Persistent Nonviral Plasmid Vector in Nasal Tissues Causes False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Diagnostic Nucleic Acid Tests
ABSTRACT
Biomedical personnel can become contaminated with nonhazardous reagents used in the laboratory. We describe molecular studies performed on nasal secretions collected longitudinally from asymptomatic laboratory coworkers to determine if they were infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) circulating in the community or with SARS-CoV-2 DNA from a plasmid vector. Participants enrolled in a prospective study of incident SARS-CoV-2 infection had nasal swabs collected aseptically by study staff at enrollment, followed by weekly self-collection of anterior nasal swabs. SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis was performed by a real-time PCR test targeting the nucleocapsid gene. PCR tests targeting SARS-CoV-2 nonstructural protein 10 (nsp10), nsp14, and envelope and three regions of the plasmid vector were performed to differentiate amplification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA from the plasmid vector’s DNA. Nasal swabs from four asymptomatic coworkers with positive real-time PCR results for the SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid targets were negative when tested for SARS-CoV-2 nsp10, nsp14, and envelope protein. However, nucleic acids extracted from these nasal swabs amplified DNA regions of the plasmid vector used by the coworkers, including the ampicillin and neomycin/kanamycin resistance genes, the promoter-nucleocapsid junction, and unique codon-optimized regions. Nasal swabs from these individuals tested positive repeatedly, including during isolation. Longitudinal detection of plasmid DNA with SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid in nasal swabs suggests persistence in nasal tissues or colonizing bacteria. Nonviral plasmid vectors, while regarded as safe laboratory reagents, can interfere with molecular diagnostic tests. These reagents should be handled using proper personal protective equipment to prevent contamination of samples or laboratory personnel.
IMPORTANCE Asymptomatic laboratory workers who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 for days to months were found to harbor a laboratory plasmid vector containing SARS-CoV-2 DNA, which they had worked with in the past, in their nasal secretions. While prior studies have documented contamination of research personnel with PCR amplicons, our observation is novel, as these individuals shed the laboratory plasmid over days to months, including during isolation in their homes. This suggests that the plasmid was in their nasal tissues or that bacteria containing the plasmid had colonized their noses. While plasmids are generally safe, our detection of plasmid DNA in the nasal secretions of laboratory workers for weeks after they had stopped working with the plasmid shows the potential for these reagents to interfere with clinical tests and emphasizes that occupational exposures in the preceding months should be considered when interpreting diagnostic clinical tests.
REFERENCES
1.
Vogels CBF, Brito AF, Wyllie AL, Fauver JR, Ott IM, Kalinich CC, Petrone ME, Casanovas-Massana A, Catherine Muenker M, Moore AJ, Klein J, Lu P, Lu-Culligan A, Jiang X, Kim DJ, Kudo E, Mao T, Moriyama M, Oh JE, Park A, Silva J, Song E, Takahashi T, Taura M, Tokuyama M, Venkataraman A, Weizman OE, Wong P, Yang Y, Cheemarla NR, White EB, Lapidus S, Earnest R, Geng B, Vijayakumar P, Odio C, Fournier J, Bermejo S, Farhadian S, Dela Cruz CS, Iwasaki A, Ko AI, Landry ML, Foxman EF, Grubaugh ND. 2020. Analytical sensitivity, and efficiency comparisons of SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR primer-probe sets. Nat Microbiol 5:1299–1305.
2.
Davidi D, Fitzgerald S, Glaspell HL, Jalbert S, Klapperich CM, Landaverde L, Maheras S, Mattoon SE, Britto VM, Nguyen GT, Platt JT, Kuhfeldt K, Landsberg H, Stuopis CW, Turse JE, Hamer DH, Springer M. 2021. Amplicon residues in research laboratories masquerade as COVID-19 in surveillance tests. Cell Rep Methods 1:100005.
3.
Robinson-McCarthy LR, Mijalis AJ, Filsinger GT, de Puig H, Donghia NM, Schaus TE, Rasmussen RA, Ferreira R, Lunshof JE, Chao G, Ter-Ovanesyan D, Dodd O, Kuru E, Sesay AM, Rainbow J, Pawlowski AC, Wannier TM, Angenent-Mari NM, Najjar D, Yin P, Ingber DE, Tam JM, Church GM. 2021. Laboratory-generated DNA can cause anomalous pathogen diagnostic test results. Microbiol Spectr 9:e0031321.
4.
Montgomery TL, Paavola M, Bruce EA, Botten JW, Crothers JW, Krementsov DN. 2021. Laboratory worker self-contamination with noninfectious SARS-CoV-2 DNA can result in false-positive reverse transcriptase PCR-based surveillance testing. J Clin Microbiol 59:e0072321.
5.
Murakami M. 2013. Evaluation of DNA plasmid storage conditions. Open Biotechnol J 7:10–14.
6.
Nguyen HH, Park J, Park SJ, Lee C-S, Hwang S, Shin Y-B, Ha TH, Kim M. 2018. Long-term stability and integrity of plasmid-based DNA data storage. Polymers (Basel) 10:28.
7.
Wally N, Schneider M, Thannesberger J, Kastner MT, Bakonyi T, Indik S, Rattei T, Bedarf J, Hildebrand F, Law J, Jovel J, Steininger C. 2019. Plasmid DNA contaminant in molecular reagents. Sci Rep 9:1652.
8.
Lopez-Rios F, Illei PB, Rusch V, Ladanyi M. 2004. Evidence against a role for SV40 infection in human mesotheliomas and high risk of false-positive PCR results owing to presence of SV40 sequences in common laboratory plasmids. Lancet 364:1157–1166.
9.
Delviks-Frankenberry K, Cingoz O, Coffin JM, Pathak VK. 2012. Recombinant origin, contamination, and de-discovery of XMRV. Curr Opin Virol 2:499–507.
10.
CDC. 2020. Real-time RT-PCR primers & probes (research use only). https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/lab/rt-pcr-panel-primer-probes.html. Accessed 12 January 2022.
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
Microbiology Spectrum
Online First
eLocator: e01695-22
Editor: Max Maurin, UJF-Grenoble 1, CHU Grenoble
PubMed: 36226962
Copyright
© 2022 Beck et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.
History
Received: 11 May 2022
Accepted: 19 September 2022
Published online: 13 October 2022
Keywords
Contributors
Editor
Max Maurin
Editor
UJF-Grenoble 1, CHU Grenoble