INTRODUCTION
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are defense molecules produced by animals and plants and are part of their innate immune systems. These peptides show wide diversity in size, sequence, structure, and antimicrobial mechanisms (
1). Most AMPs are positively charged, and their first interaction with bacteria involves the negatively charged components of the bacterial surface, namely, lipopolysaccharides (LPS) for Gram-negative bacteria and teichoic acids (TA) for Gram-positive bacteria. Bacteria have evolved inducible mechanisms for preventing these interactions by modifying their surface charge. In Gram-negative bacteria, this mechanism has been studied thoroughly in
Salmonella enterica (
2,
3). These modifications target mainly the lipid A domain of LPS. The principal modifications are the addition of 4-aminoarabinose (4-NAra) by the
arnB operon products, addition of phosphoethanolamine by EptA, hydroxylation of lipid A acyl chains by LpxO, and acylation or deacylation of lipid A by PagP or PagL, respectively (
3). The addition of 4-NAra and phosphoethanolamine is a modification commonly found in proteobacteria, whereas the others are specific to individual bacterial species. For example, resistance of the
Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor biotype to polymyxin is a result of the remodeling of lipid A by the addition of glycine or diglycine. The classical O1 biotype, which is sensitive to polymyxin, cannot perform this modification (
4).
In Gram-positive bacteria, modifications conferring resistance to AMP occur in TA by the esterification of phosphate with alanine. This reaction requires the products of at least four of the proteins encoded by the
dltXABCD operon (
5). DltA catalyzes the adenylation of
d-alanine and transfers the activated amino acid to the
d-alanyl carrier protein DltC (
6,
7). DltB is an inner-membrane protein. It has been suggested that it might be involved in the transport of alanine out of the cell through a lipid-linked intermediate, which has not yet been detected (
8). The function of DltD is still less clear. It is anchored by a single transmembrane segment in the membrane, but several experiments identified different locations for the soluble part of the protein, either in the cytoplasm or outside the cell (
8,
9). No role in TA alanylation has yet been ascribed to
dltX.
Dickeya dadantii is a plant pathogenic bacterium that is responsible for the soft-rot disease of many plants of agricultural interest (
10). It was also shown recently that these bacteria can kill some species of insects (
11,
12). Like most
Enterobacteriaceae,
D. dadantii possesses genes that are required to modify LPSs in response to AMPs, such as the
arnB operon and
eptA. An
arnB mutant is less pathogenic to the pea aphid
Acyrthosiphon pisum, showing that modification of their LPSs by 4-NAra confers resistance to animal AMPs (
13). In
S. enterica, the expression of all the genes involved in resistance to AMPs is controlled directly or indirectly (through PmrA-PmrB) by the two-component regulator system PhoP-PhoQ (
2). In
D. dadantii, expression of
arnB is induced by the AMPs polymyxin and protamine. PhoP-PhoQ is required for the induction of
arnB by protamine but not for induction by polymyxin, indicating that in
D. dadantii, at least two different regulatory systems are involved in sensing AMPs and regulating AMP resistance genes (
13).
In addition to the genes involved in resistance to AMPs that are commonly found in Gram-negative bacteria,
D. dadantii contains homologues to the
dlt genes expressed by Gram-positive bacteria. These genes are found in a few proteobacteria, such as
Bordetella pertussis (
14) and
Photorhabdus luminescens (
15). However, they are present in all the sequenced genomes of
Dickeya and
Pectobacterium spp., which are different genera of plant pathogenic enterobacteria. We suspected that the presence of these genes is related to the necrotrophic lifestyle of these bacteria having to contend with plant AMPs. In this work, we studied the regulation of
dlt gene expression in
D. dadantii isolates and analyzed the role that these genes play during plant infection. Moreover, we identified new genes that are involved in resistance of
D. dadantii to AMPs.
DISCUSSION
While the role of the
dlt operon in modifying TA in Gram-positive bacteria is well documented (
8), the function of these genes in the small number of Gram-negative bacteria in which they have been detected is still unclear. The
D. dadantii dlt operon encodes five proteins that present sequence or structural homology with their Gram-positive counterparts. DltA is a protein that might activate and ligate an amino acid to the carrier protein DltC. The activated amino acid, which is alanine in Gram-positive bacteria, has not been conclusively determined in Gram-negative bacteria. It has been suggested that it might also be alanine in
B. pertussis (
14). However, in
V. cholerae, a group of three
alm genes confers resistance to AMPs by adding glycine to LPS. The initial steps of this process require the homologues DltA and AlmE and the homologues DltC and AlmF, which activate glycine (
4). Thus, a similar mechanism can be used to incorporate various amino acids. The role of DltB is unclear. It is a member of the membrane-bound
O-acyl transferase (MBOAT) family of proteins that transfer organic acids onto the hydroxyl groups of membrane-embedded components. Sequence homology between the proteins in Gram-positive bacteria and
D. dadantii suggests that this multimembrane-spanning protein might have the same function in binding the amino acid to its substrate. The third
V. cholerae protein required to add glycine to LPS, AlmG, is also an inner-membrane protein, but it has no homology with DltB, suggesting that there is a different target or mechanism for modifying its substrate (
4). A mutant with deletion of the four
B. pertussis dra (
dlt) genes shows an increased sensitivity to AMP, but a specific role of the individual genes has not been tested (
14). The function of DltD is unknown, even in Gram-positive bacteria. A
D. dadantii dltB mutant is more sensitive to polymyxin than the wild-type strain, but in contrast, a
dltD mutant is as resistant as the wild-type strain. The absence of this gene does not seem to prevent the modification that confers resistance to AMPs. However, it might have a subtle role that was not detected by our test. Mutations that we constructed in
dltD are polar and should have inactivated the downstream genes of the same operon. Since the
dltD mutant does not have the
dltB polymyxin-sensitivity phenotype, an additional promoter is probably present in front of
dltB, allowing expression of
dltBAC independent of that of
dltD. In
V. cholerae, only three genes are required to add glycine to LPS, and no homologue of DltD has been detected. The complete
dlt operon of Gram-positive bacteria may have been transferred to Gram-negative bacteria, but
dltBAC alone might be sufficient to confer AMP resistance in these organisms. Attempts to identify the substrate of the
B. pertussis dra genes indicate the presence of unidentified outer-membrane proteins (
14). Nevertheless, we favor a hypothesis where the modified substrate is LPS, since polymyxin binds to the lipid A region of LPS (
30). The
dltB and
phoS mutants have no
O-antigen chain. This absence is not the cause of their sensitivity to AMP, since a
gmd mutant is not sensitive to polymyxin. However, for an unknown reason, these two phenotypes are linked and point to LPS as a target of the
dlt genes.
Several induction circuits control the genes involved in AMP resistance in
D. dadantii. Induction by protamine occurs through PhoP-PhoQ.
arnB,
dltB, and
phoS expression was induced in the presence of polymyxin, although the regulator involved in this control mechanism has not been characterized. In an attempt to discover this regulator, we identified
arcA as an activator of these genes. The ArcA-ArcB two-component system has been characterized in
E. coli. It controls gene expression in response to changes in the respiratory and fermentative states of the cell (
26). However, it may regulate genes that have a function other than in redox metabolism, since Liu et al. (
31) showed that 9% of the
E. coli genes are differentially expressed in an
arcA mutant. This regulation might not be direct. Park et al. (
26) found that only 85 of the 229 regulons controlled by
arcA that they identified possess ArcA binding sites. In
E. coli, the sensor ArcB detects the oxidation state of quinones.
arcB is a pseudogene in
D. dadantii, and the redox state of the cell cannot be a signal for genes regulated by
arcA.
arcA-regulated genes are not induced or repressed by anaerobiosis (data not shown). Cross talk between noncognate pairs of sensors and regulators has been demonstrated. ArcA could be phosphorylated by another sensor, and thus respond to a different signal than anaerobiosis (
32). The identity of the sensor and whether the regulation of genes involved in AMP resistance by
arcA is direct remain to be established.
The role of PhoH in the resistance to AMPs was found fortuitously during this study. While looking for an
arcA-regulated gene, we discovered that
phoH expression is induced by polymyxin, that a
phoH mutant has an increased sensitivity to this AMP, and that it was outcompeted by the WT strain in a coinoculation experiment in chicory leaves. The
phoH gene was first described in
E. coli as a phosphate starvation-induced gene, but its role in phosphate metabolism has not been explained (
33). Homologues of PhoH are present in many organisms, and they can be classified into three groups. The first group, which is present in most bacteria, is proposed to be functionally linked to phospholipid metabolism and RNA modification. Proteins of the second group, which are present in aerobes, are members of fatty acid beta-oxidation regulons. The third group is specific to enterobacteria. PhoH homologues have been found to be auxiliary metabolic genes of phages with a high prevalence in marine phage genomes, and
phoH was used to examine phage diversity in the marine environment (
34,
35). PhoH shows ATP-binding activity and may be an ATPase. Moreover, when fused to a PilT N-terminal domain in PhoH2 proteins, it possesses ATPase and RNA helicase activity (
33,
36). Thus, PhoH proteins seem to be very versatile, and their ATPase activity may have been recruited to provide energy in various processes. In
D. dadantii for example, it might be the modification of a component of the cell envelope that confers resistance to AMPs.
In addition to modifications found in many bacteria, such as the addition of 4-aminoarabinose or phosphoethanolamine, other modifications seem to exist more sporadically in bacteria. The presence of GlcN has been described on phosphate groups of
Bordetella bronchiseptica lipid A (
37) and on
B. pertussis (
38), along with most of the species of this genus. It has not been described for other genera. This substitution of the
Bordetella lipid A phosphate groups with GlcN was shown to confer
Bordetella resistance to AMPs (
39).
Screens to find genes involved in resistance to cationic AMPs or polymyxin identified 10 genes in
Yersinia pestis and 41 loci in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, respectively (
40,
41). Although some of these genes encode functions related to membrane biogenesis or changes that can modify resistance to AMPs, the modes of action of others have not been determined. Moreover, some of these genes do not confer a general resistance to AMPs but to only one of them (
40).
phoS is found only in a few bacteria and seems to have been acquired recently through lateral transfer by
D. dadantii. Its absence confers sensitivity to polymyxin, and its expression is regulated by PhoP. Its induction by the plant and the reduced fitness of the mutant in plants suggest that its product may be required for resistance to plant AMPs. PhoS localization in the outer membrane indicates that it can modify LPSs, since lipid A modification systems are usually located in the extracytoplasmic compartment of bacteria (
4).
Coinoculation experiments in chicory leaves identified three genes required for the fitness of
D. dadantii,
phoS,
dltB, and
phoH.
arnB, which is important for the survival of the bacteria in insects (
13), seems to play a minor role in plants. The presence in
D. dadantii of
dlt genes, rarely found in Gram-negative bacteria but present in all soft-rot enterobacteria, and of
phoS may be due to the phytopathogenic lifestyle of the bacteria. These genes may protect the bacteria against plant AMPs. A role for some genes in the protection against one class of AMPs has already been described, but it has never been related to the host of the bacterium (
30,
40).