Spotlight Selection
Research Article
5 May 2015

The RpoE Stress Response Pathway Mediates Reduction of the Virulence of Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli by Zinc

This article has a companion.
VIEW THE COMPANION

ABSTRACT

Zinc supplements are an effective clinical treatment for infantile diarrheal disease caused by enteric pathogens. Previous studies demonstrated that zinc acts on enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) bacteria directly to suppress several virulence-related genes at a concentration that can be achieved by oral delivery of dietary zinc supplements. Our in vitro studies showed that a micromolar concentration of zinc induced the envelope stress response and suppressed virulence in EPEC, providing a possible mechanistic explanation for zinc's therapeutic action. In this report, we investigated the molecular and physiological changes in EPEC induced by zinc. We found that micromolar concentrations of zinc reduced the bacterial growth rate without affecting viability. We observed increased membrane permeability caused by zinc. Zinc upregulated the RpoE-dependent envelope stress response pathway and suppressed EPEC virulence gene expression. RpoE alone was sufficient to inhibit virulence factor expression and to attenuate attaching and effacing lesion formation on human host cells. By mutational analysis we demonstrate that the DNA-binding motif of RpoE is necessary for suppression of the LEE1, but not the LEE4, operon. Predictably, inhibition of the RpoE-mediated envelope stress response in combination with micromolar concentrations of zinc reduced EPEC viability. In conclusion, zinc induces the RpoE and stress response pathways in EPEC, and the alternate sigma factor RpoE downregulates EPEC LEE and non-LEE virulence genes by multiple mechanisms.

INTRODUCTION

Acute diarrheal infections (ADI) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in children, particularly those living in developing countries. Worldwide, children suffer from ∼2 billion bouts of diarrhea annually, with approximately 1 million children under the age of 5 years dying of ADI every year. Even nonlethal infections can lead to malnutrition, cognitive impairment, and permanent gastrointestinal damage.
In 2008, the World Health Organization began administering dietary zinc supplements with oral rehydration therapy to those suffering from ADI. Along with restoring normal zinc levels, which are essential for proper immune function (1, 2), this metal ion affects the virulence of gastrointestinal, bacterial pathogens even in children with normal plasma zinc concentrations. In 1995, a double-blind, randomized control trial involving 937 children with acute diarrhea in New Delhi, India, demonstrated that dietary zinc supplements of 20 mg per day given to children under the age of 3 years significantly reduced the severity and duration of disease (3). The children were 23% less likely to have continued diarrhea, with a 39% reduction in the frequency of episodes. There was a 21% reduction in the mean number of days with watery stools and a 39% drop in the number of watery stools per day. Thus, by a yet unknown mechanism, zinc dietary supplements benefited children with ADI, even those with normal plasma zinc levels.
To understand the mechanism by which zinc affected bacterium-caused diarrhea, Crane and coworkers conducted investigations using enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), a major cause of infantile diarrhea in developing countries (4), as well as rabbit enteropathogenic E. coli (rEPEC), a related pathotype that infects rabbits (58). EPEC causes profuse, watery diarrhea, and a type III secretion (T3S) system encoded by the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) pathogenicity island is necessary for disease. EPEC forms hallmark attaching and effacing (A/E) intestinal lesions, with alteration of the host cell cytoskeleton and signaling events leading to destruction of the absorptive microvilli in the distal small intestine, loosening of tight junctions, and net ion secretion (9, 10). rEPEC causes diarrhea in baby rabbits with the same clinical and pathological features as those seen from EPEC in humans (1113) and thus can be used to study the pathogenesis of the human EPEC pathotype.
Zinc acetate, at micromolar concentrations, affects several EPEC and rEPEC phenotypes. EPEC adherence to epithelial cells in culture and expression of the genes encoding the bundle-forming pilus (bfp), an initial attachment factor, are reduced (14). Zinc acetate at 0.3 mM decreases type III-dependent secretion and expression of the LEE4 and LEE5 operons of the LEE. In a rabbit ileal loop model of infection, injection of 1 mM zinc acetate along with the rEPEC pathogen significantly reduced the accumulation of fluid and, thus, net secretory diarrhea. Importantly, in a follow-up study Crane et al. demonstrated that animals given dietary zinc supplements had up to 0.3 mM zinc in their intestines, i.e., concentrations high enough to reduce the virulence phenotypes demonstrated both in vitro and in the rabbit infection model (6).
The molecular mechanisms of how zinc affects these Gram-negative E. coli pathotypes remain unclear. Using genetic and biochemical techniques, we previously demonstrated that zinc acetate caused envelope stress and confirmed by electron microscopy that both the inner and outer membranes are perturbed (15). The envelope stress response is important for virulence for a number of bacterial pathogens, including those infecting the respiratory tract, such as Bordetella bronchiseptica, and the gastrointestinal tract, such as Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (16, 17). Additionally, the RpoE envelope stress pathway was highly expressed in Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum during an experimental syphilis infection. The authors identified 22 genes in the regulon, all with putative RpoE-binding sites (18). The alternate sigma factor RpoE is also important for Yersinia pseudotuberculosis survival in response to a number of environmental stresses, including temperature, pH, and high osmolarity (19). Therefore, the RpoE stress response pathway is necessary for many bacteria to cause disease, to survive within the host organism, and to combat environmental stresses.
In addition to RpoE, it was previously demonstrated in EPEC that the Cpx envelope stress pathway is necessary for proper regulation of the type III secretion system encoded by the LEE (20, 21). Activation of DegP, most likely via chaperone and protease activity, as part of the envelope stress responses posttranscriptionally inhibits assembly of the type III secretion system. Based on these results and our previous study indicating that zinc perturbs the envelope (15), we hypothesized that the RpoE envelope stress pathway is necessary for reducing EPEC virulence in response to zinc.
Here, we show that micromolar concentrations of zinc increase membrane permeability but do not significantly affect the viability of the EPEC bacteria. We demonstrate that zinc specifically induces the RpoE envelope stress response pathway and downregulates the LEE1 and LEE4 operons in EPEC by multiple mechanisms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and growth.

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Liquid cultures were grown in lysogeny broth (LB) at 37°C with aeration and with ampicillin (100 μg/ml) or kanamycin (50 μg/ml). Cultures were also grown on LB agar plates with antibiotic selection at 37°C. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) was prepared from DMEM-D5030 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and supplemented with 1 g/liter glucose, 17.9 mM sodium bicarbonate, 25 mM HEPES, 0.543 mM adenine sulfate, 4.00 mM l-glutamine, and 1.00 mM sodium pyruvate, pH 7.4. For routine maintenance of tissue culture, DMEM was prepared by supplementing F-12 medium (D5523; Sigma-Aldrich) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). Unless otherwise noted, DMEM in the rest of study refers to DMEM-D5030. A working stock of zinc acetate was dissolved in 1% glacial acetic acid solution to 100× or 1,000× treatment concentrations.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Strains and plasmids used in this study
Strain or plasmidGenotype or descriptionReference or source
Strains  
    E2348/69Prototypical EPEC serotype O127:H641
    CVD452E2348/69 ΔescN::aphA3 Kmr42
Plasmids  
    pTrc99aVector with IPTG-inducible trc promoter, pMB1 origin of replication, Ampr27
    pLC245rpoE cloned in pTrc99a downstream of the IPTG-inducible trc promoter, Ampr27
    pTrunc RpoETruncated rpoE mutant with deletion of the HTH motif (amino acids 167–190), cloned in pTrc99a downstream of the IPTG-inducible trc promoter, AmprThis study
    pRseArseA cloned in pBAD24 downstream of the arabinose-inducible PBAD promoter, Ampr43
Bacteria grown overnight in LB were diluted 1:100 in DMEM for subsequent assays. Expression of pLC245 or pTrunc RpoE was induced by 1 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG); expression of pRseA was induced by 0.2% arabinose.

Molecular cloning.

PCR was conducted to amplify a truncated rpoE insert from pLC245 template (Table 1) with EcoRI_rpoE_trunc_fwd and XbaI_rpoE_trunc_rev primers (Table 2) using Q5 High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) according to standard procedures. The insert was digested with EcoRI and XbaI and ligated into pTrc99a backbone vector. The construct was sequenced and confirmed to be correct by the core sequencing service at the Vollum Institute (Oregon Health and Science University) using pTrc99a sequencing primers (Table 2).
TABLE 2
TABLE 2 Oligonucleotides used in this study
Primer function and nameSequence (5′ to 3′)a
Cloning primers 
    pTrc99a_seq_fwdTGCAGGTCGTAAATCACTGC
    pTrc99a_seq_revCTGGCAGTTCCCTACTCTCG
    EcoRI_rpoE_trunc_fwdCCGGAATTCCCGATGAGCGAGCAGTTAAC
    XbaI_rpoE_trunc_revGCTCTAGAGCTCAACGCGGACAATCCATGATAGC
qRT-PCR primers 
    ler_RT_5end_fwdACCAGGTCTGCCCTTCTTCA
    ler_RT_3end_revTGGGATATACTAATGTGCCTGATGA
    espA_RT_5end_fwdGGGCAGTGGTTGACTCCTTA
    espA_RT_3end_revGCTGCAATTCTCATGTTTGC
    rpoE_RT_5end_fwdACCTACCGGACAATCCATGA
    rpoE_RT_3end_revAGTCCCTCCCGGAAGATTTA
    rrsB_RT_5end_fwdAGTTATCCCCCTCCATCAGG
    rrsB_RT_3end_revTGCAAGTCGAACGGTAACAG
    degP_RT_5end_fwdTGAGCGATGGTCGTAAGTTC
    degP_RT_3end_revCGGGTTCTGGATTTGGATCA
    dsbA_RT_5end_fwdAAAGTCACAGTTCCGCTGTTTG
    dsbA_RT_3end_revCGTTGATAAATACATCGCGG
a
Restriction sites used in cloning are underlined.

Growth rate and viability assays.

Turbidity was measured by an Infinite 200 Pro microplate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland) at 600-nm absorbance. Bacteria grown in DMEM or in DMEM supplemented with inducer were incubated at 37°C with shaking for the amount of time indicated on the figures. IPTG (1 mM) was used to induce expression of RpoE from plasmids pLC245 and pTrunc RpoE, while 0.2% l-arabinose was added to induce RseA expression from plasmid pRseA. For zinc susceptibility assays, bacteria were grown in medium with or without inducer at 37°C with shaking for 90 min, and then zinc acetate or vehicle (1:1,000 dilution of 10% glacial acetic acid) solutions were added into the cultures directly. Cultures were further incubated and measured for 600-nm absorbance for 160 min. Resulting cultures were serially diluted and plated on nonselective or ampicillin-selective LB agar plates in triplicates and incubated at 37°C overnight. Viability was assayed by counting the CFU per milliliter of culture.

Membrane permeability assay with SYTOX blue.

Bacteria grown in DMEM supplemented with 0.3 mM zinc acetate, 0.5 mM zinc acetate, or 1% glacial acetic acid (vehicle) were incubated at 37°C with aeration for 4 h. Turbidity of each sample as the absorbance at 600 nm was measured, and each sample was equalized to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.15. Bacterial samples were centrifuged at 8,000 × g for 10 min to collect cell pellets that were then resuspended in an equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.4). A group of vehicle-treated sample pellets were resuspended in −20°C 70% ethanol (EtOH) for 15 min and centrifuged to collect the pellets, which were resuspended in PBS as a positive control. SYTOX blue (Invitrogen, Carlsbad) was added to the mixture to a final concentration of 5 μM, and the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 10 min. Cell pellets were collected by centrifugation again at 8,000 × g for 10 min and then resuspended in 20 mM MgSO4. Cells were immobilized on 2% agar pads. Samples were then immediately imaged on a Nikon H550L fluorescence microscope at ×400 magnification using a 40× water immersion objective. At least seven fields of view were captured for each sample. For each field of view, dark-field and 4′,6′-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) filter images were obtained. Cells in each image were counted by CellProfiler, version 2.0 (Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA), and the ratio of fluorescent cells to total cells was computed. Statistically significant differences in ratios between treatments were determined by a two-tailed, unequal variance Student's t test, and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR).

Bacteria grown in DMEM or in DMEM supplemented with inducer were incubated at 37°C with aeration for 2 h. For zinc treatment, zinc acetate or vehicle (1% glacial acetic acid) solutions were added to the cultures in the beginning of incubation or 10 min before RNA extraction. One milliliter of each culture was extracted with TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). RNA samples were reverse transcribed with a SuperScript III first-strand synthesis kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) using random hexamer primers provided with the kit. Reverse-transcribed cDNA samples were subsequently diluted 1:10 with diethyl pyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated H2O to reduce inhibitory effects of reverse transcription reagents on quantitative PCR (qPCR) efficiency.
Transcripts were assayed with ImmoMix (Bioline Reagents, London) using primers listed in Table 2. The delta-delta comparative method (22) was used to analyze transcriptional changes in target genes using rrsB as the reference gene. A standard curve was generated by serially diluting cDNA samples 1:4, 1:16, 1:64, and 1:256. PCR efficiency was determined by analyzing standard curves of each primer set; qPCR efficiencies were determined to be similar (<10% difference) between experimental and control groups. Data were analyzed with the REST 2009 relative expression software tool (Roche, Penzberg, Germany) with analysis of error propagation. Statistical significance was determined by a two-tailed, unequal variance Student's t test, and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Immunoblot assay.

Bacteria were grown in DMEM at 37°C with aeration in the presence of 1 mM IPTG for 5 h. Absorbance at 600 nm was measured for each culture. A total of 100 μl of each culture equalized to 1.50 absorbance was mixed with 100 μl of 6× SDS-PAGE loading buffer and incubated on a 95°C heat block for 10 min. Twenty microliters of dyed lysates was loaded onto a 4 to 20% Mini-Protean TGX Gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules) and separated at 100 V for 80 min. Proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane at 100 V for 60 min. After the membrane was blocked with 5% nonfat milk, it was probed with anti-EspC, anti-Tir, and anti-DnaK primary antibodies (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY) and rabbit anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase conjugate as the secondary antibody (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and developed using the Western Lightning enhanced chemiluminescence method (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham).

Fluorescent actin stain (FAS) assay.

HEp-2 (human larynx carcinoma) cells were seeded at a density of 6 × 104 cells per well in a 24-well plate containing round coverslips in DMEM (4.5 mg/ml glucose) supplemented with 10% FBS and 25 μg/ml gentamicin. HEp-2 cells were grown for 60 h in a 4.5% CO2 atmosphere at 37°C. Overnight bacterial inoculants were diluted 1:100 in DMEM (1 mg/ml glucose) supplemented with 2% FBS, 1% d-mannose, and 1 mM IPTG and grown at 37°C with aeration for 2 h. Each well containing HEp-2 cells was washed twice with PBS, and 1 ml of diluted bacteria was added directly to each well. The cells were then coincubated at 37°C for 4 h. Each well was washed twice with PBS and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min; cells were then washed once with PBS, treated with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 min, and washed again with PBS. Samples were then incubated in 5 μg/ml of fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled phalloidin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis) for 45 min at 37°C. Each well was washed once with PBS and then incubated in 300 nM DAPI stain for 5 min. After being washed again with PBS and mounted onto slides, samples were randomly indexed. They were then visualized and photographed with a confocal microscope (Nikon Eclipse) using a 60×, 1.4 numerical aperture (NA) oil immersion objective lens. Samples were analyzed blindly. At least three field images were taken for each slide, with at least 400 cells examined for each treatment. Actin-rich pedestals beneath DAPI-stained bacteria were counted and quantified. Statistical significance was determined by a two-tailed, unequal variance Student's t test, and a P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

DNA sequencing analysis.

All plasmid constructs were confirmed to be correct by DNA sequencing analysis performed at the Vollum Institute at the Oregon Health and Science University.

RESULTS

Zinc reduced the growth rate of EPEC in DMEM but not viability.

Previous studies have demonstrated that micromolar concentrations of zinc acetate suppressed virulence gene expression and protein secretion in EPEC, with only a modest decrease in cell density after overnight growth in DMEM (6, 14, 15). To determine whether these results were due to an altered growth rate or viability of EPEC in DMEM with low glucose (0.1%), which is optimal for virulence expression, we monitored EPEC growth in this medium in the presence of zinc acetate. The doubling times for EPEC during balanced growth in the presence of vehicle treatment and of 0.3 mM, 0.5 mM, and 1.0 mM zinc acetate treatments were 39.4 min, 46.4 min, 73.3 min, and 117 min, respectively (Fig. 1A). We found that while the bacterial growth rate was significantly decreased due to the addition of zinc (comparison of linear fit slopes, P < 0.05), bacterial viability was not significantly different between zinc acetate and vehicle treatment groups when the number of CFU per milliliter was determined at the 4-h time point, which is after cultures had reached the stationary phase of growth (Fig. 1B). This result was consistent with the finding that cell densities were similar after overnight growth in DMEM with and without 0.4 mM zinc acetate (14), suggesting that zinc in the 400 μM range did not exert bactericidal effects on EPEC. These results show that growth is slowed in the presence of micromolar concentrations of zinc, that the time to reach stationary phase is increased, but that growth yield is not altered. Thus, inhibition of EPEC virulence by micromolar concentrations of zinc was likely not caused by a reduction in bacterial viability but, rather, by changes in bacterial physiology and/or by regulatory phenomena.
FIG 1
FIG 1 Zinc acetate reduced the EPEC growth rate but not viability. EPEC strain E2348/69 was grown in DMEM and incubated at 37°C with aeration for 90 min. Then zinc acetate was added to a final concentration of 0.3, 0.5, or 1.0 mM; 1% glacial acetic acid treatment was added as a vehicle control. The optical density at 600 nm was then recorded in the microplate reader for 160 min (A). The resulting cultures were serially diluted after 4 h of growth and plated on nonselective LB agar plates in triplicate. Viability of bacteria was determined by determining CFU counts per milliliter after overnight incubation at 37°C (B).

Micromolar concentrations of zinc increased EPEC membrane permeability.

To elucidate further the effect of zinc on EPEC, we quantified the number of bacterial cells permeable by SYTOX blue, a nucleic acid stain that penetrates only cells with compromised membranes, after treatment with 0.3 and 0.5 mM zinc acetate. Treatments with 70% EtOH and a dilution of 1% glacial acetic acid solution were used as positive and negative vehicle controls, respectively. We observed a dosage-dependent increase in cell permeability in response to the different concentrations of zinc acetate (Fig. 2). The percentage of permeable cells was significantly higher when samples were treated with 0.5 mM zinc acetate (20.9%) than with 0.3 mM zinc acetate (7.8%). Combined with results from Fig. 1, this result demonstrated that zinc acetate compromised membrane integrity at micromolar concentrations without significantly reducing bacterial viability, likely contributing to the increased EPEC doubling time compared to that of the vehicle control in DMEM containing 0.1% glucose (Fig. 1).
FIG 2
FIG 2 Zinc acetate increased membrane permeability. EPEC bacteria were grown in DMEM in the presence of a dilution of the vehicle, 10% glacial acetic acid, or 0.3 mM or 0.5 mM zinc acetate for 4 h. A group of vehicle-treated cells was collected and treated with 70% EtOH for 15 min as a positive control. Cells were harvested and stained as described in Materials and Methods. A minimum of seven fields of images were captured, with at least 8,000 cells counted by CellProfiler, version 2.0, for each treatment. The ratio of fluorescent cells, indicative of permeable membrane, to total cells was computed, and statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (two-tailed t test; *, P < 0.05).

Zinc induced the envelope stress response and suppressed LEE virulence expression.

Given that zinc increased membrane permeability of EPEC without decreasing its viability, we predicted the envelope stress regulon to be activated in response to zinc in order to promote bacterial survival. Zinc was previously reported to upregulate the transcription of rpoE and, as part of its regulon, degP, in a K-12-derived strain of E. coli (23, 24). We previously demonstrated that transcription of rpoE in a K-12-derived strain was modestly increased and that LEE gene expression was downregulated in EPEC strains in response to zinc using multicopy, plasmid-derived reporter gene fusions (15). In this study, we used qRT-PCR to quantify the effect of 0.3 mM zinc acetate on the transcriptional level of envelope stress markers degP, rpoE, and dsbA as well as LEE virulence genes, ler (LEE1) and espA (LEE4), in EPEC. Transcription of dsbA was measured to assess activation of the Cpx pathway in response to zinc as a control as dsbA is part of the Cpx regulon.
Upon 10 min of exposure to zinc acetate, envelope stress markers were all significantly upregulated, indicative of an activated envelope stress response (Fig. 3A). We observed the activating effect of zinc on the RpoE-dependent stress response as both rpoE and degP were significantly upregulated. In contrast to previous findings (24), we saw a 2-fold upregulation of dsbA, suggesting that the Cpx two-component response was also modestly activated by zinc. Upon 120 min of exposure to zinc acetate, rpoE was no longer transcriptionally increased (Fig. 3A). RseA, an inhibitor of RpoE, is encoded as part of a four-gene operon along with rpoE, which might explain why the prolonged treatment with zinc exerted negative feedback on the transcription of rpoE via the expression of RseA. The LEE virulence genes ler and espA were downregulated 2-fold when bacteria were treated with 0.3 mM zinc acetate for 120 min (Fig. 3B). Thus, activation of the RpoE regulon, which occurs mostly by posttranslational mechanisms, was associated with downregulation of LEE virulence genes in EPEC.
FIG 3
FIG 3 Zinc acetate activated the envelope stress response and suppressed LEE virulence. EPEC bacteria were grown in DMEM at 37°C with aeration for 2 h. Treatment with 0.3 mM zinc acetate or vehicle was added in the beginning or in the last 10 min of incubation. RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed into cDNA as described in the text. REST 2009 (Roche) software was used to compare changes in envelope stress marker (A) and LEE operon (B) expression between zinc acetate treatment and vehicle treatment, and statistical significance is indicated by asterisks (two-tailed t test; *, P < 0.05). All values are compared to those of the internal control, rrsB. At least three biological samples were independently prepared and assayed. Dashed lines indicate a 1.0-fold change or no change in expression. Any bars above the line indicate increased expression, while bars below the line indicate decreased expression.

Inhibition of the RpoE-mediated envelope stress response combined with zinc decreased viability.

RpoE activity is posttranslationally controlled by RseA, the envelope-bound, sequestering inhibitor of RpoE. Stress signals and outer membrane protein dynamics can trigger cleavage of RseA and subsequent release of RpoE for downstream activation of the envelope stress response pathway. We therefore took advantage of an inducible RseA construct carried on a plasmid vector to investigate whether the activation of an RpoE-dependent response was necessary for bacterial survival in the presence of 0.3 mM zinc acetate. We measured the doubling times of strain E2348/69 carrying pRseA grown in the presence and absence of the 0.2% arabinose inducer with and without the addition of 0.3 mM zinc acetate (Fig. 4).
FIG 4
FIG 4 Inhibition of RpoE-sensitized EPEC to 0.3 mM zinc acetate. EPEC bacteria containing pRseA, in order to inhibit stimulation of the RpoE envelope stress response, were grown in DMEM with 100 μg/ml ampicillin selection for 90 min in the absence (−) and presence (+) of 0.2% arabinose (Ara). Either a dilution of 1% glacial acetic acid or zinc acetate (final concentration, 0.3 mM) was then added directly to the culture. The rate of bacterial growth for the first 120 min in the absence (A) and presence (C) of zinc is presented. Cultures grown in the absence (B) and presence (D) of zinc were serially diluted and plated on an LB agar-ampicillin selection plate in triplicate. After overnight incubation at 37°C, CFU counts per milliliter were determined for each plate, and statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (two-tailed t test; *, P < 0.05).
As a control, the doubling times comparing the absence and presence of arabinose, inducing RseA, were 38.8 and 43.3 min, respectively, which represent only a modest decrease in growth rate (Fig. 4A). Induction of RseA in the absence of zinc addition led to a 10-fold reduction in EPEC viability (Fig. 4B), suggesting that basal activity of RpoE is necessary for bacterial survival. With the addition of zinc, the doubling times in the absence and presence of RseA overexpression were 51.2 and 68.5 min, respectively, indicating a 34% decrease in growth rate (Fig. 4C; comparison of linear fit, P > 0.05). This demonstrated that induction of RseA was able to further reduce the bacterial growth rate when it was combined with 0.3 mM zinc acetate. As previously demonstrated, mutation in rpoE sensitized EPEC to a variety of divalent metal ions, including zinc (23). Deletion of rpoE is lethal in E. coli without uncharacterized, compensatory mutations (25, 26). Our viability results demonstrated support for these two findings.
Induction of RseA combined with 0.3 mM zinc acetate treatment reduced EPEC viability of cultures grown in the presence of arabinose by ∼100-fold relative to growth in the absence arabinose (Fig. 4D). Our data demonstrate that the absence of a functional RpoE regulon compromises EPEC viability in the presence of only 0.3 mM zinc acetate.

Induction of RpoE alone was sufficient to suppress LEE virulence.

To address whether the expression of RpoE alone was sufficient to suppress virulence gene expression, we transformed EPEC with an inducible RpoE-carrying vector (pLC245) and an empty vector (pTrc99a) control. EPEC was grown in the presence of IPTG, and the transcriptional levels of envelope stress markers and LEE virulence genes were measured via qRT-PCR (Fig. 5). As previously reported in E. coli (27), induction of RpoE led to over 3-fold upregulation of degP with no upregulation of dsbA, which is part of the Cpx regulon, showing that the inducible vector is functional in EPEC. We observed an approximate 10-fold downregulation of the ler (LEE1) and espA (LEE4) genes when RpoE was induced, indicating that the induction of RpoE either directly inhibited the transcription of LEE virulence genes or altered other regulatory elements in order to affect expression (Fig. 5A). As a control for the effect of IPTG, we measured no significant difference in transcriptional levels of the genes of the EPEC strain carrying the empty vector in the presence and absence of IPTG (data not shown). We concluded that zinc induced the RpoE regulon and that overexpression of RpoE resulted in downregulation of LEE virulence genes in EPEC.
FIG 5
FIG 5 Induction of RpoE or truncated RpoE alone was sufficient to suppress LEE virulence. EPEC bacteria carrying pTrc99a (empty vector), pLC245 (wt RpoE), and pTrunc RpoE were grown in DMEM supplemented with 1 mM IPTG at 37°C with aeration for 2 h. RNA was extracted and reverse transcribed into cDNA as described in the text. REST 2009 (Roche) software was used to compare changes in envelope stress marker and LEE operon expression due to RpoE (A) or truncated RpoE (B) induction to the levels of the empty vector control. Statistical significance is indicated by asterisks (two-tailed t test; *, P < 0.05). Dashed lines indicate a 1.0-fold change or no change in expression. Any bars above the line indicate increased expression, while bars below the line indicate decreased expression. All values are compared to those of the internal control, rrsB. At least three biological samples were independently prepared and assayed. (C) The immunoblot assays were conducted as described in Materials and Methods. Cell lysates of EPEC carrying the pTrc99a plasmid control (lane 1), pLC245 carrying the wt RpoE (lane 2), or pTrunc RpoE (lane 3) are indicated. Mouse primary antibodies were used to probe against EspC, Tir, and DnaK (loading control). Data presented are representative of least two independent experiments for each assay.

DNA-binding domain of RpoE is necessary for LEE1 but not LEE4 downregulation.

The alternate sigma factor RpoE attaches to RNA polymerase via its N terminus and directs transcription by binding to consensus promoter sequences via a helix-turn-helix motif (HTH) on its C terminus (2830). We determined whether a mutated variant of RpoE, carried on a multicopy plasmid, would alter target gene expression in the presence of the chromosomally located wild-type (wt) rpoE gene. To do this we generated a truncated variant of RpoE lacking the −35 promoter sequence-binding motif in its C terminus (residues 167 to 190) (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) (30). As a control, we showed that EPEC doubling time and viability were not affected by overexpression of either the wt or truncated RpoE (data not shown). Expression of the truncated RpoE variant failed to upregulate degP, as expected (Fig. 5B). Also as predicted, ler was no longer downregulated when the truncated RpoE was overexpressed. However, induction of truncated RpoE still led to significant downregulation of espA (Fig. 5B). This suggested that espA and ler are differentially regulated by the induction of RpoE and that only the regulation of ler is dependent upon the DNA-binding capacity of RpoE. As the overexpression of the truncated RpoE no longer regulated ler, we concluded that the RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing σE regulated LEE1 either directly or indirectly through the expression of another gene product under the control of an RpoE-dependent promoter. It was unclear how RpoE controlled espA expression.
To monitor protein expression, we performed an immunoblot assay using whole-cell proteins and found that both Tir (LEE5) and EspC expression levels were significantly decreased by induction of both RpoE and truncated-RpoE (Fig. 5C). These data were consistent with our observations by qRT-PCR showing LEE1 and LEE4 downregulation upon RpoE overexpression (Fig. 5A and B).

Induction of RpoE attenuated the formation of attaching and effacing lesions by EPEC.

To evaluate the effect of RpoE and truncated RpoE overexpression on virulence, we employed a fluorescent actin stain (FAS) assay to assess the formation of attaching and effacing (A/E) lesions, a hallmark of EPEC infection on HEp-2 host cells. Images of HEp-2 cells alone or with coincubated EPEC strains were taken by confocal scanning laser microscopy (Fig. 6A to E). Total host cells and host cells with A/E lesions were counted blindly for each treatment. Our results showed that induction of RpoE in EPEC significantly reduced formation of A/E lesions by 39% compared to the control level (Fig. 6F). Intriguingly, induction of truncated RpoE reduced A/E lesion formation even further than induction of wild-type RpoE, with a 62% reduction in A/E lesions compared to the level in the control (Fig. 6D and F). Given that the secreted protein Tir is essential for intimin-mediated binding and the formation of pedestal structures by EPEC, this finding is consistent with our observation previously that Tir protein expression was most robustly suppressed by the induction of truncated RpoE (Fig. 5C), whereas induction of wild-type RpoE led only to a modest reduction of Tir expression. Our results clearly show that induction of both wild-type RpoE and truncated RpoE led to diminished LEE gene expression and attenuated A/E lesion formation. The results demonstrate that RpoE modulates EPEC virulence gene expression in response to zinc by multiple mechanisms, one of which requires the DNA-binding motif of RpoE.
FIG 6
FIG 6 EPEC virulence was suppressed by RpoE and truncated RpoE induction. EPEC strain E2348/69 carrying pTrc99a (empty vector), pLC245 (wt RpoE), or pTrunc RpoE or the CVD452 (ΔescN) strain, defective for type III secretion and A/E lesion formation, was grown in DMEM with 1 mM IPTG for 2 h. Bacterial culture or DMEM alone was then added to 80% confluent HEp-2 cells seeded on coverslips and coincubated for 4 h. Cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with FITC-phalloidin and DAPI counterstain. Samples were recorded by confocal microscopy and quantified as described in Materials and Methods. Representative images from each treatment are presented: HEp-2 cells only (A), HEp-2 cells with E2348/69 pTrc99a (B), HEp-2 cells with E2348/69 pLC245 (C), HEp-2 cells with E2348/69 pTrunc RpoE (D), and HEp-2 cells with strain CVD452 (E). White arrows point at A/E lesion formations identified by colocalization of DAPI-stained bacterial DNA and accumulated phalloidin-stained actin filaments. The percentages of cells with A/E lesions were quantified (F), and statistically significant differences are indicated by asterisks (two-tailed t test; *, P < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

This report addressed the underlying molecular mechanisms of how dietary zinc supplements reduce the severity and duration of EPEC-caused diarrhea. We found that micromolar concentrations of zinc acetate permeabilized the bacterial membrane without affecting growth yield over time while initially decreasing the growth rate with increasing zinc concentrations. In vitro, the addition of zinc simultaneously induced the RpoE stress response pathway and decreased expression of the LEE1 and LEE4 operons. In a previous report we presented transmission electron microscopy images of zinc-damaged EPEC membranes and modest, associated rpoE induction in a K-12-derived strain (15). Here, we establish this regulation in EPEC bacteria. We provide evidence that functional RpoE, with a DNA-binding motif intact, is necessary for zinc-mediated downregulation of LEE1 encoding the master regulator Ler (31, 32).
RpoE is an alternate sigma factor, and when bound to the RNA polymerase holoenzyme, it causes transcription to initiate, positively regulating gene expression. Thus, our data suggest that the downregulation of LEE1 is indirect. Most likely, an intermediate regulatory element, controlled by RpoE, facilitates negative regulation of LEE1 in response to zinc. Consistent with this conclusion, we were unable to locate an RpoE consensus binding site for any of the LEE operons (data not shown). The RpoE regulon is primarily controlled at the posttranslational level (26). This fact most likely explains the observation that degP is upregulated immediately after zinc addition (Fig. 3A), while downregulation of LEE1 encoding ler is not observed at the 10-min time point but can be observed 120 min after zinc addition (Fig. 3B). It was recently shown that Hfq reduces envelope stress in EPEC and that the RpoE and Cpx stress pathways are induced in a Δhfq strain of EPEC (33). Combined, these data suggest that the zinc-induced RpoE regulon suppresses LEE1 expression indirectly, perhaps through an RNA-mediated mechanism.
While the indirect regulation of LEE1 seems plausible, downregulation of LEE4, encoding the T3S system filament subunit EspA, remains unclear. These experiments are complicated by the fact that rpoE is an essential gene in E. coli and that the gene can be deleted only when, simultaneously, undefined compensatory mutations occur (26). Thus, we performed the experiments in a genetically defined system, overexpressing RpoE and the truncated version of the protein and suppressing the σE stress response by producing RseA. Surprisingly, we found that overexpression of the wt and truncated versions of RpoE suppressed LEE4 (espA) expression (Fig. 5). One possibility is that the truncated RpoE binds to the anti-sigma factor RseA, releasing wt RpoE and suppressing LEE4 expression indirectly, as predicted for LEE1. However, since degP expression is not increased in the strain containing the truncated RpoE (Fig. 5B), this does not seem likely. Thus, it is unclear how LEE4 downregulation occurs when the truncated RpoE, lacking the DNA-binding motif, is overexpressed. Nonetheless, it is well established that the LEE operons are differentially regulated in response to environmental cues and different molecular signals (34). For example, overexpression of the envelope stress regulator CpxR in EPEC suppresses LEE1, LEE4, and LEE5, while leaving LEE2 and LEE3 expression unchanged (21). In sum, our data indicate that activation of RpoE, which occurs in the presence of zinc, results in downregulation of LEE1 and LEE4 transcription (Fig. 5A), reduced EspC and Tir protein expression (Fig. 5C), and significantly reduced attaching and effacing lesion formation on HEp-2 human epithelial cells in tissue culture (Fig. 6).
Bacterial pathogens experience membrane stress due to antimicrobial peptides, bile salts, reactive oxygen species, and other insults within the human gut. Given this the fact that dietary zinc supplements are an effective clinical treatment for children with diarrhea, lessening the severity and duration of disease (3), we predicted that the combination of zinc with the inability to activate the RpoE stress pathway would severely affect EPEC viability. Indeed, we observed a decrease of over 100-fold in EPEC viability when RpoE activation was suppressed by the overexpression of RseA in the presence of 0.3 mM zinc acetate (Fig. 4D). RpoE is a conserved sigma factor in a variety of Gram-negative bacteria that live in complex environments (3537). Thus, because all intestinal pathogens must be able to counteract the effects of membrane stress, it is not surprising that an RpoE-dependent envelope stress response is required for virulence in many bacteria (1619).
Through this study we have gained an understanding of how zinc affects EPEC pathogenesis, while opening a window into how Gram-negative bacterial pathogens might be targeted for therapeutic interventions. In the intestinal niche, appropriately timed expression of virulence genes is necessary for the progression of bacterial disease. Thus, upon envelope stress mediated by zinc (Fig. 7), RpoE diminishes expression of the EPEC T3S apparatus that extends through both the inner and outer membranes because those structures are compromised (15) and must be repaired before productive interaction with the host epithelium can commence. Thus, inexpensive agents that damage the bacterial envelope, such as zinc, or molecular targeting of the envelope stress response opens a window whereby the bacteria are momentarily highly susceptible to the innate immune arsenal, potentially reducing the global diarrheal disease burden.
FIG 7
FIG 7 Model of envelope stress-mediated regulation of EPEC virulence. The RpoE-dependent envelope stress response mediates regulation of EPEC virulence by zinc. Zinc activates both the RpoE and Cpx envelope stress pathways. It was previously demonstrated that Cpx downregulates the LEE (37), and we show that RpoE downregulates both LEE genes and the non-LEE EspC, a serine protease autotransporter protein (3840). Our data suggest that LEE regulation by RpoE is indirect, and thus additional regulators remain to be identified.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Plasmids pLC245 and pBAD RseA were generously provided by Carol Gross (University of California, San Francisco) and Murata Yamada (Yamaguchi University), respectively. Tir mouse monoclonal antibody was kindly provided by Brett Finlay (University of British Columbia). Kara Cerveny (Reed College) kindly assisted with confocal microscopy work.
This work was supported, in part, by an NIH grant 5R01AI081528-02 subaward to J.L.M. and a Ruben Family Post-baccalaureate Summer Research Fellowship awarded to Y.X.

Supplemental Material

File (zam999116283so1.pdf)
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

1.
Prasad AS. 1998. Zinc and immunity. Mol Cell Biochem 188:63–69.
2.
Shankar AH, Prasad AS. 1998. Zinc and immune function: the biological basis of altered resistance to infection. Am J Clin Nutr 68:447S–463S.
3.
Sazawal S, Black RE, Bhan MK, Bhandari N, Sinha A, Jalla S. 1995. Zinc supplementation in young children with acute diarrhea in India. N Engl J Med 333:839–844.
4.
Lanata CF, Fischer-Walker CL, Olascoaga AC, Torres CX, Aryee MJ, Black RE, Child Health Epidemiology Reference Group of the World Health Organization and UNICEF. 2013. Global causes of diarrheal disease mortality in children <5 years of age: a systematic review. PLoS One 8:e72788.
5.
Abe A, Kenny B, Stein M, Finlay BB. 1997. Characterization of two virulence proteins secreted by rabbit enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, EspA and EspB, whose maximal expression is sensitive to host body temperature. Infect Immun 65:3547–3555.
6.
Crane JK, Byrd IW, Boedeker EC. 2011. Virulence inhibition by zinc in Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 79:1696–1705.
7.
Newton HJ, Sloan J, Bennett-Wood V, Adams LM, Robins-Browne RM, Hartland EL. 2004. Contribution of long polar fimbriae to the virulence of rabbit-specific enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 72:1230–1239.
8.
Zhu C, Agin TS, Elliott SJ, Johnson LA, Thate TE, Kaper JB, Boedeker EC. 2001. Complete nucleotide sequence and analysis of the locus of enterocyte effacement from rabbit diarrheagenic Escherichia coli RDEC-1. Infect Immun 69:2107–2115.
9.
Clarke SC, Haigh RD, Freestone PP, Williams PH. 2003. Virulence of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, a global pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 16:365–378.
10.
Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. 2004. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:123–140.
11.
Marches O, Nougayrede JP, Boullier S, Mainil J, Charlier G, Raymond I, Pohl P, Boury M, De Rycke J, Milon A, Oswald E. 2000. Role of Tir and intimin in the virulence of rabbit enteropathogenic Escherichia coli serotype O103:H2. Infect Immun 68:2171–2182.
12.
Milon A, Oswald E, De Rycke J. 1999. Rabbit EPEC: a model for the study of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Vet Res 30:203–219.
13.
Srikhanta YN, Hocking DM, Praszkier J, Wakefield MJ, Robins-Browne RM, Yang J, Tauschek M. 2013. RegR virulence regulon of rabbit-specific enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strain E22. Infect Immun 81:1078–1089.
14.
Crane JK, Naeher TM, Shulgina I, Zhu C, Boedeker EC. 2007. Effect of zinc in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infection. Infect Immun 75:5974–5984.
15.
Mellies JL, Thomas K, Turvey M, Evans NR, Crane J, Boedeker E, Benison GC. 2012. Zinc-induced envelope stress diminishes type III secretion in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. BMC Microbiol 12:123.
16.
Barchinger SE, Zhang X, Hester SE, Rodriguez ME, Harvill ET, Ades SE. 2012. sigE facilitates the adaptation of Bordetella bronchiseptica to stress conditions and lethal infection in immunocompromised mice. BMC Microbiol 12:179.
17.
Testerman TL, Vazquez-Torres A, Xu Y, Jones-Carson J, Libby SJ, Fang FC. 2002. The alternative sigma factor σE controls antioxidant defences required for Salmonella virulence and stationary-phase survival. Mol Microbiol 43:771–782.
18.
Giacani L, Denisenko O, Tompa M, Centurion-Lara A. 2013. Identification of the Treponema pallidum subsp. pallidum TP0092 (RpoE) regulon and its implications for pathogen persistence in the host and syphilis pathogenesis. J Bacteriol 195:896–907.
19.
Palonen E, Lindstrom M, Somervuo P, Korkeala H. 2013. Alternative sigma factor σE has an important role in stress tolerance of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis IP32953. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5970–5977.
20.
MacRitchie DM, Acosta N, Raivio TL. 2012. DegP is involved in Cpx-mediated posttranscriptional regulation of the type III secretion apparatus in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 80:1766–1772.
21.
Macritchie DM, Ward JD, Nevesinjac AZ, Raivio TL. 2008. Activation of the Cpx envelope stress response down-regulates expression of several locus of enterocyte effacement-encoded genes in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 76:1465–1475.
22.
Pfaffl MW. 2001. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 29:e45.
23.
Egler M, Grosse C, Grass G, Nies DH. 2005. Role of the extracytoplasmic function protein family sigma factor RpoE in metal resistance of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 187:2297–2307.
24.
Yamamoto K, Ishihama A. 2005. Transcriptional response of Escherichia coli to external zinc. J Bacteriol 187:6333–6340.
25.
De Las Penas A, Connolly L, Gross CA. 1997. σE is an essential sigma factor in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 179:6862–6864.
26.
Hayden JD, Ades SE. 2008. The extracytoplasmic stress factor, σE, is required to maintain cell envelope integrity in Escherichia coli. PLoS One 3:e1573.
27.
Rhodius VA, Suh WC, Nonaka G, West J, Gross CA. 2006. Conserved and variable functions of the σE stress response in related genomes. PLoS Biol 4:e2.
28.
Campbell EA, Tupy JL, Gruber TM, Wang S, Sharp MM, Gross CA, Darst SA. 2003. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli σE with the cytoplasmic domain of its anti-sigma RseA. Mol Cell 11:1067–1078.
29.
Feklistov A, Darst SA. 2011. Structural basis for promoter −10 element recognition by the bacterial RNA polymerase sigma subunit. Cell 147:1257–1269.
30.
Lane WJ, Darst SA. 2006. The structural basis for promoter −35 element recognition by the group IV sigma factors. PLoS Biol 4:e269.
31.
Elliott SJ, Sperandio V, Giron JA, Shin S, Mellies JL, Wainwright L, Hutcheson SW, McDaniel TK, Kaper JB. 2000. The locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE)-encoded regulator controls expression of both LEE- and non-LEE-encoded virulence factors in enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun 68:6115–6126.
32.
Mellies JL, Elliott SJ, Sperandio V, Donnenberg MS, Kaper JB. 1999. The Per regulon of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli: identification of a regulatory cascade and a novel transcriptional activator, the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE)-encoded regulator (Ler). Mol Microbiol 33:296–306.
33.
Vogt SL, Raivio TL. 2014. Hfq reduces envelope stress by controlling expression of envelope-localized proteins and protein complexes in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 92:681–697.
34.
Mellies JL, Barron AM, Carmona AM. 2007. Enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli virulence gene regulation. Infect Immun 75:4199–4210.
35.
Abba K, Sinfield R, Hart CA, Garner P. 2009. Pathogens associated with persistent diarrhoea in children in low and middle income countries: systematic review. BMC Infect Dis 9:88.
36.
Ades SE. 2008. Regulation by destruction: design of the σE envelope stress response. Curr Opin Microbiol 11:535–540.
37.
Raivio TL. 2005. Envelope stress responses and Gram-negative bacterial pathogenesis. Mol Microbiol 56:1119–1128.
38.
Mellies JL, Navarro-Garcia F, Okeke I, Frederickson J, Nataro JP, Kaper JB. 2001. espC pathogenicity island of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli encodes an enterotoxin. Infect Immun 69:315–324.
39.
Ruiz-Perez F, Henderson IR, Nataro JP. 2010. Interaction of FkpA, a peptidyl-prolyl cis/trans isomerase with EspP autotransporter protein. Gut Microbes 1:339–344.
40.
Navarro-Garcia F, Serapio-Palacios A, Vidal JE, Salazar MI, Tapia-Pastrana G. 2014. EspC promotes epithelial cell detachment by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli via sequential cleavages of a cytoskeletal protein and then focal adhesion proteins. Infect Immun 82:2255–2265.
41.
Levine MM. 1987. Escherichia coli that cause diarrhea: enterotoxigenic, enteropathogenic, enteroinvasive, enterohemorrhagic, and enteroadherent. J Infect Dis 155:377–389.
42.
Jarvis KG, Giron JA, Jerse AE, McDaniel TK, Donnenberg MS, Kaper JB. 1995. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli contains a putative type III secretion system necessary for the export of proteins involved in attaching and effacing lesion formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:7996–8000.
43.
Noor R, Murata M, Nagamitsu H, Klein G, Raina S, Yamada M. 2009. Dissection of σE-dependent cell lysis in Escherichia coli: roles of RpoE regulators RseA, RseB and periplasmic folding catalyst PpiD. Genes Cells 14:885–899.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Volume 81Number 111 June 2015
Pages: 3766 - 3774
Editor: C. A. Elkins
PubMed: 25819956

History

Received: 12 February 2015
Accepted: 19 March 2015
Published online: 5 May 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Contributors

Authors

Yuan Xue
Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
Biology Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA
Jossef Osborn
Biology Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA
Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
Anand Panchal
Silver Lake Research Corporation, Monrovia, California, USA
Jay L. Mellies
Biology Department, Reed College, Portland, Oregon, USA

Editor

C. A. Elkins
Editor

Notes

Address correspondence to Jay L. Mellies, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy