INTRODUCTION
Providencia spp. are Gram-negative bacilli and members of the
Enterobacteriaceae family that cause nosocomial infections, mostly associated with urinary tract infection but also with gastroenteritis and bacteremia (
1). The
Providencia genus is currently divided into five species, namely,
Providencia stuartii,
Providencia rettgeri,
Providencia alcalifaciens,
Providencia rustigianii, and
Providencia heimbachae, ordered by decreasing prevalence rates (
2).
P. stuartii is the leading species concerning the prevalence of urinary tract infections in hospitalized patients or nursing care facilities (
3). Most importantly, an increasing number of
P. stuartii strains producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) have been reported in recent years. In 2003, 52% of all
P. stuartii strains found in a large Italian university hospital were positive for the production of ESBLs (
4). In another 4-month surveillance program of Italian hospitals, about 10% of all isolates were ESBL producers, and
P. stuartii strains were reported among the five most prevalent species (
5). Antibiogram profiles showed resistances to amoxicillin-clavulanate (81.8%), ampicillin-sulbactam (40.1%), gentamicin (79.5%), and ciprofloxacin (84.1%). Other
Providencia isolates were also demonstrated to carry carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzymes, or carbapenemases, such as
blaPER-1,
blaVIM-2,
armA (
6), VIM-1 (
7), VEB-1, SHV-5 (
8), and NDM-1 (
9). These genes significantly contribute to treatment failures of infections caused by
Providencia strains and can be easily spread among other bacteria through mobile genetic elements (
9).
In view of increasing antibiotic resistance among bacteria, interest in phages and phage proteins or structural components as alternative therapeutic, decontamination, or biocontrol agents has increased (
10–12). Among these, phage tail-associated depolymerases degrade polymers either on the bacterial cell surface or in a biofilm extracellular matrix, thus facilitating phage infection (
13). Depolymerases by themselves were successfully used to strip bacterial cells from their polysaccharide-containing coats, attenuating the virulence of several Gram-negative bacilli (
Klebsiella pneumoniae,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa,
Acinetobacter baumannii,
Escherichia coli, and
Pasteurella multocida) by complementing the serum killing effect (
14–21).
We have recently isolated a
P. rettgeri-infecting phage (vB_PrtS_PR1) (
22). The current study expands the repertoire of phages infecting
Providencia hosts with a novel podovirus (vB_PstP_Stuart, further referred to as Stuart) infecting multidrug-resistant isolates of
P. stuartii species. We present the molecular and microbiological assessment of phage Stuart and explore the antivirulence properties of the phage Stuart tailspike harboring depolymerase activity.
DISCUSSION
P. stuartii is a nosocomial pathogen of clinical relevance (
2). Although not frequently associated with hospital-acquired infections, cases of bacteremia show a high mortality risk, especially in elderly patients with underlying medical conditions (
3). As observed in several bacterial species,
P. stuartii isolates have become increasingly resistant to several classes of antibiotics (
4). Therefore, phage and phage-encoded proteins have gained attention as alternative antimicrobials in new strategies to control multidrug-resistant infections (
29).
We have isolated a new phage (named Stuart) infecting drug-resistant
P. stuartii isolates. Phage Stuart is a podovirus with a relatively narrow host range. It produces plaques with expanding halos. This phenotype has been previously linked to phages harboring tail-associated depolymerases, which specifically recognize and degrade extracellular polymers that promote bacterial virulence. These properties of phage-derived depolymerases make them promising antivirulence agents (
14,
17,
30). Therefore, we further explored the phage Stuart tail-associated depolymerase to verify its potential to combat infections with drug-resistant strains of
P. stuartii.
Comparative genome analysis revealed that phage Stuart is a novel podovirus, representing a new genus of the
Autographivirinae subfamily. Its closest relatives,
Proteus phages vB_PmiP_RS8pmA, PM16, vB_PmiP_RS1pmA, and PM 75, which have been assigned recently to another new genus within the subfamily
Autographivirinae (
31,
32), share only up to 49% of DNA sequence with phage Stuart. Both phage Stuart and the
Proteus phages appear to be distant relatives of
Drulisvirus genus phages. Phage Stuart only shares 36% conserved genes with the prototypical
Drulisvirus phage KP34. Several features found in phages PM 75, PM16, and Stuart, such as the overall genome organization and the atypical lytic cassette organization (u-spanin-holin-endolysin) that mirrors those of
Drulisvirus members of the
Autographivirinae, further support their relatedness. Additionally, about 70-bp regions at the very ends of the phage Stuart genome TRs are up to 74% identical with those of several
Drulisvirus genus phages (data not shown).
We found that phage Stuart gp52 is a tailspike. First, gp52 is part of the virion particle and has homology to other phage tailspike proteins (e.g.,
Acinetobacter phage IME-AB2). Second, the recombinant gp52 is predicted to be a highly thermostable trimer, which is the most common oligomeric form found in phage tail-associated proteins, evolved to endure extreme environmental conditions to assure phage infection and survival (
33). Third, gp52 is also an enzymatically active protein that degrades EPS, suggesting that gp52 and its orthologous are not phage tail fibers but instead tailspikes, as the latter seem to often possess enzymatic activity (
34).
To better understand the role of the tailspike in the phage Stuart lytic infection cycle, the phage host range and adsorption rate were analyzed. Interestingly, the phage Stuart host range (infects PS#3, PS#5, PS#11, and PS#15) exceeds the activity spectrum of tailspike (active against PS#3, PS#11, and PS#15), which is in contrast to the similar activity spectrum observed in phages infecting
P. aeruginosa (
17),
K. pneumoniae (
30), and
A. baumannii (
25) hosts that encode one depolymerase. The decreased ability of phage Stuart to adsorb to tailspike-pretreated PS#3, PS#11, and PS#15 cells, but not to tailspike-pretreated PS#5 cells, suggests that the tailspike modifies or removes the EPS from the cell surface of PS#3, PS#11, and PS#15 strains. Since phage Stuart can infect PS#5 both with and without the tailspike treatment, this implies that it is likely using two receptors, one sensitive (present in PS#3, PS#11, and PS#15 strains) and another insensitive to the tailspike (in the PS#5 strain).
The exact nature of the receptors for phage Stuart remains to be discovered. Phage tail-associated depolymerases are known to degrade either the bacterial capsule (
14,
16,
25,
30) or the lipopolysaccharide O antigens (
17,
35). Conceivably, the tailspike of phage Stuart targets
P. stuartii capsules, like other phage tail-associated depolymerases that contain the pectate lyase domain motifs in their amino acid sequences (e.g.,
E. coli,
A. baumannii, and
K. pneumoniae) (
25,
30,
36).
To test the antivirulence properties of the tailspike, we used the human serum model. Polysaccharides present in the bacterial antigens are important virulence factors for colonization, evasion of microbial defenses, and protecting bacteria from killing and phagocytosis (
37,
38). As mentioned, phage-derived depolymerases are known to specifically recognize and degrade extracellular polymers that promote bacterial virulence (
33). Few case studies have shown their ability to reduce the bacterial virulence in murine models and to fully protect mice by enhancing the serum killing effect (
14,
17,
30). Consistently, our study demonstrated that the tailspike could make some
P. stuartii strains susceptible to the serum killing effect. A similar effect was observed in the case of other phage tailspikes with depolymerase activity, e.g., the tailspikes of
A. baumannii (
39),
K. pneumoniae (
40), and
E. coli (
18) phages, which act on cells of bacterial strains susceptible to these phages. The fact that some strains (insensitive to the phage or sensitive to the phage but insensitive to the tailspike) could be eliminated by the serum without tailspike treatment suggests that they do not carry a protective capsule or that their capsule does not protect them from the serum killing effect.
Since there is a global health concern about the increase of bacterial resistance to several types of antimicrobials, we challenged
P. stuartii cultures with the phage Stuart (antibacterial agent) or with the tailspike (antivirulent agent). While variants insensitive to phage Stuart emerged in the case of all challenged isolates, as repeatedly reported for other phages (
41), no variants insensitive to tailspike could be identified upon tailspike treatment. This is consistent with the lack of selective pressure imposed on bacteria by the tailspike, which does not act as a bactericidal agent. The antivirulence properties of tailspike may indicate the advantages of tailspikes over antibiotics and phages, which are bacteriostatic or bactericidal agents and can cause the selection of resistant bacteria when used in antibacterial therapies.
In summary, phage tailspikes with depolymerase activity are promising antivirulent agents that can make P. stuartii serum-resistant isolates vulnerable to serum killing and, hence, could help to eliminate even certain drug-resistant pathogens by the immune system of an infected organism. Their high stability and the ability to sensitize certain strains of pathogenic bacteria to the immune system without selecting for resistance phenotypes make tailspikes attractive alternative weapons to control P. stuartii drug-resistant pathogens.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, media, and bacterial growth conditions.
Clinical specimens of
Providencia species strains, including 15 strains of
P. stuartii (PS#1 to PS#15), 10 of
P. rettgeri (PS#1 to PS#10), and 1 of
P. alcalifaciens (PA#1) (
Table 1), were obtained from the collection strains of Hospital of Braga (Portugal). They were collected from different human subjects (male and female) and isolation sources (urine, bronchial aspirate, expectoration, cutaneous exudate, and pus) at various times during a period of 3 months. Strains were isolated using CLED (cysteine-, lactose-, and electrolyte-deficient) selective medium. Microbial identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed with Vitek 2 (bioMérieux) or WalkAway (Beckman Coulter) using MIC breakpoints according to CLSI guidelines (M100-S24) (
42). Of these, phage Stuart insensitive (PS#1 and PS#2) and sensitive (PS#3, PS#5, PS#11, and PS#15) strains were frequently used in this study. Strain PS#3 was used to propagate the phage Stuart. Additionally, the following collection strains from
Salmonella Genetic Stock or American Type Culture Collection centers were used:
Citrobacter freundii EC592,
Morganella morganii (CDC 4195-69),
Proteus mirabilis CECT 4101 (ATCC 14153),
Proteus vulgaris CECT 174 (ATCC 6380), and
Escherichia coli CECT 432 (ATCC 21026). All strains were grown aerobically at 37°C in Trypticase soy agar (TSA) (Oxoid) or Trypticase soy broth (TSB) (Oxoid) medium and used to study the phage Stuart and the recombinant tailspike activity spectra.
E. coli BL21(DE3) was used as a plasmid host to produce the recombinant tailspike. This strain was grown at 37°C in Luria broth (LB) (NZYTech) medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/ml).
Phage isolation and purification.
Phage Stuart was isolated and purified exactly as described elsewhere (
43). In brief, the enriched sewage samples were tested for the presence of phages by their plaque forming capacity on
P. stuartii strain lawns. The phage was screened for activity using the spot-on-lawn test and soft agar overlay method. Phage plaques were streak-purified three times before producing high-titer suspensions by soft agar overlay and polyethylene glycol (PEG) purification methods.
Phage one-step growth curve.
The phage Stuart one-step growth curve experiment to determine the latent period and burst size was performed exactly as previously described (
25). Briefly, mid-exponential phage Stuart host cells (PS#3) were harvested by centrifugation (7,000 ×
g, 5 min, 4°C), suspended in TSB, and mixed with a phage suspension (0.001 PFU per cell). Mixed samples (10 ml) were incubated at 37°C for 5 min and centrifuged (7,000 ×
g, 5 min, 4°C), and the pellet was suspended in 10 ml of TSB and further incubated at 37°C under agitation. After 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min, the phage was titrated (PFU/ml). Data were normalized by dividing phage concentration at each point by its initial concentration. Phage burst size was calculated based on the phage titer of the first plateau. Phage latent period was determined as the time until the beginning of phage titer increase.
Transmission electron microscopy.
Transmission electron micrographs (TEM) of phage Stuart were captured using a JEM-1400 microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) exactly as previously described (
44). Lysates were centrifuged (1 h, 25,000 ×
g, 4°C) to pellet phages and then washed twice with tap water. Subsequently, the suspension was deposited on carbon-coated copper nickel grids for 2 min and stained with 4% uranyl acetate (Agar Scientific) for 30 s. The virion dimension data present mean ± standard deviation from 7 observed phage particles from different TEM.
Sequencing of the phage genome and analysis of virion DNA ends.
Phage Stuart genomic DNA was purified using phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol extraction as described elsewhere (
45). The library of DNA fragments for sequencing was prepared by mechanical shearing with the use of a NEBNext Ultra DNA library prep kit and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform (2 × 150 bp) at VIB Nucleomics Core (Belgium). Quality-controlled trimmed reads were
de novo assembled into a single contig using CLC Bio Genomics Workbench v7.0 (Aarhus, Denmark) with average coverage of 5,806×. An additional library of large phage Stuart DNA fragments was prepared and sequenced using the Oxford nanopore MinION technology (435 fragments up to 12 kb; average, 1,713 bp) to clarify the ambiguous assembly pattern of sequence reads at the regions of putative virion DNA termini. Predicted virion DNA end fragments were separated by digestion with NcoI and PvuI isolated from an agarose gel (with the use of PureLink quick gel extraction kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific) and used as templates for sequencing with the following primers: 5′-CAACCTACTGTGGATAACTCTGT and 5′-AAGTCGGCCCACCTGTAAGC (left end), and 5′-GGTATAGGCCTTGTGTTAGTTTAG and 5′-AGAGTGGGGTAAGCCGTTCG (right end).
Genome annotation and comparative analysis.
Open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using Glimmer (
46) and manually inspected. A search for putative tRNA-encoding genes was performed with the use of tRNAscan-SE (
47). Identification of homologs and functions of proteins encoded by the ORFs were made by BLAST algorithms available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Protein sequences were screened with Phobius (
48), TMHMM (
49), and SignalP (
50) to predict transmembrane domains and signal peptides. Lipo1.0 (
44) was used to identify lipoprotein signal peptides (
51). Potential promoters and intrinsic (Rho-independent) terminators were predicted with the use of phiSITE (
52), PhagePromoter (
53), and ARNold (
54). Whole-genome comparisons were made with BLAST algorithms against the nonredundant database using progressiveMauve (
55), CoreGenes (
56), and PROmer/MUMmer (available at
http://mummer.sourceforge.net). Results of comparisons were visualized with Easyfig (
57) and Circos (
58).
Mass spectrometry.
For the analysis of virion proteins, phage Stuart was purified with the PEG method. Phage was added to a culture of PS#3 cells at mid-exponential phase and incubated for 8 h. Subsequently, NaCl at 1 μM was added to the suspension, the solution was incubated for 1 h in ice, and was then centrifuged (10 min, 11,000 × g, 4°C). PEG 6000 (10% [wt/vol]) was added to phage lysates, and the mixture was incubated for 16 h at 4°C. After centrifugation (10 min, 9,000 × g, 4°C), the pellet was suspended in SM buffer (100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgSO4, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5) and chloroform (1:4 [vol/vol]) was added. After centrifugation (15 min, 3,000 × g, 4°C), the upper phase was collected and filtered through a 0.22-μm Whatman polyethersulfone (PES) membrane, and the phage was titrated.
Using a high titer of purified phage suspensions (10
10 PFU/ml), structural proteins were precipitated by chloroform-water-methanol extraction (1:1:0.75, vol/vol/vol) and suspended in loading buffer (1% SDS, 6% sucrose, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 10 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 0.0625% [wt/vol] bromophenol blue). After heating at 95°C, proteins were separated in a 12% polyacrylamide gel by electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and stained using GelCode Blue Safe protein stain (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The entire gel lane containing separated proteins was cut into 24 distinct slices, trypsinized according to the protocol of Shevchenko et al. (
59), and analyzed by nanoliquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS). Peptides were identified with SEQUEST v1.4 (Thermo Fischer Scientific) and Mascot v2.5 (Matrix Sciences) and a database containing all possible phage Stuart ORFs as described previously to validate gene predictions (
60).
Cloning and expression of the tailspike encoding gene.
The tailspike encoding gene of phage Stuart (gp52) was amplified from the genomic DNA with KAPA HiFi polymerase (Kapa Biosystems) and primers 5′-CATATGGCAAAAGTAAATAGAACTGTAC-3′ and 5′-AAGCTTTTAATTAATCTCGACTTTACGCC-3′, which contained NdeI and HindIII restriction sites, respectively (underlined). The amplicon was purified (DNA Clean & Concentrator-5k; Zymo Research) and digested with NdeI and HindIII. Plasmid pET28a, which contains a sequence encoding a His tag upstream of its cloning site, was digested with NdeI and HindIII, purified (DNA Clean & Concentrator-5k; Zymo Research), and used to ligate the digested pET28a with the help of a T4 ligase (NEB). DNA of ligation mixture was electroporated into E. coli BL21(DE3)-competent cells. The presence of the correct insert in the recombinant plasmid (pET28a-tailspike) was confirmed by Sanger sequencing (GATC Biotech). E. coli BL21(DE3) cells harboring pET28a-tailspike were grown in LB medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/ml) until the exponential phase of growth (optical density of 0.5 at 620 nm), and isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) was added to a final concentration of 0.5 mM to induce the expression of the cloned gene. After induction for 18 h at 16°C, cells were harvested by centrifugation (9,500 × g, 30 min), suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2), and disrupted by 3 freeze-thawing cycles (−80°C/room temperature). Keeping the sample in ice, cells were further disrupted by sonication for a total period of 5 min (with 30-s pulses interspersed with 30 s resting on ice). Clear supernatants collected after centrifugation (9,500 × g, 30 min, 4°C) were subjected to immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (HisPur Ni-NTA resin; Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the stepwise increasing imidazole concentrations in the washing and elution buffers (20 mM NaH2PO4, 0.5 M NaCl/NaOH, pH 7.4, 25 to 250 mM imidazole). Eluted protein was dialyzed against 20 mM PBS, pH 7.0, and quantified with the Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher).
Tailspike enzymatic characterization.
The tailspike was characterized using the following two distinct methods: (i) spot test and (ii) measuring the reducing end release during the degradation of extracted exopolysaccharides (EPS) with the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method.
First, the tailspike activity spectrum was performed and compared with that of phage Stuart with spot tests. After overnight incubation at 37°C, all strains listed in
Table 1 were spread into TSA plates and spotted with 10
8 PFU/ml of phage Stuart or with 0.7 μg of the tailspike. After 8 h of incubation at 37°C, the results were visualized. Strains with clear spots surrounded with turbid haloes or just turbid haloes were scored as phage- or tailspike-susceptible, respectively. To assess the phage efficiency of plating (EOP) and exclude the possible effect of lysis from without (i.e., if phage is lysing the cells without infecting them), the suspensions of phage Stuart were serially diluted (10
8 to 10
3 PFU/ml) and spotted on the lawns of all strains listed in
Table 1. EOP was calculated by dividing the titer of the phage (PFU/ml) for each strain by the titer obtained with the propagating host (PS#3). To assess the activity of tailspike, serial dilutions of the enzyme (7 to 0.0007 μg, equivalent to 10-μl drops of 10 to 0.001 μM) were prepared and spotted on the bacterial lawns.
Second, the tailspike EPS degradation activity was evaluated using EPS from phage Stuart host (PS#3) as described previously but with minor modifications (
25). Overnight cultures grown in 2× concentrated TSB (100 ml) were pelleted (10,000 ×
g, 10 min) and suspended in 5 ml of 0.9% (wt/vol) NaCl. The suspension was further incubated with 5% phenol under agitation with a stir bar for 6 h. Cells were pelleted (10,000 ×
g, 10 min), and the supernatant was mixed with 5 volumes of 95% ethanol and kept overnight at −20°C to precipitate the EPS. After centrifugation (6,000 ×
g, 10 min), the precipitate was lyophilized and suspended in PBS. The EPS solution (5 mg/liter end concentration) was mixed with the tailspike at 0.07 μg/μl (equivalent to 1 μM end concentration) or PBS for 1 h at 37°C in the presence or absence of 5 mM EDTA. The reaction mixture was quenched by heating at 100°C for 5 min and centrifuged (8,000 ×
g, 2 min). An equal amount of dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the samples, the samples were heated at 100°C for 5 min, and the absorbance was measured at 535 nm to determine the concentration of reducing ends. Glucose was used as a standard.
Tailspike structural analysis.
The tailspike structure was characterized using (i) circular dichroism (CD) and (ii) gel electrophoretic analysis.
First, far-UV CD spectroscopy was used to analyze the protein secondary structure with a Jasco J-1500 CD spectrometer (
61). The spectrum measurements were performed with the tailspike at 0.28 μg/μl (equivalent to 4 μM) in 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7) using a wavelength range from 190 to 250 nm, with 1-nm steps, a scanning speed of 20 nm/min, high sensitivity, and a 16-s response time. Estimates of the tailspike secondary structures were made running the CD spectra in CONTINLL and set 4 optimized for the wavelength range of 190 to 240 nm at the DichroWeb server (
62). We also employed thermal denaturation with 1°C/min increments to measure the secondary structure unfolding at 215 nm, from 30 to 100°C. The melting curves were fitted into a Boltzmann sigmoidal function.
Second, the tailspike oligomeric state was analyzed by comparing the protein molecular mass estimated based on the protein migration from a native and denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Role of the tailspike in phage adsorption.
The identification of the bacterial EPS as the phage Stuart receptor was made as previously described (
25). Briefly, mid-exponential cultures of phage Stuart-insensitive (PS#1 and PS#2) and -sensitive (PS#3, PS#5, PS#11, and PS#15) strains at approximately 10
8 CFU/ml were incubated with PBS as a control or with the tailspike at 0.07 μg/μl (equivalent to 1 μM end concentration) to remove the EPS. After 2 h of incubation at 37°C, cells were washed with TSB, incubated with the phage (at a multiplicity of infection [MOI] of 0.001) for 5 min, centrifuged, and titrated. The percentage of adsorbed phages was calculated by subtracting the number of nonadsorbed phages (supernatant) from the total amount of phages. Differences between the number of phages adsorbed to PBS- and tailspike-treated cells served to verify whether the EPS is the phage receptor.
Bacterial challenge assay.
The development of phage Stuart- and tailspike-insensitive bacterial variants was conducted similarly as previously described but with minor modifications (
39). Overnight cultures of
P. stuartii PS#3 were diluted 100-fold in TSB and incubated with PBS, phage Stuart (at an MOI of 1), or tailspike at 0.07 μg/μl (equivalent to 1 μM end concentration) for 72 h at 37°C with shaking. After each 24 h, cells were pelleted and washed twice in TSB prior to the addition of a fresh portion of PBS, phage Stuart, or tailspike, respectively. After 72 h of total incubation period, 20 colonies were isolated, purified three times on TSA plates, and tested for their sensitivity toward the phage Stuart and the tailspike using the spot test.
Human serum killing assay.
The serum killing assay was performed as previously described (
63). Briefly, inocula of ≈10
4 CFU/ml of phage Stuart-insensitive (PS#1 and PS#2) and -sensitive (PS#3, PS#5, PS#11, and PS15) strains were prepared. Serum was isolated from blood donated by healthy volunteers and mixed with (i) only cells or (ii) cells and the tailspike added simultaneously. Similar samples with heat-inactivated serum (at 56°C for 30 min) were used as controls. The serum was mixed with cells in a ratio of 1 volume of serum to 3 volumes of cells. The tailspike was added at 0.07 μg/μl (equivalent to 1 μM end concentration). After 1 h of incubation at 37°C, the CFU/ml were counted and serum killing activity was assessed by comparing their number to the number of CFU/ml in the initial inoculum.
Accession number(s).
The genomic sequence of the phage vB_PstP_Stuart genome was deposited in the NCBI GenBank database with the accession number
MK387869.