INTRODUCTION
Virus-like particle (VLP) technology is a very powerful method for developing vaccines (
1–3). VLPs mimic the conformation of authentic native viruses without being infectious, since they do not carry any viral genetic material. When presented within a host immune system, VLPs evoke effective immune responses without triggering the side effects associated with the native virus. Several VLP-based vaccines are on the market, including vaccines against hepatitis B virus and human papillomavirus (
4). Furthermore, through genetic fusion or chemical conjugation, VLPs are attractive carrier proteins of foreign antigens, since they can efficiently display them within a host immune system (
5–7). An important advantage of VLP-based vaccine platforms is that VLPs can present antigens in a dense, repetitive manner, thus effectively enabling the cross-linking of B cell receptors (BCRs) (
8). Multivalent antigens bound to BCRs show more efficient processing and presentation than monovalent antigens (
9). Cross-linking of BCRs by multivalent antigens leads a conformational change in BCRs and induces signaling-active BCR microcluster formation, leading to robust B cell activation and signaling (
10). Therefore, VLP-based approaches offer great potential for developing effective vaccines against many pathogens, including antigens known to be weakly immunogenic.
The chikungunya virus (CHIKV) is a mosquito-borne alphavirus that causes chikungunya fever. The genome of the CHIKV is composed of a positive single-stranded RNA encoding four nonstructural (nsP1 to nsP4) and five structural (C, E3, E2, 6K, and E1) proteins. The five structural proteins are translated as a single polyprotein, from which the capsid (C) protein is cleaved off by capsid autoproteinase. The envelope polyprotein precursor (E3-E2-6K-E1) is translocated to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and further processed by host signalases, resulting in E1, 6K, and p62 (or the E3E2 precursor polyprotein). E1 and p62 are subsequently assembled as heterodimers in the ER and processed through the Golgi and
trans-Golgi networks, where p62 undergoes a furin-dependent maturation cleavage. The resulting mature CHIKV virion contains 240 heterodimeric spikes of E2/E1 on its surface (
11,
12). It is the expression of the structural proteins that gives rise to a chikungunya VLP (CHIK VLP), which has an icosahedral structure comprised of 240 copies of envelopes per particle arranged in a symmetric, repetitive array (triangulation number [T] = 4). CHIK VLPs,
per se, have been shown to be a promising vaccine candidate against CHIKV: immunization with CHIK VLPs themselves induced a strong neutralizing antibody response against CHIKV in mice and monkeys and prevented viremia in monkeys after subsequent challenge with CHIKV (
13). Furthermore, a phase I clinical trial demonstrated that CHIK VLP vaccine was safe and highly immunogenic (
14).
In this study, by leveraging the solid safety profile and potent immunogenicity of CHIK VLPs, we created a novel vaccine platform derived from CHIK VLPs whereby foreign antigens were engineered for insertion into two positions within the surface-loop domains of the CHIKV envelope, resulting in 240 or 480 copies of antigen displayed on the CHIK VLP surface. This repetitive, highly symmetric array of antigens greatly enhances immune responses per the explanation on BCR multimeric cross-linking and downstream activation given above. Here, we describe the characteristics of our novel VLP vaccine platform and demonstrate its efficacy and applicability in the context of the malaria CSP antigen, a major surface antigen expressed on the surface of malaria sporozoites and involved in the initial infective stage by malaria parasites in humans (
15). The central region of the
P. falciparum malaria strain's CSP contains multiple tetrapeptide (Asn-Ala-Asn-Pro [NANP]) repeats. It has been reported that the NANP repeats are a B cell dominant epitope and that anti-NANP antibodies play an important role in protection from malarial infection (
16). By incorporating the CSP repeat region as epitopes into our VLP platform, our vaccine induced high titers of anti-CSP antibodies in mice and monkeys and conferred protection against malarial infection in preclinical studies.
DISCUSSION
VLPs can function as molecular scaffolds for presenting foreign antigens and, due to their structural similarity to native viruses, VLPs can efficiently stimulate host immune cells. VLPs can serve as highly proficient tools for displaying antigens because their repetitive surface patterns and particulate structure induce potent immune responses. In addition, VLP-based vaccines have good safety histories and can be produced at large scales in heterologous expression systems (
4). In this study, we created and characterized a novel vaccine platform based on CHIK VLP. Our data demonstrate that our αVLP vaccine platform can elicit high titer antibody responses against the inserted foreign antigen in mice and monkeys.
We developed wild-type αVLP and E3E2 cleavage-impaired
E3αVLP and compared their characteristics
in vitro and
in vivo. Notably,
E3αVLP which retains E3 on the particle was detectable longer
in vivo and preferentially associated with GCs in the lymphoid organs. It is possible that the retained E3 stabilizes the VLP, enabling
E3αVLP to remain in contact with B cells in GCs longer than αVLP (
Fig. 2B). GCs are sites where high-affinity memory B cells are generated (
28), and the sustained presence of
E3αVLP can effectively promote immune responses. This is supported by evidence of
E3αVLP-NANP inducing a significantly higher antibody titer against the inserted antigen compared to the furin-sensitive, wild-type αVLP-NANP (
Fig. 3C). The density of antigens is important for B cell activation. Like native CHIKV, αVLP's quasi-crystalline surface with repetitive antigen array can be easily recognized by B cells. As shown in
Fig. 4B, 480 copies of inserted antigens are displayed on the particle surface and bind to Fab. The distances between Fabs on the neighboring spikes are 10 to 15 nm, which is within the wingspan of typical IgG molecules (10 to 20 nm), suggesting that αVLP presents epitopes at optimal distances to facilitate BCR activation by bivalent engagement.
To assess the utility of our αVLP vaccine platform, we focused on the NANP repeat antigenic region of the CSP surface protein of
P. falciparum. CSP of
P. falciparum has been extensively studied as a promising malaria vaccine target. It has been reported that soluble recombinant
P. falciparum CSP was highly immunogenic, and the immunogenicity was further enhanced by presenting CSP antigen on nanoparticles and VLPs (
27,
29). Our αVLP-based malaria vaccine, VLPM01, successfully elicited high levels of anti-CSP NANP repeat antibody. The humoral immune responses induced by VLPM01 conferred protection against malaria infection. The immune response was maintained 6 months after the last booster immunization in monkeys (
Fig. 5B). In addition to the anti-NANP antibodies, VLPM01 also induces antibodies against CHIKV backbone. There is a possibility that immunization with our αVLP may induce suboptimal levels of anti-CHIKV antibodies, leading to an increase in susceptibility to future CHIKV or cross-reactive alphavirus infections due to antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) phenomenon (
30,
31). There are no precise studies to predict the potential for ADE stemming from our alphavirus VLP vector; therefore, preclinical and clinical studies regarding ADE effects are needed.
Malaria is a serious public health problem worldwide, with 3.2 billion people at risk for malarial infection (
32). Since the malaria parasite has a complex life cycle with multiple stages that unfold in human and mosquito hosts, vaccine development has been challenging. The most advanced malaria vaccine to date is RTS,S/AS01, developed by GlaxoSmithKline, which received a favorable opinion from the European Medicines Agency in 2015 (
33). RTS,S/AS01 blocks the first stages of malaria infection by targeting CSP, and anti-NANP antibodies induced by the vaccine are likely to be one of the major mechanisms of protection in humans. It has been shown that the administration of anti-NANP monoclonal antibodies derived from an RTS,S/AS01 vaccine recipient conveyed protection against
P. falciparum challenge in mice (
34).
In our study, rhesus macaques were immunized with VLPM01 plus alum adjuvant. VLPM01 induced geometric mean anti-CSP antibody titers of 79,502 and 70,655 (defined as the dilution factor necessary to give an OD of 1.0) after the second and third immunizations, respectively. In contrast, the RTS,S plus AS adjuvants induced less than 20% as much total antibody titer in rhesus macaques (
35). Although we cannot directly compare these results, the stark difference in immunogenic response levels suggests that our VLPM01 can induce higher concentrations of anti-CSP antibodies than RTS,S. An association between anti-CSP antibody titers and protection was observed in several clinical trials, with the average titers of protected volunteers being 25 to 250 μg/ml (
15). The estimated anti-NANP antibody concentration in our VLPM01-immunized monkey serum was >200 μg/ml; therefore, we believe that VLPM01 is a promising malaria vaccine candidate.
A caveat to the use of VLPs as a vaccine platform is the potential for reduced immunogenicity stemming from any preexisting immunity against the derivative virus or other cross-reactive viruses to the said VLP. Although this was the case for some viral vaccine vectors, it has also been reported that antibody responses against herpes simplex virus- or poliovirus-vectored antigens were not affected by prior immunities (
36). The isolation and characterization of human monoclonal antibodies from CHIKV-infected and recovered individuals (
37) and the screening of a panel of mouse and human monoclonal antibodies against CHIKV (
38) revealed that the dominant neutralizing epitopes are located in E2 protein of CHIKV. In VLPM01, those epitopes are partially masked by the retained E3 or disrupted by the inserted NANP epitopes. Therefore, we expect that preexisting anti-CHIKV neutralizing antibodies induced by natural CHIKV infection may have minimal impact on VLPM01's vaccine immunogenicity.
Although more studies are needed on the effects of preexisting immunity, our preclinical data convincingly demonstrate that our αVLP vaccine bears unique and promising advantages as a new generation vaccine platform. First, by engineering two insertion sites, αVLP can display two different antigens of choice at 240 dense copies each. Second, our αVLP can display relatively large antigens depending on their structure. Combined with the good safety profile and generally robust immunogenicity induced by VLPs, our αVLP technology holds the promise of serving as a powerful template for the development of next-generation vaccines against many other pathogens and diseases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Vector construction.
The VLP expression constructs and the αVLP-based vaccine candidates used in this study are illustrated in Fig. S1 in the supplemental material. A gene coding for CHIKV strain 37997 structural proteins (C-E3-E2-6K-E1) was synthesized by Blue Heron (Bothell, WA) and cloned into pUC119-derived vector under the control of human cytomegalovirus early-immediate promoter. The plasmid encoding αVLP was created by inserting BspEI and BamHI restriction sites as a Ser-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-Ser linker between amino acids (aa) 206 and 207 in the E2 domain. The plasmid encoding
E3αVLP was prepared by replacing the furin cleavage site (E3 aa 61 to 64) with the Ser-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-Ser linker. SacII restriction site was introduced without changing the amino acid sequence to the E2 domain (aa 197 to 198) to create dual-epitope constructs. αVLP-NANP and
E3αVLP-NANP were prepared by inserting the GNP(NANP)
5NAG sequence into the BspEI/BamHI cloning sites of αVLP or
E3αVLP, respectively. Dual-NANP was prepared by replacing NotI/SacII region of αVLP-NANP with NotI/SacII fragment of
E3αVLP-NANP. The epitopes for other constructs used were as follows: VLPM01, GNP(NANP)
13NAG; and Dual-PyCSP, G(QGPGAP)
14G. The gene encoding ferritin-NANP was created as follows and cloned into pUC59. The leader sequence of human IL-2 (aa 1 to 19), followed by the Ser-Gly-Gly-Gly-Gly-Ser linker and
Helicobacter pylori non-heme-iron-containing ferritin (aa 5 to 167; GenBank
WP_000949190) with a point mutation (N19Q) (
25), was synthesized by GeneArt (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The NANP epitope, GNP(NANP)
13NAG, was inserted into the BspEI/BamHI cloning sites within the linker. HBc-NANP was created based on the previously reported malaria vaccine candidate (
24). The NANP epitope, NANPNVDP(NANP)
3 modified by the addition of 5′ BspEI and 3′ BamHI cloning sites, was inserted between aa 78 and 79 of the truncated HBc (aa 1 to 149). The gene encoding HBc-NANP was synthesized by GeneArt and cloned into pET-30a vector (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA).
Cell lines.
FreeStyle 293F cells were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific and cultured in suspension in serum-free FreeStyle 293 expression medium at 37°C in the presence of 8% CO2. The cells were authenticated by short tandem repeat profiling and confirmed to be free of mycoplasma contamination by using a LookOut mycoplasma PCR detection kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). 293T/17, 293, and NIH 3T3 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA). 293 cells (293F cells in CD293) were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (Sigma-Aldrich) containing 10% fetal bovine serum and penicillin-streptomycin solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C in the presence of 5% CO2.
Antibodies against CHIKV and CSP-NANP.
Mouse and rabbit anti-CHIKV antisera were obtained from animals immunized with 20 μg of CHIK VLP three times at 3-week intervals and characterized by immunoblotting and immunohistochemistry (see Fig. S2A and B in the supplemental material). Anti-NANP mouse monoclonal antibody (clone DG2) was generated from a female BALB/c mouse immunized with Dual-NANP with Ribi adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich). At 4 days after the last inoculation, the spleen was aseptically removed for hybridoma preparation according to standard procedures (
39). Hybridomas producing antibodies that recognize NANP peptides but do not react with CHIK VLP were screened by ELISA and further cloned. The supernatants of hybridoma cultures were collected, clarified by centrifugation, and filtered through a 0.45-μm-pore-size membrane filter. The antibody was purified by using an rProtein A/Protein G GraviTrap kit (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA) according to the manufacturer's instructions and characterized by immunoblotting (see Fig. S2C in the supplemental material).
Production and purification of VLPs.
The VLPs except for HBc-NANP were produced in FreeStyle 293F cells. The cells were transfected with VLP-expressing plasmids by using GeneX Plus transfection reagent (ATCC) according to the manufacturer's instructions. At 4 days after transfection, the cell culture supernatant was harvested and clarified by centrifugation and filtration with 0.45-μm-pore size polyethersulfone (PES) membrane. The VLPs secreted in the culture supernatant were collected by using OptiPrep density gradient medium (Sigma-Aldrich) as described previously (
13) and further purified by using a HiPrep 16/60 Sephacryl S-500 HR column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The eluates containing purified VLPs were concentrated by Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter units (EMD Millipore) and filtered with a 0.20-μm-pore-size PES membrane. HBc-NANP VLPs were expressed in
E. coli and purified by ammonium sulfate precipitation and column chromatography. The
E. coli strain, DH5α, was transformed with pET-HBc-NANP plasmid, and a single colony was cultured. VLP expression was induced by adding 0.1 mM IPTG (isopropyl-β-
d-thiogalactopyranoside), and the cells were harvested, resuspended in TSE buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.9], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA), and sonicated. Soluble lysate was collected by centrifugation and, after ammonium sulfate precipitation, the VLPs were purified using a combination of Superdex 200 and MonoQ columns (GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The eluates containing purified VLPs were pooled, concentrated, and dialyzed in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 50 mM NaCl, and 1 mM EDTA. The purified VLPs were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with InstantBlue Coomassie protein stain (Expedeon, San Diego, CA).
VLP entry into 293 cells.
293 cells were maintained as adherent monolayer cultures, plated on a 12-well culture plate at 105 cells/well, and cultured overnight. The VLP-containing culture supernatants were added to the well and, after 72 h, the conditioned medium was collected and analyzed for the remaining VLPs by Western blotting with mouse anti-CHIKV antiserum.
Western blotting.
VLP-containing culture supernatant was separated by SDS-PAGE, and the electrophoresed proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes and blotted with mouse anti-CHIKV antiserum. After incubation with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), membranes were developed using Clarity ECL Western blot substrate (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA).
Production of pseudotyped lentiviral vectors and cell entry analysis.
We created plasmids expressing glycoproteins E1/E2 and p62/E1 from αVLP and E3αVLP expression vectors. Other lentiviral plasmids were purchased from Cell Biolabs (San Diego, CA). 293T/17 cells were seeded onto a 10-cm dish at a density of 2 × 106 cells one day before transfection. The cells were transfected with 4 μg of glycoprotein expression plasmid, 12 μg of a transducing vector encoding a GFP reporter gene (pLenti-GFP), 4 μg of a packaging plasmid that expresses all HIV-1 structural proteins except Env and Rev (pCgpV), and 4 μg of a Rev expression vector (pRSV-REV) using Lipofectamine 2000 reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Empty vector (pUC19) served as negative control. Packaged lentivirus-containing supernatant was collected by centrifugation and filtered through a 0.22 μm membrane. 293 cells and NIH 3T3 cells were seeded onto 24-well plates at 105 cells/well one day before infection. The cells were infected with pseudotyped lentiviral vector with Polybrene at 8 μg/ml. The culture medium was changed to fresh medium after 1 day. At 3 days postinfection, green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression was analyzed by flow cytometry using an Attune flow cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Distribution of VLPs in vivo.
The experiments were conducted with the approval of the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University. Then, 40 μg of αVLP or
E3αVLP was intravenously administered into the tail veins of 6-week-old female BALB/c mice in a volume of 200 μl of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After the indicated time points, mice were sacrificed, and the spleens were removed and processed for cryosections as described previously (
40,
41). Cryosections (6 μm) were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.2) at 4°C for 5 min, blocked with StartingBlock blocking buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 10 min, and then sequentially incubated with primary antibodies and fluorescent-dye-conjugated secondary antibody and streptavidin. Three independent experiments (
n = 5, 10, and 12) were performed. The antibodies and reagents used for staining were as follows: rat anti-mouse/human GL7 (phycoerythrin conjugated, GL7; BioLegend, San Diego, CA), rat anti-mouse MARCO (phycoerythrin conjugated, ED31; Bio-Rad Laboratories), rat anti-mouse CD169 (biotin conjugated, MOMA-1; BMA Biomedicals, Augst, Switzerland), rabbit anti-CHIKV antiserum and goat anti-rabbit IgG (fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugated; Sigma-Aldrich), and streptavidin (brilliant violet 421; BioLegend). Whole-section four-color fluorescent images were obtained with tiling options by Olympus IX83 inverted microscope system with a DP80 digital camera and a 10× objective lens (UPlanFL N, NA = 0.30; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). All data were acquired and analyzed by using cellSens Dimension software (Olympus).
Immunizations and measurement of anti-CSP antibody titer.
Immunization and serum sample preparation were conducted at Bioqual, Inc. (Rockville, MD). Female BALB/c mice were purchased from Harlan (Frederick, MD), and male and female Indian-origin rhesus macaques were purchased from PrimGen (Hines, IL). Mice were 7 to 11 weeks old and rhesus macaques were 5 to 8 years old at the time of the experiments. All animal experiments were conducted once under Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved and Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare-assured conditions. Serum was collected from individual animals, and the anti-CSP repeat antibody titer was measured by ELISA. The ELISA plates were coated overnight with (NANP)6 peptides for P. falciparum or (QGPGAP)4 peptides for P. yoelii at 100 ng/well. Plates were blocked with 5% skim milk solution for 1 h. Samples were serially diluted in 5% skim milk and incubated in coated wells for 1 h, followed by 1 h of incubation with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse or anti-monkey antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Wells were developed using SureBlue TMB microwell peroxidase substrate (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD) and read on a microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT). The endpoint titers of serum antibodies against (NANP)6 peptides or (QGPGAP)4 peptides were determined as the serum dilution that gives an optical density of 3 standard deviations above the negative control. The serum samples collected from VLPM01-immunized monkeys were also evaluated at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (WRAIR) International Reference Center for Malaria Serology (Silver Spring, MD). Anti-NANP antibody ELISA titers were measured by using anti-human IgG-HRP as a secondary antibody. The antibody titers were initially defined as the serum dilution yielding an optical density of 1.0 in a standardized assay and then converted to μg/ml concentrations. The investigators were not blinded to allocation of samples during these experiments and outcome assessment.
Electron microscopy, cryo-EM, and image analysis.
The morphologies of HBc-NANP VLPs and ferritin-NANP nanoparticles were analyzed at the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Microscope Facility (Baltimore, MD). Briefly, the VLPs were fixed in 4% formaldehyde, and fixed samples were placed on glow-discharged carbon-coated 200-mesh copper grids. The grids were then stained with 1% phosphotungstic acid and visualized by Philips CM120 transmission electron microscopy at 80 kV with an AMT XR80 8 megapixel camera. For the cryo-EM analysis of VLPM01, aliquots of 2.5 μl of sample at a 3-μg/ml concentration were loaded on glow-discharged C-Flat grids (CF-2/2-4C-50). These grids were blotted for 5 s and flash frozen in liquid ethane using a Gatan CP3 plunge freezer. The grids were viewed using the Purdue University's FEI Titan Krios electron microscope operated at 300 kV. Images were recorded with a Gatan K2 Summit detector calibrated to have a magnification of 38,461, yielding a pixel size of 0.65 Å. A total dose of 36 e
−/Å
2 and an exposure time of 7.6 s were used to collect 38 movie frames. Fully automated data collection was implemented using LEGINON (
42). VLPM01 particles were incubated with Fab fragments of neutralizing mouse monoclonal antibody DG2 against the NANP repeats at 4°C for 30 min using a stoichiometric ratio of about two Fab fragments per insertion site. Grids were prepared as described for VLPM01, and images were recorded under the same conditions. A total of 2,800 particles each of VLPM01 and VLPM01 complexed with DG2 were boxed using the EMAN2 package (
43). MOTIONCORR software (
44) was used to correct the beam-induced motion. Contrast transfer function parameters were estimated using CTFFIND3 (
45). The 2D classifications were performed using RELION (
46), and the 3D reconstructions were performed using jspr software (
47). The final reconstructions were estimated to be 11 and 12 Å, respectively, based on the gold-standard Fourier shell correlation criterion of 0.143 (
48). Both maps were low-pass filtered to a 20-Å resolution. Both maps have been deposited in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (
www.emdatabank.org) under EMDB accession codes EMD-8424 and EMD-8425, respectively.
Passive transfer of immunoglobulin and challenge in mice.
Five- to eight-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from the National Cancer Institute (Fredrick, MD) and housed in the animal care facility at Johns Hopkins University. All procedures were performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health standards, as set in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Mice were sorted into different groups and injected intravenously with control or VLPM01-immunized monkey serum (450 μl/mouse) and immediately challenged intravenously with 2,000
P. berghei transgenic sporozoites expressing the full
P. falciparum CSP. The serum samples were coded, and the experiment was conducted by investigators blinded to the group allocation. The VLPM01-immunized monkey serum was collected weekly between weeks 5 and 8 from a monkey injected with 45 μg of VLPM01 with alum twice and pooled. After 40 h, the livers were harvested, and RNA was isolated to quantify the
P. berghei-specific 18S rRNA level by qPCR as previously described (
49).
Mouse malaria challenge model.
Six- to eight-week-old female BALB/c mice were immunized intramuscularly with 20 μg of control αVLP or Dual-PyCSP with alum adjuvant (Alhydrogel; Sergeant Adjuvants, Clifton, NJ) on days 0 and 21. Serum anti-PyCSP repeat antibody titer was measured by ELISA using (QGPGAP)4 peptide on day 33, and mice were challenged with infectious P. yoelii sporozoites intravenously on day 35. Cryopreserved P. yoelii sporozoites were purchased from Sanaria, Inc. (Rockville, MD), thawed immediately prior to challenge, and diluted according to instructions provided by Sanaria in order to deliver a challenge dose of 1,000 sporozoites/animal. Parasitemia was determined on day 7 and day 14 postchallenge by using a Giemsa-stained thin blood smear procedure. The investigators were blinded to allocation during the outcome assessment. Furthermore, 14 days after the challenge, blood was collected, and DNA was extracted by using a DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and subjected to PCR analysis. Infection was determined by amplifying P. yoelii-specific 18S rRNA, and the mouse glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene was amplified as an internal control. The primers used were as follows: P. yoelii 18S rRNA, 5′-ACATGGCTATGACGGGTAACG and 5′-CCTTCCTTAGATGTGGTAGCTATTTCTC; mouse GAPDH, 5′-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC and 5′-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA. PCR products were resolved on 2% agarose gels and visualized with SYBR Safe DNA gel stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Animal studies and statistical analysis.
No statistical methods were used to predetermine animal sample size. The samples sizes were chosen empirically to determine whether there were differences between samples. The experiments were not randomized. No animals were excluded from analysis. Statistical analyses were performed using Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). A Student t test was used for pairwise comparisons, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett's multiple-comparison test was used for comparisons across multiple groups. For the quantitative analysis of VLP staining in mouse spleen, a Mann-Whitney U test was used. All statistical tests were two-tailed. P values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank K. Tolliver, M. Nakata, and S. Mayer (VLP Therapeutics) and E. Cho-Fertikh (ECF Biosolutions) for facilitation of collaborations, manuscript preparation, and helpful discussions. We thank E. Locke and N. Richie (WRAIR) for measuring anti-CSP antibody titer in monkeys. We also thank A. Fokine (Purdue University) for assistance with the cryo-EM data analysis. We gratefully acknowledge H. Anderson (Bioqual) and S. Cherukuri (Noble Life Sciences) for managing animal experiments, Y. Zhang (AscentGene) for lentivirus experiments, R. Schuman (AIC Biotech) for assistance with monoclonal antibody production, and B. Smith (Johns Hopkins University) for EM analysis.
This research was funded by VLP Therapeutics and National Institutes of Health through grant R01 AI095366. We declare that an intellectual property application has been filed by VLP Therapeutics based on data presented in this paper. A.U., A.S., and M.I. were employees of VLP Therapeutics at the time of the study. S.K., R.U., and W.A. designed the research and are management members and shareholders of VLP Therapeutics. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.
R.U. and W.A. designed the research studies. A.U., A.S., M.I., M.L.Y., Y.F.-G., Y.H., T.A., and W.A. performed the research. A.U., A.S., M.I., T.A., F.P.Z., M.G.R., S.K., R.U., and W.A. analyzed data. A.U., A.S., M.I., M.L.Y., T.A., F.P.Z., M.G.R., and W.A. wrote the paper. All authors participated in manuscript revisions.