The development of new antiviral drugs for the therapy of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a major problem since alpha interferon therapy is moderately active and its use is often limited because of dose-dependent side effects (
14,
40). Therefore, the efficacies of nucleoside analogs, such as lamivudine and famciclovir, have been assessed in chronically HBV-infected patients to improve the response rate to antiviral therapy for chronic HBV infection. However, resistant viruses with mutations in the catalytic domain of the viral polymerase may be selected in 10 to 25% of the patients after 12 months of treatment, depending on the clinical setting (
1,
21,
33). It is therefore important to continue research to design new nucleoside analogs which could provide the basis for the development of new antiviral strategies for combating the emergence of resistant mutants. Due to their high antiviral activities and very good selectivity indices, compounds which belong to the β-
l-nucleoside analog family may represent potential candidates (
2,
26). 2′-Fluoro-5-methyl-β-
l-arabinofuranosyluracil (
l-FMAU) is a novel β-
l-nucleoside analog derived from thymidine. It was found to be a potent inhibitor of HBV replication in a stably transfected human hepatoma cell line (2.2.1.5) and to have a level of low cytotoxicity in vitro (
6). In this cell line, it was further demonstrated that
l-FMAU inhibits HBV without affecting the host DNA synthetic machinery (
27). By contrast to
d-FMAU and to 1-(2′-deoxy-2′-fluoro-1-β-
d-arabinofuranosyl)-5-iodouracil (
d-FIAU),
l-FMAU did not decrease the mitochondrial DNA content, did not affect mitochondrial function, and was not incorporated into cellular DNA (
27).
Considering its potent inhibitory activity against HBV DNA synthesis and its minimal inhibitory effect on the cellular machinery,
l-FMAU has been further explored for development as a potential anti-HBV drug. Since 40 to 50 copies of viral covalently closed circular (CCC) DNA are maintained in the nuclei of infected cells and serve as templates for new viral DNA synthesis when antiviral therapy is withdrawn (
13,
37), the ability of
l-FMAU therapy to clear viral CCC DNA should be evaluated. Furthermore, because duck HBV (DHBV) reverse transcription is primed by the synthesis of a short DNA primer (GTAA) covalently linked to a conserved tyrosine residue of the amino-terminal domain of the viral polymerase (
35,
39), the potential antipriming activity of
l-FMAU should also be considered. Therefore, we have evaluated in more detail its anti-HBV activity in the DHBV model (
23). This model provides relevant tools for the study of the modes of action of new anti-HBV agents. A primary duck hepatocyte culture system and studies with experimentally infected ducklings have been used to investigate the inhibition of viral DNA synthesis in hepatocytes, the clearance of CCC DNA from infected cells, and the toxicities of new antiviral agents (
10,
13,
20,
29,
34,
38). In this study, we also used an in vitro assay for the expression of an enzymatically active viral reverse transcriptase which was first described by Wang and Seeger (
35) and used the assay to study the mechanism of inhibition of DHBV reverse transcription by new anti-HBV compounds (
9,
30,
35,
38,
39). Our results show that
l-FMAU exhibits antiviral activity in vivo in experimentally infected ducklings and primary duck hepatocytes and that it has an inhibitory effect on the enzymatic activity of the DHBV reverse transcriptase.
DISCUSSION
In this report, we present data on the mode of action of
l-FMAU in the inhibition of hepadnavirus replication and on its antiviral activity in vivo in the DHBV model.
l-FMAU was shown to inhibit HBV replication in the human hepatoma cell line 2.2.1.5, which permanently replicates the HBV genome. It was also shown to have a very good selectivity index (>2,000) in this cell line (
6) and not to be incorporated into cellular DNA (
27).
In this study, the in vivo administration of
l-FMAU (40 mg/kg/day) by the oral route to experimentally infected ducklings showed a potent inhibition of viral replication which may support the therapeutic utility of this drug if its absence of in vivo toxicity is confirmed during long-term administration. The study of intrahepatic viral DNA at the end of 4 days of therapy showed that
l-FMAU administration is associated with decreased viral DNA synthesis (Fig.
1). Administration for 5 days could inhibit viral replication significantly but was followed by a transient rebound of viremia 5 days after drug withdrawal (Fig.
2), as has also been observed with other drugs (
2,
10,
13,
38). Interestingly, a more prolonged protocol with the administration of
l-FMAU to ducklings for 8 days could prevent the rebound of viremia after drug withdrawal and was not associated with increased serum lactic acid levels (Fig.
2). Statistical analysis showed that, although the number of animals was small, there was a significant trend for decreased viral production in
l-FMAU-treated animals compared with that in the controls (
P < 0.05). Southern blot analysis of intrahepatic viral DNA 2 weeks after drug withdrawal showed the persistence of viral CCC DNA and replicative intermediates, as was also observed in tissue culture (Fig.
3 and
5), accompanied by the persistence of viral core protein expression, as determined by Western blot analysis (Fig.
3). This emphasizes the need for a prolonged therapeutic protocol in order to cure infected hepatocytes (
10,
20,
22,
38). Although DHBV
pol gene mutants were not selected during short-term administration of
l-FMAU, it remains to be determined whether this phenomenon could be observed during long-term therapy. After drug withdrawal, the persistence of viral DNA and proteins was associated with a low level of viremia that was below the limit of detection of our dot blot assay. This may suggest either a decrease in viral particle secretion from infected hepatocytes or an enhanced clearance of viral particles from the serum. However, our attempts to detect antibodies against envelope proteins in the serum of DHBV-infected ducklings during the course of experimental infection did not show any antibody response. Analysis of the liver histology of infected ducklings showed the absence of significant signs of liver toxicity with a short-term treatment with
l-FMAU (Fig.
4). With regard to toxicity, it is noteworthy that the drug was administered when the birds were rapidly growing and cell division, including hepatocytes, was occurring at a significant rate. In control animals as well as in
l-FMAU-treated animals, a typical pattern of mild acute hepatitis characterized by portal tract inflammation and rare hepatocyte necrosis was observed. Since most studies have shown the absence of major liver damage during the natural course of experimental infection in ducklings (
24), our observation may be related to the dose of the inoculum, as was recently shown by Jilbert’s group (
14a). This further confirms the absence of toxicity of
l-FMAU administration to mice for 30 days at a dosage of 25 mg/kg/day (
4a). However, it will be necessary to confirm the absence of the in vivo toxicity of
l-FMAU during long-term administration in ducks and woodchucks. Indeed, the administration of
d-FMAU to woodchucks was associated with severe toxicity (
11), which can now be explained by the inhibitory effect of
d-FMAU on mitochondrial function (
7,
19,
28). In our experiment, a typical pattern of liver toxicity as a result of ddC administration was observed: microvesicular steatosis and acidophilic necrosis, which are typical histological signs of mitochondrial toxicity (Fig.
4 and Table
1). These histological signs have been reported with the use of several nucleoside analogs such as fialuridine (
7,
18,
25). Because it has been indicated that ddC interferes with mitochondrial DNA synthesis (
4), the liver injury observed in these animals may be related to the inhibitory effect of ddC on mitochondrial DNA polymerase. This liver toxicity may have been responsible, at least in part, for the deaths of all ddC-treated birds.
To gain insight into the mechanism of action of
l-FMAU, we have studied its antiviral activity in primary duck hepatocyte cultures chronically infected with DHBV. Our results demonstrated that
l-FMAU is a strong inhibitor of viral DNA synthesis and virion DNA release (Fig.
5). The IC
50 of
l-FMAU on virion DNA release in primary duck hepatocytes (0.1 μM) was found to be similar to the one reported in human hepatoma cells permanently transfected with HBV (
6,
27). Viral single-stranded DNA synthesis was significantly decreased, suggesting that
l-FMAU inhibits the reverse transcriptase step of DHBV replication (Fig.
5). Furthermore, short-term therapy with
l-FMAU could not clear viral CCC DNA from infected cells, as was also observed with other nucleoside analogs including β-
l-F-ddC (
38). Daily microscopic examination and determination of lactic acid levels in primary hepatocyte culture supernatants treated with
l-FMAU did not show any significant sign of cellular toxicity, as has already been observed with human hepatoma cells (
6,
27). This is in contrast to the observation made with the administration of
d-FMAU, the dextrorotatory analog of FMAU, and
d-FIAU (fialuridine), which proved to be toxic for mitochondrial functions and/or to be incorporated into cellular DNA (
7,
25,
27). The antiviral efficacy of
d-FMAU in the duck model was also evaluated by earlier studies with a dosage of 2 mg/kg/day given intraperitoneally for 5 days to adult ducks, but its toxic effect was not studied (
12). It was further shown that
d-FIAU is a more efficient substrate for mitochondrial thymidine kinase 2 than for cytosolic thymidine kinase 1 (
36) and that
d-FIAU-TP, as well as
d-FMAU-TP, inhibits mitochondrial function through its incorporation into mitochondrial DNA by DNA polymerase-γ, leading to ultrastructural defects in the mitochondria and the accumulation of intracytoplasmic lipid droplets (
19,
28). Although it was shown in previous studies and in the present work that
l-FMAU does not significantly inhibit cellular functions at concentrations that inhibit HBV replication, it remains to be shown that its administration in hepatocyte culture does not induce any ultrastructural modifications of mitochondria. Moreover, results of recent studies have shown that administration of
l-FMAU at a dosage of 10 mg/kg/day for 12 weeks is not toxic in woodchuck HBV-infected woodchucks (
32).
Experiments performed in vitro with the DHBV polymerase expressed in a reticulocyte lysate system showed an inhibitory effect of
l-FMAU-TP on the incorporation of radiolabelled TMP during viral minus-strand DNA synthesis, suggesting that
l-FMAU-TP is indeed an inhibitor of DHBV reverse transcription. The study of
l-FMAU metabolism in human hepatocytes showed that the
l-FMAU-TP concentration may peak at 20 μM (
27), which would already account for a 40% inhibition of viral reverse transcriptase. Under our in vitro conditions, the intracellular metabolism of the nucleoside analog is not taken into account. Depending on the half-life of the nucleoside analog triphosphate form, a greater inhibitory effect may be obtained in tissue culture. This hypothesis may be relevant to the case of
l-FMAU, since its triphosphate metabolite was shown to have a long half-life in human hepatocytes (
27).
l-FMAU-TP was also shown to have a very potent activity against the DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity of HBV polymerase (
27). It may be hypothesized that
l-FMAU-TP has a combined inhibitory effect on both the reverse transcriptase and the DNA polymerase activities of the hepadnavirus polymerase, which may result in a strong inhibition of viral replication in hepatocytes. By comparison with the results obtained by Staschke and Colacino (
30),
l-FMAU-TP appears to be a weaker inhibitor of TMP incorporation in viral minus-strand DNA than fialuridine triphosphate, suggesting that these drugs have a different mode of action. Interestingly, we could also show that
l-FMAU-TP inhibits the synthesis of the DNA primer for reverse transcription in a time-dependent manner, suggesting that
l-FMAU-TP may terminate the synthesis of the short primer (Fig.
6). The lack of complete inhibition of dAMP incorporation in the viral primer may be due to the fact that some of the viral polymerase polypeptides prime reverse transcription directly with dAMP in the first position, as was previously demonstrated by biochemical and genetic approaches (
9,
17,
30). It has yet to be established that
l-FMAU-TP is indeed incorporated in viral minus-strand DNA.
In conclusion, our results suggest that l-FMAU displays a strong inhibitory effect on hepadnavirus replication in primary hepatocytes and in vivo in ducklings. Long-term administration ofl-FMAU, alone or in combination with otherl-nucleosides, should be evaluated in the woodchuck model to study its toxicity and its ability to prevent the appearance of viral resistance and to eradicate viral infection.