Mycology
Brief Report
24 April 2023

Atazanavir Resensitizes Candida auris to Azoles

ABSTRACT

Candida auris represents an urgent health threat. Here, we identified atazanavir as a potent drug capable of resensitizing C. auris clinical isolates to the activity of azole antifungals. Atazanavir was able to significantly inhibit the efflux pumps, glucose transport, and ATP synthesis of all tested isolates of C. auris. In addition, the combination of itraconazole with atazanavir-ritonavir significantly reduced the burden of azole-resistant C. auris in murine kidneys by 1.3 log10 (95%), compared to itraconazole alone.

INTRODUCTION

Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant fungus associated with high mortality rates worldwide (1). Azole antifungals have been the standard of care for the treatment of most fungal infections (2). However, the overuse of azoles has led to an upsurge of azole resistance in Candida species (3). Most C. auris strains have developed high-level azole resistance (4). Due to the increasing resistance and prevalence of infections, the CDC has classified drug-resistant C. auris as an urgent health threat which critically needs the development of new antifungals (5).
A promising strategy to thwart azole resistance and restore antimicrobial efficacy is using codrugs to potentiate the activity of azoles (3, 68). Repurposing FDA-approved drugs is a valuable approach for identifying new codrugs that reduces the cost and the time required for drug development (912). Utilizing both approaches, we identified the HIV protease inhibitor atazanavir as a codrug for azole antifungals against C. auris. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of atazanavir on the activity of azole antifungal drugs against C. auris in vitro and in vivo.
The activity of atazanavir in combination with fluconazole and itraconazole was evaluated against a panel of pathogenic C. auris strains. The atazanavir-itraconazole combination was also evaluated with a time-kill assay. Additionally, mechanistic studies were performed to determine the possible mechanism of action by which atazanavir restores the activity of azoles against C. auris. Finally, we evaluated the in vivo efficacy of the atazanavir-itraconazole combination, in the presence of ritonavir as a pharmacokinetic enhancer (13), in a murine model of disseminated C. auris infection.
Nineteen clinical isolates of C. auris (Table 1) were obtained from the Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute (Utrecht, the Netherlands), the CDC, and BEI Resources. Drugs used in the study were purchased commercially: itraconazole and ritonavir (TCI America), atazanavir (Ambeed), and fluconazole (Acros Organics). Media and reagents were obtained from commercial vendors.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Effect of atazanavir on the antifungal activity of fluconazole and itraconazole against C. aurisa
C. auris isolateData for FLC-ATV:Data for ITC-ATV:
MIC (μg/mL)ΣFICIModeMIC (μg/mL)ΣFICIMode
AloneCombinedAloneCombined
CBS 109130.5/>1280.5/11.00IND0.25/>1280.0015/320.13SYN
CBS 1237264/>12832/160.56IND2/>1280.5/320.38SYN
CBS 12373128/>12832/160.31SYN1/>1280.25/320.38SYN
CBS 12766128/>12864/80.53IND2/>1280.5/80.28SYN
CBS 12768>128/>128128/80.53IND2/>1280.5/160.31SYN
CBS 12770>128/>128128/80.53IND2/>1280.5/40.27SYN
CBS 12771>128/>128128/160.56IND2/>1280.25/160.19SYN
CBS 12772>128/>128128/80.53IND2/>1280.25/160.19SYN
CBS 12773>128/>128128/20.51IND2/>1280.5/160.31SYN
CBS 12774>128/>12864/160.31SYN2/>1280.5/160.31SYN
AR0931>128/>128>128/>1282.00IND1/>1280.25/160.31SYN
AR0390>128/>3264/160.31SYN1/>1280.125/160.19SYN
AR109732/>1288/320.38SYN2/>1280.5/160.31SYN
AR10992/>1281/320.63IND0.5/>1280.125/160.31SYN
NR-5271364/>12816/320.38SYN1/>1280.125/160.19SYN
NR-5271464/>12816/320.38SYN1/>1280.125/160.19SYN
NR-527151/>1280.5/40.52IND0.25/>1280.06/320.37SYN
NR-527168/>1288/>1282.00IND1/>1280.25/40.27SYN
NR-52717>128/>12832/160.19SYN2/>1280.06/160.09SYN
a
SYN, synergy; IND, indifference; ATV, atazanavir; FLC, fluconazole; ITC, itraconazole; ΣFICI, fractional inhibitory concentration index.
The MICs of the drugs were identified following CLSI guidelines (14). We also evaluated the interactions between atazanavir and two azole drugs (fluconazole and itraconazole) against C. auris isolates using the checkerboard method, as described elsewhere (1517). Atazanavir alone did not exhibit any antifungal activity (MICs, >128 μg/mL) against all tested C. auris isolates. When tested in combination with fluconazole, atazanavir interacted synergistically against 36.8% (7/19) of C. auris isolates, with a fractional inhibitory concentration index (ΣFICI) ranging from 0.19 to 0.38. Interestingly, atazanavir displayed the most potent synergistic interaction with itraconazole, with an effect against 100% (19/19) of C. auris isolates tested (ΣFICI, 0.09 to 0.38). These findings align with our earlier findings, where lopinavir displayed the most effective synergistic interaction with itraconazole (against 100% of C. auris isolates tested) (6). Because atazanavir interacted synergistically with itraconazole against all C. auris isolates tested, the focus for the rest of the work was to further investigate the atazanavir-itraconazole combination using several experiments, including the killing kinetics, a mechanistic study, and the in vivo efficacy against C. auris isolates.
A time-kill assay was used to investigate the killing kinetics of the atazanavir-itraconazole combination against C. auris AR0390, as described previously (3, 6, 18). As shown in Fig. 1A and B, atazanavir and itraconazole (16 and 0.5 μg/mL, respectively) exerted a fungistatic activity against the tested isolate, lowering the fungal burden by 4.5 and 4.9 log10 after 24 and 48 h, respectively, compared to the negative control.
FIG 1
FIG 1 (A) Time-kill curve of itraconazole (ITC) at 0.5 μg/mL, atazanavir (ATV) at 16 μg/mL, or a combination of both (ITC+ATV). The drugs were assessed against C. auris AR0390 for 48 h at 35°C. (B) Scanning images of C. auris AR0390 colonies from the 24-hour time point plated onto YPD agar plates and incubated for 24 hours.
One of the key methods by which C. auris isolates withstand the activity of azole antifungals, resulting in treatment failure, is the overexpression of efflux pumps (3). Therefore, using an efflux pump inhibitor is a potential strategy for overcoming the microorganism’s resistance to antifungals. Encouraged by our previous work with lopinavir (6), we investigated the effect of atazanavir on the efflux activity, glucose utilization, and ATP synthesis of C. auris isolates. Glucose-induced Nile red efflux assays were performed using five isolates of C. auris, as reported previously (1921). As shown in Fig. 2A, atazanavir (8 μg/mL) hindered the efflux of Nile red in all tested C. auris isolates, leading to an increase in Nile red fluorescence intensity by 40% to 50%.
FIG 2
FIG 2 Effect of atazanavir (ATV) on Nile red efflux, glucose utilization, and ATP content of C. auris isolates. (A) Effect of ATV on efflux of Nile red in five C. auris clinical isolates. Asterisks (*) denote a statistical difference (P < 0.05) between the untreated and ATV-treated C. auris cells in the intensity of Nile red fluorescence. (B) Effect of ATV on glucose utilization of C. auris. Asterisks (*) represent a statistical difference (P < 0.0001) in the percent change in optical density at 590 nm (OD590) between ATV-treated cells and the untreated control, as determined by the unpaired t test. (C) Effect of ATV against C. auris ATP content. Asterisks (*) represent a statistical difference (P < 0.0001) in ATP levels between ATV-treated and untreated cells, as determined by the unpaired t test.
A glucose-induced acidification assay was performed to assess the impact of atazanavir on glucose utilization (22). As expected, atazanavir (32 μg/mL) significantly obstructed the ability of C. auris cells to utilize glucose, and less reduction in the OD590 values was detected (Fig. 2B).
Finally, the impact of atazanavir on the cellular ATP content of C. auris isolates was evaluated, as previously reported (23). Atazanavir (8 μg/mL) decreased the cellular ATP content in C. auris AR0390 by 20% (Fig. 2C). These results are consistent with our published data (6).
The efficacy of the itraconazole-atazanavir combination in the presence of the bioavailability enhancer ritonavir (13) was evaluated in an in vivo mouse model of disseminated candidiasis, as outlined in previous reports (24, 25). The animal experiment was conducted following the guidelines from the Virginia Tech Animal Care and Use Committee. Briefly, female immunocompromised CD-1 mice were infected with 3.33 × 107 CFU/mouse C. auris AR0390 intraperitoneally. Treatments, which were administered orally 2 h after infection and continued for 48 h, included itraconazole (5 mg/kg), atazanavir plus ritonavir (90 and 30 mg/kg, respectively), and a combination of itraconazole with atazanavir-ritonavir. The mice were then euthanized, and the fungal counts in the kidneys were determined by plating onto yeast extract-peptone-dextrose (YPD) agar containing chloramphenicol (100 μg/mL). The itraconazole-atazanavir-ritonavir combination significantly decreased the fungal burden of C. auris in murine kidneys by 1.15 log10 (93%) and 1.3 log10 (95%) compared to the vehicle control and itraconazole alone, respectively (Fig. 3).
FIG 3
FIG 3 In vivo efficacy of the itraconazole (ITC)-atazanavir (ATV)-ritonavir (RTV) combination in a murine model of C. auris disseminated infection. Female CD-1 mice (n = 8) were infected with azole-resistant C. auris AR0390 and then treated with either the vehicle control, ITC (5 mg/kg), ATV-RTV (90 and 30 mg/kg, respectively), or ITC-ATV-RTV (5, 90, and 30 mg/kg, respectively). Statistical difference was measured via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the post hoc Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons. The asterisk (*) denotes statistical significance of the combination treatment (P < 0.01) compared to the untreated control. The pound sign (#) denotes statistical significance (P < 0.01) compared to the ITC-treated group.
Our findings highlight that HIV protease inhibitors are a promising class of drugs that can be combined with azole antifungals to potentially treat fungal infections caused by challenging pathogens such as C. auris. It is noteworthy that patients with HIV are at higher risk for serious fungal infections, and protease inhibitors, such as atazanavir and ritonavir, are part of the routine therapy for them (26). Therefore, azole and HIV protease inhibitor combination therapy could be the best fit for such scenarios (27).
In conclusion, our results show that atazanavir is a promising drug that enhances the activity of azole antifungals against C. auris both in vitro and in vivo.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

M.N.S. and E.A.S. are supported in part by the National Institutes of Health (R01AI141439). We declare no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1.
Jeffery-Smith A, Taori SK, Schelenz S, Jeffery K, Johnson EM, Borman A, Manuel R, Brown CS, Candida auris Incident Management Team. 2018. Candida auris: a review of the literature. Clin Microbiol Rev 31:e00029-17.
2.
Robbins N, Caplan T, Cowen LE. 2017. Molecular evolution of antifungal drug resistance. Annu Rev Microbiol 71:753–775.
3.
Eldesouky HE, Lanman NA, Hazbun TR, Seleem MN. 2020. Aprepitant, an antiemetic agent, interferes with metal ion homeostasis of Candida auris, and displays potent synergistic interactions with azole drugs. Virulence 11:1466–1481.
4.
Kean R, Ramage G. 2019. Combined antifungal resistance and biofilm tolerance: the global threat of Candida auris. mSphere 4:e00458-19.
5.
Mohammad H, Eldesouky HE, Hazbun T, Mayhoub AS, Seleem MN. 2019. Identification of a phenylthiazole small molecule with dual antifungal and antibiofilm activity against Candida albicans and Candida auris. Sci Rep 9:18941.
6.
Eldesouky HE, Salama EA, Lanman NA, Hazbun TR, Seleem MN. 2020. Potent synergistic interactions between lopinavir and azole antifungal drugs against emerging multidrug-resistant Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e00684-20.
7.
Shaban S, Patel M, Ahmad A. 2020. Improved efficacy of antifungal drugs in combination with monoterpene phenols against Candida auris. Sci Rep 10:1162.
8.
Eldesouky HE, Mayhoub A, Hazbun TR, Seleem MN. 2018. Reversal of azole resistance in Candida albicans by sulfa antibacterial drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00701-17.
9.
Eldesouky HE, Salama EA, Li X, Hazbun TR, Mayhoub AS, Seleem MN. 2020. Repurposing approach identifies pitavastatin as a potent azole chemosensitizing agent effective against azole-resistant Candida species. Sci Rep 10:7525.
10.
Thangamani S, Maland M, Mohammad H, Pascuzzi PE, Avramova L, Koehler CM, Hazbun TR, Seleem MN. 2017. Repurposing approach identifies auranofin with broad spectrum antifungal activity that targets Mia40-Erv1 pathway. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 7:4.
11.
de Oliveira HC, Castelli RF, Alves LR, Nosanchuk JD, Salama EA, Seleem M, Rodrigues ML. 2022. Identification of four compounds from the Pharmakon library with antifungal activity against Candida auris and species of Cryptococcus. Med Mycol 60:myac033.
12.
Thangamani S, Younis W, Seleem MN. 2015. Repurposing clinical molecule ebselen to combat drug resistant pathogens. PLoS One 10:e0133877.
13.
Renjifo B, van Wyk J, Salem AH, Bow D, Ng J, Norton M. 2015. Pharmacokinetic enhancement in HIV antiretroviral therapy: a comparison of ritonavir and cobicistat. AIDS Rev 17:37–46.
14.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, 4th ed. CLSI standard M27. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
15.
Gu W, Guo D, Zhang L, Xu D, Sun S. 2016. The synergistic effect of azoles and fluoxetine against resistant Candida albicans strains is attributed to attenuating fungal virulence. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:6179–6188.
16.
Meletiadis J, Pournaras S, Roilides E, Walsh TJ. 2010. Defining fractional inhibitory concentration index cutoffs for additive interactions based on self-drug additive combinations, Monte Carlo simulation analysis, and in vitro-in vivo correlation data for antifungal drug combinations against Aspergillus fumigatus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:602–609.
17.
Chen Y-L, Lehman VN, Averette AF, Perfect JR, Heitman J. 2013. Posaconazole exhibits in vitro and in vivo synergistic antifungal activity with caspofungin or FK506 against Candida albicans. PLoS One 8:e57672.
18.
Hagras M, Salama EA, Sayed AM, Abutaleb NS, Kotb A, Seleem MN, Mayhoub AS. 2020. Oxadiazolylthiazoles as novel and selective antifungal agents. Eur J Med Chem 189:112046.
19.
Keniya MV, Fleischer E, Klinger A, Cannon RD, Monk BC. 2015. Inhibitors of the Candida albicans major facilitator superfamily transporter Mdr1p responsible for fluconazole resistance. PLoS One 10:e0126350.
20.
Ivnitski-Steele I, Holmes AR, Lamping E, Monk BC, Cannon RD, Sklar LA. 2009. Identification of Nile red as a fluorescent substrate of the Candida albicans ATP-binding cassette transporters Cdr1p and Cdr2p and the major facilitator superfamily transporter Mdr1p. Anal Biochem 394:87–91.
21.
Eldesouky HE, Li X, Abutaleb NS, Mohammad H, Seleem MN. 2018. Synergistic interactions of sulfamethoxazole and azole antifungal drugs against emerging multidrug-resistant Candida auris. Int J Antimicrob Agents 52:754–761.
22.
Koselny K, Green J, DiDone L, Halterman JP, Fothergill AW, Wiederhold NP, Patterson TF, Cushion MT, Rappelye C, Wellington M, Krysan DJ. 2016. The celecoxib derivative AR-12 has broad-spectrum antifungal activity in vitro and improves the activity of fluconazole in a murine model of cryptococcosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:7115–7127.
23.
Li S-X, Wu H-T, Liu Y-T, Jiang Y-Y, Zhang Y-S, Liu W-D, Zhu K-J, Li D-M, Zhang H. 2018. The F1Fo-ATP synthase beta subunit is required for Candida albicans pathogenicity due to its role in carbon flexibility. Front Microbiol 9:1025.
24.
Xin H, Mohiuddin F, Tran J, Adams A, Eberle K. 2019. Experimental mouse models of disseminated Candida auris infection. mSphere 4:e00339-19.
25.
Hager CL, Larkin EL, Long L, Zohra Abidi F, Shaw KJ, Ghannoum MA. 2018. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the antifungal activity of APX001A/APX001 against Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02319-17.
26.
Liu P, Foster G, Gandelman K, LaBadie RR, Allison MJ, Gutierrez MJ, Sharma A. 2007. Steady-state pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of voriconazole and ritonavir in healthy male subjects. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:3617–3626.
27.
Sekar VJ, Lefebvre E, De Pauw M, Vangeneugden T, Hoetelmans RM. 2008. Pharmacokinetics of darunavir/ritonavir and ketoconazole following co-administration in HIV-healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol 66:215–221.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Volume 67Number 517 May 2023
eLocator: e01631-22
PubMed: 37092991

History

Received: 6 December 2022
Returned for modification: 26 February 2023
Accepted: 7 April 2023
Published online: 24 April 2023

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Keywords

  1. HIV protease inhibitors
  2. Candida auris
  3. atazanavir
  4. azole resistance
  5. efflux pumps
  6. in vivo disseminated candidiasis mouse model

Contributors

Authors

Yehia Elgammal
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
Center for One Health Research, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
Center for One Health Research, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Pathobiology, Virginia-Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA
Center for One Health Research, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA

Notes

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note:

  • For recently published articles, the TOTAL download count will appear as zero until a new month starts.
  • There is a 3- to 4-day delay in article usage, so article usage will not appear immediately after publication.
  • Citation counts come from the Crossref Cited by service.

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

View Options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share the article link

Share with email

Email a colleague

Share on social media

American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy