INTRODUCTION
Viruses infect all living things from three domains of life (
Bacteria,
Archaea, and
Eukarya), and they represent the most abundant and ubiquitous biological entities on the planet (
1–3). As mandatory intracellular parasites, viruses evolve in close physical contact with their hosts and drive the evolution of the host via gene transfer (
4–6) and coevolutionary arms races (
7–10). The major virological discoveries of the last few decades are the successive discoveries of the diverse nature of the virosphere with respect to virion structures (
3,
11–13), genetic repertoire (
14–16), and various replication strategies in the cell (
17–19). Despite the puzzling origin and diversity of viruses, recent structural and phylogenomic analyses yielded evidence suggesting that viruses emerged in the very early stages of evolution (
20–23), which may account for the enormous diversity of modern viruses (
24).
Nucleocytoplasmic large DNA viruses (NCLDVs) form a monophyletic group of eukaryotic viruses with large and complex double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genomes ranging from 100 kbp to 2.50 Mbp (
25,
26). The NCLDVs originally encompassed the families
Poxviridae,
Asfarviridae,
Iridoviridae,
Ascoviridae, and
Phycodnaviridae (
27), and have subsequently expanded with the discoveries of new groups of giant viruses infecting amoebae, including
Mimiviridae (
28),
Marseilleviridae (
29), pandoraviruses (
14), pithoviruses (
30), faustoviruses (
31), mollivirus (
32), kaumoebavirus (
33), cedratviruses (
34), and pacmanvirus (
35). Their virions display substantial morphological variations. Many of the NCLDVs present large icosahedral capsids composed of double-jelly roll major capsid proteins (MCPs), but exceptions to this virion architecture are seen in
Poxviridae, with brick- or ovoid-shaped virions;
Ascoviridae, with bacilliform or allantoid capsids; mollivirus, with a spherical virion; and pandoraviruses and pithoviruses, with amphora-shaped virions (
11,
36). The host organisms of NCLDVs span a wide range of eukaryotes, namely Unikonts (Metazoa and Amoebozoa), Plantae (green algae), and Chromalveolata (Haptophyta, Alveolata, and stramenopiles) (
36). Some NCLDVs replicate exclusively in the cytoplasm, whereas others replicate using both nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments (
17).
NCLDVs and other large DNA viruses acquired many genes from the cellular genome during evolution (
37,
38). However, phylogenetic analyses suggest that essential DNA processing proteins of eukaryotes, including DNA polymerases, originally derived from viruses (
39–41). Phylogenies of some DNA repair enzymes (
42,
43) and DNA-dependent RNA polymerases (
44) of NCLDVs are also consistent with their early divergence, prior to radiation of the eukaryotic domain. Another notable feature of NCLDVs is that they encode many unique but functionally unknown genes, i.e., orphan genes (ORFans) or lineage-specific genes, which may be the result of ongoing
de novo creation of genes in their genomes (
45,
46). The ancient origin and unique features of these large DNA viruses prompted biologists to propose theories to interconnect viruses with major evolutionary transitions (
47–49), such as the emergence of the DNA replication machinery (possibly including the DNA itself) (
39,
50,
51) and the emergence of the eukaryotic nucleus (
52,
53).
Amoebae are a potent tool to isolate novel large DNA viruses. Currently, viruses isolated using amoeba coculture are classified into at least nine groups, as mentioned above. All of these viruses belong to the NCLDVs, though this classification is controversial for some of the viruses (
11,
54). However, the actual natural hosts of these viruses have not yet been determined. In the present study, we newly isolated “
Acanthamoeba castellanii medusavirus (Medusavirus)” from a muddy freshwater sample spilled out from hot spring in Japan, using an amoeba coculture method. Some unique features of the newly identified virus assigned medusavirus to a new family of NCLDVs and led us to conclude that amoeba is indeed the most promising natural host and that lateral gene transfers (LGTs) have taken place repeatedly and bidirectionally between the virus and its host since the early stages of their coevolution.
DISCUSSION
Previous metagenomic analyses indicated that giant viruses could inhabit heated environments, such as hot deserts and hot springs (
66,
67), although no giant virus had been isolated from such special environments. Medusavirus is the first giant virus isolated from a heated environment (43.4°C), and it shows several unique features in its replication cycle and particle morphology. It also presented distant phylogenetic and genomic relationships with other known large DNA viruses. Therefore, we propose that medusavirus represents a new family of large DNA viruses,
Medusaviridae.
