Research Article
10 November 2020

Methane Monooxygenase Gene Transcripts as Quantitative Biomarkers of Methanotrophic Activity in Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b

ABSTRACT

Methanotrophic microorganisms are characterized by their ability to oxidize methane. Globally they have a significant impact on methane emissions by attenuating net methane fluxes to the atmosphere in natural and engineered systems, though the populations are dynamic in their activity level in soils and waters. Methanotrophs oxidize methane using methane monooxygenase (MMO) enzymes, and selected subunit genes of the most common MMOs, specifically pmoA and mmoX, are used as biomarkers for the presence and abundance of populations of bacterial methanotrophs. The relative expression of these biomarker genes is dependent on copper-to-biomass ratios. Empirically derived quantitative relationships between methane oxidation biomarker transcript amounts and methanotrophic activity could facilitate determination of methane oxidation rates. In this study, pure cultures of a model type II methanotroph, Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b, were grown in hollow-fiber membrane bioreactors (HFMBR) under different steady-state methane oxidation conditions. Methanotroph biomass (DNA based) and methane oxidation biomarker mRNA transcript amounts were determined using quantitative PCR (qPCR) and reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR), respectively. Under both copper-present and copper-limited conditions, per-cell pmoA mRNA transcript levels positively correlated with measured per-cell methane oxidation rates across 3 orders of magnitude. These correlations, if maintained across different methanotrophs, could prove valuable for inferring in situ oxidation rates of methanotrophs and understanding the dynamics of their impact on net methane emissions.
IMPORTANCE Methanotrophs are naturally occurring microorganisms capable of oxidizing methane and have an impact on global net methane emissions. The genes pmoA and mmoX are used as biomarkers for bacterial methanotrophs. Quantitative relationships between transcript amounts of these genes and methane oxidation rates could facilitate estimation of methanotrophic activity. In this study, a strong correlation was observed between per-cell pmoA transcript levels and per-cell methane oxidation rates for pure cultures of the aerobic methanotroph M. trichosporium OB3b grown in bioreactors. If similar relationships exist across different methanotrophs, they could prove valuable for inferring in situ oxidation rates of methanotrophs and better understanding their impact on net methane emissions.

INTRODUCTION

Methane (CH4) is a major greenhouse gas with 28 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide over a 100-year period (1). Aerobic methanotrophs (methane-oxidizing bacteria) play a key role in the global methane cycle by consuming methane from the atmosphere as well as methane produced by methanogens as it rises through the soil or water column, thereby mitigating atmospheric releases from methanogenic habitats (25). Despite numerous studies, in situ methane oxidation rates are hard to quantify, with the largest uncertainties in global CH4 model estimates being from microbial CH4 cycling (6, 7).
Aerobic methanotrophs exhibit diversity in their phylogeny, physiology, and ecology, and their activity has been shown to be influenced by methane, oxygen, and copper levels as well as variations in moisture, nitrogen source, pH, and temperature. However, a defining characteristic is their similarity in pathways and enzymes used to convert methane into carbon dioxide. Bacterial methanotrophs rely on methane monooxygenases (MMOs), enzymes that require oxygen to initiate the oxidation of CH4. Localized variations in habitat and nutrient levels are reflected in the activity of methanotrophs, ultimately affecting the expression of MMO genes and enzyme amounts. Links drawn between expression of MMO genes or MMO enzymes and activities could allow for a better understanding of the dynamics of in situ activities of methanotrophs in soil and water systems, as well as engineered bioreactors using methanotrophs to convert methane into bioproducts (8, 9). Bacterial methanotrophs (aerobic and anaerobic, such as NC10 methanotrophs) can have two forms of MMO: a membrane-bound or particulate MMO (pMMO) encoded by the three-gene operon pmoCAB and/or a soluble or cytoplasmic MMO (sMMO) encoded by the six-gene operon mmoXYBZDC (10). Nearly all known bacterial methanotrophs possess pMMO (with Methylocella and Methyloferula being the exceptions), while sMMO is found in a subset of bacterial methanotrophs (11, 12). For methanotrophs capable of expressing both sMMO and pMMO, like Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b, the canonical “copper switch” regulates MMO expression. Both sMMO and pMMO actively contribute to whole-cell methane oxidation, with relative contributions depending on copper-to-biomass ratios (13). At low copper-to-biomass ratios (<0.89 μmol of copper per g [dry weight] of cells), sMMO is more highly expressed, while at high copper-to-biomass ratios, pMMO is more highly expressed (2, 14). M. trichosporium OB3b under conditions of pMMO expression has higher affinities and pseudo-first-order methane oxidation rates than under copper-free conditions for sMMO expression; sMMO also has a broader substrate specificity than pMMO (15). Well-conserved regions of genes pmoA and mmoX, targeted by widely used “universal” primers, are used as biomarkers for both the presence and activity of aerobic methanotrophs (1619). The genes pmoA and mmoX are also used as phylogenetic biomarkers, as they generally agree with phylogenies drawn from the 16S rRNA gene; however, more exceptions are found as novel methanotroph species are discovered (20).
Biomarkers can be used as indicators of microbial community and function, providing insight into in situ microbial activities (21). They have been shown to be reliable for making quantitative predictions of activity levels of specific functions within microbial communities. Protein and mRNA biomarkers have been successfully used as estimators of in situ microbial activities of Geobacter (22, 23), organohalide-respiring communities (2427), and hydrogenotrophic (28) and acetoclastic (28) methanogens. These studies have shown the utility of mRNA biomarkers not only in identifying microbial function but also in their quantitative predictive power to quantify activities of specific community members. Though biomarkers have been developed for several biogeochemically relevant microbial guilds, methanotroph RNA biomarker development for this purpose requires further examination.
Methanotroph DNA and mRNA biomarkers have been used to assess methanotrophic communities, and these biomarkers have been suggested as a proxy for in situ methanotrophic activity (29, 30). Increased pmoA gene copy numbers have been correlated with increased methane oxidation potential in peatland material incubations (31, 32). Gene copies indicate the presence of methanotrophs and capacity for biotransformation of methane in soils but do not provide insight into extant (or in situ) levels of activity, which can be dynamic temporally and spatially. Some studies have also looked at both pmoA transcript levels and per-cell pmoA transcript levels, which directly indicate active methanotroph populations (30, 31). In permafrost thaw ponds, higher numbers of pmoA mRNA transcript copies were observed in methane-depleted zones (33), and increased pmoA mRNA transcript copies have been observed in soil slurries with higher methane oxidation rates (34). Correlations between per-cell pmoA transcript levels and per-cell methanotrophic activity have been observed in rice field soil microcosms (35) and in situ at a peat bog site (30). However, to test these correlations, microcosm studies are not ideal models for steady-state methanotrophy. Systems capable of achieving steady-state conditions, like chemostat reactors, are more suitable study systems. Research on methanotroph Methylococcus capsulatus Bath in chemostat cultures has shown that copper concentrations positively correlated with methane oxidation activity and pMMO transcript amounts (36). These results show that increases in methanotrophic activity were generally accompanied by an increase in methane oxidation biomarker mRNA amounts. Biomarker transcript abundances could serve as quantitative predictors of methanotrophic activity allowing for prediction of in situ rates even in transient systems like soils and engineered bioreactors.
To examine relationships between biomarker amounts and methanotrophic activity, hollow-fiber membrane bioreactors (HFMBRs) serve as an ideal study system. In HFMBRs, gaseous substrates from a pressurized source are delivered through a membrane directly to reactor medium and kinetic and mass transfer limitations are minimized while achieving high cell concentrations under steady-state conditions (37). Additionally, methane and oxygen provided to HFMBRs can be manipulated independently by adjusting source pressures.
The objective of this work was to determine if methanotroph biomarkers (DNA and RNA transcripts for MMO genes) showed quantitative correlation with lab-controlled methane oxidation rates. To achieve this, MMO mRNA biomarker and cell amounts in pure cultures of a type II aerobic methanotroph, M. trichosporium OB3b, were determined in controlled steady-state HFMBRs with membrane-based methane and oxygen delivery. Genome copies, serving as a proxy for cell abundance, were determined using quantitative PCR (qPCR), and biomarker transcript amounts were determined using reverse transcription-qPCR (RT-qPCR). A biokinetic mechanistic model consisting of Monod growth kinetics and membrane methane and oxygen permeation was developed to inform on operational conditions to achieve different oxidation rates. Reactor data were used with model expressions to calculate methanotroph oxidation rates. The dynamics of mRNA biomarker levels during transient copper limitation, which has been shown to alter relative expression of mmoX and pmoA in M. trichosporium OB3b, was also examined.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Reactor performance and models.

Results from abiotic reactor runs allowed inference of permeation coefficients for methane and oxygen (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material), which were then used in the biokinetic model. Rapid equilibrium between the headspace and liquid phases was assumed and supported by the response time in abiotic permeation tests (Fig. S1). The model-calculated permeation coefficients (Kp), simplified to units of centimeters per hour in this reactor system, were 4.1 cm per h for methane and 1.5 cm per h for oxygen. Model-calculated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) tubing Kp values were comparable to literature values converted to model units, ranging from 5.6 to 8.6 cm per h for methane and 1.7 to 2.4 cm per h for oxygen (3841). For conditions of 1 atm, 25°C, and a tubing length of 20 cm, this corresponds to 0.057 mg CH4 per min and 0.37 mg O2 per min permeating through the membrane.
Flow rates were maintained constant for the four reactor conditions throughout the duration of the experiment, with an average retention time of 3.21, 4.18, 5.76, and 10.25 days for reactor conditions A, B, C, and D, respectively (Fig. S2 and Table S1). Actual methane, oxygen, and biomass data for the four conditions are shown in Fig. 1. An initial rise in methane concentrations, followed by a rise in biomass and decrease in methane concentrations, was observed for all reactors before they settled into steady-state conditions. Oxygen was provided in excess throughout reactor operation, ensuring at least a 2:1 mole ratio of oxygen to methane to prevent oxygen limitation. Oxygen concentrations in the liquid phase for all reactor conditions (Fig. 1) were well above reported oxygen Km values for aerobic methanotrophs (∼0.01 mg per liter) (42).
FIG 1
FIG 1 HFMBR performance (data points) and model predictions (dashed lines) for the four tested M. trichosporium OB3b reactor conditions. Shown are aqueous concentrations of CH4 (blue diamonds) and O2 (red squares) on the left y axis and biomass (black circles) on the right y axis for condition A (retention time = 3.21 days [A]); condition B (retention time = 4.18 days [B]), condition C (retention time = 5.76 days [C]), and condition D (retention time = 10.25 days [D]). Data are means ± standard deviations from triplicate reactors for a given sampling date, except for condition D, with a single replicate. Reactor model values are shown as dotted lines. Under all conditions, a steady state was reached after startup.
Compared to batch cultures with typical non-steady-state conditions, continuously fed, steady-state conditions allow for direct correlation of steady-state functional gene expression levels with observed activity level of cultures. M. trichosporium OB3b has been shown to be capable of achieving steady-state conditions in continuous culture previously (43). However, relationships between steady-state methane oxidation rates and functional gene expression levels have not been explored. Reactors were considered at steady-state conditions when no significant changes in methane and biomass concentrations were observed, with start times corresponding to days 24, 20, 25, and 15 for conditions A, B, C, and D, respectively (Fig. 1 and Table S1). Reactor methane and biomass concentrations for all conditions remained constant during the steady-state period, and oxygen concentrations were ∼4 to 8 mg per liter (Fig. 1 and Table S1). In some cases (Fig. 1B and C), reactor dissolved methane concentrations were higher than model-predicted concentrations during the start-up phase, possibly due to elevated oxygen levels partially inhibiting methane oxidation rates (44). Once steady state was reached, the observed concentrations matched model predictions.

Reactor methane oxidation rates and biomarker abundances.

Reactor methane oxidation rates, as milligram CH4 per milliliter per day, were determined using model expressions and measured reactor data (Fig. 2). Both unit volume and biomass (as cell dry weight) normalized methane oxidation rates were constant during the steady-state periods (Fig. 2 and Table S1). Observed reactor steady-state volumetric methane oxidation rates (0.060 to 0.105 mg CH4 per ml) were within the reported range for methanotroph methane oxidation rates in environmental systems, typically between 0.00014 and 0.14 mg CH4 per ml per day (45). Reactor biomass normalized methane oxidation rates (0.478 to 0.870 mg CH4 per mg cell [dry weight] per day) also agreed with available literature values for pure culture and mixed community aerobic methanotrophs (0.86 to 3.85 mg CH4 per mg cell [dry weight] per day) (4648).
FIG 2
FIG 2 HFMBR CH4 oxidation rate and biomarker amounts for the four tested M. trichosporium OB3b reactor conditions. CH4 oxidation rate (left y axis) and biomarker amounts (right y axis) are shown for condition A (retention time = 3.21 days [A]), condition B (retention time = 4.18 days [B]), condition C (retention time = 5.76 days [C]), and condition D (retention time = 10.25 days [D]). Data are means ± standard deviations from triplicate reactors for a given sampling date, except for condition D, with a single replicate.
Using qPCR and RT-qPCR, M. trichosporium OB3b cell and transcript abundances for pmoA and mmoX (genes encoding key pMMO and sMMO polypeptides, respectively) were determined for selected dates during steady-state conditions. Biomarker data are shown as sampling date averages across triplicate reactors for each condition, except for condition D with a single replicate (Fig. 2). Data shown were corrected with losses determined from recoveries of spiked-in luciferase DNA and RNA, with recovery percentages across samples ranging from 1.47 to 39.12% and 0.84 to 14.70% for DNA and mRNA, respectively. Agreement was observed in both cell and pmoA transcript abundances for each individual reactor condition across sampling dates showing steady-state methanotroph cell numbers and pmoA transcript levels (Fig. 2). Differences in M. trichosporium OB3b abundances were statistically significant, and differences were not observed in pmoA mRNA abundances across reactor conditions (Fig. 2 and Table S2). Conditions A and B had higher flow rates, meaning higher growth rates, than conditions C and D, likely needing higher methane oxidation rates. Higher expression of pMMO was expected than for sMMO, as copper in nitrate mineral salts (NMS) medium was above reported copper-to-biomass ratios of 0.89 μmol copper per g (dry weight) of cells needed for pMMO expression (2). This was reflected in the data with mmoX mRNA transcript abundances being significantly lower than pmoA (Fig. 2 and Table S2). Culture density looked similar between conditions A, B, and C (Fig. 1), while differences were observed in M. trichosporium OB3b abundance determined by genome number (Fig. 2), with conditions A and B lower than condition C. A possible explanation is the proportion of intracytoplasmic membranes (ICMs), where methane oxidation takes place, in the cells. ICMs in methanotrophs increase in proportion to methane oxidation rates, increasing available surface area for methane oxidation (49). Conditions A and B had higher per-cell methane oxidation rates, similar biomass levels, and lower genome numbers than conditions C and D. Cells under conditions A and B were likely larger due to higher growth rates and to accommodate extra ICMs than under conditions C and D.

Biomarker mRNA expression response to copper starvation.

Following collection of steady-state samples for reactors for condition B, 4.2-day retention time reactors (Fig. 1B and 2B) were switched to copper-free NMS medium and monitored for an additional 16 days (∼3.7 retention times) to examine biomarker pmoA, mmoX, and mbnA transcript response to changes in copper conditions (Fig. 3). The gene mbnA encodes a putative precursor polypeptide essential for production of copper-binding, ribosomally produced, posttranslationally modified peptides (RiPP) called methanobactins. Methanobactins are suspected to work together with a protein called MmoD in the regulation of the “copper switch” and MMO operons (14, 50). Methanobactin is produced and secreted under copper starvation conditions and then reinternalized, serving as a copper source for pMMO (51). Previous work has shown that the M. trichosporium OB3b pmoA and mmoX transcript level response when exposed to new copper levels occurs in the order of minutes and hours for washed cell pellets and cultures in bioreactors, respectively (52, 53). Copper-free medium was provided to condition B reactors at day 36 (day 0, copper-free condition); from this time, the only copper in the system was that already present in the reactor, including biomass-associated Cu. During this time, no significant changes were observed in reactor biomass levels and dissolved oxygen. Following the start of copper starvation, dissolved methane concentrations rose from about 0.3 mg per liter to a maximum of 1.35 mg per liter 8.8 days later (∼2.1 retention times) before returning to prestarvation levels at day 14.7 (∼3.5 retention times). During this time, cell amount and pmoA, mmoX, and mbnA transcript levels were quantified using qPCR and RT-qPCR and converted to per-cell transcript levels (Fig. 4).
FIG 3
FIG 3 Condition B, 4.2-day retention time M. trichosporium OB3b reactor performance under copper-free medium conditions. Shown are aqueous concentrations of CH4 and O2 on the left y axis and biomass on the right y axis. All data are means ± standard deviations from triplicate reactors for a given sampling date. Time zero at the top x axis indicates transition to copper-free medium. Retention times during copper-free medium operation did not change.
FIG 4
FIG 4 Per-cell biomarker transcript levels in M. trichosporium OB3b during transition to copper-free medium for condition B, 4.2-day retention time reactors. Per-cell pmoA, mmoX, and mbnA transcript levels are shown versus time. Data are means ± standard deviations from triplicate reactors for a given sampling date. Time zero at the top x axis indicates transition to copper-free media.
After the addition of copper starvation medium, pmoA expression decreased 3.6-fold after 0.91 days (0.21 retention time) and after 4.84 days (1.14 retention times) and on, pmoA expression decreased at least 14-fold compared to conditions of copper availability. Differences in per-cell pmoA transcript levels between copper-present and copper-free conditions were statistically significant (P < 0.005). Compared to copper-replete conditions (0.08 to 0.18 copy per cell), a slight increase in per-cell mbnA transcript levels was observed under copper starvation conditions, with 0.48 copy per cell observed after 4.84 days (1.14 retention times) and a maximum of 0.56 copy per cell after 15.80 days (3.72 retention times) following the addition of copper-free media (Fig. 4). However, differences in per-cell mbnA transcript levels between copper-present and copper starvation conditions were found to not be statistically significant (P > 0.5). The onset of copper depletion did not strongly affect mmoX expression, with only a slight, but statistically significant (P < 0.05), increase in per-cell transcript amounts during copper-free medium reactor operation. The maximum observed per-cell mmoX transcript level during this period was 0.085 after 4.84 days (1.14 retention times). The largest changes in per-cell transcript levels during copper-free operation relative to copper-present amounts were a 23.5-fold decrease for pmoA, a 2.2-fold increase for mmoX, and a 3.9-fold increase for mbnA, all occurring after 4.84 days, which corresponded roughly to 1 retention time. Additionally, a drop in methanotrophic activity was shown by a small increase in dissolved methane in the reactor (Fig. 3). Cell amounts determined using qPCR did not change under copper-free conditions (Table S3), and RNA recoveries and qPCR efficiencies were consistent across samples and gene targets. Under these conditions, per-cell pmoA transcript abundances remained almost 2 orders of magnitude higher than per-cell mmoX transcript abundances (Fig. 4). Observed per-cell pmoA transcript levels under copper-replete (∼100) and copper-depleted (∼10) conditions were similar to previously reported values, while per-cell mmoX transcript levels during copper starvation were lower than the reported maximum of ∼1 mmoX transcript per cell during copper starvation (14). Copper levels were not determined during this period, but copper was assumed to be leaving in the reactor effluent, dissolved in the reactor medium and via biomass-associated copper. Low mmoX transcript levels observed during copper-free operation could be due to reactor copper-to-biomass ratios being below the threshold to induce a decrease in pmoA expression but still above reported thresholds for maximum mmoX expression. Based on estimated copper concentrations from dilution of the reactor medium, copper-to-biomass ratios would be below the reported threshold for maximum mmoX expression and inhibition of pmoA expression after 12.23 days (2.88 retention times). After 15.80 days (3.72 retention times), the estimated copper concentration would be 0.054 μM Cu, with a copper-to-biomass ratio of 0.410 μmol of copper per g (dry weight) of cells, about 2-fold lower than the reported copper-to-biomass threshold for maximum mmoX expression and inhibition of pmoA expression. However, copper salvaging mechanisms may diminish the limitation for Cu.

Correlations between biomarker levels and methane oxidation rates.

Methane oxidation mRNA biomarker amounts during steady-state operation were normalized with M. trichosporium OB3b cell abundances to obtain per-cell transcript levels. Differences in per-cell pmoA transcript levels were statistically significant, but those for per-cell mmoX transcript levels across the methane oxidation rate conditions were not (Table S4). Inclusion of both mmoX and pmoA transcripts (as per-cell pmoA plus mmoX transcript levels) showed no difference compared to pmoA alone, as mmoX transcript levels were orders of magnitude lower than for pmoA. Differences in per-cell pmoA transcript levels across oxidation rate conditions suggest differences in activities of the M. trichosporium OB3b populations in these reactors. The range of observed per-cell pmoA transcript levels in this study (0.25 to 120.74) are similar to reported per-cell transcript levels for aerobic methanotrophs under both controlled (14, 35, 54) and in situ (29, 30, 55) conditions.
The observed M. trichosporium OB3b per-cell methane oxidation rates for the conditions explored ranged from 0.013 to 3.816 pmol CH4 per cell per day (Fig. 5), agreeing with reported literature values for aerobic methanotrophs, with values of 0.005 to 2.504 pmol CH4 per cell per day after conversion to the same units (2, 5658). Reported values included those for a variety of aerobic methanotrophs, including pure cultures of M. trichosporium OB3b, Methylomicrobium album BG8, a Methylocystis sp., methanotroph strain WP 12, mixed methanotrophic cultures, and soil methanotrophs with growth conditions including in situ and batch. Power law trends were used to explore correlations between per-cell biomarker transcript levels and per-cell methane oxidation rates and between biomarker copies per volume and volumetric methane oxidation rates (Fig. 5 and Fig. S3). Higher per-cell pMMO or pmoA transcript levels were hypothesized to correspond to more active cells with increased per-cell methane oxidation rates. A strong positive correlation (Pearson’s R2 = 0.97) across 3 orders of magnitude was observed between M. trichosporium OB3b per-cell pmoA transcript levels and per-cell methane oxidation rates (Fig. 5).
FIG 5
FIG 5 Correlation of steady state per-cell pmoA transcript levels with per cell methane oxidation rates for M. trichosporium OB3b. Condition A, retention time = 3.21 days (diamonds); condition B, retention time = 4.18 days (circles); condition C, retention time = 5.76 days (triangles); and condition D, retention time = 10.25 days (squares). Data shown are reactor averages for the methane oxidation rates in this study, for three replicates (conditions A, B, and C), one replicate (condition D). Error bars represent standard deviations of per-cell biomarker transcript levels (y axis) and methane oxidation rates per cell (x axis) across sampling dates. Power law trend and R2 value are shown.
No significant correlation was observed for per-cell mmoX transcript levels and per-cell methane oxidation rates, ranging from 0.02 to 0.88 (Table S5 and Fig. S3B), as mmoX transcript amounts were orders of magnitude lower than for pmoA. The correlation observed between per-cell pmoA plus mmoX transcript levels and per-cell methane oxidation rates (Table S5 and Fig. S3C) was due to an abundance of pmoA mRNA transcripts. Per-volume pmoA and mmoX transcript levels and methane oxidation rate showed weak correlations (Fig. S3D to F). This could be due to per-volume pmoA and mmoX transcript levels not being significantly different across reactor conditions and differences being reflected in per-cell transcript levels.
Correlations between per-cell biomarker transcript levels and per-cell methane oxidation rates during copper-limited reactor operation were also explored (Fig. S4). During copper limitation, the per-cell methane oxidation rate decreased, per-cell pmoA transcript levels decreased, and per-cell mmoX transcript levels slightly increased compared to those under copper-present conditions (Fig. 4 and Fig. S4). The strong correlation observed between per-cell pmoA transcript levels and per-cell methane oxidation rate under copper-present conditions was maintained during the copper-free operation, as per-cell pmoA transcript levels were still orders of magnitude higher than per-cell mmoX transcript levels. No changes were observed for the correlation between per-cell mmoX transcript levels and per-cell methane oxidation rate. This could be explained by biomass-associated copper remaining in the system. Further work is needed exploring these relationships under true copper-deficient conditions without potential effects of biomass-associated copper. Per-volume genome copies based on cell densities also showed a weak correlation with methane oxidation rates (Fig. S2A). Genome or cell amounts were not expected to be good indicators of activity: gene copies can indicate presence or potential but not necessarily active populations, as identical populations in terms of cell abundances can exhibit drastic differences in activity due to transient differences in local conditions. This was observed in a study of aerobic methane oxidation rates in lakes where absolute numbers of methanotrophs did not vary, while methane oxidation rates varied significantly over space and time (59). As mentioned previously, per-cell transcript levels have been suggested as descriptors of methanotrophic activity and have been found to be positively associated with methanotrophic activity in environmental soil and bog samples (29, 30). In batch culture incubations, whole-cell M. trichosporium OB3b activity was also found to positively correlate with pmoA transcript levels across growth phases (13). The strong correlation observed in M. trichosporium OB3b for per-cell pmoA transcript levels and per-cell methane oxidation rate was hypothesized to be due to the direct involvement of pMMO in methanotrophic activity. Increases in methane oxidation rate would require larger pMMO enzyme amounts and, therefore, per-cell pmoA expression. These results suggest that per-cell pmoA transcript levels may serve as a quantitative biomarker of methane oxidation rate for M. trichosporium OB3b and potentially across other pMMO-utilizing aerobic methanotrophs.
In this study, we quantified the predictive capabilities of methane oxidation mRNA biomarkers to reflect extant activity levels of methanotroph populations. This was achieved by quantifying methanotroph biomarker transcript abundances in continuously fed chemostat membrane bioreactors with the type II aerobic methanotroph M. trichosporium OB3b under steady-state conditions. A very strong correlation (R2 = 0.97) between per-cell pmoA transcript levels and per-cell methane oxidation rates was determined. As most aerobic methanotrophs and the anaerobic NC10 group bacterial methanotrophs (60) rely on pMMO enzymes for methane oxidation, similar correlations between per-cell pmoA transcript levels and methanotrophic activities being maintained across bacterial methanotroph types seem plausible. The presented work shows a strong correlation between per-cell methanotroph biomarker pmoA transcript levels and per-cell methane oxidation rates in pure methanotroph cultures and represents a step toward applying the quantitative predictive power of mRNA biomarkers to monitor dynamic activities of methanotroph populations in situ, with implications for the global methane cycle.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strain and growth conditions.

Experiments were conducted at 25°C using pure M. trichosporium strain OB3b (NCIMB 11131; VKM B-2117) cultures grown on nitrate mineral salts (NMS) medium (61). Prior to inoculation of bioreactors, M. trichosporium OB3b cultures were grown in 160-ml serum bottles (Wheaton, Millville, NJ) with 100 ml culture and 60 ml air headspace under constant shaking at 150 rpm. Bottles were provided 30 ml methane, with methane and air replenished when depleted until an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of at least 0.100 (approximate concentration of 40 mg cells [dry weight] per liter) was reached before inoculation of reactors. Multiple M. trichosporium OB3b culture bottle replicates were combined to obtain enough inoculum volume for all reactors.

Reactor design and experimental conditions.

Hollow-fiber membrane bioreactors (HFMBRs) were designed and constructed for this study. The HFMBR design could achieve steady-state conditions, and methane and oxygen delivery could be manipulated independently by controlling membrane gas pressures. HFMBRs consisted of 1-liter Pyrex medium bottles (Corning, Corning, NY) with modified gas-tight butyl rubber caps, including two separate permeation tube membranes for bubble-less delivery of CH4 (≥99.5% purity; Airgas, Radnor, PA) and O2 (≥99.99% purity; Airgas) gases (Fig. 6). Permeation tube gas release valves (Fig. 6B) were kept closed during reactor operation to maintain constant pressures inside tubes. Reactors had a liquid volume (VL) of 0.8 liter and headspace volume (VG) of 0.265 liter and were operated as chemostats at room temperature under sterile conditions. Reactor experiments were conducted at four distinct flow rates affecting the methane oxidation rates. These corresponded to reactors with 3.2-day (condition A), 4.2-day (condition B), 5.8-day (condition C), and 10.3-day (condition D) retention times (Fig. S2 and Table S1). For each condition, triplicate reactors were operated concurrently, except for 10.3-day (condition D) reactors with only one reactor, as one replicate reactor developed biofilm on the membrane and was not used.
FIG 6
FIG 6 Schematic of bioreactor experimental setup. (A) Overview of experimental system; (B) detailed view of chemostat HFMBR.
NMS medium was delivered to reactors using a multiplexed peristaltic pump (Ismatec, Wertheim, Germany). Retention time was determined by measuring reactor effluent volumes as time elapsed. Permeation tube pressures were set by adjusting pressure gauges with an Omega PCL425 pressure calibrator (Omega Engineering Inc., Norwalk, CT) and confirmed by measuring gas amounts with a gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) as described below. Permeation tubing was platinum-cured, HelixMark PharmaFocus PDMS tubing (3.18-mm inside diameter [i.d.] by 6.35-mm outside diameter [o.d.] by 1.59-mm wall thickness; Freudenberg Medical, Carpinteria, CA) due to its high gas permeability compared to those of other tubing materials (38). Reactors were operated under conditions of oxygen excess, and permeation tube pressures were kept constant under reactor steady-state conditions. Once reactor assembly was complete, reactors were inoculated with M. trichosporium OB3b, and permeation tubes and the medium pump were turned on. All reactors were provided NMS medium with 2 μM Cu. At the conclusion of steady-state methane oxidation rate conditions for condition B (retention time of 4.2 days), copper limitation and its effect on pmoA, mmoX, and mbnA mRNA expression were explored by supplying the reactor with copper-free NMS medium.

Methane, oxygen, and biomass sampling.

Methane and oxygen concentrations were determined from headspace samples collected via the reactor septa (Fig. 6B) with a 100-μl gas-tight syringe (VICI Precision Sampling, Baton Rouge, LA) and measuring gas amounts with a GC-TCD (5890 Series II; Hewlett-Packard, San Jose, CA) with helium (≥99.999% purity; Airgas) as a carrier gas using a 1.8-m by 3.175-mm by 2.1-mm stainless steel 60/80 Mol Sieve 5A column (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA). Headspace concentrations were converted to aqueous phase concentrations by comparison to prepared reference standards and using Henry’s law coefficient at 25°C (62). Reactor microbial biomass was monitored via OD600 readings using a NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) and correlating measurements to M. trichosporium OB3b culture biomass as cell dry weight using a standard curve. Biomass amounts were determined by filtering M. trichosporium OB3b culture biomass with Whatman grade GF/F glass microfiber filters (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL) and quantifying by drying at 105°C and weighing after cooling in a desiccator. Reactor biomass samples for nucleic acid extraction and mRNA and DNA biomarker quantification were collected on selected dates (conditions A, B, and D, n = 2; condition C, n = 3) under steady-state conditions as well as during copper limitation for condition B.

Nucleic acid extraction and cDNA synthesis.

DNA and RNA extractions were performed on 2-ml culture samples. Sample collection, processing, and storage were as previously described (26). DNA was extracted using the AllPrep DNA/RNA minikit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and RNA using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), following the manufacturers’ instructions. Luciferase (luc) DNA and mRNA spike-ins were used as internal reference standards to account for DNA and RNA losses during extraction and reverse transcription (RT) steps as previously reported (63). Recovered quantities of luc mRNA (Promega, Madison, WI) and luc DNA (Promega) were used to correct recovered target gene quantities as previously described (27, 64).
Extracted DNA concentrations were estimated using NanoDrop; aliquots were diluted 10-fold and stored at −20°C until further analysis. Extracted RNA was processed the same day, undergoing RQ1 RNase-free DNase (Promega) treatment as previously described (24), and concentrations were estimated using NanoDrop. Aliquots of RNA were then treated with the iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions for RT of mRNA to cDNA. Following cDNA synthesis, samples were diluted 5-fold and stored at −20°C until further analysis. Nucleic acid quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) was done on a subset of representative samples at the Cornell Biotechnology Resource Center (BRC).

Quantitative PCR analyses and primer selection.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) and reverse transcription-qPCR (RT-qPCR) analyses of M. trichosporium OB3b cultures were performed using primers indicated in Table 1. For condition B, transcript amounts for methanobactin gene subunit mbnA, encoding a precursor polypeptide involved copper switch, were also quantified (Table 1). M. trichosporium OB3b cell amounts were determined by qPCR using pmoA primers on extracted DNA and pmoA, mmoX, and mbnA transcript amounts by RT-qPCR using respective primers on cDNA.
TABLE 1
TABLE 1 Gene targets and qPCR primers in this study
Target genePrimerSequence (5′–3′)Reference
M. trichosporium OB3b pmoAqpmoA_fwTTCTGGGGCTGGACCTAYTTC52
 qpmoA_revCCGACAGCAGCAGGATGATG 
M. trichosporium OB3b mmoXqmmoX_fwTCAACACCGATCTSAACAACG52
 qmmoX_revTCCAGATTCCRCCCCAATCC 
luc internal standardluc_fwTACAACACCCCAACATCTTCGA63
 luc_revGGAAGTTCACCGGCGTCAT 
M. trichosporium OB3b mbnAmbnA_fwTGGAAACTCCCTTAGGAGGAA14
 mbnA_revCTGCAC GGATAGCACGAAC 
All qPCRs were performed in triplicate in 96-well qPCR plates with 20-μl reaction volumes using Luna universal qPCR master mix (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Thermal cycling was conducted on an iCycler IQ multicolor real-time detection system (Bio-Rad) using previously reported qPCR conditions (14, 52, 63). Melt curve analyses were conducted on all samples to check for nonspecific amplification. Specificities of qPCR products were verified on a subset of representative samples via gel electrophoresis and Sanger sequencing at the Cornell BRC. “No RT” control qPCRs were done on DNase-treated RNA extracts to check for DNA contamination. Average cycle threshold (CT) values were used to quantify DNA and mRNA biomarker copies using standard curves from dilutions of pure culture DNA of known copies per microliter (see below). Values for copies per microliter were converted to copies per milliliter of original culture sample and corrected with corresponding sample recovered luc DNA and cDNA amounts determined via qPCR.
To generate qPCR standards, M. trichosporium OB3b DNA was quantified using the Quant-iT double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) assay kit (Invitrogen) on a Tecan Infinite M200 Pro microplate reader (Tecan US, Inc., Raleigh, NC) and converted to genome copies using published M. trichosporium OB3b genome information (65). Standard curves for determination of luc recoveries were made from the same luc DNA as used to spike samples. Standards ranged from 107 copies per μl to 102 copies per μl for each gene target and were stored at −20°C until use. Biomarker qPCR and RT-qPCR data were used to determine per-volume genome (cell amounts) as well as per-volume and per-cell pmoA and mmoX transcript amounts (per-cell transcript levels).

Calculation of methane oxidation rates.

A mechanistic biokinetic model describing the reactor system was developed using Stella Architect 1.1 (ISEE Systems, Lebanon, NH) and previously published biokinetic parameters for M. trichosporium OB3b (42, 66, 67). Methane and oxygen permeation coefficients (Kp) for the reactor setup were determined in duplicate sterile reactors by measuring permeant gas concentrations over time and fitting data to a model describing the reactor system. The abiotic HFMBR model is available in the supplemental material (Fig. S5 and Tables S6 and S7). Following Kp determination, explicit mechanistic predictions could be made for reactor methane, oxygen, and biomass in the reactor, including methanotroph growth and consumption of gaseous substrates (Table 2).
TABLE 2
TABLE 2 Model expressions describing methanotroph growth in HFMBRsa
ModelExpressionEquation
MethanedmCH4dt = Kp,CH4Ap,CH4VL(CL,CH4*CL,CH4)kmaxXaVL(CL,CH4Km,CH4 + CL,CH4)CL,CH4Q1
OxygendmO2dt = Kp,O2Ap,O2VL(CL,O2*CL,O2)2(1+ fe)kmaxXaVL(CL,O2Km,O2 + CL,O2)CL,O2Q2
BiomassdXadt = kmaxXaY(CL,CH4Km,CH4 + CL,CH4)(CL,O2Km,O2 + CL,O2)bXaXa(QVL)3
a
dmCH4dt = methane mass accumulation rate in reactor (milligrams CH4 per day). dmO2dt = oxygen mass accumulation rate in reactor (milligrams CH4 per day). dXadt = methanotroph biomass accumulation rate in reactor (milligrams biomass per day). Kp = permeation coefficient (centimeters per day). Ap = permeation tube surface area per liquid volume (per centimeter). VL = liquid volume (centimeters cubed). CL* = theoretical concentration of substrates in equilibrium with gas phase (milligrams CH4 per cubic centimeter). CL = concentration of substrate in liquid phase (milligrams CH4 per cubic centimeter). kmax = maximum specific rate of substrate utilization (milligrams CH4 per milligram VSS [see below] per day) (value: 2.2) (66). Xa = methanotroph concentration (milligrams biomass per cubic centimeter). Km,CH4 = Monod half-saturation constant for methane (milligrams per cubic centimeter) (value: 7 × 10−5) (66). Km,O2 = Monod half-saturation constants for oxygen (milligrams per cubic centimeter) (value: 1 × 10−5) (42). Q = flow rate (cubic centimeter per day). fe = fraction of methane used for energy (unitless) (value: 0.34) (67). Y = yield (milligram VSS [see below] per milligram CH4) (value: 0.66) (67). b = endogenous decay coefficient (per day) (value: 0.18) (66). Values based on methanotroph biomass measured as milligram volatile suspended solids (VSS) converted to milligram cell biomass (cell dry weight) using a conversion factor of 0.79 mg VSS per mg cell (dry weight).
Expressions for the mass rate of methane and oxygen accumulation in bioreactor liquid are shown as equations 1 and 2, respectively. The expression for methanotroph biomass is shown as equation 3. A double Monod equation was used to calculate microbial biomass and substrate consumption terms (68). The model assumed that all substrates other than methane and oxygen were present in excess and that inhibition of methanotrophs occurred under high oxygen levels as observed by Ren and colleagues (44). Reported stoichiometric and kinetic expressions and parameters for M. trichosporium OB3b with nitrate as a nitrogen source were used (Table 2). Details of the biotic model information are available in Fig. S6 and Table S8.
Reactor methane oxidation rates were determined from reactor data using model equation 1, methane concentrations were determined via GC-TCD, and cell amounts were determined via qPCR of the pmoA gene. Methane oxidation rates (milligrams CH4 per liter per day) were converted to appropriate units to obtain methane oxidation rates per unit volume, normalized by pmoA gene copies and pmoA copies per genome (n = 2 in M. trichosporium OB3b) (69) to obtain cell normalized methane oxidation rates.

Statistical analysis.

Statistical analyses were conducted using R studio software (version 3.4.2) with the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test to examine differences in DNA and mRNA biomarker amounts and per-cell biomarker amounts across the reactor conditions.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank James Gossett for bioreactor design suggestions and Jeremy Semrau for providing the Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b cultures. We are grateful the Cornell Statistical Consulting Unit for their assistance with the statistical analyses.
This work was supported by a Cornell Sloan Graduate Fellowship to E.F.T.
The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. All authors have given approval for the final version of the manuscript.
We declare no competing financial interest.

REFERENCES

1.
IPCC. 2015. Climate change 2014: synthesis report. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland.
2.
Hanson R, Hanson T. 1996. Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Rev 60:439–471.
3.
Conrad R. 2009. The global methane cycle: recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved. Environ Microbiol Rep 1:285–292.
4.
Reeburgh W, Whalen S, Alperin M. 1993. The role of methylotrophy in the global methane budget, p 1–14. In Murrell JC, Kelly DP (ed), Microbial growth on C1 compounds. Intercept Ltd, Andover, United Kingdom.
5.
Bridgham SD, Cadillo-Quiroz H, Keller JK, Zhuang Q. 2013. Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales. Glob Chang Biol 19:1325–1346.
6.
Kirschke S, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Saunois M, Canadell JG, Dlugokencky EJ, Bergamaschi P, Bergmann D, Blake DR, Bruhwiler L, Cameron-Smith P, Castaldi S, Chevallier F, Feng L, Fraser A, Heimann M, Hodson EL, Houweling S, Josse B, Fraser PJ, Krummel PB, Lamarque J-F, Langenfelds RL, Le Quéré C, Naik V, O’Doherty S, Palmer PI, Pison I, Plummer D, Poulter B, Prinn RG, Rigby M, Ringeval B, Santini M, Schmidt M, Shindell DT, Simpson IJ, Spahni R, Steele LP, Strode SA, Sudo K, Szopa S, van der Werf GR, Voulgarakis A, van Weele M, Weiss RF, Williams JE, Zeng G. 2013. Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nat Geosci 6:813–823.
7.
Aronson EL, Allison SD, Helliker BR. 2013. Environmental impacts on the diversity of methane-cycling microbes and their resultant function. Front Microbiol 4:225.
8.
Rostkowski KH, Criddle CS, Lepech MD. 2012. Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment for a cradle-to-cradle cycle: biogas-to-bioplastic (and back). Environ Sci Technol 46:9822–9829.
9.
Zuñiga C, Morales M, Revah S. 2013. Polyhydroxyalkanoates accumulation by Methylobacterium organophilum CZ-2 during methane degradation using citrate or propionate as cosubstrates. Bioresour Technol 129:686–689.
10.
Dalton H. 2005. The natural and unnatural history of methane-oxidizing bacteria. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:1207–1222.
11.
Dedysh SN, Knief C, Dunfield PF. 2005. Methylocella species are facultatively methanotrophic. J Bacteriol 187:4665–4670.
12.
Vorobev AV, Baani M, Doronina NV, Brady AL, Liesack W, Dunfield PF, Dedysh SN. 2011. Methyloferula stellata gen. nov., sp. nov., an acidophilic, obligately methanotrophic bacterium that possesses only a soluble methane monooxygenase. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 61:2456–2463.
13.
Han JI, Semrau JD. 2004. Quantification of gene expression in methanotrophs by competitive reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Environ Microbiol 6:388–399.
14.
Semrau JD, Jagadevan S, Dispirito AA, Khalifa A, Scanlan J, Bergman BH, Freemeier BC, Baral BS, Bandow NL, Vorobev A, Haft DH, Vuilleumier S, Murrell CJ. 2013. Methanobactin and MmoD work in concert to act as the “copper-switch” in methanotrophs. Environ Microbiol 15:3077–3086.
15.
Burrows KJ, Cornish A, Scott D, Higgins IJ. 1984. Substrate specificities of the soluble and particulate methane mono-oxygenases of Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Microbiology 130:3327–3333.
16.
Holmes AJ, Costello A, Lidstrom ME, Murrell JC. 1995. Evidence that particulate methane monooxygenase and ammonia monooxygenase may be evolutionarily related. FEMS Microbiol Lett 132:203–208.
17.
Costello AM, Lidstrom ME. 1999. Molecular characterization of functional and phylogenetic genes from natural populations of methanotrophs in lake sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:5066–5074.
18.
Fernández-Baca CP, Truhlar AM, Omar AEH, Rahm BG, Walter MT, Richardson RE. 2018. Methane and nitrous oxide cycling microbial communities in soils above septic leach fields: abundances with depth and correlations with net surface emissions. Sci Total Environ 640-641:429–441.
19.
Oswald K, Milucka J, Brand A, Hach P, Littmann S, Wehrli B, Kuypers MMM, Schubert CJ. 2016. Aerobic gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs mitigate methane emissions from oxic and anoxic lake waters. Limnol Oceanogr 61:S101–S118.
20.
Knief C. 2015. Diversity and habitat preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as molecular marker. Front Microbiol 6:1346.
21.
Lovley DR. 2003. Cleaning up with genomics: applying molecular biology to bioremediation. Nat Rev Microbiol 1:35–44.
22.
Holmes DE, Nevin KP, O’Neil RA, Ward JE, Adams LA, Woodard TL, Vrionis HA, Lovley DR. 2005. Potential for quantifying expression of the Geobacteraceae citrate synthase gene to assess the activity of Geobacteraceae in the subsurface and on current-harvesting electrodes. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:6870–6877.
23.
Wilkins MJ, Callister SJ, Miletto M, Williams KH, Nicora CD, Lovley DR, Long PE, Lipton MS. 2011. Development of a biomarker for Geobacter activity and strain composition; proteogenomic analysis of the citrate synthase protein during bioremediation of U(VI). Microb Biotechnol 4:55–63.
24.
Rahm BG, Richardson RE. 2008. Correlation of respiratory gene expression levels and pseudo-steady-state PCE respiration rates in Dehalococcoides ethenogenes. Environ Sci Technol 42:416–421.
25.
Rahm BG, Richardson RE. 2008. Dehalococcoides’ gene transcripts as quantitative bioindicators of tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, and cis-1,2-dichloroethene dehalorespiration rates. Environ Sci Technol 42:5099–5105.
26.
Rowe AR, Heavner GL, Mansfeldt CB, Werner JJ, Richardson RE. 2012. Relating chloroethene respiration rates in Dehalococcoides to protein and mRNA biomarkers. Environ Sci Technol 46:9388–9397.
27.
Heavner G, Mansfeldt C, Debs G, Hellerstedt S, Rowe A, Richardson R. 2018. Biomarkers’ responses to reductive dechlorination rates and oxygen stress in bioaugmentation culture KB-1TM. Microorganisms 6:13.
28.
Rowe AR, Mansfeldt CB, Heavner GL, Richardson RE. 2013. Methanospirillum respiratory mRNA biomarkers correlate with hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis rate during growth and competition for hydrogen in an organochlorine-respiring mixed culture. Environ Sci Technol 47:372–381.
29.
Kolb S, Knief C, Dunfield PF, Conrad R. 2005. Abundance and activity of uncultured methanotrophic bacteria involved in the consumption of atmospheric methane in two forest soils. Environ Microbiol 7:1150–1161.
30.
Freitag TE, Toet S, Ineson P, Prosser JI. 2010. Links between methane flux and transcriptional activities of methanogens and methane oxidizers in a blanket peat bog. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:157–165.
31.
Tuomivirta TT, Yrjälä K, Fritze H. 2009. Quantitative PCR of pmoA using a novel reverse primer correlates with potential methane oxidation in Finnish fen. Res Microbiol 160:751–756.
32.
Peltoniemi K, Laiho R, Juottonen H, Bodrossy L, Kell DK, Minkkinen K, Mäkiranta P, Mehtätalo L, Penttilä T, Siljanen HMP, Tuittila ES, Tuomivirta T, Fritze H. 2016. Responses of methanogenic and methanotrophic communities to warming in varying moisture regimes of two boreal fens. Soil Biol Biochem 97:144–156.
33.
Crevecoeur S, Vincent WF, Comte J, Matveev A, Lovejoy C. 2017. Diversity and potential activity of methanotrophs in high methane-emitting permafrost thaw ponds. PLoS One 12:e0188223.
34.
Siljanen HMP, Saari A, Bodrossy L, Martikainen PJ. 2012. Effects of nitrogen load on the function and diversity of methanotrophs in the littoral wetland of a boreal lake. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 80:548–555.
35.
Reim A, Lüke C, Krause S, Pratscher J, Frenzel P. 2012. One millimetre makes the difference: high-resolution analysis of methane-oxidizing bacteria and their specific activity at the oxic-anoxic interface in a flooded paddy soil. ISME J 6:2128–2139.
36.
Choi D-W, Kunz RC, Boyd ES, Jeremy D, Antholine WE, Han J-I, Zahn JA, Boyd JM, Mora AD, Dispirito AA, Semrau JD. 2003. The membrane-associated methane monooxygenase (pMMO) and pMMO-NADH:quinone oxidoreductase complex from Methylococcus capsulatus Bath. J Bacteriol 185:5755–5764.
37.
Yasin M, Park S, Jeong Y, Lee EY, Lee J, Chang IS. 2014. Effect of internal pressure and gas/liquid interface area on the CO mass transfer coefficient using hollow fibre membranes as a high mass transfer gas diffusing system for microbial syngas fermentation. Bioresour Technol 169:637–643.
38.
Robb WL. 1968. Thin silicon membranes. Their permeation properties and some applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci 146:119–137.
39.
Pinnau I, Toy LG. 1996. Gas and vapor transport properties of amorphous prefluorinated copolymer membranes based on 2,2-bistrifluoromethyl-4,5-difluoro-1,2-dioxole/tetrafluoroethylene. J Memb Sci 109:125–133.
40.
Pinnau I, He Z. 2004. Pure- and mixed-gas permeation properties of polydimethylsiloxane for hydrocarbon/methane and hydrocarbon/hydrogen separation. J Membr Sci 244:227–233.
41.
Beeskow-Strauch B, Schicks JM, Zimmer M. 2015. Evaluation of CH4 gas permeation rates through silicone membranes and its possible use as CH4-extractor in gas hydrate deposits. Energies 8:5090–5106.
42.
Joergensen L. 1985. The methane mono-oxygenase reaction system studied in vivo by membrane-inlet mass spectrometry. Biochem J 225:441–448.
43.
Shah NN, Park S, Taylor RT, Droege MW. 1992. Cultivation of Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b: III. Production of particulate methane monooxygenase in continuous culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 40:705–712.
44.
Ren T, Amaral JA, Knowles R. 1997. The response of methane consumption by pure cultures of methanotrophic bacteria to oxygen. Can J Microbiol 43:925–928.
45.
Segers R. 1998. Methane production and methane consumption: a review of processes underlying wetland methane fluxes. Biogeochemistry 41:23–51.
46.
Broholm K, Christensen TH, Jensen BK. 1992. Modelling TCE degradation by a mixed culture of methane oxidizing bacteria. Water Res 26:1177–1185.
47.
Morinaga Y, Yamanaka S, Yoshimura M, Takinami K, Hirose Y. 1979. Methane metabolism of the obligate methane-utilizing bacterium, Methylomonas flagellata, in methane-limited and oxygen-limited chemostat culture. Agric Biol Chem 43:2453–2458.
48.
Bédard C, Knowles R. 1989. Physiology, biochemistry, and specific inhibitors of CH4, NH4+, and CO oxidation by methanotrophs and nitrifiers. Microbiol Rev 53:68–84.
49.
Bowman J. 2006. The methanotrophs—the families Methylococcaceae and Methylocystaceae, p 266–289. In Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer KH, Stackebrandt E (ed), The prokaryotes. Springer, New York, NY.
50.
Semrau JD, DiSpirito AA, Gu W, Yoon S. 2018. Metals and methanotrophy. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e02289-17.
51.
Balasubramanian R, Kenney GE, Rosenzweig AC. 2011. Dual pathways for copper uptake by methanotrophic bacteria. J Biol Chem 286:37313–37319.
52.
Knapp CW, Fowle DA, Kulczycki E, Roberts JA, Graham DW. 2007. Methane monooxygenase gene expression mediated by methanobactin in the presence of mineral copper sources. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:12040–12045.
53.
Chi Fru E, Gray ND, Mccann C, De J, Baptista C, Christgen B, Talbot HM, Ghazouani AE, Dennison C, Graham DW. 2011. Effects of copper mineralogy and methanobactin on cell growth and sMMO activity in Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Biogeosciences 8:2887–2894.
54.
Yoon S, Im J, Bandow N, Dispirito AA, Semrau JD. 2011. Constitutive expression of pMMO by Methylocystis strain SB2 when grown on multi-carbon substrates: implications for biodegradation of chlorinated ethenes. Environ Microbiol Rep 3:182–188.
55.
Esson KC, Lin X, Kumaresan D, Chanton JP, Murrell JC, Kostka JE. 2016. Alpha- and gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs codominate the active methane-oxidizing communities in an acidic boreal peat bog. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:2363–2371.
56.
Roslev P, King GM. 1995. Aerobic and anaerobic starvation metabolism in methanotrophic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1563–1570.
57.
Nyerges G, Han SK, Stein LY. 2010. Effects of ammonium and nitrite on growth and competitive fitness of cultivated methanotrophic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5648–5651.
58.
Kits KD, Campbell DJ, Rosana AR, Stein LY. 2015. Diverse electron sources support denitrification under hypoxia in the obligate methanotroph Methylomicrobium album strain BG8. Front Microbiol 6:1072.
59.
Carini S, Bano N, LeCleir G, Joye SB. 2005. Aerobic methane oxidation and methanotroph community composition during seasonal stratification in Mono Lake, California (USA). Environ Microbiol 7:1127–1138.
60.
Ettwig KF, Butler MK, Le Paslier D, Pelletier E, Mangenot S, Kuypers MMM, Schreiber F, Dutilh BE, Zedelius J, de Beer D, Gloerich J, Wessels HJCT, van Alen T, Luesken F, Wu ML, van de Pas-Schoonen KT, Op den Camp HJM, Janssen-Megens EM, Francoijs K-J, Stunnenberg H, Weissenbach J, Jetten MSM, Strous M. 2010. Nitrite-driven anaerobic methane oxidation by oxygenic bacteria. Nature 464:543–548.
61.
Whittenbury R, Phillips K, Wilkinson J. 1970. Enrichment, isolation and some properties of methane-utilizing bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 61:205–218.
62.
Sander R. 2015. Compilation of Henry’s law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent. Atmos Chem Phys 15:4399–4981.
63.
Johnson DR, Lee PKH, Holmes VF, Alvarez-Cohen L. 2005. An internal reference technique for accurately quantifying specific mRNAs by real-time PCR with application to the tceA reductive dehalogenase gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3866–3871.
64.
Rowe AR, Mansfeldt CB, Heavner GL, Richardson RE. 2015. Relating mRNA and protein biomarker levels in a Dehalococcoides and Methanospirillum-containing community. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99:2313–2327.
65.
Stein LY, Yoon S, Semrau JD, DiSpirito AA, Crombie A, Murrell JC, Vuilleumier S, Kalyuzhnaya MG, Op Den Camp HJM, Bringel F, Bruce D, Cheng JF, Copeland A, Goodwin L, Han S, Hauser L, Jetten MSM, Lajus A, Land ML, Lapidus A, Lucas S, Médigue C, Pitluck S, Woyke T, Zeytun A, Klotz MG. 2010. Genome sequence of the obligate methanotroph Methylosinus trichosporium strain OB3b. J Bacteriol 192:6497–6498.
66.
Smith LH, Kitanidis PK, Mccarty PL. 1997. Numerical modeling and uncertainties in rate coefficients for methane utilization and TCE cometabolism by a methane- oxidizing mixed culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 53:320–333.
67.
Rostkowski KH, Pfluger AR, Criddle CS. 2013. Stoichiometry and kinetics of the PHB-producing type II methanotrophs Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b and Methylocystis parvus OBBP. Bioresour Technol 132:71–77.
68.
Rittmann BE, McCarty PL. 2001. Environmental biotechnology: principles and applications. McGraw-Hill, Boston, MA.
69.
Gilbert B, McDonald IR, Finch R, Stafford GP, Nielsen AK, Murrell JC. 2000. Molecular analysis of the pmo (particulate methane monooxygenase) operons from two type II methanotrophs. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:966–975.

Supplemental Material

File (aem.01048-20-s0001.pdf)
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

Applied and Environmental Microbiology cover image
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Volume 86Number 2310 November 2020
eLocator: e01048-20
Editor: Claire Vieille, Michigan State University
PubMed: 32948519

History

Received: 4 May 2020
Accepted: 10 September 2020
Published online: 10 November 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

KEYWORDS

  1. methanotrophs
  2. methane oxidation
  3. Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b
  4. biomarkers
  5. pmoA

Contributors

Authors

School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
Ruth E. Richardson
School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA

Editor

Claire Vieille
Editor
Michigan State University

Notes

Address correspondence to Egidio F. Tentori, [email protected].

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Citations

View Options

Figures and Media

Figures

Media

Tables

Share

Metrics & Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Share Options
Share the article link

Share on social media
Get Access
Buy Article
Applied and Environmental Microbiology Vol.86 • Issue 23 • ASM Journals Pay Per View, PPV 25
Journal Subscription
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
ASM members can purchase subscriptions to journals.
Join or renew
View Options
Tables
Figures and Media
References
American Society for Microbiology ("ASM") is committed to maintaining your confidence and trust with respect to the information we collect from you on websites owned and operated by ASM ("ASM Web Sites") and other sources. This Privacy Policy sets forth the information we collect about you, how we use this information and the choices you have about how we use such information.
FIND OUT MORE about the privacy policy