succinate dehydrogenase, and its presence in legumes may require it to be rendered nontoxic by rhizobia (7). More recently, the Sinorhizobium meliloti malonate catabolic operon (matPQMAB) was characterized (13). A separate TRAP (tripartite ATP-independent permease) system (Sma0151, Sma0155, and Sma0157) was also shown to be induced by malonate in S. meliloti (14) and was subsequently characterized as a malonate transporter (13). This contrasts with MatC, which is a major facilitator system (MFS) present in R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii. In stark contrast to the results in clover, strains with mutations in each gene of the matPQMAB operon of S. meliloti did not decrease N2 fixation by alfalfa (13). To resolve this paradox, we examined the symbiotic role of malonate catabolism in two biovars of R. leguminosarum, the same clover-nodulating R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii TCC 14479 already used (10) and the pea-nodulating R. leguminosarum bv. viciae Rlv3841.

matA, matB, and matC mutants do not grow on malonate.

The chromosomal matABC operon (RL0990-RL0992) of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae Rlv3841 has the same structure as that of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ATCC 14479, where matA encodes malonyl-CoA decarboxylase, matB encodes malonyl CoA synthetase, and matC encodes a transport system for malonate. The matA, matB, and matC genes from strains Rlv3841 and ATCC 14479 were mutated, forming RU4053, LMB557, RU4054, LMB134, LMB510, and LMB136 (see supplemental material).
Growth of both R. leguminosarum Rlv3841 and ATCC 14479 was very poor on agar plates containing malonate as the sole carbon source, with concentrations above 5 mM preventing growth (Table 1; see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). Strain Rlv3841 grew in liquid culture on malonate (5 mM) or succinate (20 mM) as the sole carbon source with generation times of 19 h � 1.5 h (mean � standard error of the mean [SEM]) and 5 � 0.5 h, respectively. Mutation of matA, matB, or matC prevented growth of strains derived from Rlv3841 and ATCC 14479 on malonate (5 mM) (Table 1 and Fig. S1). The addition of malonate (5 mM) to Rlv3841 or ATCC 14479 prevented growth on succinate as a carbon source (Table 1). Thus, malonate (5 mM), which by itself enables slow growth, prevents growth in the presence of a preferred carbon source such as succinate, consistent with malonate being an inhibitor of succinate dehydrogenase (7). Succinate dehydrogenase mutants of R. leguminosarum also grow slowly on succinate, although this was overcome by growth on other dicarboxylates such as malate (15). Growth on succinate may be particularly sensitive to malonate because the first step in its catabolism is blocked. Malonate also prevented growth on succinate when the gene encoding the malonate transporter (matC) was mutated, suggesting the presence of an alternative low-affinity malonate transporter.
Table 1
Table 1 Growth of R. leguminosarum bv. viciae and R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii strains on different carbon sources
Sole carbon source(s)Growth of the following strain on the indicated carbon sourcea:
Rlv3841 (WT)RU4053 (matA)LMB557 (matB)RU4054 (matC)ATCC 14479 (WT)LMB134 (matA)LMB510 (matB)LMB136 (matC)
None
5 mM malonate++
10 mM malonate
20 mM succinate++++++++++++++++
5 mM malonate and 20 mM succinate
10 mM malonate and 20 mM succinate
a
Growth is scored as shown in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material: −, no growth; +, poor growth; ++, good growth. WT, wild type.

Complementation of malonate catabolic and transport mutants.

The promoter for the putative matABC operon has been shown to be immediately upstream of matA in strain ATCC 14479 by footprinting (16). However, while matA and matB overlap by 3 bp, suggesting translational coupling, there is an intergenic region of 96 bp between matB and matC in both Rlv3841 and ATCC 14479. In order to determine whether there is a separate promoter for matC from strain ATCC 14479, this 96-bp intergenic region, together with the whole matC gene, was cloned into pRU1097 (promoterless vector) to form pLMB606. Plasmid pLMB606 did not complement strain LMB136 (ATCC 14479 matC) for growth on malonate (5 mM) as the sole carbon source (Table 2). Thus, matC lacks its own promoter. For a control, matC was cloned into the taurine-inducible broad-host-range vector pLMB509 (17), forming pLMB653. The complemented strain [LMB136(pLMB653)], but not the matC strain containing an empty vector [LMB136 (pLMB509)], grew on malonate (5 mM) plus taurine (0. 1 mM) (Table 2). To further investigate the promoter of the mat operon, clones of matA, matAB, and matABC were made in pRU1097. These clones contain the complete intergenic region between matR and matA, but none complemented growth of matA or matB or matC mutants on malonate (Table 2). However, the entire matRABC region did complement matA, matB, and matC strains for growth on malonate (Table 2 and see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). This is consistent with matR being a positive regulator of matABC, which form a single operon. When matABC is cloned without matR, the chromosomal copy of matR may result in insufficient MatR for productive binding across multiple operator sites contained on several copies of the plasmid.
Table 2
Table 2 Complementation of ATCC 14479-derived malonate mutants with different complementing plasmids
Complementing plasmidGrowth of the following mutant with the indicated complementing plasmida:
matA mutant (LMB134)matB mutant (LMB510)matC mutant (LMB136)
pLMB605 (pmatA)
pLMB610 (pmatAB)ND
pLMB606 (pmatC)NDND
pLMB628 (pmatABC)
pLMB654 (pmatRABC)+++
pLMB509 (pTau vector)bNDND
pLMB653 (pTau::matC)bNDND+
a
Growth of mutant strains derived from R. leguminosarum ATCC 14479 is scored as shown in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material: −, no growth; +, poor growth; ND, not determined. Growth was measured on UMS agar (see detailed methods in the supplemental material) supplemented with 5 mM malonate as the sole carbon source.
b
Grown on 5 mM malonate plus 0.1 mM taurine.