Single-particle cryo-EM revealed that the medusavirus shows structural features common to other icosahedral NCDLVs. The internal membrane surrounding the viral DNA is a typical feature of all structurally characterized icosahedral NCDLVs (
68). The internal membrane of medusavirus extends and directly binds to the major capsid below the 5-fold axis (arrows in
Fig. 2b), whereas it swells near the 5-fold axis in
Melbournevirus (MelV) of the family
Marseilleviridae (
69). The total particle size of 260 nm of medusavirus, including the 14-nm surface spikes, is larger than that of MelV. However, the actual capsid diameter, 232 nm (excluding the 14-nm surface spikes) is similar to that of MelV, although T=277 of the medusavirus capsid is smaller than T=304 of the MelV capsid. The average distance between the MCPs was estimated to be 7.55 nm for medusavirus and 7.44 nm for MelV. Therefore, the MCPs are somewhat more loosely packed in medusavirus than in MelV. Faustovirus has been previously reported as a T=277 icosahedral large DNA virus (
70). The virus has a larger capsid diameter (240 nm) than the actual capsid diameter (232 nm) of medusavirus excluding the 14 nm surface spikes. The faustovirus virion has a double layered capsid, where the packing of the outer shell can be influenced by the inner shell formed with a T=64 icosahedron.
The most unique structural feature of medusavirus is the presence of spherical-headed spikes on the capsid surface. Spike structures on the capsid surface have been reported for several NCLDVs, such as
Paramecium bursaria Chlorella virus (PBCV-1) and
Phaeocystis pouchetii virus (PpV01), but their locations on the capsid surface are limited (
71). Our cryo-EM results suggest that the T=277 icosahedral capsid of medusavirus is covered with 2,660 spikes, assuming that each capsomer has one spike.
Chilo iridescent virus (CIV) also has short fibers that extend from each capsomer. The number of CIV fibers is estimated at 1,460, based on the T=185 icosahedral capsid (
71). However, CIV fibers appear to be more flexible and do not exhibit a spherical-headed structure, unlike the medusavirus spikes.
A notable feature of the replication cycle of medusavirus is the entry of the viral genome into the host nucleus, eventually filling the nucleus with the synthesized viral DNA. Our FISH analysis showed that viral DNA replication was initiated inside the nucleus at the periphery of the nucleolus and appeared to be completed in the nucleus (
Fig. 3). Several NCLDVs transfer the viral DNA to the host nucleus to initiate DNA replication.
Iridoviridae and
Asfarviridae replication cycles are initiated in the nucleus but are completed in the cytoplasm (
72). In the case of a
Phycodnaviridae PBCV-1, the viral DNA, and probably DNA-associated proteins, move to the nucleus, where early transcription is detected within 5 to 10 min PI (
73). The replication cycles of pandoraviruses and mollivirus involve the disorganization or deformation of the nucleus, respectively, suggesting that their early replication phase depends on host nuclear functions (
14,
32). Marseilleviruses replicate in the cytoplasm, which initiate their replication by transiently recruiting the nuclear transcription machinery to their cytoplasmic viral factory (
74). Thus, there appears to be a variety of dependences on the host nuclear functions across giant viruses. Medusavirus was found to encode neither an RNA polymerase nor DNA topoisomerase II, although all known NCLDVs encode at least one of these enzymes. DNA topoisomerase II encoded by PBCV-1 is thought to function in the late stages of viral replication or packaging, both of which occur in the cytoplasm (
75,
76). Medusavirus may be recruiting these functions from the host. The presence of spliceosomal intron-like sequences and the lack of an mRNA capping enzyme gene suggest that medusavirus may also be dependent on the host nucleus for mRNA processing.
In addition, medusavirus provided us the answer to the enigmatic presence of the MCP genes in the
Acanthamoeba genome (
Fig. 15a). Previous studies predicted the existence of unidentified families of NCLDVs through the discovery of MCP genes in
Acanthamoeba genomes (
62–64). Our phylogenetic analysis shows that the medusavirus MCP gene forms a monophyletic group with the MCP genes in the amoeba genome and thus indicates that medusavirus indeed belongs to the predicted family. These observations clearly show that LGT of the MCP genes had occurred from medusavirus to
Acanthamoeba in ancient times.
