INTRODUCTION
The emergence of drug-resistant bacteria has been recognized as a global health crisis (
1). If left unchecked, antibiotic resistance threatens to overturn the substantial gains that have been made to human health care by the use of antibiotics to treat and prevent infectious disease, resulting in huge social and economic costs. Globally, the antibiotic resistance crisis has been spearheaded by the alarmingly rapid rise in the prevalence of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains that are resistant to the cornerstone antibiotics of first-line tuberculosis (TB) therapy: rifampicin (which inhibits transcription) and isoniazid (which inhibits cell wall biosynthesis). The situation has been exacerbated by the emergence and spread of extensively drug-resistant (XDR)
M. tuberculosis strains that are also resistant to second-line TB therapeutics, such as the fluoroquinolones (which inhibit DNA topoisomerases) and linezolid (which inhibits the ribosome). It is estimated that there were at least 450,000 new cases of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) worldwide in 2019, and at least 180,000 deaths from MDR-TB were reported (
2). The World Health Organization (WHO) has set a goal to eliminate TB by 2035, but this clearly cannot be achieved without addressing antibiotic resistance. Recently, striking progress has been made toward treating resistant disease, as in 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved a novel combination therapy that is able to treat both MDR- and XDR-TB disease effectively using three new antibiotics (bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid), albeit with higher cost and greater side effects than standard first-line therapy (
3). There have so far been no similar efforts toward improvements in first-line therapy, which is the primary line of defense, but clearly, retaining or improving the efficacy of the inexpensive first-line drugs for the treatment of drug-sensitive TB is imperative, as is enhancing their activity where possible to lower therapeutic doses and thereby reduce side effects and improve patient adherence.
Genome maintenance is essential for bacterial survival. Both transcription and replication processes inflict stresses that challenge genome topology and integrity. R-loops, which are RNA/DNA hybrids that form spontaneously in the genome during transcription, are a major threat to genome stability and can be lethal if not resolved (
4,
5) (
Fig. 1). Persistent R-loops can alter DNA topology, block both transcription and replication, and promote double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs) (
6–9), although not all R-loops are pathological, since R-loop formation can be a necessary intermediate in plasmid replication (
10) and in bacterial immune system surveillance via CRISPR (clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats) (
11). Multiple helicases and endonucleases contribute to the resolution of these hybrids, but RNase HI activity provides the major dedicated function for this, by targeted hydrolysis of the RNA strand in the RNA/DNA hybrid (
12). Cells therefore require precisely controlled levels of RNase HI activity to prevent dysfunction. It was recently demonstrated that loss of RNase HI function in
Escherichia coli drives the extinction of rifampicin- and streptomycin-resistant strains (
13), suggesting that RNase HI might be a promising new antimicrobial target. RNase HI is already a validated target for HIV therapy, with the discovery and optimization of many specific and selective inhibitors of the RNase H activity of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (
14), some of which have promising antiviral activity coupled with low cellular toxicity (
15,
16), although none as yet have been approved for clinical use.
The mycobacteria possess a bifunctional RNase HI enzyme called RnhC that is composed of an N-terminal domain with RNase HI activity and a C-terminal domain from the acid phosphatase family that possesses cobalamin-P phosphatase activity (CobC) and is involved in vitamin B
12 biosynthesis (
17–20). These domains can function separately, although the CobC domain confers increased activity on the RNase HI domain of
M. tuberculosis RnhC (Rv2228c) via an unknown mechanism (
17). Although most mycobacteria have only one gene encoding RNase HI activity, the nonpathogenic saprophytic model organism
Mycolicibacterium smegmatis possesses a single-domain RNase HI called RnhA in addition to RnhC. Both RNase HIs have been well characterized biochemically, as have single knockout strains of both
rnhA and
rnhC (
18,
19,
21), which both grow indistinguishably from the wild type (
18,
19). However, simultaneous deletion of both genes is lethal, reinforcing the essentiality of RNase HI activity in mycobacteria (
18,
19). Transposon mutagenesis in
M. tuberculosis located the essentiality of function to the RNase HI domain of RnhC (
22,
23). Moreover,
M. tuberculosis rnhC can rescue
M. smegmatis from the lethality of the double knockout of
rnhA and
rnhC (
20).
In this study, we used the dual RNase HIs of M. smegmatis to investigate RNase HI as a novel drug target in mycobacteria. We used single RNase HI knockout strains to deplete RNase HI activity and showed that deletion of RnhC in particular is sufficient to cause the accumulation of R-loops and to induce markers of genome topological stress. Furthermore, deletion of RnhC enhanced the killing activity of various antitubercular drugs, with an especially marked effect on rifampicin activity. We also identified four small molecules, previously shown to inhibit HIV RNase HI, as in vitro inhibitors of recombinant M. tuberculosis RnhC that also potentiate rifampicin killing in whole M. tuberculosis cells. Together, these results validate RNase HI as a drug target in the mycobacteria, demonstrate the potential for enhanced therapy by combining rifampicin treatment with RNase HI inhibitors, and open avenues to rescue rifampicin-resistant strains for therapy with rifampicin through RNase HI inhibition.
DISCUSSION
R-loops are genotoxic stresses for all cells, and the resolution of these structures is critical for cell survival. RNase HI is the primary enzyme that resolves R-loops, although cells have evolved multiple mechanisms to reduce their occurrence or to repair them. In M. tuberculosis, RNase HI activity is essential for the growth of the bacterium in vitro, which makes it a potential drug target. Nevertheless, not much is known about the cellular consequences of RNase HI inhibition in the mycobacteria. In this study, we showed for the first time that depletion of RNase HI activity in M. smegmatis, by deletion of either of the two genes encoding RNase HI enzymes, caused an accumulation of R-loops. Loss of rnhC had a greater effect on R-loop accumulation than loss of rnhA.
The involvement of RnhC, and to a lesser extent RnhA, in the resolution of R-loops in
M. smegmatis indicates that both enzymes are part of a protective system to remove the RNA/DNA hybrids that form spontaneously in the genome during transcription before they induce DNA damage. The ability of
M. tuberculosis rnhC to fully complement the Δ
rnhC phenotype in
M. smegmatis strongly suggests that RnhC carries out the equivalent role in both bacteria. Our data are consistent with previous reports showing that loss of RNase HI activity in
Bacillus subtilis (
55),
Saccharomyces cerevisiae (
56,
57), or human cells (
58) resulted in the accumulation of R-loops.
Our striking finding that low levels of transcriptional inhibition promote R-loop accumulation (
Fig. 4) gives new insight into R-loop metabolism. It is well established that polymerases which stall or backtrack during transcription are susceptible to forming R-loops (
27,
28,
59–61) and that R-loop formation is able to stall translocating polymerases. The twin domain model of transcription shows that DNA in the wake of RNA polymerase becomes negatively supercoiled (i.e., underwound) and that DNA ahead of it becomes positively supercoiled (i.e., overwound) (
30,
62,
63). For some promoters, transcriptional bursts result in loading of multiple RNA polymerase molecules (
64) which tend to travel in convoys due to torsional constraints (
65). Hence, in actively transcribed genes which contain polymerase convoys (
66), the wake of unwound DNA from one polymerase is rewound by the following enzyme, thus reducing the need for topology-modifying enzymes, limiting backtracking (
65,
67) and protecting this interpolymerase region of DNA from R-loop formation (
Fig. 8A). Thus, a topological balance exists in the DNA between actively transcribing RNA polymerases, which is disrupted if a polymerase is stalled.
Our results indicate that completely halting transcription with high levels of rifampicin abolishes R-loops, whereas lower levels of rifampicin increase R-loops through intermittent stalling of polymerases within the promoter region. This in turn severely affects cell viability in the absence of RNase HI. It is clear that an R-loop cannot arise directly from the rifampicin-bound polymerase, as no more than 3 nucleotides have been added to the transcript, so the R-loop must arise from an actively transcribing polymerase that is affected by this stalled polymerase in the promoter region. Stalled polymerases can provide barriers to supercoil diffusion. We hypothesize, therefore, that the last polymerase to have escaped the promoter will generate an increasing amount of underwound DNA, which promotes R-loop formation and which will likely stall this translocating polymerase. Further, if a convoy of polymerases is active in transcription, as occurs in instances of burst transcription, then a domino effect may be created over the length of the gene (
Fig. 8B).
R-loop formation due to prevention of RNA polymerase escape from the promoter in this model requires at least one active polymerase that is affected by the stalled polymerase. Most R-loops are known to form in the 5′ end of genes, where cotranslational coupling may not yet have occurred. The most parsimonious explanation for this is that the affected polymerase is active on the same gene as the rifampicin-inhibited polymerase as shown in
Fig. 8, but we cannot exclude longer-range effects on nearby active genes by similarly providing a barrier to supercoil diffusion. Divergently transcribed genes might be more susceptible in this case. Genes with high burst activity are more likely to have convoys of polymerases (
64,
66), which might also be more prone to generating longer regions of negative supercoiling, and hence longer R-loops, as they are pulled along by the supercoiling forces generated by the leading polymerases in the convoy. Many
E. coli genes have been shown to exhibit burst behavior dependent on the level of transcription (
68,
69) or sigma factor recruitment (
70). The proposed “domino effect” model of formation of R-loops under rifampicin stress is a thus a general, biologically plausible model based on previous models of polymerase activity (
66,
71,
72) that nonetheless will be affected by the propensity of the DNA sequence to form R-loops, the availability of the nascent RNA to bind to DNA (i.e., whether transcription/translation is uncoupled), and potentially the “burstiness” of the promoter.
We showed that even partial loss of RNase HI activity through the deletion of
rnhC or
rnhA synergized extraordinarily well with transcriptional inhibition by rifampicin at concentrations below the MIC
90 (
Fig. 5). This reveals an unappreciated role for RNase HI in promoting survival and possibly persistence under rifampicin stress. Rifampicin is one of the front-line drugs for TB therapy (
2) and a vital component in resolving bacterial persistence
in vivo (
73). Notably, exposure to sub-MICs of rifampicin is thought to be instrumental in the emergence of antibiotic resistance in clinical settings. Our results suggest that inhibiting both RNase HI and transcription might act against the emergence of drug resistance, even in sub-MICs of inhibitors of both RNase HI and RNA polymerase. It also raises the possibility that RNase HI inhibition might rescue rifampicin as a treatment option in rifampicin-resistant bacteria, by increasing their sensitivity to its cellular effects.
Partial loss of RNase HI activity was compatible with isoniazid (
Fig. 6D) and enhanced killing with moxifloxacin and streptomycin (
Fig. 6A and
B), indicating that in addition to providing a new target for drug development and enhancing first-line therapy, RNase HI inhibition would be a useful adjunct to second-line therapy as well. Uncoupling of transcription and translation is known to enhance R-loop production (
48), and ribosomes can actively reverse stalled polymerases that might be more prone to R-loop formation (
74). It is noteworthy, however, that the combination of translational inhibition and RNase HI depletion does not affect the cell as potently as the combination of transcriptional inhibition and RNase HI depletion. We speculate that in the context of actively translocating RNA polymerases, the opportunity for R-loop formation due to translational inhibition is much reduced compared to the propensity for R-loop formation arising from stalled RNA polymerases, resulting in less synergy.
Many antibiotics, including rifampicin, are antagonistic with moxifloxacin (
75), so the synergy of the latter with RNase HI depletion is both intriguing and valuable. We hypothesize that the synergy of moxifloxacin with RNase HI depletion might result from an increased number of gyrase/DNA complexes due to the 3-fold-increased expression of DNA gyrase (
Fig. 1), resulting in a higher burden of double-strand DNA breaks (
76).
Our finding that RNase HI depletion does not potentiate amsacrine lethality (
Fig. 6C) contrasts with the synthetic lethal effect in
E. coli of the loss of RNase HI and topoisomerase I (
5). This apparent anomaly could be due to various factors. First, the expression of topoisomerase I is less effectively induced in the Δ
rnhC strain than DNA gyrase I, which would be consistent with a topology-ameliorating effect of R-loops that has recently been proposed (
26). Second, amsacrine is an uncompetitive inhibitor of topoisomerase I which binds to the topoisomerase I:DNA complex (
77). Since topoisomerase I and mRNA are both localized by RNA polymerase and are both competing for the same underwound DNA substrate, any R-loop formation would effectively remove underwound DNA as a substrate for topoisomerase I and proportionally reduce the binding of amsacrine to a DNA:topoisomerase I complex, an opposite effect to that seen with moxifloxacin. A final possibility is that, although amsacrine is on-target in eukaryotic cells and has been shown to inhibit
M. tuberculosis topoisomerase I
in vitro (
77), it has not formally been shown that it does the same in mycobacterial cells. Topoisomerase I is an emerging drug target for development of anti-TB therapeutics. We predict that competitive inhibitors of topoisomerase I, which would more accurately mimic loss of the
topA gene, might still be effective synergistic partners for RNase HI inhibitors.
R-loop formation is favored by high GC content and GC skew and is promoted by G4 quadruplex structures. Although sites susceptible to R-loop formation have not yet been mapped in the mycobacteria, over 10,000 sites for G4 quadruplexes in the
M. tuberculosis genome have been predicted (
78). The high (>65%) GC content of the mycobacterial genomes is likely to favor both the formation and the persistence of R-loops. If mycobacteria are more prone than other bacteria to R-loop formation due to their high GC content, this could account for the essential nature of RNase HI in the mycobacteria, since R-loops promote replication-transcription collisions (
6,
7,
9,
55,
79), DNA recombination (
6,
56,
80–82), DSBs (
9,
82–84), and gene silencing.
The housekeeping nature of the enzymes involved in these synergistic combinations suggests that a wider application for combination therapeutics including RNase HI inhibitors also exists for other organisms. The loss of the
rnhC gene in
Listeria monocytogenes correlates with a loss of virulence in mice (
55), and in
E. coli, both streptomycin-resistant strains and rifampicin-resistant strains were competitively disadvantaged in Δ
rnhA backgrounds (
13). This indicates the potential for therapeutic aspects of RNase HI inhibition in bacteria even where RNase HI activity is not essential under laboratory conditions or where rifampicin tolerance is high.
This study identified four HIV RNase HI inhibitors that have activity against
M. tuberculosis RNase HI
in vitro and show synergy with rifampicin in a whole-cell assay (
Fig. 6). The compound NSC600285 in particular is known to affect human RNase HI
in vitro (
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioassay/366) but is not toxic to eukaryotic cells unless the cells are deficient in DNA replication or repair, such as the Δ
rad50 and Δ
rad18 yeast strains (
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioassay/155). This supports an on-target effect in eukaryotic cells and indicates that modifications are necessary to develop these chemical scaffolds for higher affinity and specificity for
M. tuberculosis RNase HI. However, the inhibition we observe indicates that these scaffolds can penetrate both eukaryotic and prokaryotic cell walls, a key consideration for the delivery of antibiotics to intracellular pathogens such as
M. tuberculosis and
L. monocytogenes.
In combination, these lines of evidence strongly support an on-target effect on RNase HI in vivo for these compounds. However, the generation of resistant mutants to formally demonstrate on-target in vivo activity will require the development of compounds with higher affinity. Crystal structures of the compounds in complex with M. tuberculosis RNase HI will allow more extensive structure-activity relationships to be established, and we are actively pursuing this approach. The use of rifampicin as a sensitizing compound will be advantageous in high-throughput screening, both for isolating compounds that might otherwise inhibit RNase HI too weakly to be identified in a normal growth inhibition screen and for prioritizing hits for further investigation and development.
In summary, this study validates RNase HI as a vulnerable, druggable target in the mycobacteria. It provides insight into R-loop metabolism in general and specifically highlights the contribution that low-level transcriptional inhibition makes to R-loop formation. It also demonstrates the proof of principle that this is a novel cellular susceptibility, which can be utilized as an antibacterial strategy. High-affinity inhibitors of RNase HI would be synergistic with some current first- and second-line antibiotics, with the potential to reduce the effective dose of rifampicin, with a concomitant reduction in side effects, and to reverse rifampicin resistance, rescuing this antibiotic for therapy.