The gram-negative bacterium
Legionella pneumophila is thecausative agent of a potentially fatal form of pneumonia calledLegionnaires' disease.
L. pneumophila is found infreshwater environments, where it parasitizes many different species ofprotozoa (
17). Humansbecome infected with
L. pneumophila by inhaling aerosolsgenerated from contaminated water sources. Upon entry into the humanlung,
L. pneumophila is internalized into bactericidal,alveolar macrophages. In contrast to phagosomes bearing most bacterialspecies, the compartment harboring
L. pneumophila does nottraffic into the lysosomal network and is not significantly acidifiedin the first few hours after uptake(
26,
27). Instead, thephagosome interacts with early secretory vesicles at endoplasmicreticulum exit sites (
29)and then undergoes a series of maturation events in which itsequentially associates with small vesicles, mitochondria, andeventually becomes surrounded by the rough endoplasmic reticulum(
25,
60). Formation of thisspecialized compartment, called a “replicativephagosome,” allows the microorganism to grow intracellularly(
25,
28). Later in theinfective cycle, a majority of the replicative phagosomes fuse withacidified compartments containing late endocytic markers, and this isbelieved to play an important role in the replicative cycle of thispathogen prior to exit from its host cell(
59).
The key to
L. pneumophila's virulence is its ability to form areplicative phagosome, since mutants defective in this trait cannotreplicate inside host cells and are thus unable to cause disease(
24,
26). One large class ofproteins that allow
L. pneumophila to alter the endocyticpathway is encoded by the
dot/icm genes(
3,
5,
37). To date, over twodozen
dot/icm genes have been identified and are clustered intwo areas of the
L. pneumophila chromosome (region I andregion II) (
63). Based onthe similarity of the Dot/Icm proteins to proteins involved inconjugative DNA transfer, and the fact that the Dot/Icm system cantransfer the mobilizeable plasmid RSF1010, it was proposed that the
dot/icm genes of
L. pneumophila encode a type IVsecretion system (
31,
50,
63).
Type IVsecretion systems are able to export DNA and/or proteins out of thebacterial cell and include plasmid transfer systems (e.g., the
tra and
trb genes of the plasmid RP4), as well assystems involved in the delivery of virulence factors(
10,
46,
66). The canonical typeIV secretion system is encoded by the
virB operon of the plantpathogen
Agrobacterium tumefaciens(
66). A number of otherpathogens, including
Bartonella tribocorum,
Bordetellapertussis,
Brucella abortus,
Helicobacterpylori, and
Rickettsia prowazekii, contain orthologues tothe VirB proteins, and some of these systems have been shown to exportproteins essential for virulence(
10). In contrast tothese type IV systems, the
L. pneumophila Dot/Icm proteinshave limited sequence similarity to the VirB proteins. Instead, theDot/Icm proteins show high similarity to the transfer proteins fromIncI plasmids (e.g., R64 and ColIb-P9) and compose a type IVB secretionsystem (
31,
57).
Wedemonstrate here that a T4CP homologue, the DotL protein, is not onlyrequired for growth of L. pneumophila inside macrophages butis also essential for viability of certain strains on bacteriologicalmedia. The lethality caused by loss of dotL in those strainscan be suppressed by mutations that inactivate the Dot/Icm complex,which is consistent with a DotL role in regulating the activity of thistype IV secreton.
DISCUSSION
The
dot/icmgenes are required for the intracellular replication of
L.pneumophila and encode a type IVB secretion system that appears tohave evolved from the conjugation apparatus of an IncI plasmid. We havedemonstrated here that three
dot genes,
dotL,
dotM, and
dotN, are essential for growth of
L.pneumophila strain Lp02 on bacteriological media. This is indirect contrast to the established paradigm that the
dot/icmgenes are dispensable under the laboratory conditions of growth onplates (
3,
37). In addition, we wereable to isolate a large collection of suppressors of the
ΔdotL lethality and have shown that the majority ofthese map to other
dot/icm genes. However, inactivation ofseveral
dot/icm genes (
dotK,
icmS, and
icmW) did not suppress loss of
dotL, indicatingspecificity to the suppression.
DotL has limited homology to theT4CP family of proteins. T4CPs have been proposed to play a centralrole in type IV secretion systems(
34). They have beenshown to bind substrates synthesized in the cytoplasm and target themto the secretion apparatus in the inner membrane(
2,
15,
61). T4CPs have also beenshown to interact with other components of the secretion apparatus,namely, the VirB10-family of proteins(
20,
35). Finally, T4CPs areabsolutely required for export of substrates(
22). Based on theirhomology to
Escherichia coli FtsK and
Bacillussubtilis SpoIIIE, and their ability to bind DNA, T4CPs have beenproposed to function as molecular pumps, driving export of substratesvia hydrolysis of ATP(
22). In consideration ofthese traits, T4CPs would appear to be likely candidates to function asregulators of the type IV secretion complexes.
Based on thesimilarity of DotL to T4CPs, it is surprising that inactivation of the
dotL gene in strain Lp02 is lethal. No other known T4CP isessential for viability. Moreover, the only proteins associated withconjugative transfer that that are required for bacterial viability areinhibitors of plasmid toxin segregation factors(
43). DotL, however,shows no sequence similarity to such factors. In addition, if DotLfunctioned as an inhibitor of a plasmid segregation toxin, then the
ΔdotL lethality suppressors would be predicted to mapto the toxin. In contrast, many of the
ΔdotLsuppressors are components of the Dot/Icm machinery, and thenon-
dot/icm suppressors do not have homology to any knowntoxin inhibitors.
To explain these overall observations regardingtoxicity induced by loss of
dotL, we propose that loss of theDotL protein results in the accumulation of a toxic structureconsisting of a portion of the Dot/Icm complex (Fig.
9). This partial Dot/Icm complex could be deleterious for a number ofdifferent reasons. First, a partial Dot/Icm complex could misassembleor misfold in the absence of DotL, disrupting the membrane in somefashion. Alternatively, loss of
dotL could be toxic becausethe type IV secretion system forms an unregulated pore in the membranein the absence of DotL (Fig.
9). In this model, DotLwould play the role of a regulator of the complex, controlling theopening and closing of the pore.
We favor the unregulated poremodel for the following reasons. First, if a misfolded subcomplex werethe cause of the lethality one would not anticipate that inactivationof the majority of
dot/icm genes (20 of 23) would suppress theloss of
dotL. Second, the JR32
ΔdotLphenotype, increased sensitivity to sodium relative to a wild-typestrain, is much more consistent with an unregulated pore. Although thesodium sensitivity of wild-type
L. pneumophila strains is notwell understood, it is believed to result from leakage of sodium ionsthrough the Dot/Icm secretion apparatus(
11,
64). This model issupported by the observation that strains resistant to sodium chlorideoften contain mutations in
dot/icm genes(
63). Taken in thiscontext, loss of a regulator of the secretion pore is predicted toenhance the effect of exogenous sodium and is consistent with thehypersensitivity of the JR32
ΔdotL. Finally, there isprecedence in the literature of an example in which loss of a proteinresulted in an unregulated pore that can be lethal under certaincircumstances. Inactivation of
Yersinia pestis lcrG results inan unregulated type III secretion pore under certain conditions and hasled to the model where LcrG forms a plug at the base of the apparatus(
39,
58).
Based on thephenotype of a strain lacking
dotL, mutations that causelowered viability in the presence of an intact Dot/Icm apparatus werepreviously isolated (
13).
lidA was shown to encode a protein exported by the Dot/Icmsystem that may interact directly with DotL(
13). Other
lidgenes may encode proteins necessary for proper assembly of the Dot/Icmcomplex, particularly a subcomplex consisting of DotL, DotM, and DotN.For example, three Lid proteins are involved in disulfide bondmetabolism and, since the DotN protein is rich in cysteine residues, itmay be that mutations affecting the formation of disulfide bonds coulddisrupt folding of DotN(
13).
The
ΔdotL lethality phenotype in Lp02 has proven to beuseful for several additional reasons. First, it has provided aconvenient plate selection for additional
dot/icm mutants.This is noteworthy because many of the
dot/icm genes wereidentified by labor-intensive screens that have never been performed tosaturation (
1,
3,
45). The only selectionfor
dot/icm mutants previously available was based on thephenomenon that sodium-resistant
L. pneumophila strains wereoften avirulent, although this phenomenon is poorly understood and maybe mutagenic (
11,
64). The benefit of ournew selection is amply demonstrated since we have already identified anadditional
dot/icm gene,
dotV, by thisprocedure.
The
ΔdotL lethality phenotype alsoprovides information about existing Dot/Icm proteins. A number ofDot/Icm proteins that appear to be primarily cytoplasmic and notmembrane associated were still able to suppress the loss of DotL whentheir genes were inactivated. For example, IcmQ and IcmR have beenshown to be soluble proteins in the cytoplasm of
L.pneumophila where IcmR appears to function as a chaperone for IcmQ(
16). Although thespecific function of IcmQ remains unknown, the fact that
ΔicmQ and
ΔicmR were able to suppressthe lethality caused by the
ΔdotL suggests that theyare directly required for the assembly or activity of the Dot/Icmcomplex. Another example is the DotB ATPase(
55). Although DotB doesnot appear to be an integral component of the Dot/Icm membrane complex,it is required for expression of the
ΔdotL lethalitytrait, thus indicating that the protein plays a role in the assemblyand/or function of the apparatus.
In contrast, inactivation of
icmS or
icmW did not suppress loss of
dotL.Since
icmS and
icmW are predicted to encodecytoplasmic proteins and have been proposed to function as chaperonesfor secreted substrates(
12), their failure tosuppress is consistent with our model. Moreover, inactivation of asecreted substrate
ralF(
41) also failed tosuppress loss of
dotL (unpublished results). One additionalDot/Icm protein, the putative lipoprotein DotK, was also not requiredfor
ΔdotL lethality. Combined with the observationthat a
ΔdotK strain shows only mild defects forintracellular growth(
53), this suggests thatDotK is not essential for the formation of the Dot/Icm complex. Furtherexamination of how various
dot/icm mutants are able tosuppress loss of
dotL may reveal information on whichcomponents are key to formation of the secretion pore.
A thirdinteresting observation that resulted from our analysis of the
ΔdotL lethality involved
dotM and
dotN. Similar to
dotL, we discovered that
dotM and
dotN are also essential for viability in theLp02 background and are not essential for the viability of JR32 onbacteriological media but are required for growth of JR32 insidemacrophages (
50). Sinceall three proteins appear to code for inner membrane components of thesecretion apparatus, it is possible that DotM and DotN interact withDotL and regulate its activity, perhaps by modulating its proposednucleotide hydrolysis capability. In fact, we have recently shown thatDotM can be coimmunoprecipitated by using DotL specific antibodies(Vincent and Vogel, unpublished).
It is interesting that deleting
dotL in two very closely related strains results in verydifferent phenotypes: death versus life. This is likely to be due to agenetic difference between the two strains acquired during theirderivation. The JR32 strain may have acquired a suppressor mutation orLp02 may have lost a gene that prevents Δ
dotLlethality. One difference between these strains is that Lp02 lacks thesecond type IV secretion system encoded by the
lvhB operon(
47). However, deletionof the
lvhB operon in JR32 did not cause the
dotLdeletion to be lethal, and therefore the identity of the suppressor(s)remains to be discovered. Nevertheless, the difference between thesetwo strains may not be as profound as it initially appeared, since theJR32 Δ
dotL strain is less fit than a wild-type strain,as demonstrated by its hyper-NaCl sensitivity. It is possible that thedifference in phenotypes between the two strains is more a matter ofdegrees of sensitivity to loss of
dotL rather than JR32 beingimpervious to its loss.
The
ΔdotL phenotypedescribed here is consistent with the proposal that T4CPs function asinner membrane gates for exported substrates(
49). Furthercharacterization of this interesting phenomenon should shed light notonly on the function of DotL and other T4CPs but also on the
L.pneumophila Dot/Icm complex and other type IV secretionsystems.