Furthermore, we detected traces of massive LGTs between medusavirus and
Acanthamoeba in both the host-to-virus and virus-to-host directions. The entrance of the medusavirus genome into the nucleus may facilitate physical contact between the viral DNA and host DNA, possibly increasing the chance of LGT between medusavirus and
Acanthamoeba. A number of viruses have already been isolated in laboratories using the amoeba coculture method, but from the natural environment no virus has been isolated with convincing evidence that allows a claim that
Acanthamoeba is its genuine natural host. Medusavirus encodes a larger number of
Acanthamoeba gene homologs (86/461 = 18.7%) than
Mollivirus sibericum (50/523 = 9.6%) or
Pandoravirus salinus (56/2336 = 2.4%) does (
32). The significant amount of gene transfers observed between medusavirus and
Acanthamoeba suggests that
Acanthamoeba or a related amoeba is indeed the major natural host of medusaviruses.
Medusavirus was found to be the first isolated virus to encode all four core histone proteins and one linker histone domain. The four core histones were identified in virion proteomic analysis, suggesting their involvement in the viral DNA packaging and their possible formation of nucleosome-like structures in the medusavirus virion. The presence of the core histone genes has previously been reported in several other eukaryotic dsDNA viruses. In bracoviruses, the H4 protein plays a critical role in suppressing host (insect) immune responses during parasitism (
77). Marseilleviruses are known to encode three sets of fused histone genes, H2B/H2A, archaeal histone/H3, and an unknown domain/H2A. These histones have also been found in marseillevirus virions (
29) and are suggested to function in the compaction, protection, and/or regulation of the viral genomes (
78). If the DNA replication, transcription, and mRNA capping of medusavirus are partly dependent on the host cell nucleus, as suggested above, the histones may also facilitate these processes via interaction with the host molecular machinery.
Based on the phylogenetic analysis of DNA polymerases, Villarreal and DeFilippis proposed a hypothesis that the DNA polymerase gene of an ancient DNA virus related to the extant
Phycodnaviridae (
Feldmannia sp. virus) gave rise to the eukaryotic Pol δ (
39). Subsequent studies have revealed that Pol δ is closely related to PolBs of
Phycodnaviridae,
Mimiviridae, and pandoraviruses (
41,
79). In the present study, medusavirus PolB has established another branch that is most closely related to the eukaryotic Pol δ clade but is clearly separate from PolBs of other known NCLDVs. In this reconstructed tree, the eukaryotic Pol δ clade was embedded inside a larger tree of viral homologs defining several outgroups. This tree topology suggests that the eukaryotic Pol δ originated from an ancestor of medusavirus or its relative. The phylogenetic tree of the medusavirus core histone homologs shows a similar tree topology, implying that eukaryotic histones may have derived from the ancient viruses through virus-to-eukaryote LGT. It is worth noting that dinoflagellates, which have largely abandoned histones, have apparently acquired the viral-derived alternatives for histones (
80). Nonetheless, the possibility of the reverse host-to-virus transfer direction is not excluded for these putative LGTs.
Medusavirus is a novel large DNA virus isolated from hot spring water in Japan. Structural, genomic, and proteomic characterization of medusavirus revealed its unique features compared to other known large DNA viruses. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the medusavirus lineage emerged in ancient times, but the virus presently encodes a full set of histone genes and a DNA polymerase gene, which are associated with modern eukaryotic homologs. On the other hand, the host amoeba encodes medusavirus homologs, including MCP. Taking these observations in account, we conclude that amoebae are the most promising natural hosts of medusavirus and that LGTs have occurred repeatedly and bidirectionally between medusavirus and its host due to physical contact between viral and host DNAs since ancient times. Medusavirus is the first NCLDV to be isolated from a thermal environment. This indicates that the ecological niche of NCLDVs is broader than previously thought. We would like to continue analyzing Medusaviridae, such as more detailed infection mechanisms, thermal tolerance, and diversity, etc. Further investigation of large DNA viruses should reveal the active coevolutionary interactions between the NCLDVs and eukaryotic organisms at the global scale.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Virus isolation.
Acanthamoeba castellanii (Douglas) strain Neff (ATCC 30010) cells were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and cultured in peptone-yeast-glucose (PYG) medium at 26°C as described previously (
14,
81). An outflow water/soil sample (50 ml) was collected from a water sample spilled out from a hot spring in Japan. The water temperature was 43.4°C at the sampling site. After removal of floating bacteria and small viruses by filtration using a 20-μm filter (no. 43; Whatman International, Maidstone, UK), the collected mud and dead leaves were resuspended in 13 ml of sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and stirred gently for 1 day at room temperature. The sample was again filtered through another 20-µm filter. Then, the filtered sample (10 ml) was further filtered through a sterile 1.2-µm filter (Millex-AA; Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The filtrate (9.5 ml) was then mixed with PYG medium (18 ml).
Acanthamoeba cell suspension (0.5 ml) was added and incubated with gentle stirring for 1 h at room temperature, followed by incubation at 26°C in a total of 142 wells using two 96-well microplates. After 5 days, amoeba cells with delayed proliferation were screened. Culture supernatant from growth-retarded wells showing phenotypical difference was inoculated into fresh amoeba cells in an individual well of a 12-well microplate. After 3 days, supernatant of all three wells with cell encystment was inoculated into a fresh amoeba cell suspension in three 25-cm
2 culture flasks and then in three 75-cm
2 culture flasks. Supernatant from each 75-cm
2 culture flask was stored at 4°C as an isolated virus solution (named HS-1, HS-2, and HS-3).
Virus cloning and cultivation.
Among the three isolated virus solutions, virus cloning of HS-1 was performed according to a cloning method used for
Mollivirus sibericum (
32) with several modifications as described below. Briefly, HS-1-infected amoeba cells in 75-cm
2 culture flask were harvested and washed with an excess amount of fresh PYG medium to remove surplus viruses. Amoeba cells were then resuspended in 16 ml of fresh PYG medium. Eight serial 3-fold dilutions were performed in a 96-well microplate by mixing 50 μl of the solution from the previous well with 100 μl of fresh PYG. Each last eighth dilution was examined under a light microscope to verify the existence of fewer than two amoeba cells per well. Only one amoeba cell was observed in each well. Several hundred fresh amoeba cells were added to the wells containing only one cell and cultured for 3 days until most cells exhibited encystment. The obtained viral clone was designated “
Acanthamoeba castellanii medusavirus (Medusavirus),” and amplified and stored at 4°C for further use.
To routinely culture medusavirus, amoeba cells were initially cultured using eight 25-cm2 culture flasks, each containing 25 ml of PYG medium. The cells were inoculated with medusavirus (multiplicity of infection [MOI], ∼1 to 2), and then the culture media containing medusaviruses were harvested 1–4 days postinfection (PI). Amoeba cells and cell debris were removed by centrifugation (800 × g, 5 min, 24°C), and the medusavirus particles were collected by centrifugation (8,000 × g, 35 min, 4°C). The collected medusavirus particles were resuspended in 5 ml of PBS, and filtered through a 0.45-μm filter (Millex-AA, Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), centrifuged (8,000 × g, 35 min, 4°C), and resuspended in 10 μl of PBS. This purification protocol was performed 5 to 10 times to obtain high numbers of medusavirus particles.
Cryo-electron microscopy and single-particle analysis.
A suspension of 2.5 ml of purified medusavirus particles was applied to an R1.2/1.3 Mo grid (Quantifoil Micro Tools GmbH, Germany), which was previously glow-discharged, and snap-frozen in liquid ethane using a Vitrobot Mark IV unit (FEI Company, USA) at a condition of 95% humidity at 4°C. Frozen grids were imaged using a JEM-2200FS electron microscope operated at 200 kV accelerating voltage and equipped with an omega-type energy filter and field emission electron source (JEOL Ltd., Japan). The images were recorded on a DE20 direct detector (Direct Electron LP, USA) at a nominal magnification of ×25,000 for a 3-s exposure time with 75 movie frames. The total electron dose was below 20 electrons (e−)/Å2 for each image. The numerical pixel size corresponds to 2.3 Å on the specimen. The movie frames were motion corrected using a manufacture-provided script, DE_process_frames.py, and summed. The resulting images were subjected to single-particle analysis.
For single-particle analysis, a total of 5,406 medusavirus particles were selected from 1,198 motion-corrected images and binned by two using RELION software (
82). The extracted particles were classified by reference-free alignment, where the class averages were simultaneously separated into DNA-filled, partially DNA-filled, filled with non-DNA, and empty particles classes. For structural analysis of the viral capsid, a total of 2,288 DNA-filled particles and a total of 1,397 empty particles were selected from well-aligned two-dimensional (2D) classes, respectively, and used for three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction by imposing the icosahedral symmetry. The handedness of the 3D map was determined by independent subtomogram averaging. The final map resolutions were estimated using the gold-standard Fourier shell correlation (GS-FSC) criterion of 0.143. The cryo-EM maps were visualized and annotated by UCSF Chimera (
83). The icosahedral T-number was determined by manually counting the surface spike-like short fibers that extended from each capsomer.
Conventional electron microscopy.
Harvested cells infected by medusaviruses (8 h PI) or purified medusavirus particles were subjected to regular transmission electron microscopic observation as described previously (
81). Plastic-embedded virus-infected amoeba cells were sectioned at 70-nm thickness using an ultramicrotome (EM-UC7; Leica Microsystems, Austria). The thin sections were mounted on a Formvar-coated slot mesh and stained with 2% uranyl acetate and 1% lead citrate for 5 min each. Transmission electron microscopy observation was done using a JEM1010 microscope (JEOL Ltd., Japan) at 80 kV accelerating voltage. The images were recorded in a 2k × 2k side-mount Veleta charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Olympus, Japan).
Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis.
For tracing medusavirus DNA in host cells after infection, FISH analysis was performed as described below. Briefly, purified medusavirus DNA (4.68 μg) was labeled with Cy3 using the nick translation method. Amoeba cells cultured in a 12-well plate were infected with medusaviruses and harvested at 10 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 8 h, 14 h, 24 h, and 48 h PI from each individual well of the 12-well plate. Cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed with methanol:acetate (3:1) solution. One drop of the fixed cell suspension was placed on a glass slide and air dried completely. Cy3-labeled medusavirus DNA probe was placed on the glass slide and incubated at 67°C for 5 min, followed by hybridization at 37°C for 2 h, and stringent washing with 50% formamide in 2× and 1× SSC buffer (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate). Cells on the glass slide were also stained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). The detection of FISH and DAPI signals were performed using the Leica CW-4000 cytogenetic workstation (Leica Microsystems K.K., Tokyo, Japan).
Genome analysis.
After virus cloning and purification, the genomic DNA of medusavirus (1.2 μg) was prepared using NucleoSpin tissue XS (Macherey-Nagel, Germany), following the manufacturer’s protocol, and further purified using AMPure XP (Beckman Coulter). The DNA library for sequencing was prepared using a g-Tube (Covaris) and an SMRTBell template prep kit 1.0 (Pacific Biosciences), and sequencing was performed on a PacBio RS II sequencer (Pacific Biosciences). The total number of subreads was 304,607, and the total number of sequenced nucleotides was 1,325,027,506. Canu v1.5 (
84) was used to assemble the reads to generate a final single contig of 381,277 bp.
Gene prediction and annotation.
Gene prediction was performed using GeneMarkS v4.32 (
85). Putative introns were predicted using GeneWise v2.4.1 (
86) with visual inspection of the alignments. Amino acid sequence similarity searches (E value < 1E−5) were performed against the UniRef90 database, Virus-Host Database (Virus-Host DB) (
87), RefSeq database, and the Conserved Domains Database (CDD) using BLASTP and RPS-BLAST of BLAST+ (
88) (v2.6.0). tRNA genes were identified using tRNAscan-SE (
89) (v1.3.1). NCLDV core genes were assigned to viral genomes through homology searches against the Nucleo-Cytoplasmic Virus Orthologous Groups (NCVOG) database (
90).
Phylogenetic analysis.
The hidden Markov model (HMM) profiles for DNA polymerases, MCPs, and DNA-packaging ATPases were constructed using sequences in NCVOG (
90). Homologs of each protein were identified using HMMsearch (
91) against the Virus-Host DB (
87). Sequences were aligned using Multiple Alignment using Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT) v7.220 (
92) with default parameters. Tree reconstruction was performed using RaxML v8.2.4 (
93) with the selected LG+F model and PROTGAMMA parameter with 100 bootstrap replicates. The HMM profiles of histone families were constructed using sequences in the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Orthology (KO) database (
94) (H2A, KO no.
K11251; H2B, no.
K11252; H3, no.
K11253; and H4, no.
K11254). The homologs of each protein were recruited using HMMsearch (
91) against the Virus-Host DB (
87). Eukaryotic and archaeal histone and eukaryotic DNA polymerase sequences were manually collected. Tree reconstruction was performed using PhyloBayesMPI (
95) with four chains for at least 4,000 cycles. The cladistic tree was computed using the neighbor-joining method based on the presence/absence matrix of gene clusters derived from OrthoFinder (
96) clustering with a previously proposed similarity score (
97). Branch support values were estimated using 100 times of bootstrap resampling. The proteomic tree was computed using ViPTreeGen (
98) (v1.1.0).
Lateral gene transfer (LGT) analysis.
To identify LGT candidates between
A. castellanii and medusavirus, bidirectional BLASTP searches were performed by including sequences from UniRef90 but excluding the query genome. UniRef90 contains the proteome sequences of
A. castellanii strain Neff but does not contain most of the protein sequences from draft genome sequences of other
A. castellanii strains. When a gene of
A. castellanii got a best hit for a gene of medusavirus and the same medusavirus gene got a best hit for the same
A. castellanii gene, the pair of genes were considered a candidate for LGT. For inference of the directions of the LGT candidates, the most similar homologs of the bidirectional BLASTP searches were examined after excluding the hits against
A. castellanii or medusavirus genes. In the BLASTP result with a query of a medusavirus gene, the best-hit gene after excluding hits to
A. castellanii genes was determined and considered to be the closest gene. In the same way, in the BLASTP result with a query of an
A. castellanii gene, the best-hit gene after excluding hits to medusavirus genes was considered to be another closest gene. In this way, we defined the two closest genes for a pair of LGT candidates. If at least one of the closest genes was a viral gene, it was inferred that LGT occurred from virus to amoeba (VtoA). Conversely, if at least one of the closest genes was a eukaryote gene, it was inferred that LGT occurred from amoeba to virus (AtoV). In other cases, we did not determine the direction of LGT. The transcriptional activity of the candidate LGT genes was determined using the transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) data sets of
A. castellanii in the GenBank Sequence Read Archive (SRA), namely accession no.
SRR611709,
SRR611787,
SRR611788,
SRR611790,
SRR611791,
SRR611792,
SRR611793,
SRR611795,
SRR611796,
SRR611797,
SRR629488,
SRR957287,
SRR957291, and
SRR957297. For selected genes (i.e., MCP and DNA-packaging ATPase sequences), we confirmed their LGT directions with the use of phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
Proteome analysis of purified medusavirus.
Following virus collection, medusavirus was further purified using 10% to 60% sucrose density gradient centrifugation (2,300 ×
g, 86 min, 4°C). A white-colored virus fraction with a sucrose gradient of approximately 10% to 20% was resuspended in PBS and washed twice with PBS with subsequent centrifugation (8,000 ×
g, 35 min, 4°C). Medusavirus particles were resuspended in PBS containing 0.5% SDS and protease inhibitor cocktail (product no. 25955-11; Nacalai Tesque), and incubated for 1 h at 65°C. Samples were subjected to trichloroacetic acid (TCA) precipitation followed by resuspension in 250 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5) containing 2 mM EDTA, and protein was quantified by the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) method. Proteins were reduced for 2 h at 37°C with 0.67 M dithiothreitol (DTT) in 250 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5) containing 2 mM EDTA, subsequently alkylated with 1.4 M iodoacetamide in 250 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5) containing 2 mM EDTA for 30 min at room temperature, and treated with trypsin for 20 h at 37°C. After desalination and concentration, the treated proteins were subjected to liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis using the East-nLC 1200 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA) and a Q Exactive Plus spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA). All spectra data were then subjected to NCBI homology search using the Mascot server (
http://www.matrixscience.com/server.html).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank TaKaRa Bio, Inc. (Kusatsu, Shiga, Japan), for medusavirus genome sequencing, Chromosome Science Labo, Inc. (Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan), for FISH analysis, Yasushi Ishihama of Kyoto University and APRO Life Science Institute, Inc. (Naruto, Tokushima, Japan) for proteome analysis, and Sachiko Yamada for preparing EM samples. We also thank Tomohiro Akashi and Keita Aoki of Tokyo University of Science for their helpful discussions, and Lucy Kwok for proofreading the manuscript. Computational time was provided by the SuperComputer System, Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University.
This work was supported by JSPS/KAKENHI (no. 18H02279 to H.O. and no. 16H03804 to M.T.), Scientific Research on Innovative Areas from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Science, Sports and Technology (MEXT) of Japan (no. 16H06429, 16K21723, and 16H06437 to H.O., and no. 17H05825 to K.M.), the Collaborative Study Program of the National Institute for Physiological Sciences (no. 2017-501 and 2018-501 to M.T.), and the Collaborative Research Program of the Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University (no. 2017-24 and 2018-32 to M.T.).
M.T. designed the research; G.Y., R.B.M., C.S., Y.K., T.M., K.M., H.O., and M.T. performed the research; G.Y., R.B.M., C.S., Y.K., T.M., K.M., H.O., and M.T. analyzed the data; G.Y., K.M., H.O., and M.T. wrote the initial version of the manuscript, and all authors contributed to the finalization of the manuscript.
We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.