INTRODUCTION
Numerous bacteria are able to utilize maltose and maltodextrins as carbon and energy sources. Depending on the organism, the uptake of these compounds is catalyzed by one of at least three different transport systems. Maltose and maltodextrins, which are taken up by an ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter (
1) or via the LacY-like MalY permease (
2,
3), enter bacterial cells without modification. Nevertheless, their catabolism can largely vary from one organism to another. It usually includes α-glucosidases, which liberate either glucose or maltose from the nonreducing end of maltose or maltooligosaccharides, and maltose or maltodextrin phosphorylases, which use inorganic phosphate to phosphorolyze α-1,4 linkages by liberating glucose-1-phosphate (glucose-1-P) from the nonreducing end of maltose or maltodextrins. Maltose or maltooligosaccharides taken up via the phosphoenolpyruvate:carbohydrate phosphotransferase system (PEP:PTS) arrive in phosphorylated form in bacterial cells (
4,
5), and their catabolism therefore requires different sets of enzymes. In most organisms, maltose-6′-phosphate produced during PTS-catalyzed transport is hydrolyzed by a 6-phospho-α-glucosidase (6-P-α-glucosidase) (
6,
7).
While the transport of maltose and maltooligosaccharides has been studied in detail in several bacteria, including
Enterococcus faecalis (
8,
9), less is known about their subsequent degradation. In addition, there is no common pathway of maltodextrin catabolism, but depending on the organism, different catabolic routes are used. Maltose and maltodextrin catabolism has been extensively studied in
Escherichia coli (
1). This organism takes up maltose and maltooligosaccharides up to at least maltoheptaose via an ABC transport system. Four different enzymes, a maltodextrin phosphorylase (MalP) (
1), a glucogenic α-1,4-glycosidase (MalZ) (
10), an amylomaltase (MalQ) (
11), and a debranching enzyme (GlgX) (
12), are required for their subsequent catabolism.
Maltose and maltodextrin catabolism has also been studied in
Bacillus subtilis, the model organism of
Firmicutes (
13). This bacterium takes up maltose via a PTS and uses an NAD-dependent 6-P-α-glucosidase to hydrolyze maltose-6′-P produced during PTS-catalyzed transport into glucose-6-phosphate (glucose-6-P) and glucose (
6). Maltotriose and higher maltooligosaccharides are taken up by an ABC transporter.
B. subtilis uses two different α-1,4-glucosidases for the degradation of maltodextrin. The glucogenic α-1,4-glucosidase MalL (YvdL) stepwise liberates glucose from maltooligosaccharides up to maltopentaose (
4), whereas the maltogenic α-1,4-glucosidase YvdF liberates maltose preferably from longer maltooligosaccharides (
13). MalL also hydrolyzes maltose into two glucose molecules, and
B. subtilis therefore has no need for an amylomaltase.
B. subtilis also possesses a debranching enzyme (pullulanase), AmyX, which was proposed to hydrolyze α-1,6 linkages (
13).
Enterococci and streptococci transport maltose mainly via a PTS permease, MalT (
14), but in contrast to
B. subtilis, they lack a 6-P-α-glucosidase. Instead, they possess a phosphatase (MapP), which transforms maltose-6′-P formed by PTS-catalyzed transport into maltose (
8), which is subsequently phosphorolyzed to glucose and glucose-1-P.
E. faecalis also transports maltotriose preferably via MalT; intracellular maltotriose-6″-phosphate is subsequently converted to maltotriose by the enzyme MapP (
9). However, the enzymes catalyzing the further catabolism of maltotriose and higher maltodextrins, which are taken up via an ABC transporter, were not known. Interestingly, maltodextrin utilization by
E. faecalis affects the colonization of the gastrointestinal tract (
15) and of the liver and kidney (
9).
We demonstrate here that two enzymes, the genes of which are located upstream from the maltodextrin ABC transporter operon (
9) but oriented in opposite direction (
Fig. 1), play a major role in maltodextrin catabolism. One functions as a maltose-producing α-1,4- as well as α-1,6-exoglucosidase but also exhibits endoglucosidase activity with cyclodextrins. The other is a glucose-producing α-1,6-glucosidase. A third gene encodes an enzyme, which like
E. coli MalQ, functions as an amylomaltase but exclusively transfers glucosyl residues; its physiological role remains unknown.
DISCUSSION
Numerous bacteria utilize maltose and linear α-1,4- and α-1,6-linked maltooligosaccharides. However, their transport and catabolism vary largely from one organism to another. Maltose and maltooligosaccharide uptake can be catalyzed by ABC transporters, PTS permeases, or LacY-like transporters. The use of different systems probably reflects the optimal adaptation of the organisms to the environments in which they are exposed to maltodextrin. The pathogen
Neisseria meningitidis, which colonizes the nasopharynx in about 15% of the human population, is frequently exposed to high concentrations of maltose and maltooligosaccharides, and uptake by the ion-driven permease MalY might be sufficient to reach high intracellular concentrations (
3). Uptake via an ABC transporter (
1) and especially via a PTS permease (
9) allows the accumulation of maltooligosaccharides and their efficient catabolism even when their extracellular concentration is low, such as in soil. The energetic costs are similar for ion-driven and ABC-catalyzed transport but are lower for PTS-catalyzed uptake, because the substrate arrives already in phosphorylated form in the cell and is primed for further catabolism. The higher energetic transport costs can be compensated in bacteria which use a phosphorylase for the catabolism of maltose and maltodextrins. The same kind of “energy saving” also applies for the special case of enterococci and streptococci, which in the first catabolic step dephosphorylate maltose-6′-P and maltotriose-6″-P produced during PTS-catalyzed uptake (
8,
9). Maltose formed directly from maltose-6′-P by MapP or from maltotriose-6″-P by the combined action of MapP and MmdH is subsequently phosphorolyzed to glucose and glucose-1-P (
Fig. 10).
Bacterial catabolism of maltose and maltodextrin varies even more strongly than their transport. The most cost-efficient way of maltodextrin catabolism occurs via phosphorolysis, where longer maltodextrins
(n) are stepwise phosphorolyzed to maltodextrins
(n−1) plus glucose-1-P by using inorganic phosphate as a phosphoryl donor. This mode of catabolism is operative in
E. coli, where the maltodextrin phosphorylase MalP efficiently phosphorolyzes maltopentaose and longer maltooligosaccharides by liberating glucose-1-P from their nonreducing end. The enzyme is much less efficient with maltotetraose, does not react with maltose and maltotriose, and therefore degrades longer maltooligosaccharides mainly to maltotetraose and a small amount of maltotriose (
1). Their further catabolism is achieved by the glucogenic α-1,4-glycosidase MalZ, also called maltodextrin glucosidase, which hydrolyzes maltooligosaccharides by liberating glucose from their reducing end (
21), but this enzyme does not recognize maltose (
22). In contrast to MalP, the glucose-producing glucosidase is not cost-efficient, because one ATP has to be hydrolyzed for each glucose molecule liberated by MalZ to transform it to glucose-6-P. The catabolic energy costs will only be low if the ratio of glucose molecules liberated by MalP to MalZ is high.
The combined action of MalP and MalZ leads to the transformation of longer maltodextrins into maltose (
10). However,
E. coli possesses neither a maltose-specific α-1,4-glucosidase nor a phosphorylase able to support growth on maltose. Instead, maltose catabolism in
E. coli requires the amylomaltase MalQ, which catalyzes the transglycosylation/disproportionation of maltooligosaccharides by removing a glucose residue from the nonreducing end of maltooligosaccharides. While glucose is released and further catabolized, the part of the molecule that remains bound to the enzyme is transferred to a maltose or maltooligosaccharide molecule (
11). The possible advantage of
E. coli using the cumbersome amylomaltase instead of the phosphorylase reaction is not understood.
Streptococcus mutans also uses a glycosyltransferase, MalQ, which, similar to amylomaltase from
E. coli, removes glucose from maltose and maltotriose and transfers the remaining glucose or maltose residue to another maltooligosaccharide molecule. However, this organism probably spends less energy than
E. coli for maltooligosaccharide catabolism, because it contains no homologue of the glucogenic α-glucosidase MalZ. It only uses the phosphorylase GlgP, which releases glucose-1-P from maltodextrin and amylodextrin but not from maltose and maltotriose (
23).
Although
E. faecalis contains a maltose phosphorylase, it also possesses an amylomaltase-like enzyme (MmgT) with α-1,4-hydrolase and glucosyl transferase activities. It cuts off glucose residues from one maltooligosaccharide and transfers them to another. In contrast to MalQ of
E. coli (
1,
11) and
S. mutans (
23), MmgT does not react with maltose. In
E. coli and
S. mutans, MalQ is essential for the catabolism of maltose because the organisms lack a functional maltose phosphorylase. In contrast, in bacteria which contain a maltose phosphorylase, such as
E. faecalis and
Clostridium butyricum (
24), MalQ-like proteins react with maltotriose and higher maltooligosaccharides. The physiological function of MmgT is not known, because its deletion had no significant effect on the utilization of the maltooligosaccharides tested in the growth studies.
In organisms which (similar to enterococci and streptococci) use only maltose-producing α-1,4- and α-1,6-glucosidases, the energy costs for the catabolism of maltotetraose and longer maltooligosaccharides are probably slightly lower than in
E. coli. The combined action of MmdH and MalP leads to the transformation of maltotetraose into two molecules of glucose-1-P and glucose and of maltopentaose into two molecules of glucose-1-P and three glucose molecules.
B. subtilis probably incurs the highest catabolic energy costs, because the main enzymes of maltodextrin catabolism seem to be a maltogenic α-1,4-glucosidase (YvdF) that liberates maltose from longer maltooligosaccharides (maltopentaose to maltoheptaose) (
13), and a glucogenic α-1,4-glucosidase (MalL or YvdL), which stepwise liberates glucose from maltooligosaccharides up to maltopentaose (
25). MalL also hydrolyzes maltose into two glucose molecules. Consequently, maltooligosaccharides are entirely converted to glucose molecules, which need to be phosphorylated with ATP. It should be noted that
B. subtilis contains a presumed maltose phosphorylase, YvdK, of unknown physiological role (
4).
E. faecalis contains a debranching enzyme, GmdH, which hydrolyzes α-1,6 linkages by liberating glucose from the nonreducing end, similar to most maltodextrin-utilizing bacteria. Surprisingly, MmdH exhibits both α-1,4- and α-1,6-glucosidase activities. It hydrolyzes α-1,6 linkages by liberating maltose from the nonreducing end. GmdH and MmdH are required for the catabolism of panose and isopanose, respectively, two maltotriose linkage isomers (
Fig. 5) taken up by the ABC transporter (
Fig. 10). GmdH also liberates glucose from isomaltose and isomaltotriose. Its sequence and substrate specificity strongly resemble those of α-1,6-glucosidases in
B. subtilis (YcdG),
Bacillus cereus (
26), and
Bacillus coagulans (
27).
In E. faecalis, the genes encoding the enzymes required for the transport and catabolism of maltose and maltodextrins are organized in four different operons. The regulation of their expression is poorly understood. Only the malP operon is required for all substrates. Expression of the mdx operon is not needed for maltose and maltotriose utilization, and MmdH from the upstream operon is not required for maltose catabolism. Differential expression of these operons based on multiple regulators and/or inducers is therefore expected.
The genes required for maltose and maltodextrin utilization are usually subjected to catabolite repression. Indeed, the
E. faecalismdxE and
mmdH genes contain potential
cre sequences, the binding sites of the catabolite control protein A–Ser46-phosphorylated HPr (P-Ser46-HPr) complex (
28). Maltooligosaccharide utilization in
Firmicutes is also subjected to inducer exclusion (
29). While in enterobacteria, EIIA
Glc interacts with and inhibits MalK, P-Ser46-HPr has recently been reported to interact with MalK1 of
L. casei (
16), and a similar mechanism is probably operative in
E. faecalis. P-Ser46-HPr-mediated catabolite repression takes about 30 min to become effective, whereas P-Ser46-HPr-requiring inducer exclusion leads to an almost instant stop of maltodextrin uptake (
29) and hence formation of the inducer.