INTRODUCTION
Human African trypanosomiasis (HAT), also know as sleeping sickness, is caused by two subspecies of the protozoan parasite
Trypanosoma brucei and is transmitted through the bite of infected tsetse flies. In west and central Africa,
T. b. gambiense is responsible for the chronic form of the disease, whereas
T. b. rhodesiense is responsible for a more acute form of the disease in eastern Africa. Poor and neglected populations living in remote rural areas of sub-Saharan Africa are at risk for HAT, and in 2006, it was estimated that 50,000 to 70,000 individuals were infected (
35). In recent years, the reported HAT cases have decreased to approximately 10,000 (
29,
36), with over 95% of the reported cases due to
T. b. gambiense infection.
There are four drugs currently registered for use against sleeping sickness. Pentamidine and suramin are used against the hemolymphatic stage (stage 1) of the disease, while melarsoprol and eflornithine (DFMO) are used against stage 2 of the disease, when the parasites have invaded the central nervous system (CNS). The disease is fatal if left untreated. The drugs currently in use are unsatisfactory due to cost, toxicity, poor oral bioavailability, long treatment, and lack of efficacy. Melarsoprol treatment is highly toxic, and up to 5% of the second-stage patients treated with melarsoprol die of a reactive encephalopathy. Eflornithine treatment requires four daily intravenous infusions over 14 days, meaning that this therapy is expensive and logistically difficult in rural clinics. The only advance in the last 25 years has been the introduction of nifurtimox-eflornithine combination therapy (NECT) (
25). Despite the reduced toxicity and treatment duration of NECT compared to those of melarsoprol or eflornithine, the requirement for 7 days of intravenous administration is still a limitation.
The aim of the present study was to characterize the antitrypanosomal activity of the 5-nitroimidazole drug candidate fexinidazole and its two principal metabolites, fexinidazole sulfoxide and fexinidazole sulfone, using phenotypic
in vitro and
in vivo screening. Fexinidazole is targeted for the treatment of HAT, currently in phase I clinical studies, and had been in preclinical development as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent during the 1970s when the
in vivo efficacy in the
T. b. brucei strain GVR35 mouse CNS model of HAT was first demonstrated (
14).
Some of the data presented here have previously been published in summary form (
33).
DISCUSSION
Only four drugs are registered for HAT treatment. Pentamidine and suramin are used against the early stage of the disease, while treatment of the second stage depends on melarsoprol, eflornithine, and the recently introduced nifurtimox-eflornithine combination therapy (NECT). Melarsoprol is an arsenical compound and is highly toxic with severe adverse effects (
18). In addition, there have been alarming reports of treatment failures with both melarsoprol and eflornithine, which until recently have been the only available drugs for second-stage treatment (
1), and it is hoped that the broad implementation of the NECT regimen may avert the further development of eflornithine resistance. New safe and effective drugs with simplified dosing regimens are urgently needed. Ideally, such new treatments would be effective in both acute and chronic disease stages. Such new treatment options would largely simplify disease management and, importantly, avoid the painful lumbar puncture procedure currently required for distinguishing between disease stages.
Fexinidazole has recently been identified as a promising new drug candidate for the treatment of HAT (
33), and data presented here provide
in vitro and
in vivo profiling of the antitrypanosomal efficacy of fexinidazole and its two primary metabolites, sulfoxide and sulfone.
Fexinidazole and the sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites were tested
in vitro alongside reference drugs against a panel of African trypanosomes of
T. brucei spp. (
Table 1), which included sensitive and resistant wild-type strains, laboratory-induced melarsoprol- and pentamidine-resistant and P2-transporter knockout strains, and new field isolates. The data showed that there is no evidence of innate resistance to fexinidazole or the two metabolites within any of the strains tested, as all IC
50s were in similar ranges and varied by less than a factor of 4. The new
T. b. gambiense strains showed reduced IC
50s for pentamidine, but this is unlikely to indicate resistance in the field given the higher blood levels and long terminal half-life of the drug found in patients after standard treatment (
4).
Fexinidazole showed
in vivo efficacy in both the acute mouse model and, more importantly, the chronic mouse model with established brain infection. In the STIB900 acute mouse model, fexinidazole demonstrated 100% efficacy at an i.p. dose of 50 mg/kg/day and an oral dose of 100 mg/kg/day, both given for 4 days (
Table 2). While a fexinidazole dose of 50 mg/kg/day i.p. was fully effective, the sulfoxide only partially cured with the same dose and route of administration and the sulfone was ineffective. After oral administration at a dose of 100 mg/kg/day, both the sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites were only partially effective, whereas fexinidazole cured 100% of the animals. Although no pharmacokinetic data are currently available to formally demonstrate oral absorption of the sulfoxide or sulfone metabolite in mice, it may be that neither is as readily absorbed as fexinidazole via the oral route. However, it is apparent that even when the i.p. route of administration, which should maximize the systemic bioavailability of the compounds, was used, neither metabolite was as effective as the parent fexinidazole in this acute model of disease. In addition, it is unlikely that protein binding could account for the lack of effectiveness of the metabolites when given orally, and while fexinidazole is highly protein bound in plasma (93% in mice and 95% in humans), neither metabolite is highly protein bound, at least in human plasma (26% and 42%, respectively, for the sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites) (data not shown). Overall, these data support the view that fexinidazole itself, acting as a biologically active prodrug while rapidly being metabolized to the sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites in all animals tested (
33), is likely to be a more useful compound for oral treatment than either of its two metabolites given alone.
In 1983, Jennings and Urquhart reported that fexinidazole, given in combination with suramin, cured a
T. brucei CNS infection in mice (
14). We have tested fexinidazole as monotherapy in the GVR35 mouse model of stage 2 HAT involving brain infection using two different vehicle formulations (
Table 3). Using the optimized Methocel-Tween 80 vehicle, fexinidazole showed a dose-related increase in efficacy and cured 7 of 8 infected mice at a single oral daily dose of 200 mg/kg/day for 5 days. In comparison, nifurtimox was ineffective in the GVR35 mouse model up to a dose of 200 mg/kg/day for 5 days. It is of interest to note that the presumed trough levels of the two metabolites after 24 h are reported to be around 1 μg/ml (
33), which would allow for a daily dosing schedule to be maintained with systemic drug levels near those required to kill the parasite
in vitro. Clearly, in this model, the drug levels in the CNS are of key importance, and while no data are available from the experiments presented, published data indicate that, in mice, brain levels of fexinidazole, sulfoxide, and sulfone are approximately 0.8, 5, and 1 μg/ml, respectively, at 60 min post-oral dosing with fexinidazole (
33). Further experiments are under way to more fully assess the brain levels of the compounds in mice at different times. While the most effective oral dose of 200 mg/kg may seem high, fexinidazole is well-tolerated in laboratory animals at significantly higher doses (
32), and although no data are available for mice regarding a no-toxic-effect level, a 50% lethal dose of >10,000 mg/kg has been reported (data not shown).
It is important to note that, of the drugs currently in clinical use, only melarsoprol has been shown to be effective in this experimental stage 2 HAT model.
Pulse incubation of
T. b. rhodesiense with fexinidazole and the sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites shows that a 48-h period of exposure is required to produce irreversible effects on trypanosomal survival for all three compounds (
Fig. 1). This result has implications for
in vivo efficacy, as it suggests that plasma or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations may need to be maintained at or above optimal trypanocidal concentrations for >48 h to achieve elimination of all parasites. As discussed above, it is apparent, at least in mice, that while plasma levels of fexinidazole may not be maintained at a sufficient killing concentration, both the sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites are present in plasma and in the brain at concentrations sufficient to kill all parasites. In addition, the data indicate that a 5-day dosing schedule would ensure sufficient trough levels of these metabolites at 24 h to maintain effective killing concentrations in plasma. Concentrations in the brain reach several micrograms per ml 1 h after oral application (
33), but information on the persistence of fexinidazole and its metabolites is not available. It can be assumed that the metabolites and mainly sulfone are responsible for the trypanocidal effect in the brain. The CSF is often used as a surrogate for the brain since it is accessible without the need to kill the animal (
6). Thus, these data provide support for the observations in both mouse models that oral treatment with fexinidazole for 4 days (acute model) or 5 days (CNS model) can achieve a cure. This time-dose relationship has previously been described for diamidines such as diminazene aceturate, which is able to kill trypanosomes after a short exposure time of 15 min at 1 μg/ml (
16), while other trypanocidal agents (e.g., trybizine hydrochloride) with an
in vitro potency similar to or greater than that of diminazene aceturate require a much longer exposure time, >8 h, at 10 μg/ml to lead to death of the parasites (
17).
Fexinidazole and the sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites have similar
in vitro trypanocidal activities (Tables
1 and
2) (
33). The
in vivo activity of fexinidazole is likely to be due to the concerted action of the three molecules. The
in vitro combination studies performed support this hypothesis. All combinations of fexinidazole and its metabolites were investigated using the fixed-ratio isobologram method (
10). The IC
50s for fexinidazole, sulfoxide, and sulfone in combination did not differ from that of each drug alone, resulting in indifferent mean ΣFIC values between 1 and 1.4 for the combinations.
In several foci, melarsoprol treatment failures have reached 30% of those treated (
19,
22,
28,
31), and treatment failures of up to 16% with eflornithine have recently been reported (
1,
24). A strategy to prevent the development of resistance is the use of drugs in combination, and the introduction of nifurtimox-eflornithine combination therapy (NECT) is an important development in the treatment of
T. b. gambiense infections (
25). The rationale behind combination treatments in general is that the likelihood of developing resistance to a single drug is relatively high but much lower with a drug combination (
34). Although
in vitro cross-resistance studies have yet to be fully validated as predictive of human drug resistance, a recently published study on the cross-resistance of fexinidazole and its sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites in a nifurtimox-resistant
T. b. brucei strain supports the approach of utilizing chemically unrelated drug combinations (
30). Those same authors also showed that resistance against fexinidazole could easily be generated in the laboratory, thus underlining the potential need for a combination partner for fexinidazole. In the present study, fexinidazole and its sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites were tested
in vitro in combination with three existing drugs, pentamidine, melarsoprol, and eflornithine. All combinations resulted in indifferent mean ΣFIC values. This observation supports the proposition that fexinidazole could be a candidate for combination with existing drugs that are currently acceptable treatments, such as pentamidine, eflornithine, and NECT, or more likely with other new drug candidates that may become available in the future.
In conclusion, the data presented in this paper demonstrate that fexinidazole and its sulfoxide and sulfone metabolites rapidly formed in vivo are effective at killing the parasites responsible for human African trypanosomiasis. Fexinidazole is effective in both acute and chronic mouse models of HAT at doses and dosing regimens which are expected to be practicable for human treatment. Time-dose studies indicate that effective drug levels need to be maintained for at least 48 h, and interaction data show that there is no cross-inhibition between fexinidazole and the sulfoxide or sulfone metabolite or other chemically unrelated treatment modalities. Overall, these data provide evidence that fexinidazole has the potential to be an effective oral treatment for both T. b. gambiense and T. b. rhodesiense forms of human sleeping sickness and both stages of the disease.