Clover and pea infected with mat mutants are fixation positive.

Since malonate catabolism has been reported to be essential for N2 fixation by white clover infected with R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii (10), our principal aim was to examine the symbiotic phenotypes of mat mutants of R. leguminosarum nodulating pea and clover. Pea (Pisum sativum cv. Avola) or red and white clover (Trifolium pretense and Trifolium repens, respectively) inoculated with R. leguminosarum bv. viciae or R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii strains, respectively, were grown on nitrogen-free medium, and acetylene reduction was measured at 4 and 5 weeks as previously described (18). Peas nodulated by matA, matB, or matC mutants produced normal red nodules, and plants were green and healthy, unlike uninoculated plants, which were yellow and stunted (data not shown). Furthermore, peas nodulated by mat mutants were not altered in acetylene reduction relative to strain Rlv3841 (Table 3), indicating no impairment of N2 fixation. From this, we conclude that as for alfalfa, malonate is not an important carbon source required for N2 fixation in pea. However, mat mutants of strain ATCC 14479 inoculated on red and white clover also produced green healthy plants with red nodules, which were indistinguishable from plants inoculated with ATCC 14479. This contrasts with uninoculated control plants that were stunted and yellow (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material). Light and electron micrographs of nodules infected with matA or matC strains were indistinguishable from nodules infected with ATCC 14479 (data not shown). Furthermore, the rates of acetylene reduction were unaltered in red clover inoculated with matA, matB, and matC mutants relative to those inoculated with ATCC 14479 (Table 3). Likewise, white clover inoculated with a matB mutant was unaltered relative to plants inoculated with ATCC 14479. Bacteria recovered from nodules from peas and from both red and white clover showed the expected resistance markers and gene insertions, indicating that the mutations were stably maintained throughout the experiments. In agreement with results for alfalfa (13), malonate cannot be an essential carbon source for N2 fixation in white clover, red clover, or pea.
Table 3
Table 3 Acetylene reduction by strains of R. leguminosarum on pea (P. sativum) and red and white clover (T. pretense and T. repens)
PlantTime postinoculation (wk)StrainRelevant genotype or phenotypeaAmt of acetylene reduced (μmol/plant/h) (mean � SEM) (n)b
Pea3Rlv3841WT2.65 � 0.17 (6)
  RU4053matA::pK192.82 � 0.15 (6)
  RU4054matC::pK192.87 � 0.16 (6)
 4Rlv3841WT6.9 � 0.35 (6)
  LMB557matB::ΩSpr7.2 � 0.50 (6)
Red cloverc4ATCC 14479WT0.118 � 0.020 (30)
  LMB134matA::ΩTcr0.099 � 0.009 (30)
  LMB136matC::ΩTcr0.117 � 0.023 (30)
 5ATCC 14479WT0.431 � 0.01 (12)
  LMB510matB::ΩSpr0.470 � 0.015 (24)
White cloverc5ATCC 14479WT0.407 � 0.019 (24)
  LMB510matB::ΩSpr0.446 � 0.044 (36)
a
Abbrevations used: WT, wild type; Spr, spectinomycin resistance; Tcr, tetracycline resistance.
b
The number of plants tested is shown in parentheses.
c
Plants shown in Fig. S2 in the supplemental material.
An important question is why our results for red and white clover are in stark contradiction to those previously published (10). In the two studies, the same parent strain of R. leguminosarum bv. trifolii ATCC 14479 was used. One possibility is that malonate catabolism in nodules is principally a detoxification reaction. The malonate mutants characterized previously (10) did not form mature bacteroids, indicating that their development had been impaired. This can be contrasted with dicarboxylate transport mutants (dct) mutants of R. leguminosarum biovars trifolii and viciae which develop normally to form morphologically branched cells (19, 20), although they senesce early (11). Thus, high concentrations of malonate in the nodule might poison carbon metabolism and potentially prevent bacteroid development and N2 fixation. The levels of malonate reported in legumes vary widely, and this may be due to cultivation conditions or the plant species or cultivar. For example, matABC in strain Rlv3841 was induced in the rhizosphere of alfalfa but not pea, suggesting that differing levels of malonate were encountered (21). This might explain why mat mutants used in different studies could lead to different N2 fixation phenotypes in clover. We conclude that malonate does not drive N2 fixation in legume nodules but instead is a poor carbon source that can also act as a metabolic poison.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council UK grant BB/F013159/1.

Supplemental Material

File (zam999104525so1.pdf)
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

1.
Stumpf DK and Burris BH. 1979. A micromethod for the purification and quantification of organic acids of the tricarboxylic acid cycle in plant tissues. Anal. Biochem.95:311–315.
2.
Streeter JG. 1987. Carbohydrate, organic acid, and amino acid composition of bacteroids and cytosol from soybean nodules. Plant Physiol.85:768–773.
3.
Bentley LE. 1952. Occurrence of malonic acid in plants. Nature170:847–848.
4.
Streeter JG. 1991. Transport and metabolism of carbon and nitrogen in legume nodules. Adv. Bot. Res.18:129–187.
5.
Streeter JG. 1995. A new model for the rapid effects of noninvasive treatments on nitrogenase and respiratory activity in legume nodules. J. Theor. Biol.174:441–452.
6.
Udvardi MK and Day DA. 1997. Metabolite transport across symbiotic membranes of legume nodules. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.48:493–523.
7.
Schramm RW. 1992. Proposed role of malonate in legume nodules. Symbiosis14:103–113.
8.
Kang SW, Hong SY, Ryoo HD, Rhyu KI, and Kim YS. 1994. Kinetics of malonyl-CoA synthetase from Rhizobium trifolii and evidences for malonyl-AMP formation as a reaction intermediate. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc.15:394–399.
9.
An JH and Kim YS. 1998. A gene cluster encoding malonyl-CoA decarboxylase (MatA), malonyl-CoA synthetase (MatB) and a putative dicarboxylate carrier protein (MatC) in Rhizobium trifolii—cloning, sequencing, and expression of the enzymes in Escherichia coli. Eur. J. Biochem.257:395–402.
10.
An JH, Lee HY, Ko KN, Kim ES, and Kim YS. 2002. Symbiotic effects of ΔmatB Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii mutant on clovers. Mol. Cells14:261–266.
11.
White J, Prell J, James EK, and Poole P. 2007. Nutrient sharing between symbionts. Plant Physiol.144:604–614.
12.
Lodwig E and Poole P. 2003. Metabolism of Rhizobium bacteroids. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.22:37–78.
13.
Chen AM, Wang YB, Jie S, Yu AY, Luo L, Yu GQ, Zhu JB, and Wang YZ. 2010. Identification of a TRAP transporter for malonate transport and its expression regulated by GtrA from Sinorhizobium meliloti. Res. Microbiol.161:556–564.
14.
Mauchline TH, Fowler JE, East AK, Sartor AL, Zaheer R, Hosie AHF, Poole PS, and Finan TM. 2006. Mapping the Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021 solute-binding protein-dependent transportome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.103:17933–17938.
15.
Finan TM, Wood JM, and Jordan C. 1981. Succinate transport in Rhizobium leguminosarum. J. Bacteriol.148:193–202.
16.
Lee HY, An JH, and Kim YS. 2000. Identification and characterization of a novel transcription activator, MatR, for malonate metabolism in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii. Eur. J. Biochem.267:7224–7230.
17.
Tett AJ, Rudder SJ, Bourdes A, Karunakaran R, and Poole PS. 2012. Regulatable vectors for environmental gene expression in Alphaproteobacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.78:7137–7140.
18.
Poole PS, Schofield NA, Reid CJ, Drew EM, and Walshaw DL. 1994. Identification of chromosomal genes located downstream of dctD that affect the requirement for calcium and the lipopolysaccharide layer of Rhizobium leguminosarum. Microbiology140:2797–2809.
19.
Ronson CW, Lyttleton P, and Robertson JG. 1981. C4-dicarboxylate transport mutants of Rhizobium trifolii form ineffective nodules on Trifolium repens. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.78:4284–4288.
20.
Finan TM, Wood JM, and Jordan DC. 1983. Symbiotic properties of C4-dicarboxylic acid transport mutants of Rhizobium leguminosarum. J. Bacteriol.154:1403–1413.
21.
Ramachandran V, East AK, Karunakaran R, Downie JA, and Poole PS. 2011. Adaptation of Rhizobium leguminosarum to pea, alfalfa and sugar beet rhizospheres investigated by comparative transcriptomics. Genome Biol.12:R106.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Volume 79Number 1415 July 2013
Pages: 4496 - 4498
PubMed: 23666330

History

Received: 21 March 2013
Accepted: 3 May 2013
Published online: 20 June 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Contributors

Authors

Ramakrishnan Karunakaran
Department of Molecular Microbiology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom
Alison K. East
Department of Molecular Microbiology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom
Philip S. Poole
Department of Molecular Microbiology, John Innes Centre, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom

Notes

Address correspondence to Philip S. Poole, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy