Brief Report
24 April 2012

Transcriptional Response of the Cellobiose Dehydrogenase Gene to Cello- and Xylooligosaccharides in the Basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium

ABSTRACT

Cellobiose dehydrogenase (CDH) gene transcripts were quantified by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) in cultures of Phanerochaete chrysosporium supplemented with various cello- and xylooligosaccharides in order to elucidate the mechanism of enhanced CDH production in xylan/cellulose culture. Cellotriose and cellotetraose induced cdh expression, while xylobiose and xylotriose induced expression of cellobiohydrolase genes, especially cel7C.

TEXT

The basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium produces various extracellular carbohydrate-degrading enzymes (14, 24) and oxidative enzymes (13) that degrade wood, which contains cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin as major components. Cellulose is a β-1,4-linked homopolymer of glucose, and the cellulolytic system of this fungus involves multiple endoglucanases (EGs) and cellobiohydrolases (CBHs) (20, 21), which hydrolyze cellulose into cellobiose and cellooligosaccharides. In addition to hydrolytic enzymes, redox enzymes such as cellobiose dehydrogenase (CDH) are involved in cellulose degradation (1, 3, 4, 23). CDH oxidizes cellobiose and cellooligosaccharides into the corresponding 1,5-δ-lactones (5, 15). The role of CDH in cellulose degradation has been widely discussed (7, 8, 10, 25), and its relationship with polysaccharides monooxygenase was recently pointed out (12, 16, 22). A study by Dumonceaux and coworkers on a CDH-deficient mutant of the wood-rotting basidiomycete Trametes versicolor indicated that CDH is also involved in degradation of other plant cell wall components (2). We have recently reported that arabinoxylan, the major hemicellulose of monocots, enhances fungal growth and CDH production when it is supplemented into cellulose-degrading cultures, although it could not serve as a carbon source for P. chrysosporium by itself (6). In the present study, a similar response of the fungus was observed when glucuronoxylan (from beech wood) was added to cellulolytic culture, suggesting that the main-chain structure of xylan affects fungal growth, extracellular protein production and CDH activity. To elucidate the mechanism of these effects, we used reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) to quantify CDH gene transcripts in cultures supplemented with xylose or xylooligosaccharides as well as glucose or cellooligosaccharides.
Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain K-3 (9) was cultivated in Kremer and Wood medium (11) for 4 days with cellulose (CF11; Whatman, Fairfield, NJ), with or without xylan (from oat spelt, Serva Electrophoresis, Heidelberg, Germany; from beech, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Briefly, xylan from beech wood has side chains of 4-O-methyl-β-d-glucuronic acid whereas that from oat spelt has additional side chains of α-l-arabinose. The packed volume of fungal mycelium and protein concentration of the culture filtrate were estimated as described previously (6). Cellobiose dehydrogenase (CDH) activity of the culture filtrates was assayed using cellobiose and cytochrome c as described previously (17). For transcriptional analysis in cultures with purified xylooligosaccharides, P. chrysosporium was precultivated for 3 days and the mycelium was transferred into resting medium as previously described (18). After resting cultivation for 6 h, 100 μM glucose, cellobiose, cellotriose, cellotetraose, cellopentaose, xylose, xylobiose, xylotriose, or xylotetraose was added to the medium. Five milliliters of culture was collected every hour until 5 or 6 h, and the mycelium was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for the preparation of total RNA and corresponding cDNA. The gene transcripts of cdh, cel6A, cel7C, and cel7D were quantified using quantitative PCR (qPCR) since the corresponding proteins are the dominant cellulases in medium containing cellulose. The primer sets were listed in the previous papers (18, 19). The actin gene was used as an internal standard.
P. chrysosporium was cultivated for 4 days in synthetic media containing cellulose only (C), cellulose and oat spelt xylan (COX), and cellulose and beech xylan (CBX) as carbon sources. As shown in Fig. 1A, the fungal volumes in COX and CBX cultures were larger than that in C culture during cultivation. As shown in Fig. 1B, production of extracellular proteins increased markedly in COX and CBX cultures but only weakly in C culture. The concentrations of extracellular protein in COX and CBX cultures were 0.37 g/liter and 0.34 g/liter, respectively, while that in culture C was 0.14 g/liter. As shown in Fig. 1C, the CDH activity in culture C was 2.2 U/liter on day 4, whereas the corresponding values in COX and CBX cultures were 42 and 41 U/liter, respectively. These results indicate that the effect of xylan is due to the β-1,4-xylan main chain structure of xylans but not the side chains.
Fig 1
Fig 1 Time courses of fungal volume (A), concentration of extracellular protein (B), and CDH activity (C) of P. chrysosporium grown in culture medium containing cellulose (filled square), cellulose and oat spelt xylan (open circle), and cellulose and beech xylan (filled triangle). Error bars show the standard deviations for the results from three experiments.
P. chrysosporium was cultivated for 5 or 6 h in media containing xylose (X), xylooligosaccharide (DP = 2 to 4, xylobiose [X2], xylotriose [X3], or xylotetraose [X4]), glucose (G), or cellooligosaccharide (degree of polymerization [DP] = 2 to 5, cellobiose [C2], cellotriose [C3], cellotetraose [C4], or cellopentaose [C5]), and the level of cdh gene transcripts was quantified by real-time RT-PCR. As shown in Fig. 2A and B, there was no change of cdh expression in the cultures supplemented with X and G compared with the corresponding controls. However, cdh was quickly upregulated (within 1 h) in the presence of X2, X3, and X4, reaching maximum values of 7.0 × 102, 7.4 × 102, and 7.4 × 102, respectively. However, in cultures supplemented with C3 and C4, the numbers of cdh transcripts reached 1.0 × 104 and 1.6 × 104, respectively, at 2 h after supplementation. Thus, cdh gene expression is induced more strongly by cellooligosaccharides than by xylooligosaccharides. We previously found that production of glycoside hydrolase (GH) family 10 xylanase was enhanced in xylan-containing culture (6), so we speculated that xylooligosaccharides produced by the xylanase promote CDH production in the culture. However, the results of the present study indicate that upregulation of cdh transcription by short and unsubstituted xylooligosaccharides is not sufficient to account directly for the enhanced production of secreted protein. We next examined the effect of xylooligosaccharides on the expression of cellobiohydrolase (cel) genes. cel6A, cel7C, and cel7D transcripts were all increased by xylooligosaccharides; in particular, cel7C transcripts were increased up to 20-fold by xylobiose and xylotriose (Fig. 3).
Fig 2
Fig 2 Time course of cdh transcripts of P. chrysosporium grown in culture medium supplemented with xylooligosaccharides and cellooligosaccharides. (A) X, xylose; X2, xylobiose; X3, xylotriose; X4, xylotetraose. (B) G, glucose; C2, cellobiose; C3, cellotriose; C4, cellotetraose; C5, cellopentaose. Control means culture without saccharides. Error bars show standard deviations for results from three experiments. Note that the scale on the vertical axis is not the same in panels A and B.
Fig 3
Fig 3 Time courses of cel6A (A), cel7C (B), and cel7D (C) transcripts of P. chrysosporium grown in culture medium supplemented with xylose (X), xylobiose (X2), xylotriose (X3), and xylotetraose (X4). Control means culture without saccharides. Error bars show standard deviations for results from three experiments. Note that the scale on the vertical axis is not the same in panels A, B, and C.
In conclusion, the induction of cellulolytic enzymes by xylan in cellulose-degrading culture is not simply due to xylooligosaccharides but is more complex, involving induction by cellotriose and cellotetraose. One possible interpretation is that xylooligosaccharides promote the production of cellobiohydrolases, which produce cellooligosaccharides that in turn enhance the expression of other cellulolytic genes, including cdh. We are currently addressing the complex gene regulation system in P. chrysosporium by analysis of large-scale transcriptomic data; the results will be reported shortly.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research to M.S. (no. 20380100 and 23248025) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, and Technology and a Research Fellowship to C.H. (no. 233288) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS).

REFERENCES

1.
Ayers AR, Ayers SB, and Eriksson KE. 1978. Cellobiose oxidase, purification and partial characterization of a hemoprotein from Sporotrichum pulverulentum. Eur. J. Biochem. 90:171–181.
2.
Dumonceaux T, Bartholomew K, Valeanu L, Charles T, and Archibald F. 2001. Cellobiose dehydrogenase is essential for wood invasion and nonessential for kraft pulp delignification by Trametes versicolor. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 29:478–489.
3.
Eriksson K. 1978. Enzyme mechanisms involved in cellulose hydrolysis by the rot fungus Sporotrichum pulverulentum. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 20:317–332.
4.
Eriksson KE, Pettersson B, and Westermark U. 1974. Oxidation: an important enzyme reaction in fungal degradation of cellulose. FEBS Lett. 49:282–285.
5.
Henriksson G, Pettersson G, Johansson G, Ruiz A, and Uzcategui E. 1991. Cellobiose oxidase from Phanerochaete chrysosporium can be cleaved by papain into two domains. Eur. J. Biochem. 196:101–106.
6.
Hori C, Igarashi K, Katayama A, and Samejima M. 2011. Effects of xylan and starch on secretome of the basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium grown on cellulose. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 321:14–23.
7.
Igarashi K, Samejima M, and Eriksson K. 1998. Cellobiose dehydrogenase enhances Phanerochaete chrysosporium cellobiohydrolase I activity by relieving product inhibition. Eur. J. Biochem. 253:101–106.
8.
Igarashi K, Tani T, Rie K, and Masahiro S. 2003. Family 3 beta-glucosidase from cellulose-degrading culture of the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium is a glucan 1,3-beta-glucosidase. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 95:572–576.
9.
Johnsrud SC and Eriksson KE. 1985. Cross-breeding of selected and mutated homokaryotic strains of Phanerochaete chrysosporium K-3—new cellulase deficient strains with increased ability to degrade lignin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 21:320–327.
10.
Kawai R, Igarashi K, Kitaoka M, Ishii T, and Samejima M. 2004. Kinetics of substrate transglycosylation by glycoside hydrolase family 3 glucan (1→3)-beta-glucosidase from the white-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Carbohydr. Res. 339:2851–2857.
11.
Kremer SM and Wood PM. 1992. Evidence that cellobiose oxidase from Phanerochaete chrysosporium is primarily an Fe(III) reductase. Kinetic comparison with neutrophil NADPH oxidase and yeast flavocytochrome b2. Eur. J. Biochem. 205:133–138.
12.
Langston J et al. 2011. Oxidoreductive cellulose depolymerization by the enzymes cellobiose dehydrogenase and glycoside hydrolase 61. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77:7007.
13.
Levasseur A et al. 2008. FOLy: an integrated database for the classification and functional annotation of fungal oxidoreductases potentially involved in the degradation of lignin and related aromatic compounds. Fungal Genet. Biol. 45:638–645.
14.
Martinez D et al. 2004. Genome sequence of the lignocellulose degrading fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium strain RP78. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:695–700.
15.
Morpeth FF. 1985. Some properties of cellobiose oxidase from the white-rot fungus Sporotrichum pulverulentum. Biochem. J. 228:557.
16.
Phillips CM, Beeson WT, Cate JH, and Marletta MA. 2011. Cellobiose dehydrogenase and a copper-dependent polysaccharide monooxygenase potentiate cellulose degradation by Neurospora crassa. ACS Chem. Biol. 6:1399–1406.
17.
Samejima M and Eriksson KE. 1992. A comparison of the catalytic properties of cellobiose:quinone oxidoreductase and cellobiose oxidase from Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Eur. J. Biochem. 207:103–107.
18.
Suzuki H, Igarashi K, and Samejima M. 2010. Cellotriose and cellotetraose as inducers of the genes encoding cellobiohydrolases in the basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:6164.
19.
Suzuki H, Igarashi K, and Samejima M. 2008. Real-time quantitative analysis of carbon catabolite derepression of cellulolytic genes expressed in the basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 80:99–106.
20.
Uzcategui E, Johansson G, Ek B, and Pettersson G. 1991. The 1,4-beta-d-glucan glucanohydrolases from Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Re-assessment of their significance in cellulose degradation mechanisms. J. Biotechnol. 21:143–159.
21.
Uzcategui E, Ruiz A, Montesino R, Johansson G, and Pettersson G. 1991. The 1,4-beta-d-glucan cellobiohydrolases from Phanerochaete chrysosporium. I. A system of synergistically acting enzymes homologous to Trichoderma reesei. J. Biotechnol. 19:271–285.
22.
Westereng B et al. 2011. The putative endoglucanase PcGH61D from Phanerochaete chrysosporium is a metal-dependent oxidative enzyme that cleaves cellulose. PLoS One 6:e27807.
23.
Westermark U and Eriksson K. 1974. Cellobiose:quinone oxidoreductase, a new wood-degrading enzyme from white-rot fungi. Acta Chem. Scand. B 28:209–214.
24.
Wymelenberg AV et al. 2005. The Phanerochaete chrysosporium secretome: database predictions and initial mass spectrometry peptide identifications in cellulose-grown medium. J. Biotechnol. 118:17–34.
25.
Yoshida M, Igarashi K, Kawai R, Aida K, and Samejima M. 2004. Differential transcription of beta-glucosidase and cellobiose dehydrogenase genes in cellulose degradation by the basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 235:177–182.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Volume 78Number 1015 May 2012
Pages: 3770 - 3773
PubMed: 22407682

History

Received: 18 January 2012
Accepted: 28 February 2012
Published online: 24 April 2012

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Contributors

Authors

Chiaki Hori
Department of Biomaterial Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Hitoshi Suzuki
Department of Biomaterial Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Present address: Department of Chemical Engineering & Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kiyohiko Igarashi
Department of Biomaterial Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Masahiro Samejima
Department of Biomaterial Sciences, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Notes

Address correspondence to Masahiro Samejima, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy