Spotlight Selection
Research Article
20 June 2013

Transkingdom Genetic Transfer from Escherichia coli to Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a Simple Gene Introduction Tool

This article has been corrected.
VIEW CORRECTION

Abstract

Transkingdom conjugation (TKC) permits transfer of DNA from bacteria to eukaryotic cells using a bacterial conjugal transfer system. However, it is not clear whether the process of DNA acceptance in a recipient eukaryote is homologous to the process of conjugation between bacteria. TKC transfer requires mobilizable shuttle vectors that are capable of conjugal transfer and replication in the donor and recipient strains. Here, we developed TKC vectors derived from plasmids belonging to the IncP and IncQ groups. We also investigated forms of transfer of these vectors from Escherichia coli into Saccharomyces cerevisiae to develop TKC as a simple gene introduction method. Both types of vectors were transferred precisely, conserving the origin of transfer (oriT) sequences, but IncP-based vectors appeared to be more efficient than an IncQ-based vector. Interestingly, unlike in agrobacterial T-DNA (transfer DNA) transfer, the efficiency of TKC transfer was similar between a wild-type yeast strain and DNA repair mutants defective in homologous recombination (rad51Δ and rad52Δ) or nonhomologous end joining (rad50Δ, yku70Δ, and lig4Δ). Lastly, a shuttle vector with two repeats of IncP-type oriT (oriTP) sequences flanking a marker gene was constructed. TKC transfer of this vector resulted in precise excision of both the oriTP loci as well as the marker gene, albeit at a low frequency of 17% of all transconjugants. This feature would be attractive in biotechnological applications of TKC. Taken together, these results strongly suggest that in contrast to agrobacterial T-DNA transfer, the circularization of vector single-stranded DNA occurs either before or after transfer but requires a factor(s) from the donor. TKC is a simple method of gene transfer with possible applications in yeast genetics and biotechnology.

INTRODUCTION

The type IV secretion system (T4SS) is a bacterial secretion system that mediates conjugative transfer of DNA and proteins. Some members of the T4SS have a wide transfer range not only between evolutionarily distant bacteria but also with eukaryotes (1). This characteristic has been exploited as a means of gene transfer from Escherichia coli to various bacteria (24) and also from Agrobacterium species to various higher plants and fungi (5, 6). Transkingdom conjugation (TKC) is a phenomenon by which DNA is transferred into a eukaryotic cell by a T4SS-based bacterial conjugal transfer system; however, it is not clear whether the process of DNA acceptance in a recipient eukaryote is homologous to the process of conjugation between bacteria (710).
Although the TKC phenomenon was first reported in 1989 (7), it has been poorly studied and has not been developed as a gene introduction method for practical use, in contrast to other conventional methods, such as chemical transformation and electroporation (11, 12). Its biggest advantage is simplicity. A gene of interest cloned into a TKC vector and introduced into an E. coli strain carrying a helper plasmid can be directly introduced into a recipient eukaryotic cell without any additional steps of DNA extraction or of transfer into an Agrobacterium donor. Thus, TKC is an attractive high-throughput method of gene introduction that is capable of operating multisamples.
In a typical conjugal plasmid transfer, as well as in TKC, the essential elements are the T4SS, mobilization of the DNA, and the origin of transfer (oriT), the latter being the start site of the conjugal transfer (7, 13, 14). Currently there are two types of oriT regions, derived from IncP- and IncQ-type plasmids, that are capable of developing TKC shuttle vectors. When using shuttle vectors with IncP-type oriT (oriTP), it is necessary and sufficient for the helper plasmid in the donor bacterium to encode the IncP-type T4SS and DNA nickase/relaxase (traI), whereas in the case of shuttle vectors carrying IncQ-type oriT (oriTQ), mob genes derived from the IncQ plasmid are required to be present for oriTQ recognition, which causes an increase in the vector size (Fig. 1).
Fig 1
Fig 1 Schematic of TKC gene transfer. The donor strain, Escherichia coli HB101, carries a helper plasmid and a mobilizable TKC shuttle vector capable of replicating in the recipient yeast. The helper plasmid contains T4SS-derived transfer genes (tra) from an IncP1α plasmid (light gray box). The shuttle vectors used in this study contain either oriTP from RK2 (RP4) plasmid or oriTQ/mob from RSF1010 plasmid (black spot), a eukaryotic origin of replication, ARS/CEN (dark gray box), and a selectable marker suitable for expression in yeast (black box). Transfer of the shuttle vector into the recipient yeast cell previously lacking the marker gene allows for identification of transformants (transconjugants) on selective media.
The contribution of recipient factors has been studied by genome-wide screening of yeast genes for involvement in TKC (15). If a vector DNA is transferred as a linear single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), like in the T-DNA (transfer DNA) transfer system in agrobacteria (16, 17), there may be a loss of parts of the transferred DNA sequence due to exonuclease activity in the recipient yeast cell, and the transfer efficiency is influenced by the rate of DNA repair in the recipient. In contrast, if the vector DNA is recircularized immediately or transferred as a circularized ssDNA, as in bacterial conjugal transfer (18), the transfer ssDNA is protected from the exonucleases. A TKC-based gene introduction system is expected to be suitable for introducing replicative type vectors that possess yeast replication origins, such as ARS.
In this study, to develop TKC as a powerful gene introduction method, we have constructed different mobilizable shuttle vectors and evaluated their precision in different forms of transfer from bacteria into S. cerevisiae. Our proposed gene introduction method has sufficient efficiency for practical use and is simpler than other methods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Yeast and bacterial strains and cultural conditions.

All yeast and bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table 1, including the ones which are provided by the National Collection of Yeast Cultures (NCYC), United Kingdom, and the National Bio-Resource Project (NBRP) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan. The media used included yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) broth or agar for S. cerevisiae BY4742 and its derivatives, yeast extract-peptone-adenine-dextrose (YPAD) broth or agar for MaV203, and Luria-Bertani (LB) broth or agar for E. coli, prepared as recommended for the ProQuest two-hybrid system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). When required for selection of auxotrophic strains, synthetic complete (SC) media or agar lacking leucine and/or tryptophan or uracil were prepared. Antibiotics used were 50 μg ml−1 ampicillin, 30 μg ml−1 chloramphenicol, 50 μg ml−1 kanamycin, 50 μg ml−1 streptomycin, or 7.5 μg ml−1 tetracycline as required. All chemicals were obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Ind., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Bacterial cultures were incubated at 37�C, and yeast cultures at 28�C, by following conventional methods.
Table 1
Table 1 Strains and plasmids used in this study
Strain or plasmidaRelevant characteristicsSource or reference
S. cerevisiae strains  
    BY4742S288c derivative; MATα his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 lys2Δ0 ura3Δ0Invitrogen
    103C04BY4742 background; rad52Δ::kanMX4-barcodeInvitrogen
    104H11BY4742 background; yku70Δ::kanMX4-barcodeInvitrogen
    105G10BY4742 background; lig4Δ::kanMX4-barcodeInvitrogen
    131F03BY4742 background; rad51Δ::kanMX4-barcodeInvitrogen
    132B12BY4742 background; rad50Δ::kanMX4-barcodeInvitrogen
    NCYC3623Fermentation yeast L-1374 derivative; MATα ho::hygMX ura3::kanMX-barcodeNCYC
    NCYC3625Fermentation yeast DBVPG 6044 derivative; MATα ho::hygMX ura3::kanMX-barcodeNCYC
    NCYC3627Wild yeast UWOPS03-461.4 derivative; MATα ho::hygMX ura3::kanMX-barcodeNCYC
    NCYC3630Fermentation yeast Y12 derivative; MATα ho::hygMX ura3::kanMX-barcodeNCYC
    NCYC3631Wild yeast YPS606 derivative; MATα ho::hygMX ura3::kanMX-barcodeNCYC
    MaV203MATα leu2-3,112 trp1-109 his3Δ200 ade2-101 cyh2R can1R gal4Δ gal80Δ GAL1::lacZ HIS3UASGAL1::HIS3@LYS2d SPAL10UASGAL1::URA3Invitrogen
E. coli strain  
    HB101F hsdS20(rB mB) recA13 ara-14 proA2 lacY1 galK2 rpsL20 xyl-5 mtl-1 supE44 λ leu thiNBRP Japan
Plasmids  
    TKC vectorsb  
        pAY205oriVQoriTQmobQURA3 TRP1 ARS1; Kanr TetrAB526841c, 8
        pEXP-AD502 oriTQ/mob cwPrey vector for yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) system derived from pEXP-AD502; oriTQ and mob genes derived from RSF1010This study
        pEXP-AD502 oriTP cw/acwPrey vector for Y2H system derived from pEXP-AD502; oriTP (derived from RK2 plasmid)This study
        pDBLeu oriTP cwBait vector for Y2H system derived from pDBLeu; oriTPThis study
        pRS314 LEU2 oriTPTRP1 LEU2 CEN6/ARSH4 ori-pMB1 AmproriTPThis study
        pRS314::LEU2 2�oriTPTRP1 LEU2 CEN6/ARSH4 ori-pMB1 Ampr 2�oriTP (LEU2 fragment with XhoI linker amplified from pRS315 was cloned in pCRXL, and then BamHI/PstI-digested fragment was cloned in BamHI/PstI sites of pRS314::LEU2 2�oriTP)This study
    Helper plasmids  
        pRH210traP1αtrbP1αori-pMB1 AmprAB526839c, 8
        pRH220traP1αtrbP1αori-pSC101 CamrAB526840c, 15
a
Clockwise (cw) and anticlockwise (acw) represent the direction of transfer from oriT shown in Fig. 2.
b
TKC vectors for the Y2H system were deposited in NBRP–Yeast, Japan (http://yeast.lab.nig.ac.jp/nig/index_en.html).
c
DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession number.
d
HIS3UASGAL1::HIS3@LYS2, 125-bp GAL1 upstream activating sequence (UAS) in the HIS3 promoter driving HIS3, integrated at the LYS2 locus.

Plasmids.

Plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1 and shown in Fig. 2. Primers used for the amplification of oriTP, oriTQ/mob, and LEU2 regions are listed in Table 2, as are those for the confirmation of the integrity of oriTP and oriTQ regions. For the construction of novel TKC vectors, a 287-bp fragment of oriTP was PCR amplified from plasmid pRH210 (DDBJ accession number AB526839), which is derived from RK2, and inserted at the SnaBI site of plasmid pEXP-AD502 or at the blunt-end-treated Tth111I site of plasmid pDBLeu. Alternatively, a 2,978-bp fragment of oriTQ/mob was PCR amplified from pAY205 (DDBJ accession number AB526841), which is derived from RSF1010, and inserted into the SnaBI site of pEXP-AD502. For the construction of pRS314::LEU2 2�oriTP, the 287-bp fragment and another 275-bp SacI-digested fragment of oriTP were inserted into the SnaBI site and the SacI site of pRS314, respectively, followed by insertion of a 2,091-bp BamHI/PstI-digested LEU2 fragment from pCR-XL-TOPO (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) into the BamHI/PstI site of pRS314.
Fig 2
Fig 2 TKC shuttle vectors. Gene maps of TKC vectors used in this study are shown. (a) pAY205 (cw) (8). (b) pEXP-AD502 oriTQ (cw). (c) pDBLeu oriTP (cw). (d) pEXP-AD502 oriTP (cw/acw). cw (clockwise) and acw (anticlockwise) represent the direction of transfer of plasmid DNA starting from oriT. All vectors except pAY205 are applicable to the yeast two-hybrid system.
Table 2
Table 2 Primers used for analysis of oriT region
Target and primer nameSequenceAnalysis
pAY205  
    oriT mob Fw5′-TTCGAGCTTGGCCAGCCGAT-3′PCR
    IncQ oriT/mob Rv5′-GTGGCCAGCCCGCTCTAAT-3′ 
    RSF1010 oriT R15′-GCCTTCGCGCTGGATG-3′Sequencing
pEXP-AD502 oriTP (acw/cw)  
    pEXP-AD502 Fw5′-GCAATAACCGGGTCAA-3′PCR
    ARS/CEN6 Rv5′-TTTTTGTTTTCCGAAGATGT-3′ 
    RK2 oriT MroI R25′-TATTCCGGAAAACAGCAGGGAAGCAGC-3′Sequencing
pEXP-AD502 oriTQ  
    IncQ oriT/mob Fw5′-TCCCTCTTGGCCCTCTCCTT-3′PCR
    IncQ oriT/mob Rv5′-GTGGCCAGCCCGCTCTAAT-3′ 
    RSF1010 oriT R15′-GCCTTCGCGCTGGATG-3′Sequencing
pRS314::LEU2 2� oriTP  
    pRS314oriT flank F15′-GCGGCATCAGAGCAGATT-3′Sequencing
For plasmid isolation from yeast TKC transformants, each colony from the selection plate was picked up and thinly streaked on another selection plate to purify it. An isolated positive clone from this plate was again picked up and cultured in liquid medium for plasmid preparation. A Zymoprep yeast plasmid miniprep kit (Zymoresearch, Irvine, CA) was used for plasmid preparation from yeast. For plasmid preparation from E. coli, Wizard plus SV miniprep DNA purification systems (Promega, Madison, WI) and a QuickLyse miniprep kit (Qiagen, Duesseldorf, Germany) were used.

TKC reactions.

Aliquots of 12.5 μl each of E. coli and yeast suspensions in Tris-NaCl buffer (TNB; 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 0.5% NaCl) (7), containing 3.8 � 106 and 1.0 � 106 CFU, respectively, were mixed and incubated for 1 h at 28�C and were further processed on a plate with appropriate auxotrophic selection medium. In case of analysis of TKC carrying no helper plasmid or vector carrying no oriT sequence, the TKC reactions were performed using 3 or 10 times the amount of TNB and cells, respectively. In the case of analysis of vector carrying two oriTP sequences, pRS314::LEU2 2�oriTP, the TKC reaction was performed using twice the amount of TNB and cells.
For the analysis of TKC transfer of two plasmids simultaneously, the donor and recipient cells were cultured on LB and YPAD plates, respectively, containing appropriate antibiotics. The TKC reaction was scaled up to include 9.2 � 108 and 8 � 106 CFU of the donor bacterium and recipient yeast, respectively, and incubated in 200 μl of TNB to improve sensitivity and saturate the attachment of recipient with donor.

RESULTS

Reconfirmation of the TKC phenomenon.

As the TKC phenomenon is not very well known among researchers (although it was first reported in 1989 [7]), we tried to reconfirm its existence. The TKC reaction was performed by mixing a donor strain from E. coli HB101, carrying the mobilizable vector pAY205 and the helper plasmid pRH210, and a recipient strain, S. cerevisiae BY4742 (Fig. 1). Uracil-prototrophic transformants were detected, while no transformant was observed when a micropore membrane filter was used to partition the donor and recipient cells or when the solution, which was obtained by filtering the donor suspension through the filter membrane, was mixed with the recipient cells (see Fig. S1a in the supplemental material). The TKC phenomenon was also not observed in the donor lacking the helper plasmid, which carries tra genes (see Fig. S1b). These results show that transfer of the vector requires a conjugal transfer system and not incorporation of the vector from the reaction solution released by cell lysis of the donor.

Analysis of TKC efficiency and accuracy in yeast DNA repair mutants.

If a shuttle vector transfers as a linear ssDNA molecule without telomeric sequences, it needs to be recircularized to be stably maintained in a yeast cell as an episome. We tested the efficiency of TKC transfer from E. coli HB101 into S. cerevisiae strain BY4742 and compared it to that in five of its mutants known to be defective in DNA repair. We used the shuttle vector pAY205 (Fig. 2a), which possesses the oriTQ region and mob genes derived from an IncQ-type plasmid, RSF1010, and has been used in TKC studies before (8). In addition to the parental strain, the recipient strains were rad50Δ, yku70Δ, and lig4Δ mutants that are defective in nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and also in transfer of T-DNA from Agrobacterium tumefaciens to S. cerevisiae. rad51Δ and rad52Δ are defective in homologous recombination (HR) but are capable of accepting DNA by T-DNA transfer (19). The TKC efficiency of the five mutants, estimated on the basis of the frequency of the URA3 marker, did not show significant differences from that of the wild-type parental strain (Fig. 3a). This result suggested that the DNA repair system in the recipient cell is not critical for transferring and recircularizing the replicative type vector. To investigate the possibility of modifications in the junction sequence around the oriTQ region, we analyzed the transferred vector DNA sequence. The oriTQ regions were PCR amplified from transformants (transconjugants) derived from parental and mutant yeast recipients. Ten randomly selected clones from each recipient, or a total of 60 clones, were analyzed. An amplicon of the expected size of 803 bp was detected in 59 transformants, while the remaining transformant that was derived from the wild-type recipient did not yield a product in PCR amplification (Fig. 3b). The nucleotide sequences of the oriTQ region from the 59 transformants further confirmed that their junctions were preserved (Fig. 3c and d). These results indicated that the recircularization of transferred vectors is independent of the recipient yeast DNA repair system.
Fig 3
Fig 3 TKC transfer efficiency and accuracy in yeast DNA repair mutants is not affected. Plasmid pAY205 from the donor strain, E. coli HB101 carrying pRH210, was transferred by TKC into the recipient strain, S. cerevisiae BY4742, or its mutant strains defective in DNA repair. Transconjugants were identified based on expression of a URA3 marker conferring uracil prototrophy. (a) Frequency of obtaining transconjugants after TKC transfer in the indicated yeast DNA repair mutants. Values plotted are means � standard deviations (SD) of at least three independent experiments. (b) TKC transfer in DNA repair mutants was validated by PCR amplification of the oriT and its flanking region of the pAY205 plasmid (803 bp) in the 10 randomly selected clones from each TKC reaction. Arrowheads on the left indicate the size of the DNA marker (λ/StyI). Arrowheads on the right indicate the predicted size of PCR fragments. Lane NC, negative control (PCR using recipient yeast total DNA). Lane PC, positive control (PCR using purified plasmid DNA extracted from E. coli HB101 carrying pAY205). (c) Representative DNA sequence analysis of the oriTQ nick site. (d) The oriTQ nick site sequence in the original mobilizable vector (pAY205) and in the vector recovered from each transformant used for panel b.

Impact of the choice of oriT on efficiency and accuracy of TKC transfer of mobilizable plasmids from bacteria to yeast.

We constructed and compared two types of vectors that had the same shuttle vector backbone, pEXP-AD502, but differed in having either oriTQ/mob genes or oriTP (Fig. 2b and d). Vectors with the oriTP regions in clockwise (cw) or anticlockwise (acw) orientation were generated. The TKC efficiency of plasmid pEXP-AD502 oriTP (acw) was similar to that of its mirror vector, pEXP-AD502 oriTP (cw), but it was 3.4-fold higher than that of pEXP-AD502 oriTQ (cw). Similarly, TKC efficiency in vector pEXP-AD502 oriTP (cw) was higher than that of pEXP-AD502 oriTQ (cw) by 5.5-fold (Fig. 4a). To validate the TKC transfer, the oriT regions of transferred vectors were PCR amplified and sequenced. For each of the three vectors, 32 clones were analyzed, or 96 clones in total. All amplicons showed expected sizes (1,390 or 1,348 bp; Fig. 4b), and their junction sequences were preserved (Fig. 4c and d). From these data, we concluded that while the shuttle vectors tested here showed similar accuracy of TKC transfer, the oriTP-based vectors were more efficient than oriTQ-based vectors in terms of the number of transconjugants obtained.
Fig 4
Fig 4 Comparative efficiency and accuracy of TKC transfer of oriTP and oriTQ/mob shuttle vectors from E. coli HB101 into S. cerevisiae MaV203. (a) TKC efficiency was measured in terms of frequency of yeast clones with selectable marker recovered after TKC transfer of oriTP or oriTQ/mob shuttle vector. Values plotted are means � SD from at least four independent experiments. No transformant was observed when the parental vector pEXP-AD502 was used (lane −oriT, <3.9 � 10−8 transconjugants/recipient). Values plotted are means � SD from three independent experiments. (b) TKC transfer was validated by PCR amplification of either oriTP or oriTQ and each flanking region of the transferred plasmids in clones recovered from each TKC reaction. Arrowheads on the left indicate the size of the DNA marker (λ/StyI). Arrowheads on the right indicate the predicted size of PCR fragments. (c) Representative result of sequence analysis of the nick site. (d) The oriTQ or oriTP nick site sequence of the mobilizable vectors (pEXP-AD502 oriTP acw and cw, as well as pEXP-AD502 oriTQ) was found to be intact in plasmids recovered from representative transconjugants used in panel b from each set.

Simultaneous transfer of two plasmids by transkingdom conjugation.

An ability to simultaneously introduce multiple vectors via a single reaction would be a key advantage of genetic manipulation. The simultaneous TKC transfer of two vectors, pEXP-AD502 oriTP (cw) and pDBLeu oriTP (cw), from E. coli HB101 to S. cerevisiae MaV203 was investigated using two different methods (Fig. 2). In the first method (redundant transfer), both vectors were first introduced into the same bacterial donor strain that was used for TKC transfer to yeast (Fig. 5a). Successful transfer of the vectors was examined by growth on selective media to identify exconjugants carrying the TRP1 and/or LEU2 marker genes for tryptophan and leucine auxotrophy, respectively. Double transformants (TRP1+ LEU2+) were detected at an efficiency of 1.6 � 10−6 transformants/recipient cell, which is less than one-sixth the efficiency of transformants possessing at least one of the two vectors (Fig. 5b). In a second method (redundant conjugation), the TKC reaction was performed between a single recipient yeast strain and two independent donor strains, each carrying one of the two vectors (Fig. 5c). However, no double transformant was detectable at the experimental scale (<7.7 � 10−8 transformants/recipient cell) (Fig. 5d). Thus, the efficiency of the redundant transfer method was at least 20-fold higher than that of the redundant conjugation method.
Fig 5
Fig 5 Comparison of methods for simultaneous TKC transfer of two plasmids. (a and b) Redundant transfer. (a) Schematic showing simultaneous transfer of two mobilizable plasmids from the donor strain, E. coli HB101, to the recipient strain, S. cerevisiae MaV203, in a single TKC reaction. Mobilizable plasmids with TRP1 or LEU2 markers that confer tryptophan or leucine prototrophy were used to test this method. (b) TKC efficiency of redundant transfer carrying two types of vector. Lane −Leu represents TKC efficiency carrying either pDBLeu oriTP (cw) or both types of vector, lane −Trp represents that carrying either pEXP-AD502 oriTP (cw) or both, and lane −Trp, −Leu represents both types of vector. Bars plotted are means � SD from at least three independent experiments. (c and d) Redundant conjugation. (c) Schematic showing TKC reaction between the recipient yeast and two independent donors, each carrying one of the two mobilizable plasmids as described for panel a. (d) TKC efficiency of transfer was measured as described for panel b.

Excision of a marker gene flanked by two oriT loci during TKC transfer.

From the viewpoints of biosafety and size minimization of transferred DNA, it is advisable to remove antibiotic resistance genes and the origin of vegetative replication (oriV) from the transferred DNA. A vector designed to test the excision of the TRP1 marker was flanked by two direct repeats of the oriTP region in the same orientation (Fig. 6a). Among 100 transformants, which were selected by leucine prototrophy, 17 transformants lacked tryptophan prototrophy, indicating excision of TRP1. The transferred vectors were extracted from 10 of the transformants with leucine prototrophy but without tryptophan prototrophy (Leu+/Trp) and used as templates for PCR amplification to detect the oriT and its flanking region. However, we could not design appropriate PCR primers which worked well for detection of their status of excision. Thus, the same plasmids were used to transform E. coli. Restriction digestion analysis of the plasmids recovered from E. coli transformants confirmed the absence of TRP1 DNA (Fig. 6b), and sequencing results indicated that the recircularization had occurred precisely between the two nick sites in all of the plasmids (Fig. 6c and data not shown). These results indicate that both of the oriT genes were recognized and had been excised along with the intervening TRP1 gene.
Fig 6
Fig 6 Excision of selectable marker from plasmid with two oriTP sequences. (a) Schematic showing two directly repeated oriTP sequences and auxotrophy markers TRP1 (tryptophan) and LEU2 (leucine) in mutually opposite orientations. EcoRV sites (indicated as RV) were used in restriction digestion analysis. The 4 possible predicted outcomes of transfer (1 to 4) are based on growth of transformants on media lacking leucine or both leucine and tryptophan. (b) EcoRV digestion of plasmids obtained from Trp/Leu+ clones indicating excision of TRP1 gene sequence located in the region intervening between the oriTP repeats. Arrowheads on the left indicate DNA bands representing the mobilizable vector in the donor; those on the right indicate DNA bands derived from the vector in each transformant. Asterisks indicate DNA bands derived from the helper plasmid pRH220, and the lane M is a size marker (λ/HindIII). (c) Representative DNA sequence of the junction sequence of a vector shown in panel b.

DISCUSSION

This study supplies basic data regarding the form of TKC to develop it as a practical method for gene introduction into a yeast, S. cerevisiae.
Yeast mutations known to result in impaired DNA repair did not affect either the transformation efficiency or the transfer accuracy (Fig. 3a and b). Among the 92 oriTQ-mediated transformants and 64 oriTP-mediated transformants (Fig. 3 and 4), only one transformant had lost the junction sequence of vector (Fig. 3a). These results indicated that the vector recircularization occurred precisely during transfer in a recipient cell-independent manner. In the case of T-DNA transfer from A. tumefaciens to S. cerevisiae, the percentage of precise circularization of a replicative-type transfer vector is low; Bundock et al. reported that 3 of 48 transformants contained circularized vector joined at its nick sites in the left and right border of the flanking sequences (20). They deduced that the circularization occurred in yeast because T-DNA is transferred as a linear ssDNA molecule. The exact site at which recircularization of the transfer vector occurs in TKC has not been clarified. Our results suggest that it occurs either in the donor E. coli or in recipient yeast; however, most probably it is dependent on a factor(s) from the donor. A recent transfer model of an IncW-type conjugative plasmid proposed that it occurs in recipient cells mediated by a donor factor, TrwC. The latter covalently binds to the 5′ end of a single-stranded transferring plasmid and localizes at the exit site of type 4 pilus during conjugation (18). Our results seem to support this model. Thus, TKC-based gene transfer appears to be a more reliable method than T-DNA transfer, at least in terms of precise transfer of a replicative type vector.
TKC efficiency was compared between oriTP- and oriTQ-type vectors. A higher efficiency in oriTP-type vector than oriTQ-type vector was predictable, because the T4SS used in this experiment was derived from an IncP-type plasmid, RK2. The oriTQ-type vector designed here carried a 3-kb DNA fragment derived from an IncQ plasmid, RSF1010, containing oriTQ, and the requisite mobilizing functions encoded by mobA, mobB, and mobC (Fig. 2b). Including a longer fragment containing additional genes may achieve higher TKC efficiency, but it becomes more cumbersome in the later steps of cloning, and the larger size reduces efficiency. On the other hand, if the fragment also contains oriV and rep genes, such as the vector pAY205 (Fig. 2a), then the transfer vector may be applicable to other Gram-negative bacterial hosts.
In the case of general bacterial conjugal transfer, once a recipient cell accepts a plasmid, expression of surface-exclusion (entry-exclusion) proteins encoded by the transferred plasmid inhibits conjugation between cells having the same type of plasmid (21, 22). However, in TKC, this exclusion system does not work, because these genes cannot express in yeast. Our results suggested that some transfer occurred redundantly (Fig. 5b), but the selection of recipient cell is random (Fig. 5d). In the case of redundant transfer, the ratio of recipients possessing both vectors was 15 to 16% of those receiving at least one of the two vectors. For the simultaneous transfer of two plasmids, assuming an equal transfer efficiency for both, the frequency of obtaining double transformants by the redundant transfer method is calculated to be around 17% (see Fig. S1d in the supplemental material). The question of whether the redundant transfer is a reflection of formation of multiple type 4 pili remains open.
The excision of a marker gene during TKC transfer was achieved, albeit at a low efficiency, by using a vector carrying two repeats of the oriTP gene flanking the TRP1 marker. Because the nick site of oriTP was found to be recognized and recircularized precisely in vectors with a single oriTP (Fig. 4), we expected that in the dual oriT vector, the transfer would start from one oriTP nick site and would end precisely at the other site. Nevertheless, the majority of transformants showed tryptophan prototrophy (83 out of 100 Leu+ transformants). Thus, the result indicates that the transfer frequently passes through the other oriTP region and ends at the original oriTP nick site or further. Although there is no convincing interpretation at present for the low efficiency of excision, the frequency is sufficient for practical applications.
Finally, we propose the simplest gene introduction method for S. cerevisiae mediated by TKC. Mixing a small amount of liquid cultures at the stationary phase of the donor E. coli and the recipient yeasts could easily transform various S. cerevisiae strains. These strains are not only commonly used experimental strains but also are derivatives of wild and industrially utilized strains worldwide (see Fig. S1c in the supplemental material). This method does not require any steps and reagents for vector DNA extraction and preparation of competent cells.
In this study, we focused on determining the potential of TKC as a gene introduction tool and assess the characteristics of the different forms of transfer in TKC. Our findings indicate that TKC can transfer vectors of two types precisely and simultaneously. Additionally, it can excise unnecessary regions for a recipient cell within a vector. Therefore, TKC can be used as a simple gene introduction tool in S. cerevisiae by using specifically designed vectors. A gene introduction method for other organisms using TKC and construction of TKC vectors for those organisms is hoped to be established.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the National Bio-Resource Project (NBRP) of the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, for providing E. coli strain HB101 and S. cerevisiae shuttle vectors pRS314 and pRS315. We also thank Yosuke Ikegaya for his excellent technical assistance.
This work was supported in part by the NIG Cooperative Research Program (2007-B10) and JSPS KAKENHI (21510209).

Supplemental Material

File (zam999104531so1.pdf)
File (zam999104531so2.pdf)
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

1.
Waksman G and Fronzes R. 2010. Molecular architecture of bacterial type IV secretion systems. Trends Biochem. Sci.35:691–698.
2.
Elhai J and Wolk CP. 1988. Conjugal transfer of DNA to cyanobacteria. Methods Enzymol.167:747–754.
3.
Hunter CN and Turner G. 1988. Transfer of genes coding for apoproteins of reaction center and light-harvesting Lh1 complexes to Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J. Gen. Microbiol.134:1471–1480.
4.
Trieucuot P, Carlier C, Martin P, and Courvalin P. 1987. Plasmid transfer by conjugation from Escherichia coli to Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.48:289–294.
5.
Gelvin SB. 2003. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: the biology behind the “gene-jockeying” tool. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.67:16–37.
6.
Michielse CB, Hooykaas PJ, van den Hondel CA, and Ram AF. 2005. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation as a tool for functional genomics in fungi. Curr. Genet.48:1–17.
7.
Heinemann JA and Sprague GF Jr. 1989. Bacterial conjugative plasmids mobilize DNA transfer between bacteria and yeast. Nature340:205–209.
8.
Nishikawa M, Suzuki K, and Yoshida K. 1992. DNA integration into recipient yeast chromosomes by trans-kingdom conjugation between Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet.21:101–108.
9.
Nishikawa M, Suzuki K, and Yoshida K. 1990. Structural and functional stability of IncP plasmids during stepwise transmission by trans-kingdom mating: promiscuous conjugation of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Jpn. J. Genet.65:323–334.
10.
Waters VL. 2001. Conjugation between bacterial and mammalian cells. Nat. Genet.29:375–376.
11.
Ito H, Fukuda Y, Murata K, and Kimura A. 1983. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacteriol.153:163–168.
12.
Thompson JR, Register E, Curotto J, Kurtz M, and Kelly R. 1998. An improved protocol for the preparation of yeast cells for transformation by electroporation. Yeast14:565–571.
13.
Bates S, Cashmore AM, and Wilkins BM. 1998. IncP plasmids are unusually effective in mediating conjugation of Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae: involvement of the tra2 mating system. J. Bacteriol.180:6538–6543.
14.
Sota M and Top EM. 2008. Horizontal gene transfer mediated by plasmids, p 111–181. InLipps G (ed), Plasmids: current research and future trends. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
15.
Mizuta M, Satoh E, Katoh C, Tanaka K, Moriguchi K, and Suzuki K. 2012. Screening for yeast mutants defective in recipient ability for transkingdom conjugation with Escherichia coli revealed importance of vacuolar ATPase activity in the horizontal DNA transfer phenomenon. Microbiol. Res.167:311–316.
16.
Tinland B, Hohn B, and Puchta H. 1994. Agrobacterium tumefaciens transfers single-stranded transferred DNA (T-DNA) into the plant cell nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.91:8000–8004.
17.
Yusibov VM, Steck TR, Gupta V, and Gelvin SB. 1994. Association of single-stranded transferred DNA from Agrobacterium tumefaciens with tobacco cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.91:2994–2998.
18.
Russi S, Boer R, and Coll M. 2008. Molecular machinery for DNA translocation in bacterial conjugation, p 183–213. InLipps G (ed), Plasmids: current research and future trends. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
19.
van Attikum H, Bundock P, and Hooykaas PJ. 2001. Non-homologous end-joining proteins are required for Agrobacterium T-DNA integration. EMBO J.20:6550–6558.
20.
Bundock P, den Dulk-Ras A, Beijersbergen A, and Hooykaas PJ. 1995. Trans-kingdom T-DNA transfer from Agrobacterium tumefaciens to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J.14:3206–3214.
21.
Garcillan-Barcia MP and de la Cruz F. 2008. Why is entry exclusion an essential feature of conjugative plasmids?Plasmid60:1–18.
22.
Haase J, Kalkum M, and Lanka E. 1996. TrbK, a small cytoplasmic membrane lipoprotein, functions in entry exclusion of the IncP alpha plasmid RP4. J. Bacteriol.178:6720–6729.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Volume 79Number 1415 July 2013
Pages: 4393 - 4400
PubMed: 23666333

History

Received: 18 March 2013
Accepted: 3 May 2013
Published online: 20 June 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Contributors

Authors

Kazuki Moriguchi
Department of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan
Noritaka Edahiro
Department of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan
Shinji Yamamoto
Department of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan
Katsuyuki Tanaka
Department of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan
Nori Kurata
Plant Genetics, National Institute of Genetics, Yata, Mishima, Japan
Katsunori Suzuki
Department of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science, Hiroshima University, Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima, Japan

Notes

Address correspondence to Kazuki Moriguchi, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy